Monday, December 29th 2025

Apple Studio Display 2 to Pack an A19 Chip, Come with ProMotion and HDR

Apple is preparing to update its Studio Display lineup in 2026 with the new Studio Display 2. Targeted squarely at creators, photography professionals, and video production crews, the new Studio Display 2 will be designed to ideally go with Mac Studio and Mac Pro workstations. Studio Display 2 surfaced in a report by Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, who identified code in an iOS 26 build pointing to display "J527" as confirmation of a new Studio Display. Perhaps the biggest reveal from the code is that Studio Display 2 will come with ProMotion, and variable refresh rate. It will support a maximum refresh rate of 120 Hz, up from the current 60 Hz of Studio Display.

The current Studio Display isn't just limited to 60 Hz, but also only has standard dynamic range (SDR). Studio Display 2 is expected to introduce HDR support, leveraging Mini LED technology. This would be similar to the latest MacBook Pro display offering ProMotion and HDR with up to 1,000 nits brightness using Mini LED illumination for sustained lighting, and an impressive 1,600 nits for HDR. Apple will likely use the latest display tech to offer a feature-packed HDR implementation for content professionals.
Lastly, Apple is expected to upgrade the SoC driving its display. The current Studio Display uses an 7 nm Apple A13 SoC, which is expected to be overhauled with the latest 3 nm Apple A19 chip. This chip will be responsible for various display-side processing and connectivity tasks, and come with various calibration features. Apple is expected to unveil Apple Studio Display 2 in 2026 alongside a next-generation Mac Studio workstation powered by M5 series SoCs.
Sources: Macworld, Bloomberg
Add your own comment

13 Comments on Apple Studio Display 2 to Pack an A19 Chip, Come with ProMotion and HDR

#1
LastDudeALive
Do other high-end professional monitors also have flagship phone chips powering them? This seems a tad wasteful to just re-use their latest iPhone chip, unless this is a subtle hint that the iPhone 17 has underperformed. Surely they can come up with a smaller chip with a few less cores to maximize wafer usage.

Or maybe this will use binned A19s with 2 cores disabled or something like that.
Posted on Reply
#2
Onasi
@LastDudeALive
It’s absolutely wasteful, but this is either Apple attempting to further give this a halo status, or the yields on A19 are very good indeed… or they aren’t selling as much 17s as they would initially expect too. Who knows. The chip is obviously overkill.
Posted on Reply
#3
sudothelinuxwizard
LastDudeALiveDo other high-end professional monitors also have flagship phone chips powering them? This seems a tad wasteful to just re-use their latest iPhone chip, unless this is a subtle hint that the iPhone 17 has underperformed. Surely they can come up with a smaller chip with a few less cores to maximize wafer usage.

Or maybe this will use binned A19s with 2 cores disabled or something like that.
It needs a somewhat powerful chip for the Center Stage Shenanigans, and probably it was easiest in terms of logistics, Tim Apple is a supply-chain freak.

Also, the current Studio Monitor actually runs full fat iOS under the hood, and presumably this will too.
Posted on Reply
#4
phints
Finally a decent refresh rate on an Apple display. 120Hz VRR is baseline (would have preferred 240Hz but I know there is no real gaming on Macs).

I'm sure price will be enormous, but the horrible 60Hz era is finally ending even at the professional level.
Posted on Reply
#5
LastDudeALive
sudothelinuxwizardIt needs a somewhat powerful chip for the Center Stage Shenanigans, and probably it was easiest in terms of logistics, Tim Apple is a supply-chain freak.

Also, the current Studio Monitor actually runs full fat iOS under the hood, and presumably this will too.
Ahh, I guess the inclusion of the NPU does make it easier to just re-use the A19.

Since it has a full smartphone chip, it would be cool if you could just use it as a stand-alone computer.
Posted on Reply
#6
sudothelinuxwizard
LastDudeALiveit would be cool if you could just use it as a stand-alone computer.
Absolutely, but that would cannibalize the Apple TV box and Tim Apple ain't having any of that.
Posted on Reply
#7
star-affinity
phintsFinally a decent refresh rate on an Apple display. 120Hz VRR is baseline (would have preferred 240Hz but I know there is no real gaming on Macs).

I'm sure price will be enormous, but the horrible 60Hz era is finally ending even at the professional level.
I'm quite sure even the most dedicated gaming PC will have a hard time pushing 240 Hz at 5120 by 2880 pixels in many 3D gaming situations. But in the future I guess...
Posted on Reply
#8
Zareek
I got a guess on pricing, one arm and two legs! Apple will claim that legs are obsolete when you have such a grand display to view the world through and one arm is all you need in the age of AI.
Posted on Reply
#9
LastDudeALive
star-affinityI'm quite sure even the most dedicated gaming PC will have a hard time pushing 240 Hz at 5120 by 2880 pixels in many 3D gaming situations. But in the future I guess...
I'm sure that media professionals (which this is aimed at) will love a higher refresh rate. It's more and more common to film and deliver content higher than 60fps.
Posted on Reply
#10
lemonadesoda
Despite the fact that facetime and imessages are in need of a serious upgrade and better integration, i would like it if the display and its A19 could run them and Zoom when the PC is off, turning the display into a communications terminal. And/or primary/secondary display for iphone and ipad.
Posted on Reply
#11
PenguinBelly
Obviously Apple AI is listening and watching everything in front at all times. Else why the A19?
Posted on Reply
#12
star-affinity
LastDudeALiveI'm sure that media professionals (which this is aimed at) will love a higher refresh rate. It's more and more common to film and deliver content higher than 60fps.
120 Hz is nice also at the desktop and outside of gaming. Not sure ”professionals” feel the need for more than that.

I don’t think more than 120 Hz is much of a benefit on the desktop and my display is capable of 240 Hz.

But maybe people have different wishes here too? :)

I still don’t think the majority will notice much difference at the desktop going from 120 Hz to 240 Hz and it will just use more energy. But, VRR can be used of course.
Posted on Reply
#13
LastDudeALive
star-affinity120 Hz is nice also at the desktop and outside of gaming. Not sure ”professionals” feel the need for more than that.

I don’t think more than 120 Hz is much of a benefit on the desktop and my display is capable of 240 Hz.

But maybe people have different wishes here too? :)

I still don’t think the majority will notice much difference at the desktop going from 120 Hz to 240 Hz and it will just use more energy. But, VRR can be used of course.
The refresh rate is going from 60hz (on the old monitor) to 120hz (on this new monitor).
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 15th, 2026 06:54 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts