Monday, April 16th 2018

Intel Rumored to Commemorate 40th Anniversary of the 8086 with a Special Core i7 SKU?

Intel recently celebrated 20 years of the Pentium brand that made the company a household name, with a special Pentium 20th Anniversary Edition G3258 SKU. If rumors are to be believed, the company could do something similar with the upcoming 40th anniversary of its 8086 processor, the distant ancestor of today's x86 architecture. Some sources even suggest that the company could take advantage of its 8th generation Core product cycle to launch a "Core i7-8086K" SKU.

Pictures surfaced on social media of the said "i7-8086K" SKU in the flesh, complete with a part number "SR3QQ." Based on the same 14 nm "Coffee Lake" silicon as the i7-8700K, this chip has a nominal clock speed of 4.00 GHz, a maximum Turbo Boost frequency above 5.00 GHz, an unlocked multiplier, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. Intel could choose June 8th (around the 2018 Computex and the actual anniversary of 8086), to launch the new SKU.
Source: WCCFTech
Add your own comment

30 Comments on Intel Rumored to Commemorate 40th Anniversary of the 8086 with a Special Core i7 SKU?

#26
Makaveli
Durvelle27That’s sad, my phone has 8 cores but intel mainstream hasn’t caught on yet.
Your phone has 8 ARM cores a Quad core i5 will destroy it for performance.

They don't need to play the numbers game that is for clueless consumers.
Posted on Reply
#27
HimymCZe
MakaveliWhy does that matter the majority of software can't use 8 cores.

Don't be one of those people just obessed with specs and big numbers like the Andriod phone crowd.
Agreed there, but whats the point upgrading 11y old 4C to ANOTHER FUCKING 4C?
Posted on Reply
#28
BiggieShady
MakaveliWhy does that matter the majority of software can't use 8 cores.
Are you for real? You do know how software works? You run multiple processes each of which runs multiple threads and that's usually enough parallelism to use 24 cores, it may not saturate them to 100% so you'd think they are not used ... but there is a huge win in latency, responsiveness for huge number of short/light OS tasks and all the free resources for any heavy long running tasks that may come (for example user restoring multiple browser tabs session)
Posted on Reply
#29
Makaveli
BiggieShadyAre you for real? You do know how software works? You run multiple processes each of which runs multiple threads and that's usually enough parallelism to use 24 cores, it may not saturate them to 100% so you'd think they are not used ... but there is a huge win in latency, responsiveness for huge number of short/light OS tasks and all the free resources for any heavy long running tasks that may come (for example user restoring multiple browser tabs session)
I'd give all that up to have a phone that would last me 5 days on one charge.

Wishing for a 16 core cell phone is not the kind of real life improvement i'm going to notice.
HimymCZeAgreed there, but whats the point upgrading 11y old 4C to ANOTHER FUCKING 4C?
Look at the last 10 years of cpu releases from intel

There is process improvements
lower power usage
higher IPC
higher Clock speed

The list goes on without just increasing core count so your point kinda goes out the window.
Posted on Reply
#30
Midland Dog
HimymCZeAgreed there, but whats the point upgrading 11y old 4C to ANOTHER FUCKING 4C?
My mates core 2 quad q8400 @ 3.6ghz trades blows with my g3258 @ 4.6ghz, its worth the upgrade if a somewhat modern dual core can trade blows with it
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 25th, 2024 00:57 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts