Monday, January 19th 2026

AMD Reportedly Prioritizing Radeon RX 9070 XT Over Non-XT Version

AMD is reportedly shifting its production strategy to focus more on the Radeon RX 9070 XT graphics cards instead of the non-XT version. According to PROHARDVER, AMD is reallocating internal capacity towards the higher-end Radeon RX 9070 XT, which has a higher MSRP of $599. This decision is driven by the fact that the production costs for both GPUs are the same, as they both use the Navi 48 die and 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. With memory pricing being the main bottleneck, AMD aims to concentrate on a SKU that offers a better profit margin and justifies the engineering efforts invested in the series. Although both SKUs have the same memory configuration, the non-XT version uses a Navi 48 XT die, likely a lower-bin version of the Navi 48 XTX die. As a result, production costs are similar, but the Radeon RX 9070 XT has a slight 9% price premium over the non-XT model.
PROHARDVERThis does not make the Radeon RX 9070 a very good alternative for manufacturers, and according to our information, its production is not stopped, but the focus is largely on the Radeon RX 9070 XT, so they may produce more of this model in the future at the expense of its smaller brother. On paper, this could help minimize the need for price correction, since the fastest Radeon model is already more expensive, so it is less affected by the increase in memory prices.
Fortunately, this doesn't mean that production of the non-XT model will cease. Instead, it will receive less capacity from AMD, but not enough to cause a shortage. Additionally, AMD is working closely with add-in card (AIC) partners to stabilize memory pricing. According to the company, these partnerships are beneficial in stabilizing the availability and price fluctuations of the current hardware. While there are no guarantees, AMD is striving to maintain stable pricing and availability.
Sources: PROHARVER, via VideoCardz
Add your own comment

38 Comments on AMD Reportedly Prioritizing Radeon RX 9070 XT Over Non-XT Version

#26
Luminescent
If i were to imagine a conversation between AMD and Nvidia talking about discrete gaming GPU it would be like :
Nvidia - Do you still make gpu's for those losers ?
AMD - Neah, threw some crumbs and mostly fake it, lots of promises but we never intend to deliver, what about you ?
Nvidia - No chance, we hated it then and hate them even more now, fuck those losers whining and bitching about everything, "it's too expensive", now we make it 1000$ for entry level, let's see how they like it now, HAHAHA
AMD - we will do the same, HAHAHHA
Posted on Reply
#27
Dirt Chip
Darc RequiemWith all the legitimately dumb things AMD does, there is no need to invent slights. AMD focusing on producing a card in segment that Nvidia is allegedly abandoning is a smart play. Which is odd to me because it goes against their usual mantra. "Never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity".
I wouldn’t call axing one of two top sku focusing. At best It is convergence and practicality it result in less options for the consumer.
It is a copy pasta of NV move, adjusted for their own GPU portfolio.
Hanc, opportunity didn’t miss. Imo.
Posted on Reply
#28
Bruno_O
LuminescentI have the 9070 xt and it's true, from 200W to 300W you gain very little performance, maybe 10%, they pushed this chip to compete with 5070 ti better.
it beats the 5070 TI according to newer reviews where the AMD FineWine driver optimizations pushed it over, while using similar power to the 5070 TI, so your comment makes no sense
RejZoRWasn't price gap between non-XT and XT very tiny where in performance, XT was significantly faster? And while I overpaid RX 9070 XT on launch and it was from smaller local store which always has higher priced graphic cards, it was still significantly cheaper than RTX 5070Ti and I still absolutely love it.
the price gap was 10%, XT is not "significantly faster", it was/is 10% faster - but currently most people can buy a non XT for 20-30% less money than the XT
melkor_unlimitedrtx 5070 Ti is lower High End
RX 9070XT is upper mid class

Source: Team Green PR manual
your "lower high end" card has less performance than your "upper mid class", both have 16GB, both use similar power - Team Green is full of shit
Posted on Reply
#29
Rover4444
LuminescentIf i were to imagine a conversation between AMD and Nvidia talking about discrete gaming GPU it would be like :
Nvidia - Do you still make gpu's for those losers ?
AMD - Neah, threw some crumbs and mostly fake it, lots of promises but we never intend to deliver, what about you ?
Nvidia - No chance, we hated it then and hate them even more now, fuck those losers whining and bitching about everything, "it's too expensive", now we make it 1000$ for entry level, let's see how they like it now, HAHAHA
AMD - we will do the same, HAHAHHA
Thankfully my GOAT Intel is giving the people what they want :love:
Posted on Reply
#30
razaron
_roman_I do not see any justification to keep a graphic card for maybe a future purchase of KCD2.
Recently finished KCD1 and started KCD2. Somehow it looks and runs better than the first game. Most of the time I get 60fps @ 2560x1600 with FSR set to native AA. So you might not need to upgrade, at least for that game.
Posted on Reply
#32
ThomasK
SsenolI always say AMD is a source of regret. You never know what they'll release, when, or how they'll disappoint their customers. We saw this with the RDNA 2 cards; trusting AMD means taking a risk.
What credibility do you have, really? Your comment makes you sound like one of Jensen's bots.
Posted on Reply
#33
Ssenol
ThomasKWhat credibility do you have, really? Your comment makes you sound like one of Jensen's bots.
I am a computer maintenance and repair technician myself, and since 2013 I have been building computers based on AMD systems. My recommendation was AMD. While you disliked AMD FX processors, I was using computers with AMD FX processors. There's no need for pointless chatter; today's AMD is not the same AMD as before. If you don't know when to let go of things, companies will abandon you like this. I hope you get hit by a blow from AMD in the future.
Posted on Reply
#34
ThomasK
Ssenoltoday's AMD is not the same AMD as before.
You are totally right, the company is now profitable and makes better products than what we got on the FX days.
SsenolI am a computer maintenance and repair technician myself, and since 2013 I have been building computers based on AMD systems. My recommendation was AMD.
Great! Are Intel products now better, so that you are no longer recommending Amd? Or are you just speaking out of a personal frustration? Because that's what it looks like.
SsenolIf you don't know when to let go of things, companies will abandon you like this. I hope you get hit by a blow from AMD in the future.
Thanks, I really appreaciate and take into consideration advice coming from random people on tech forums. That's why I keep coming back.

Have a good day!

XX
Posted on Reply
#35
Krit
vlad.coolishThe Navi 48 chip is good, but a middle-class videocard should have a 200W TDP, not 300W.
To not lose stock performance my RX 9070 XT is good at around 264w slightly faster than stock. There probably is still a headroom to run it at 258w. When undervolted RX 9070 XT can easily mach RTX 5070 Ti performance per watt. After 304 watts efficiency is dropping fast not worth it!

Total War Attila 98.1 fps (stock 304w) vs 100 fps (UV 264w)
War Thunder 211.9 fps (stock 304w) vs 218 fps (UV 264w)
Metro Exodus ~148.6fps (stock 304w) vs ~149.8fps (UV 264w)

Usually RX 9070 XT is better purchase than RX 9070 because of laughable price difference between them.
melkor_unlimitedrtx 5070 Ti is lower High End
RX 9070XT is upper mid class
It depends for example in Steel Nomad AMD will destroy nvidia and in Unigine nvidia will destroy AMD.
Icon CharlieThe cheapest, brand new 9070 is going for $580.00
The cheapest brand new 9070XT is going for $720.00
That's weird right now difference between XT and non XT is only 39€ +6%. And RTX 5070 Ti is 248€ +37% more expensive than RX 9070 XT. All are gigabyte crap models!!!!!

Even RTX 5070 has lost this p/p crown and right now it straight up sucks if compare it to RX 9070 XT p/p wise.
Posted on Reply
#36
Ssenol
ThomasKGreat! Are Intel products now better, so that you are no longer recommending Amd? Or are you just speaking out of a personal frustration? Because that's what it looks like.



XX
My friend, it seems we disagreed. What I meant wasn't to say buy Intel instead of AMD, but rather to say buy an Nvidia graphics card instead of an AMD one, even though it's a little more expensive. There are many reasons for this. I'm not criticizing the hardware itself, but the software aspect is that it doesn't justify its price. If you buy an Nvidia, even though it's a little more expensive, you can feel more comfortable with the software; it doesn't have the trust-breaking behavior of AMD, and we know that you get at least 10 years of feature and update support. Do you understand? Fanboyism doesn't benefit anyone.
Posted on Reply
#37
medi01
Mack4285I guess this is some intermediary news. Later in the year it will be obvious all hardware sales are going down fast. Then they will cut/stop manufacturing even more.
Welp, from the day before yesterday, AMD earnings:

Gaming business revenue was $3.9 billion, up 51% year-over-year, driven by improved semi-custom sales and strong demand for AMD Radeon GPUs.
Posted on Reply
#38
ThomasK
Ssenolyou can feel more comfortable with the software
If you're referring to drivers, Nvidia had as much problems as Amd recently. Just look it up here on TPU. The rest of the software stack is irrelevant to me, since I don't use it.
Ssenolit doesn't have the trust-breaking behavior of AMD
The only trust-breaking behavior I got was when I bought a GTX 970 in 2015, just to find out it had 3.5GB instead of 4GB.
Ssenoleven though it's a little more expensive
Where I live, Nvidia hardware has historically been significantly more expensive than Amd or Intel.
Ssenolyou get at least 10 years of feature and update support
I update much more frequently than that, because paying less for specific hardware allows me to do so. 10 years of updates offers me nothing.
SsenolDo you understand? Fanboyism doesn't benefit anyone.
Are you drinking water from a toilet bowl? If you read your own comments here, you'll quickly realize they sound more fanboyish than anything I've written.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 14th, 2026 05:07 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts