Tuesday, June 17th 2025

Intel Arc "Battlemage" B770 GPU Support Lands in Popular AIDA64 Tool

More confirmations regarding the final release of the Intel Arc "Battlemage" B770 GPU have landed, this time with the update of the popular AIDA64 tool. Just days after support for BMG-G31 GPUs, supposedly the SKUs behind the higher-end B770 and B750 models, has landed in the open-source Mesa driver, diagnostic tools are next. In the latest AIDA64 beta version 7.99.7817, FinalWire has added an interesting "GPU information for Intel Battlemage (BMG-G31)" section as a feature update. This means that the tool can now officially recognize Intel's upcoming GPUs and allow users to perform diagnostics. Additionally, the tool also supports the now finalized PCI Express 7.0 controllers and devices, as PCI-SIG has ratified the final specifications of the PCIe Gen 7 standard.

With this confirmation, higher-end Intel Arc B770 and B750 GPUs are getting more credibility for an actual release. We expect to hear more about it in the coming weeks as the rumored Q4 launch nears. Earlier rumors suggest that Intel will pair 32 Xe2 cores for the B770 model with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus. Will Intel satisfy the needs of Arc graphics gamers who have been waiting for a higher-end card remains to be seen. Drop your expectations in the comments, and let us know.
Sources: AIDA64, via VideoCardz
Add your own comment

8 Comments on Intel Arc "Battlemage" B770 GPU Support Lands in Popular AIDA64 Tool

#1
Daven
Lots of 16 GB options:

Arc B750 16 GB $299 (guess)
Arc B770 16 GB $349 (guess)
Radeon 9060XT 16 GB $349
Geforce 5060Ti 16 GB $429
Radeon 9070 16 GB $549
Radeon 9070XT 16 GB $599
Geforce 5070Ti 16 GB $749
Geforce 5080 16 GB $999

If you consider all of the above in your purchasing decision, then the entire GPU price range is basically 16 GB.
Posted on Reply
#2
Mr. Perfect
Hmm. So if 20XE cores in the B580 lands 20% under a 5060, maybe 32XE cores will land somewhere around or above the 5060Ti? Probably to much to hope for 5070 levels.
Posted on Reply
#3
Darc Requiem
Mr. PerfectHmm. So if 20XE cores in the B580 lands 20% under a 5060, maybe 32XE cores will land somewhere around or above the 5060Ti? Probably to much to hope for 5070 levels.
According to Techpower Up's releative performance guide, the 5060 and B580 have near equal performance on average. B580 has 1% edge. Who knows how the additional XE cores will scale perfromance wise. It has 60% more cores, if it scaled linearly that'd put it between the 4070 and 7800XT but Alchemist scaled terriblly. I guess will see if the managed to resolve that with Battlemage.
Posted on Reply
#4
ToTTenTranz
IIRC the news we got a while ago was that the B770 was cancelled, meaning the consumer version of G31 had been cancelled.
The fact that we're seeing AIDA64 support for BMG-G31 could mean that an Arc Pro SKU with that chip is coming (more VRAM, higher margins), and not the B770 consumer SKU.


It could still be that Intel saw Nvidia fumbling Blackwell and decided it was a good opportunity to bring consumer G31 back from the dead, but with Intel's CEO claiming they're only going to bring new products if they have 50%+ margins I'm not so sure that would be happening.
Posted on Reply
#5
Fouquin
Darc RequiemAccording to Techpower Up's releative performance guide, the 5060 and B580 have near equal performance on average. B580 has 1% edge. Who knows how the additional XE cores will scale perfromance wise. It has 60% more cores, if it scaled linearly that'd put it between the 4070 and 7800XT but Alchemist scaled terriblly. I guess will see if the managed to resolve that with Battlemage.
That index is hiding the details a bit. B580 is around 15-18% slower at 1080p but the position flips at 4K. Doesn't apply to all games, as games like CS2 show a substantial lead from the 5060.
Posted on Reply
#6
Mr. Perfect
FouquinThat index is hiding the details a bit. B580 is around 15-18% slower at 1080p but the position flips at 4K. Doesn't apply to all games, as games like CS2 show a substantial lead from the 5060.
Yeah, I was using the 1080p charts when figuring B580 is 80% of a 5060. If the B770 lands upstream enough, it might be reasonable to use the 1440p charts, which scales a little better for Intel. Should be exciting having some more competition!
Posted on Reply
#7
rjc34
FouquinThat index is hiding the details a bit. B580 is around 15-18% slower at 1080p but the position flips at 4K. Doesn't apply to all games, as games like CS2 show a substantial lead from the 5060.
Is it just me or does there seem to be some inconsistencies in the various average performance numbers on the 5060 review? For the minimum framerates, the B580 is at 28.9 compared to the 5060 at 28.0, yet it's shown in the relative chart as being 118%, which doesn't add up. Big difference between the average FPS and relative performance numbers too.

I vaguely remember at some point reading something from W1zzard explaining why those numbers can come out pretty different but I can't for the life of me recall any specifics or if I'm just imagining that.
Posted on Reply
#8
Vayra86
DavenLots of 16 GB options:

Arc B750 16 GB $299 (guess)
Arc B770 16 GB $349 (guess)
Radeon 9060XT 16 GB $349
Geforce 5060Ti 16 GB $429
Radeon 9070 16 GB $549
Radeon 9070XT 16 GB $599
Geforce 5070Ti 16 GB $749
Geforce 5080 16 GB $999

If you consider all of the above in your purchasing decision, then the entire GPU price range is basically 16 GB.
Imagine paying 299 for 8GB in this day and age.

That's not just stupid, its fucking retarded. No dev is going to even consider that capacity going forward. If you can still run low in 2027, you can rub your hands I reckon.
Posted on Reply
Jun 21st, 2025 04:36 CDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts