Tuesday, November 25th 2025

Colorful Updates iGame RTX 50 Ultra Z Series, Now Compatible with ASUS BTF Mainboards

by
T0@st
 Discuss (7 Comments)
Colorful has revised a couple of its iGame GeForce RTX 50 Ultra Z, to bring them in line with the latest ASUS connection standards. Specifically, their modular GC-HPWR piece is compatible with motherboards that feature BTF 2.0 interfaces. Naturally, ASUS has already outfitted a limited selection of its own graphics card products with the clutter reducing BTF design. Focusing back on Colorful, the Chinese manufacturer will still equip their newly updated youthful graffiti-themed Ultra Z options with standard 16 and 8-pin power connectors. The detachable hidden power connection system has debuted on an iGame RTX 5070 Ti Ultra Z OC option—graphics card enthusiasts have noticed retail listings pop up on China's JD.com platform. According to a mid-November VideoCardz article, Colorful appears to be preparing similarly upgraded RTX 5070, 5060 Ti, and 5060 models. Oddly, the firm's iGame Ultra Z product range does not expand upwards into the RTX 5080 tier.
Sources: realVictor_M on X, Wccftech, VideoCardz, JD.com Product Listing

Related News

Add your own comment

7 Comments on Colorful Updates iGame RTX 50 Ultra Z Series, Now Compatible with ASUS BTF Mainboards

#1
CornyOC
Ngl, I hate Asus' Armory Crate, but I might go back to their mobo and overly expensive GPUs if I can drop that fire hazard 12VHPWR cable.
Posted on Reply
#2
bonehead123
ummmm.....Armory Crate, like the infamous iClueLess, CAM, and any number of other garbaggio, resource-sucking, shit-pit slackwarez will NEVER, EVER, EVER, get within 1000 miles of my computers, regardless of it's components or software configurations !
Posted on Reply
#3
Space Lynx
Astronaut
i mean i have their gpu, but i don't use their software. i just use msi afterburner. lmao
Posted on Reply
#4
Chaitanya
CornyOCNgl, I hate Asus' Armory Crate, but I might go back to their mobo and overly expensive GPUs if I can drop that fire hazard 12VHPWR cable.
This solution just moves the fire hazard from GPU to motherboard where it can take your rest of the system with it while keeping GPU safe.
Posted on Reply
#5
SemperPC09
This is interesting, I wonder if enough brands will team up and there will be enough marketing hype to evolve BTF and other like advancements into a big deal (I am talking its not a gaming rig if its not BTF" big Just how I see lots of people trash on others that don't have an X3d chip). I am very interested in these boards and cards and how they will fare over the long term. BTF does look really clean though, not too many people can deny that. However, I will wait to hop on this hype train until I see the lifespan and potential problems GC-HPWR has.
Posted on Reply
#6
TheinsanegamerN
SemperPC09This is interesting, I wonder if enough brands will team up and there will be enough marketing hype to evolve BTF and other like advancements into a big deal (I am talking its not a gaming rig if its not BTF" big Just how I see lots of people trash on others that don't have an X3d chip). I am very interested in these boards and cards and how they will fare over the long term. BTF does look really clean though, not too many people can deny that. However, I will wait to hop on this hype train until I see the lifespan and potential problems GC-HPWR has.
Highly doubt it. Asus released their ROG docks earlier, and they have abandoned the XG mobile connection for a more traditional Thunderbolt 5 interface. Far greater compatibility, but leaving XG owners in a bind.

BTF is still extremely rare in the wild and is a DIY exclusive thing too.
Posted on Reply
#7
ZeDestructor
ChaitanyaThis solution just moves the fire hazard from GPU to motherboard where it can take your rest of the system with it while keeping GPU safe.
Considering that in my machine the GPU cost me 2350 while mobo+CPU+memory cost me around 1100, I'd call this good risk evaluation. Besides, realistically you'd only be melting the GH-HPWR section of the slot, not the whole board or anything attached to the board.
SemperPC09This is interesting, I wonder if enough brands will team up and there will be enough marketing hype to evolve BTF and other like advancements into a big deal (I am talking its not a gaming rig if its not BTF" big Just how I see lots of people trash on others that don't have an X3d chip). I am very interested in these boards and cards and how they will fare over the long term. BTF does look really clean though, not too many people can deny that. However, I will wait to hop on this hype train until I see the lifespan and potential problems GC-HPWR has.
TheinsanegamerNHighly doubt it. Asus released their ROG docks earlier, and they have abandoned the XG mobile connection for a more traditional Thunderbolt 5 interface. Far greater compatibility, but leaving XG owners in a bind.

BTF is still extremely rare in the wild and is a DIY exclusive thing too.
I don't see anything about GC-HPWR that would require BTF besides Asus' insistence on it. Personally, I would much prefer having mobo connectors remain exactly where they are right now and just get the GC-HPWR added to it. If nothing else, it saves me the effort of cutting a large hole in my very nice motherboard tray.
Posted on Reply
Nov 14th, 2026 16:32 CST change timezone

Latest GPU Drivers

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts