Monday, December 1st 2025

Linux Kernel 6.18 Released with Potential LTS Status

Linus Torvalds released Linux kernel 6.18 bringing new hardware support, virtualization improvements, and file system updates. The biggest change is the removal of the Bcachefs file system. Linux 6.18 also adds KVM x86 CET virtualization support, letting virtual machines use Intel and AMD's control-flow security features. The kernel can now run as a guest on FreeBSD's Bhyve hypervisor. AMD gets several virtualization improvements including Secure AVIC support, while a new dm-pcache feature lets persistent memory speed up slower storage devices. File systems see notable updates. Btrfs gets initial support for larger block sizes, while XFS now enables online filesystem checking by default. EXT4 adds new management capabilities, and OverlayFS gains case-folding support for better compatibility. Intel USBIO drivers are now included along with support for Wildcat Lake graphics. Additionally, new Tyr and Rocket drivers, along with more AMD Versal platform drivers, have been added.

Laptops get initial haptic touchpad support, new hardware includes DualSense PlayStation controller audio jacks and Apple M2 Pro, M2 Max, and M2 Ultra chips. Intel's Alder Lake-S processors (Core i7-12700K and Core i5-12600K) also gain support. In terms of performance the new release gets a boost with Sheaves, which speeds up how the kernel allocates memory. Swap handling is faster, NFS servers scale better, and UDP network performance has improved. The Rust Binder driver is now supported, and x86 systems get a new option to control microcode loading. Linux 6.18 could become the next long-term support kernel; however, that hasn't been confirmed yet. Development for Linux 6.19 starts now, with the first test version expected on December 14th.
Source: 9to5Linux
Add your own comment

31 Comments on Linux Kernel 6.18 Released with Potential LTS Status

#1
Space Lynx
Astronaut
new hardware includes DualSense PlayStation controller audio jacks

so i mean if this wonders it supports dualsense haptic feedback in games that support that feature too? interesting
Posted on Reply
#2
Harun8
Alder Lake is getting support? The Alder Lake that's 4 years old?
Posted on Reply
#3
Space Lynx
Astronaut
Harun8Alder Lake is getting support? The Alder Lake that's 4 years old?
don't worry, you can plug in some headphones to your dualsense now, its all okaygers :roll:
Posted on Reply
#4
Nomad76
News Editor
Harun8Alder Lake is getting support? The Alder Lake that's 4 years old?
two new SOCs , Core i7-12700K and Core i5-12600K
Posted on Reply
#6
_roman_
Very nice to see even more work done on the file systems.

I syned a few hours ago. Gentoo still does not have it in the tree: packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources

I may share again the new kernel options i may find.

I wonder if they are talking about x86. I thought x86 was dead. cpu micocode loading was possible for a long time as far as i know for amd64.
Posted on Reply
#8
Tomorrow
Imagine that. OS change log that is actually meaningful. Not like "this month we added Agentic AI to everything" and "Added new smilies".
Posted on Reply
#9
LastDudeALive
TheGeekn°72...what?
x86 is 32-bit only computers. AMD64 is the 64-bit extension.
Apple M2 Pro, M2 Max, and M2 Ultra chips
This is the most exciting part to me. If I was in the market for a laptop right now, I'd absolutely want to get an Apple Silicon Macbook Air and install Linux on it.
Posted on Reply
#10
TheGeekn°72
TomorrowImagine that. OS change log that is actually meaningful. Not like "this month we added Agentic AI to everything" and "Added new smilies".
lmfao
LastDudeALivex86 is 32-bit only computers. AMD64 is the 64-bit extension.
right, I had a brain fart for a moment, mixed up what x86 was for
LastDudeALiveThis is the most exciting part to me. If I was in the market for a laptop right now, I'd absolutely want to get an Apple Silicon Macbook Air and install Linux on it.
Still surprised Apple didn't spend resources on finding a way to brick Apple devices that don't have MacOS on them
Posted on Reply
#11
LastDudeALive
Intel's Alder Lake-S processors (Core i7-12700K and Core i5-12600K) also gain support.
Does this mean you couldn't install any Linux version at all on these processes? Or did they just lack some specific optimizations, like the e-core thread control?
Posted on Reply
#12
Unregistered
Intel's Alder Lake-S processors (Core i7-12700K and Core i5-12600K) also gain support.
Weird.

edit: oh it's only for EDAC.
#13
haswrong
TomorrowImagine that. OS change log that is actually meaningful. Not like "this month we added Agentic AI to everything" and "Added new smilies".
well, tpu is in need of adding an image of :chip: and :smoke: in their library, thats for sure... as many of the rtx5090 will go up in smoke soon.
Posted on Reply
#14
Solaris17
Super Dainty Moderator
6.18 lets go!

Posted on Reply
#15
TheGeekn°72
Solaris176.18 lets go!
nice, did you do that yourself or it's been merged in their update repo?
Posted on Reply
#16
Solaris17
Super Dainty Moderator
It made it into the repo as of this morning I imagine. I checked last night before bed and it wasnt in the manjaro kernel tool, now it is.

