Friday, August 29th 2025

Samsung's Second-Gen 2 nm GAA Node Is Make-or-Break for Its Foundry Business

As we have seen with Intel, leading-edge node development is a difficult thing to maintain, unless you are TSMC. It appears that Samsung's push into cutting-edge nodes now hinges on the success of its 2 nm GAA process, which will be a make-or-break node for Samsung Foundry. As the first 2 nm product, Samsung envisioned its own Exynos 2600 flagship SoC for the first-generation SF2 node. However, potential external clients are watching closely to see whether Samsung can translate its development progress into reliable, high-yield manufacturing. This is an area where the 3 nm SF3 node reportedly struggled. If the first 2 nm ramp proves stable, it would validate months of engineering work and reopen opportunities for large-scale foundry contracts. Adding to the pressure, Samsung is already preparing a second-generation variant, known as SF2P, and work on an SF2P+ follow-up is underway. These next steps are important because they promise further gains in performance, power efficiency, and density.

Reports of a major multi-billion Dollar agreement to supply AI-focused chips on Samsung's 2 nm platform have increased expectations and put faith in Samsung's Foundry capability. Such a contract would be a meaningful commercial win, but it will count for little unless Samsung can deliver steady yields and predictable capacity. In the long term, Samsung expects multi-year demand for 2 nm wafers, which is why it is developing multiple process generations in parallel. Nevertheless, the company's reputation in bleeding-edge foundry work will be decided by whether SF2 variants, especially second-generation SF2P and SF2P+, mature quickly enough to offer both the technical benefits and manufacturing reliability customers require. Proving the first 2 nm node can scale is crucial. Still, Samsung's future competitiveness will ultimately rest on stabilizing yields and showing that its second-generation processes can sustain performance and supply over time.
Source: ZDNet Korea
Add your own comment

10 Comments on Samsung's Second-Gen 2 nm GAA Node Is Make-or-Break for Its Foundry Business

#1
kondamin
is no one interested in not leading nodes?
have AMD get a strix point line made on samsung 4 so there is availability
Posted on Reply
#2
Vayra86
kondaminis no one interested in not leading nodes?
have AMD get a strix point line made on samsung 4 so there is availability
Yeah this puzzles me too, though diversification to 'something worse' isnt going to bring any company to a good position and might detract funds / time from developing the cutting edge. I guess there isnt enough shortage for companies to care yet.
Posted on Reply
#3
FilipposTechGR
Samsung really needs to nail the 2 nm ramp this time. Without stable yields, all these big AI contracts won’t mean much in the long run.
Posted on Reply
#4
dyonoctis
kondaminis no one interested in not leading nodes?
have AMD get a strix point line made on samsung 4 so there is availability
Some industries are, GF bread and butter is non leading nodes. But Samsung got an interest to keep going with bleeding edge.

The other issue is that TSMC is also proposing very good “old” nodes. Just look at all the 7nm zen CPUs still shipping. Samsung is sadly seen as a cost effective solution, with not ideal performance.
Posted on Reply
#5
windwhirl
kondaminis no one interested in not leading nodes?
have AMD get a strix point line made on samsung 4 so there is availability
For processors seeking **leadership** performance, the only good node choice are the newest ones, in the 5/4/3 nm range currently.

There's also another matter, Samsung's 3nm process might be different enough from TSMC's that it could require extensive modifications to the existing chip design.

They might look at Samsung if they want to make Ryzen IODs there tho. The IOD in Ryzen has always been a generation or two behind in process node compared to the actual CCD, so picking Samsung for the IOD could be in the cards at some point if Samsung has a success with their node.
Posted on Reply
#6
bug
kondaminis no one interested in not leading nodes?
have AMD get a strix point line made on samsung 4 so there is availability
It depends. Older nodes are quickly repurposed for chipsets and other electronics that's don't need to be on the cutting edge. CPUs, GPUs, mobile SoCs do not have that luxury. I mean, imagine AMD stating Zen6 will be built on TSMC 5nm, will offer similar performance to Intel's counterpart, but will draw 400W+ to do it. Would you buy that?
Components that dictate the overall system power draw do need the latest and greatest. A component that draws ~5W next to the CPU/GPU, nobody cares if you build it on an older node and draws 7 or 10W instead.
Posted on Reply
#7
kondamin
bugIt depends. Older nodes are quickly repurposed for chipsets and other electronics that's don't need to be on the cutting edge. CPUs, GPUs, mobile SoCs do not have that luxury. I mean, imagine AMD stating Zen6 will be built on TSMC 5nm, will offer similar performance to Intel's counterpart, but will draw 400W+ to do it. Would you buy that?
Components that dictate the overall system power draw do need the latest and greatest. A component that draws ~5W next to the CPU/GPU, nobody cares if you build it on an older node and draws 7 or 10W instead.
fairly certain strixpoint halo on samsung 4nm made for desktops would be sold out the moment they are announced
Posted on Reply
#8
bug
As we have seen with Intel, leading-edge node development is a difficult thing to maintain
Remember TSMC also ran in trouble with their 20-something node. But they weren't smug about it, they did what they had to do and got back on track.
Posted on Reply
#9
Mack4285
If previous node didn't work out yield-wise, why would an even denser node suddenly work? It starts to look a bit like Intel, who never really got a good node after their 10nm, and is always saying that next node will magically work out for them.
Posted on Reply
#10
bug
Mack4285If previous node didn't work out yield-wise, why would an even denser node suddenly work? It starts to look a bit like Intel, who never really got a good node after their 10nm, and is always saying that next node will magically work out for them.
It has to do with how work happens in these projects. And there are learned lessons.
Posted on Reply
Nov 11th, 2026 23:39 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts