I'm not talking about pricepoint, of course Intel is more expensive, but in turn the performance is better, no one is trying to bash you for cumming your pants over AMD products. Im just saying that there's reasons why they are more expensive. As i just said, AMD has the price for performance segment locked down, but overall in terms of CPU performance, Intel comes out on top. And that's where i personally aim, where the performance is... even if i can't get the best performance CPU at the time, i still supprt that chip maker. So if AMD brought out a really awesome architecture and i couldn't afford the best of it, i would still pick AMD in a new build or whatever. But thats just me. Let not start a flame war.