Friday, May 28th 2021

Intel Launches 10nm "Tiger Lake" Desktop Processors

Intel is likely preparing to launch its 10 nm "Tiger Lake" processor on the desktop platform. momomo_us discovered the existence of at least four new processor SKUs in Intel's ARK pages. At least one of these is marked as a desktop chip. What isn't clear, is whether these are Socket LGA1200 chips, like "Rocket Lake-S," or whether these are FC-BGA chips that have been adapted for specific desktop use-cases, such as NUCs. At the heart of these chips is the new 10 nm "Tiger Lake" 8-core/16-thread silicon, which packs 8 "Willow Cove" CPU cores, 24 MB of shared L3 cache, and a Gen12 Xe LP iGPU that has 32 EUs.

The common theme with the processor model numbering with these SKUs is the brand extension "B," next to model numbers we commonly associate with "Rocket Lake-S" SKUs. Another commonality is TDP. All four SKUs are marked as 65-Watt chips, including the part that has an unlocked multiplier. The lineup is led by the Core i9-11900KB, an 8-core/16-thread chip with Thermal Velocity Boost frequency of up to 5.30 GHz, and base frequency of 3.30 GHz. The Core i7-11700B lacks an unlocked multiplier, but interestingly features TVB, and retains the core-count and cache amount of the i9-11900KB. It is clocked at speeds of up to 5.30 GHz. The Core i5-11500B is a 6-core/12-thread part, with 12 MB of L3 cache, and the same 5.30 GHz boost, set via TVB. The Core i3-11100B is a 4-core/8-thread part with 8 MB L3 cache, and is likely based on the 4-core "Tiger Lake" die, with its iGPU cut down. The clocks remain the same. It remains to be seen how Intel markets these parts.
Add your own comment

69 Comments on Intel Launches 10nm "Tiger Lake" Desktop Processors

#51
Ravenas
GerKNGplease show me a 5950x for 580€ i'd buy one instantly.
Don’t think you understand the post. I just purchased a 5950x on Amazon for $799 MSRP. Intel released the 11900k which is literally a worse chip than the previous generation, at the same price, $799. Then after about a week immediately dropped the price down to 10900k prices.
Posted on Reply
#52
londiste
RavenasDon’t think you understand the post. I just purchased a 5950x on Amazon for $799 MSRP. Intel released the 11900k which is literally a worse chip than the previous generation, at the same price, $799. Then after about a week immediately dropped the price down to 10900k prices.
11900K RCP (which in Intel's case, is pretty much MSRP) is $539-549. At least in EU it has been available at 550€, close to the intended price, although occasionally jumping to 590€.
5950X has been a little weird. It was listed at slightly over MSRP - 850 or so - from launch to around end of January but availability was spotty. From end of Jan to end of March it was available but generally at 900+ prices. Since early April it has been available and at MSRP.
Posted on Reply
#53
GerKNG
RavenasDon’t think you understand the post. I just purchased a 5950x on Amazon for $799 MSRP. Intel released the 11900k which is literally a worse chip than the previous generation, at the same price, $799. Then after about a week immediately dropped the price down to 10900k prices.
the MSRP of the 11900k is 549€ (since day one!)
the 5950x MSRP is 799€
Posted on Reply
#54
Ravenas
GerKNGthe MSRP of the 11900k is 549€ (since day one!)
the 5950x MSRP is 799€
Released at $799 above MSRP on Newegg, dropped to $613-650, now settled at $549.

Even at $549, it’s overpriced in comparison to what the 10900k released at. It’s not as a good as a 10900k.
Posted on Reply
#55
GerKNG
RavenasReleased at $799 above MSRP on Newegg, dropped to $613-650, now settled at $549.

Even at $549, it’s overpriced in comparison to what the 10900k released at. It’s not as a good as a 10900k.
29.3.2021 (Pre Launch Review one day before release)
the 11900k starts at 550€, the predecessor is available for 460€ (10900k)

this was from one day before launch. the price was the same since day one.
Posted on Reply
#56
Ravenas
GerKNG29.3.2021 (Pre Launch Review one day before release)
the 11900k starts at 550€, the predecessor is available for 460€ (10900k)

this was from one day before launch. the price was the same since day one.
Don’t care what any review site says. I was going to purchase one from Newegg day one, the price was $799. A week later is dropped. Don’t know about Europe pricing, but that’s what occurred here.

wccftech.com/intel-core-i9-11900k-bundles-from-newegg-and-antonline-make-buying-the-hard-to-find-processor-easier/

Micro center a week after launch:
Posted on Reply
#57
RandallFlagg
RavenasDon’t care what any review site says. I was going to purchase one from Newegg day one, the price was $799. A week later is dropped. Don’t know about Europe pricing, but that’s what occurred here.

wccftech.com/intel-core-i9-11900k-bundles-from-newegg-and-antonline-make-buying-the-hard-to-find-processor-easier/

Micro center a week after launch:
Trying to compare launch day / week pricing to some 'good deal' you got on a competitor product that has been out for 8 months is very disingenuous.

As of right now, you can get an 11900K at Microcenter for $519 (if you can find one) while the 11700K is $359 and the 5800X is $399. The 5950X is usually out of stock but when you can find it, MC has a deal going for $799. On Amazon the 5950X is $999 while the 5900X is $685.

So no despite your continued equivocating and cherry picking of pricing at different points in the product release cycle, this is not a valid price / performance comparison. The 11700K and 11900K compete with the 5800X in price / performance, they've never been in competition with a 5950X as when the 11900K released the 5900X was $1000 and the 5950X was going for $1400 - mostly only available on the scalper market.
Posted on Reply
#58
GerKNG
RavenasDon’t care what any review site says.
the only that they say is the exact day one MSRP for Europe.
and when they try to rip of your in NA with heavy overpricing in stores (that are not even the MSRP... just blown random prices).. that's your problem.

549 is the official price since the first second when the 11900k hits the market.
Posted on Reply
#59
r9
I would buy this over 11900k any day ...
Posted on Reply
#60
Ravenas
GerKNGthe only that they say is the exact day one MSRP for Europe.
and when they try to rip of your in NA with heavy overpricing in stores (that are not even the MSRP... just blown random prices).. that's your problem.

549 is the official price since the first second when the 11900k hits the market.
I stated the chip launched over priced well above MSRP at $799. Twist and turn that anyway you want, brick and mortar or online, reviews stating the MSRP, or any other theoretical reasoning. The fact remains it launched at $799, dropped to between $600 and $650 a week later, and now rests at $549. The 11900k is a worse chip than the 10900k.

Those are the facts I stated.
Posted on Reply
#61
ThrashZone
RavenasI stated the chip launched over priced well above MSRP at $799. Twist and turn that anyway you want, brick and mortar or online, reviews stating the MSRP, or any other theoretical reasoning. The fact remains it launched at $799, dropped to between $600 and $650 a week later, and now rests at $549. The 11900k is a worse chip than the 10900k.

Those are the facts I stated.
Hi,
Indeed this 11 series 8 core is one of the stupidest priced chips I've seen in a while it makes no sense at all
Like r9 says 10850k is obviously a better chip and price.
GerKNGthe only that they say is the exact day one MSRP for Europe.
and when they try to rip of your in NA with heavy overpricing in stores (that are not even the MSRP... just blown random prices).. that's your problem.

549 is the official price since the first second when the 11900k hits the market.
Hi,
Sure wasn't in the USA buddy lol
Posted on Reply
#62
ratirt
GerKNGplease show me a 5950x for 580€ i'd buy one instantly.
5950x MSRP is $800 not 580 EUR.
GerKNGthe MSRP of the 11900k is 549€ (since day one!)
the 5950x MSRP is 799€
yes true and the 11900K is a ruse however you slice it.
Posted on Reply
#63
AusWolf
RavenasI stated the chip launched over priced well above MSRP at $799. Twist and turn that anyway you want, brick and mortar or online, reviews stating the MSRP, or any other theoretical reasoning. The fact remains it launched at $799, dropped to between $600 and $650 a week later, and now rests at $549. The 11900k is a worse chip than the 10900k.

Those are the facts I stated.
The fact that Newegg (not Intel) launched it above MSRP is not Intel's fault. It's also not their fault that you bought it for that price.

Just out of curiosity, what made you choose the 11900K over the 11700K?
Posted on Reply
#64
Ravenas
AusWolfThe fact that Newegg (not Intel) launched it above MSRP is not Intel's fault. It's also not their fault that you bought it for that price.

Just out of curiosity, what made you choose the 11900K over the 11700K?
I never bought one, I was going to buy one at launch for $549, but they were priced high at $799. I’m not concerned with whose fault it is for the pricing, I’m stating that they were priced at $799 and poster wanted to argue a bunch of different circular nonsensical theories and claimed proofs as to why they were priced at MSRP at launch. Just trolling apparently.

To further elaborate, after discovering from W1zz’s review that the chip performed worse than the 10900k and consumed more power, I decided Intel was just using the chip as a stop gap and slapping customers in their face because of their presumed market position. At the time the 10900k remained priced at $549, and then they eventually had to face the reality that the 10900k price had to be dropped, and then drop 11900k pricing to actually move 11900k inventory. The 11900k is still available everywhere, what does that tell you?
Posted on Reply
#65
ThrashZone
RavenasI never bought one, I was going to buy one at launch for $549, but they were priced high at $799. I’m not concerned with whose fault it is for the pricing, I’m stating that were priced at $799 and poster wanted to argue a bunch of different circular nonsensical theories and claimed proofs as to why they were priced at MSRP at launch. Just trolling apparently.

To further elaborate, after discovering from W1zz’s review that the chip performed worse than the 10900k and consumed more power, I decided Intel was just using the chip as a stop gap and slapping customers in their face because of their presumed market position. At the time the 10900k remained priced at $549, and then they eventually had to face the reality that the 10900k price had to be dropped, and then drop 11900k pricing to actually move 11900k inventory. The 11900k is still available everywhere, what does that tell you?
Hi,
I got my 10900k at microcenter for just over 400.us soon after release couldn't believe it was there and add to cart was active lol
Mine was also made in China which all others made out of Korea weren't very good at all.

Then the apex came instock for 400.us I believe at newegg and I was packing up and returning an overpriced 500us+ formula to amazon.
Posted on Reply
#66
AusWolf
RavenasI never bought one, I was going to buy one at launch for $549, but they were priced high at $799. I’m not concerned with whose fault it is for the pricing, I’m stating that were priced at $799 and poster wanted to argue a bunch of different circular nonsensical theories and claimed proofs as to why they were priced at MSRP at launch. Just trolling apparently.

To further elaborate, after discovering from W1zz’s review that the chip performed worse than the 10900k and consumed more power, I decided Intel was just using the chip as a stop gap and slapping customers in their face because of their presumed market position. At the time the 10900k remained priced at $549, and then they eventually had to face the reality that the 10900k price had to be dropped, and then drop 11900k pricing to actually move 11900k inventory. The 11900k is still available everywhere, what does that tell you?
It's not just that. If you look at the 11700K, it literally offers the same as the 11900K for $200 less. With the current generation i9, you're only buying the name, nothing else.
Posted on Reply
#67
londiste
AusWolfIt's not just that. If you look at the 11700K, it literally offers the same as the 11900K for $200 less. With the current generation i9, you're only buying the name, nothing else.
Extra 100-300MHz (probably at the lower end of that range) for 35% more :)
Posted on Reply
#68
Aquinus
Resident Wat-man
btarunrAt the heart of these chips is the new 10 nm "Tiger Lake" 8-core/16-thread silicon, which packs 8 "Willow Cove" CPU cores, 24 MB of shared L3 cache, and a Gen12 Xe LP iGPU that has 48 EUs.
32 != 48.


The 8 core chips only have 32 EUs. It's the quad cores with a beefier cache that have 96 EUs or less and are branded Iris Xe, but I don't see anything with 48 EUs in Intel's lineup for these new chips.
Posted on Reply
#69
ThrashZone
AusWolfIt's not just that. If you look at the 11700K, it literally offers the same as the 11900K for $200 less. With the current generation i9, you're only buying the name, nothing else.
Hi,
I believe 10900k is 10 core so is 10850k
10700k is not so there is your 200.us savings two less cores.
11 series you'd be paying for another 8 core for twice as much as the 10700k just for single core boost performance.
Guess you'd fall back to 11700k instead right can't blame you there 11900k is stupid priced.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 25th, 2024 18:42 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts