Friday, October 23rd 2026

Xbox Misses Microsoft's Executive Pay Target for the Fifth Time in Six Years

Microsoft's Xbox division has missed a performance goal tied to executive pay for the fifth time in six years. Microsoft's top named executives, a group that has included CEO Satya Nadella and CFO Amy Hood, have had one Xbox-related metric in their pay packages since 2020. According to Game File, which went through Microsoft's new proxy statement filed on October 21, the fiscal 2026 target was 4.3% growth in Xbox content and services revenue. Instead, that revenue fell 6% by the compensation measure, while the proxy's own business highlights put the drop at 5%. The miss caps a rough year for the division, which saw its revenue slide and later announced plans to lay off 3,200 workers as part of a year-long reset.

The target metric itself has shifted over the years. It started as Game Pass subscriber growth, which Xbox missed in 2021 and 2022, then switched to content and services revenue growth in 2023, which Xbox missed that year and again in 2024. Fiscal 2025 was the lone exception, with Xbox growing that revenue by just under 15% against a target of more than 14%. Of course, the Xbox goal is only a small slice of the pay package. Nadella's total compensation for fiscal 2026 came in at roughly $90.6 million, down from about $96.5 million a year earlier, though the filing doesn't pin that dip on Xbox. CEO Asha Sharma has denied divestment rumors and said Microsoft will take the long-term view, so it's reasonable to expect the turnaround to take more than one fiscal year.
Sources: Microsoft 2026 Proxy Statement (SEC), via Game File 1, 2
Add your own comment

15 Comments on Xbox Misses Microsoft's Executive Pay Target for the Fifth Time in Six Years

#1
Space Lynx
Astronaut
Maybe they will learn MBA's don't know shit?

Posted on Reply
#2
MrDweezil
Frankly it would be a pretty bad look if they hit that target after laying everyone off all year.
Posted on Reply
#3
Darmok N Jalad
I'm honestly surprised that Xbox and Surface are still around. Several other hardware endeavors from MS have fallen to the ash heap long ago.
Posted on Reply
#4
notoperable
Cry me a river, M$
Darmok N JaladI'm honestly surprised that Xbox and Surface are still around. Several other hardware endeavors from MS have fallen to the ash heap long ago.
They have no alternative because of the supply chain hijack - all the base are belong to ai
Space LynxMaybe they will learn MBA's don't know shit?

LOL, took them long enough
BTW- mastery, you just made my day
Posted on Reply
#5
Hakker
How will they survive the upcoming year. Seriously just 90 million. I can remember a time when executive made about 20x more than the average worker. Not 20x more than an entire division.
Posted on Reply
#6
the54thvoid
Super Moderator
Darmok N JaladI'm honestly surprised that Xbox and Surface are still around. Several other hardware endeavors from MS have fallen to the ash heap long ago.
In fairness, the Surface line up was good. My wife is still using her 2015(?) Surface (with 3rd party keyboard). It still runs fast for daily (light) use. Maybe that's a problem - making products that last isn't good for business.
Posted on Reply
#7
Darmok N Jalad
the54thvoidIn fairness, the Surface line up was good. My wife is still using her 2015(?) Surface (with 3rd party keyboard). It still runs fast for daily (light) use. Maybe that's a problem - making products that last isn't good for business.
I tried multiple Surface devices in the early days. All of them had problems. It got to the point that I wrote off the brand. Still, sales for the division is apparently bad enough that MS now lumps it in with Windows revenue. If Surface was doing well, they’d want to promote it, not obfuscate it. Xbox has nowhere to hide, so it’s getting hammered.
Posted on Reply
#8
TumbleGeorge
It is alarming that no one even hinted that the problem is the huge size of the salaries of the managers, and not that there are no profits. Do not lay off the workforce, but from the salaries of the disgruntled managers in question, or themselves. Even if they are the main "actors" and owners. Lay them off.
Posted on Reply
#9
PlumdBob
HakkerHow will they survive the upcoming year. Seriously just 90 million. I can remember a time when executive made about 20x more than the average worker. Not 20x more than an entire division.
You hit the nail right square on the head. Stuff is expensive due to excessive executive pay across almost every industry.
Posted on Reply
#10
EsaT
Space LynxMaybe they will learn MBA's don't know shit?
You sure MBAs don't know anything?
Because modern MBAs seem to be made of that stuff itself.
Posted on Reply
#11
Steevo
PlumdBobYou hit the nail right square on the head. Stuff is expensive due to excessive executive pay across almost every industry.
Im not defending their execs for being shitty at their job relative to salary.

But 3,200 workers at 200K a year plus insurance, taxes etc.... its 640,000,000 annually minimum. Probably closer to a billion a year.
Posted on Reply
#12
Darmok N Jalad
SteevoIm not defending their execs for being shitty at their job relative to salary.

But 3,200 workers at 200K a year plus insurance, taxes etc.... its 640,000,000 annually minimum. Probably closer to a billion a year.
Yeah, executives might be overpaid, but being such a small subset of a company (and ultimately responsible for those 3200 jobs), it’s not why prices are high. Failing to reach product milestones abd being way over budget is the problem. At Xbox, MS did clean out at least some of the executive and upper management, because they failed to lead their organization successfully. There was undoubtedly a lot of dead weight in some of these studios to miss the mark by as much as they have if entire games with years of work are getting dumped. Either they weren’t very far along, or the product was just terrible.
Posted on Reply
#13
_JP_
It's like launching a console with a bunch of proprietary stuff, a locked multiplayer and exclusive titules, albeit at a low price or a bunch of open established standards, multiplayer like it always existed for PCs, titles that you can play anywhere but its a whole unit optimized and upgradable, though for a higher price is so much of a difficult concept to achieve. Maybe your targets wouldn't miss.
Posted on Reply
#15
Space Lynx
Astronaut
EsaTYou sure MBAs don't know anything?
Because modern MBAs seem to be made of that stuff itself.
indeed they do not, which is why so many companies are doing hit and misses. sometimes you need to think about the long term, and MBA's are trained to only think about the short term.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 13th, 2026 05:15 PST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts