Tuesday, December 5th 2017
AMD Officially but Silently Downgrades Radeon RX 560 with an 896 SP Variant
The phenomenon of Radeon RX 560 graphics cards with 896 stream processors is more widespread than earlier thought. It looks like RX 560 cards with 896 stream processors will be more widely available than the previously thought Greater China region; with AMD silently editing the specifications of the SKU to have either 896 or 1,024 stream processors, as opposed to the 1,024 it originally launched with. There are no clear labeling guidelines or SKU names to distinguish cards with 896 stream processors from those with 1,024.
The Radeon RX 560 and the previous-generation RX 460 are based on the 14 nm "Polaris 11" silicon, which physically features 16 GCN compute units (CUs), each packed with 64 stream processors. The RX 560 originally maxed this silicon out, with all 16 CUs being enabled, while the RX 460 has two CUs locked. The decision to change specs of the RX 560 effectively makes it a re-brand of the RX 460, which is slower, and provides fertile grounds for bait-and-switch lawsuits.
Source:
Heise.de
The Radeon RX 560 and the previous-generation RX 460 are based on the 14 nm "Polaris 11" silicon, which physically features 16 GCN compute units (CUs), each packed with 64 stream processors. The RX 560 originally maxed this silicon out, with all 16 CUs being enabled, while the RX 460 has two CUs locked. The decision to change specs of the RX 560 effectively makes it a re-brand of the RX 460, which is slower, and provides fertile grounds for bait-and-switch lawsuits.
129 Comments on AMD Officially but Silently Downgrades Radeon RX 560 with an 896 SP Variant
says 896 shaders 1196 clock
OC!
I will look at it in the AM again... pretty tired so perhaps something isn't landing.
Please see added edits to previous post. ;)
COOL: The HIS says it.. now what about the MSI which doesn't display that info? Wait, let me guess.. its 1196 so it has to be a D...
Mine comes with 896sp with 1180MHz boost clock, but managed to flash to 1024sp vBIOS without problem thanks to TPU vBIOS database, its unverified but it works. Same boost clock only different sp count. You can see the benchmark on 'Your PC ATM' thread.
Nvidia as least uses Ti (most of the time) for these variations, but I'm not aware of something similar from AMD.
But I'm going to do little besides frowning upon this practice. If the customer is so poorly educated as to be mislead by a name, the customer gets what they deserve.
Is this their act trying to balance that some Ryzen 5 comes fully unlocked?
Clearly there was indeed a very well defined distinction that was subsequently ignored.
Can we stop now?
It's funny because most fanboys shit talked the 970 without ever knowing exactly what was the issue with it and mistakenly made the "3.5+0.5" maymays.
It's not like your buying a high-end card anyway.
Again... if there is a segment where every fps matters, its the budget cards like this.
www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-radeon-rx560-spec-change,36061.html?sf175501572=1
Few seem to be buying it.
The toms article bunks the 970 association...
...it also states there is a "significant" performance difference.