Posted on Reply
#17
Dr. Dro
LastDudeALivex86 is 32-bit only computers. AMD64 is the 64-bit extension.
Rant post, never mind it's not aimed at you specifically

It's just petty semantics anyway. Whether that is "amd64" or "EM64T", they're functionally the exact same thing, they don't work without the x86 base extensions and x86 itself isn't much use without the 64-bit superset, I feel like this whole "ackshyually, it's amd64 🤓👆" shtick is still a vindictive, petty way to get back at Intel for the "Itanic" that stuck by, just another technology way, way ahead of its time IMHO. And in the name of petty brand loyalty we let 2 multi-billion-dollar megacorps screw us all over their little patent game. I advocate for simply taking the x86 and x64 licenses from Intel and AMD both, and putting them in the public domain by force. Just declare it in the interest of national security or some other excuse.

"What would the world look like if IA-64 succeeded" is still the single biggest what-if in the tech world for me
Posted on Reply
#19
Harun8
droopyROI have a 12600K, if i were to install Cachy or Bazzite i would run in to issues, or those get updated to this kernel by updates ?
CachyOS should already be on 6.18, Bazzite might take a week or two. Some distros like Bazzite wait a bit just to ensure there are no bugs. Updating less frequently is associated with stability. There are distros like Debian which stay on 1 kernel version for years for stability. Bazzite (Fedora Atomic based) is in the middle of the pack, waiting weeks, not months/years, but also not days like CachyOS (Arch based)

Regardless from the link dgianstefani sent, looks like its just adding 12600K support for 1 specific feature (Error Detection And Correction in L1 and L2 cache), I'd assume the 12600K/12700K have still been working in Linux otherwise. Two major CPUs with very relevant market share not working in Linux for 4 years shouldn't be possible
Posted on Reply
#20
Solaris17
Super Dainty Moderator
These two CPUs worked fine in Linux. This patch is for a feature specific to those models.
Posted on Reply
#21
shuffy_losys
Dr. DroRant post, never mind it's not aimed at you specifically

It's just petty semantics anyway. Whether that is "amd64" or "EM64T", they're functionally the exact same thing, they don't work without the x86 base extensions and x86 itself isn't much use without the 64-bit superset, I feel like this whole "ackshyually, it's amd64 🤓👆" shtick is still a vindictive, petty way to get back at Intel for the "Itanic" that stuck by, just another technology way, way ahead of its time IMHO. And in the name of petty brand loyalty we let 2 multi-billion-dollar megacorps screw us all over their little patent game. I advocate for simply taking the x86 and x64 licenses from Intel and AMD both, and putting them in the public domain by force. Just declare it in the interest of national security or some other excuse.

"What would the world look like if IA-64 succeeded" is still the single biggest what-if in the tech world for me
Though to be fair, Intel implemented x86-64 ever so slightly differently than AMD did, and this isn't just the whole hooblabaloo with AVX and stuff.

But for more fun pedantry, this should really specify which flavor of x86, because we have:
  • The original from the 8086/8088
  • Whatever name was given to the 80286/80288
  • The 32-bit extension to x86, or IA-32, introduced from the 80386 (I think Linux specifies this as i386)
  • i486 (80486)
  • i586 (the OG Pentium)
  • i686 (The Pentium Pro architecture)
  • i786 (Netburst)
Posted on Reply
#22
Dr. Dro
shuffy_losysThough to be fair, Intel implemented x86-64 ever so slightly differently than AMD did, and this isn't just the whole hooblabaloo with AVX and stuff.

But for more fun pedantry, this should really specify which flavor of x86, because we have:
  • The original from the 8086/8088
  • Whatever name was given to the 80286/80288
  • The 32-bit extension to x86, or IA-32, introduced from the 80386 (I think Linux specifies this as i386)
  • i486 (80486)
  • i586 (the OG Pentium)
  • i686 (The Pentium Pro architecture)
  • i786 (Netburst)
Yeah, I mean, "copy my homework and change a few words" and add/change/remove a few instructions of largely academic interest, to top it off, we've x86-64-v1 through v4, highlighting the different capability levels of these CPUs as well... we are so past this
Posted on Reply
#23
remixedcat
Hope they have proper sensor support for my b650e steel legend 🙏 i only have basic temp support
Posted on Reply
#24
Space Lynx
Astronaut
remixedcatHope they have proper sensor support for my b650e steel legend 🙏 i only have basic temp support
slightly off-topic, just make sure that particular board has latest BIOS update, as it prevents any chips from frying. i have same mobo basically. most mobo's i don't think bios update really matters, but being latest actually does matter for ours, better safe than sorry imo anyway

anyways off topic post i will move on now
Posted on Reply
#25
Harun8
remixedcatHope they have proper sensor support for my b650e steel legend 🙏 i only have basic temp support
Which sensors are you missing? Ive never looked at most my sensors, curious how the support for my Z890 Steel Legend is
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 14th, 2026 02:08 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts