Monday, August 10th 2026

Intel Xeon 7 "Diamond Rapids" to Arrive with up to 256 P-Cores

According to the latest information shared by long-time Intel leaker Jaykihn, Intel's upcoming Xeon 7 "Diamond Rapids" will feature a flagship SKU with up to 256 P-Cores. This contradicts previous reports suggesting that Intel's flagship Xeon 7 SKU would be limited to 192 P-Cores and 192 threads, as this generation does not include Hyper-Threading. From Intel's VLSI Symposium 2026 presentation, we learned that "Diamond Rapids" includes four Compute tiles, also known as "core building blocks" (CBBs), each built on the Intel 18A-P foundry node. Each Compute tile contains a CPU complex with 48 "Panther Cove" P-Cores and an L3 cache localized to the tile. However, a 256-core design implies CBBs with 64 cores each and possibly a larger L3 cache.

Using Intel's latest 18A-P node, the "Diamond Rapids" CBBs are expected to achieve a 9% increase in performance at the same power level compared to the standard 18A node, or an 18% power reduction at the same performance level. Since Intel aims for maximum performance, we can expect these improvements to enhance performance further or to optimize power consumption with the additional cores. Earlier claims suggested a 500 W TDP design for 192 P-Core version, featuring 16 DDR5 memory channels and running on a new LGA-9324 socket on the "Oak Stream" platform. However, a 256-core design could go much higher, and cooling manufacturers have indicated 800+ W TDP designs for this socket.
For comparison, AMD's Zen 6 "Venice" platform offers up to 256 Zen 6c dense cores and 512 threads, which Intel will aim to compete against with its 256 P-Core SKU. However, AMD's platform is already available, while the Xeon 7 series of "Diamond Rapids" designs will only be released next year. Intel plans to reintroduce a Hyper-Threading Xeon family in 2028 with the arrival of Xeon 8 "Coral Rapids."
Source: Jaykihn
Add your own comment

6 Comments on Intel Xeon 7 "Diamond Rapids" to Arrive with up to 256 P-Cores

#1
ncrs
Earlier claims suggested a 500 W TDP design
That seems a bit too low. We know that EPYC Venice 256c variants span from 400W (AMD 9xx6-015 test config) to 600W TDP (AMD 9xx6-041 test config) with no information about the high frequency parts or extra cache ones. Rumors go up to 1400W for SP7 in general, but IMO that seems too high.
Additionally there have been "leaks" from cooling manufacturers about the LGA-9324 socket: (source, archive.org)
The LGA9324-1U-FWA31 is a 1U server cooler purpose-built for Intel’s next-generation LGA9324 socket CPUs (e.g., Xeon Ultra 9000 series). It targets high-density data centers, AI training clusters, and edge supercomputing nodes, solving the thermal challenge of cooling 800W+ TDP CPUs within 1U rack space.
Posted on Reply
#2
AleksandarK
News Editor
ncrsThat seems a bit too low. We know that EPYC Venice 256c variants span from 400W (AMD 9xx6-015 test config) to 600W TDP (AMD 9xx6-041 test config) with no information about the high frequency parts or extra cache ones. Rumors go up to 1400W for SP7 in general, but IMO that seems too high.
Additionally there have been "leaks" from cooling manufacturers about the LGA-9324 socket: (source, archive.org)
Thanks, updating!
Posted on Reply
#3
TheGuruStud
Oh, yeah, 2000W PL2, so hot right now. 🤡
Posted on Reply
#4
maur0
TheGuruStudOh, yeah, 2000W PL2, so hot right now. 🤡
When it comes out, I want to see if it will beat the 256-core Epyc. What do you think?

Posted on Reply
#5
Tomorrow
Does it also come with free lifetime subscription to nuclear powered energy to feed this thing?
Intel for the life of it cant release a pure P-core CPU on a mainstream socket. I can only imagine what kind of furnace a 256 P-core server CPU is.
Posted on Reply
#6
Geddagod
maur0When it comes out, I want to see if it will beat the 256-core Epyc. What do you think?
Don't think it can overcome the disadvantages of a worse node and worse core design (using P-cores rather than E/dense cores). Unless they really push power...
TomorrowIntel for the life of it cant release a pure P-core CPU on a mainstream socket. I can only imagine what kind of furnace a 256 P-core server CPU is.
I'm guessing the advertised TDP will be the same. Remember top end GNR had a 500 watt TDP, which is the same as high core count Turin skus.
However in actual nT workloads DMR will prob end up pulling more power than equally specced AMD stuff... just like what we see in GNR vs Turin (classic).
Posted on Reply
Nov 12th, 2026 04:40 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts