Saturday, December 31st 2011

Sapphire Readies Radeon HD 7970 Cards with 1335 MHz Core Clock, 6 GB Memory

It looks like AMD's claims of HD 7970's extreme overclocking capabilities weren't the usual PR hoopla. A confidential company document revealing the non-reference models Sapphire has in the works, got leaked to the web, and it is a bundle of surprises. To begin with, Sapphire plans no less than six non-reference Radeon HD 7970 models apart from the vanilla AMD reference design card. Among these, the top-of-the-line cards are codenamed "Atomic RX" and "Atomic WC". One can guess that the "RX" is an air-cooled card, and the "WC" a water-cooled one. It packs blistering clock speeds of 1335 MHz core, with 5735 MHz (1433 MHz actual) memory.

The other card that caught our eyes is codenamed "FLEX 6G". The Flex variant typically features a flexible display output configuration. This card is said to have six mini-DP connectors. While this card sticks to AMD reference clock speeds, it packs a whopping 6144 MB of video memory, all wired to a single GPU. While 4 Gbit GDDR5 chips don't exist, we expect Sapphire to be using 24 * 2 Gbit chips on this card, with twelve sets of two chips sharing 32 bit paths. Then there are other milder factory overclocked cards apart from the Atomic; there's Toxic 3G, and VaporX 3G, both packing impressive out of the box clock speeds.
Source: ChipHell
Add your own comment

85 Comments on Sapphire Readies Radeon HD 7970 Cards with 1335 MHz Core Clock, 6 GB Memory

#51
Delta6326
7970 on LN2 hits 1700MHz!!! :rockout::pimp::toast:


From Legit Reviews

Posted on Reply
#52
v12dock
Block Caption of Rainey Street


Faster than 6990 and 590 SLI/Xfired... :eek:

1 beats 4 :eek:
Posted on Reply
#53
n0tiert
i already feel sad on my 6990..... that stuff geting to fast ,
my 4870x2 done good jobs for over 3 years (still rocks on BF3 for that age) ,
i have my 6990 now almost 6 month and i already see it´s getting old after that period :(

me wonders why they don´t release it

spider, dragon , scorpion, .... platform related

instead of coding the stuff right on current cpu´s / gpu´s they just making things faster for merchandise hypes
Posted on Reply
#54
THANATOS
crazyeyesreaper It wasn't planned as an insult, I don't even consider It as an insult but If you don't like it I will just edit it:).
Posted on Reply
#55
dj-electric
v12dockwww.guru3d.com/imageview.php?image=35194

Faster than 6990 and 590 SLI/Xfired... :eek:

1 beats 4 :eek:
idk how did u got to that conclusion, moreover how did you got to it based on a stupid synthetic benchmark. the sapphire 1335Mhz gpu will be as fast as a single HD6990\GTX590
Posted on Reply
#56
WhoDecidedThat
What gets me giddy is that Voltage Control is not allowed on these cards yet. So after Voltage Control is unlocked just imagine the "Potential" of these cards. Reference designs should be able to fly to 1.2 GHz on the core! :D
Posted on Reply
#57
v12dock
Block Caption of Rainey Street
blanarahul1 beats 2 you moron! 6990 cfx and 590 sli are way up in the charts!
Btw the overclocks of the 7970 in this chart are 1.125 GHz on the core and 6.6 GHz on the memory which is about the same as the Toxic 3G card.
This also shows the performance of the ATOMIC cards will score ~ 10,000 marks in 3D mark 11 Performance Preset. :D
Sorry for not clarifying my post I was talking about the 1700mhz score. Thanks for the insult and please have a wonderful new year. Btw double posts are frowned apon

Cheers
Posted on Reply
#58
WhoDecidedThat
v12dockSorry for not clarifying my post I was talking about the 1700mhz score. Thanks for the insult and please have a wonderful new year. Btw double posts are frowned apon

Cheers
Don't mind the insult i was a little angry. Same to you too. But seriously mate you are right it does beat Quad Sli/Cfx! :eek:
Posted on Reply
#59
ucanmandaa
This is the real bulldozer :) definitely getting one or two when they come out
Posted on Reply
#60
Assimilator
millenniumnow (jf-amd if you are reading) please please make the 7950 unlockable, even partially unlockable, and amd will have a huge hit on their hands. Please please make this happen! Omg!111
this.
Posted on Reply
#61
ensabrenoir
ucanmandaaThis is the real bulldozer :) definitely getting one or two when they come out
That.....that....that word...that terrible word....how could you use in the same sentence in the one area where amd stomps all competition for real. Remember the hype the graphs and charts...dont jinx this man ....or I will and I mean I WILL unleash my army of digital cybog ninja monkies upon u....u have been warned....
Posted on Reply
#62
wolf
Performance Enthusiast
So damn tempting, this card is an overclockers dream...
Posted on Reply
#63
micropage7

looks pretty promising
btw, its like spy shot paper
Posted on Reply
#64
radrok
It's awesome :D
:rockout:

Kudos to Shamino, damn 15k P score 3Dmark2011
Posted on Reply
#66
dj-electric
Imagining Sapphire's ATOMIC HD7970 + LN2 = mind blown
Posted on Reply
#67
NdMk2o1o
See we either now need a new standard for game graphics that can take advantage of these beastly GPU's or monitor mfr's need to give us more than shitty 1080p on a single monitor that isn't going to cost $600+ otherwise us single monitor gamers will have no need to upgrade for at least 2 years (excludes upgrading because of e-peen envy)
Posted on Reply
#69
radrok
NdMk2o1oSee we either now need a new standard for game graphics that can take advantage of these beastly GPU's or monitor mfr's need to give us more than shitty 1080p on a single monitor that isn't going to cost $600+ otherwise us single monitor gamers will have no need to upgrade for at least 2 years (excludes upgrading because of e-peen envy)
You could always force more AA samples or use a more taxing method, still I fully agree that it's crazy I had to pay more than 1k for some 1600p monitors
Posted on Reply
#70
OneCool
radrokIt's awesome :D

Kudos to Shamino
Legends dont get there by themselves ;)
Posted on Reply
#71
PremoGS
Well for starters, fake news.



A professional overclocker (korrrhonen) couldnt reach more than 1285Mhz with watercooling and Sapphire's aircooled card does better? Also, even impossible for the Sapphire's watercooled version. 1125MHz maybe, but not 1325MHz.
Posted on Reply
#73
twicksisted
PremoGSWell for starters, fake news.

sf3d.pp.fi/images/AMD%20HD7970/new%20driver/uusi%20ajuri%203dm11%20p.png

A professional overclocker (korrrhonen) couldnt reach more than 1285Mhz with watercooling and Sapphire's aircooled card does better? Also, even impossible for the Sapphire's watercooled version. 1125MHz maybe, but not 1325MHz.
thats a different card... that screenie of yours is a 3gb card not the 6gb card they talking about in the thread...
Posted on Reply
#74
PremoGS
twicksistedthats a different card... that screenie of yours is a 3gb card not the 6gb card they talking about in the thread...
Doesnt matter whether it's the 3GB or 6GB model, nothing else is different than the vRam size.
Posted on Reply
#75
twicksisted
Thats not exactely true, this could be a better binned more expensive model... it could be anything, at this point we just dont know... what we do know is that its a different card as its got 6gb and not 3gb onboard.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 9th, 2024 19:29 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts