Friday, February 20th 2026

RetroDECK Emulator Removes Nintendo Switch Emulation Over "Toxicity" and DMCA Risk

Given the similar form factors, it's unsurprising that many gamers turned to their Steam Decks to emulate Nintendo Switch games, but that era seems to be drawing to a close, as RetroDECK, a Linux emulation platform capable of emulating multiple game systems, has just confirmed that it will be removing support for Ryubing, a fork of the now-infamous Ryujinx Switch emulator, from its available emulators. The developer behind the emulator explained in a February 19 blog post that Switch emulation would be removed in a minor update. This comes after support for Ryubing was added in a November update.

The blog mentions two main reasons for the removal of Ryubing, stating that "Switch emulation has consistently been the source of the most issues within the project, generating the highest volume of warnings, bans, toxicity, and support tickets," and adding that the questionable legality of emulators like Ryubing and Nintendo's aggressive protection of its intellectual property exposes the volunteers and community involved in the RetroDECK project to undue legal exposure. As of an upcoming update, indicated in an edit to an old blog post to be 0.10.4b, Switch emulation will be removed from RetroDECK "forever," and discussions about Switch emulation will also be banned from all of RetroDECK's communities and social platforms effective immediately.
RetroDECK notes that it will still be possible for enterprising users to add Ryubing back into RetroDECK, but they will need to configure it manually or move it from an old installation as a user-made mod without support from RetroDECK's developers. Any Ryubing configuration files and save game files will remain on user systems after the update, but players will no longer be able to launch them from RetroDECK after the update.
Source: RetroDECK Wiki
Add your own comment

6 Comments on RetroDECK Emulator Removes Nintendo Switch Emulation Over "Toxicity" and DMCA Risk

#1
phints
Makes sense for the project, but not as though it's hard to install Ryujinx on any platform at this point.
Posted on Reply
#2
lexluthermiester
They did this to themselves. Creating emulation for a currently produced retail product blatantly invites legal problems. They need to focus on emulating only retired and no longer commercially viable systems.
phintsMakes sense for the project, but not as though it's hard to install Ryujinx on any platform at this point.
That too is questionable.
Posted on Reply
#3
Ruru
Trepie
lexluthermiesterThey did this to themselves. Creating emulation for a currently produced retail product blatantly invites legal problems. They need to focus on emulating only retired and no longer commercially viable systems.


That too is questionable.
Isn't emulation 100% legal but sharing the BIOS isn't? IIRC that's why most emulators won't have their BIOS packed with them, the user has to have one on their own.

edit: Though I don't know how it varies between different countries and laws...
Posted on Reply
#4
windwhirl
RuruIsn't emulation 100% legal but sharing the BIOS isn't? IIRC that's why most emulators won't have their BIOS packed with them, the user has to have one on their own.

edit: Though I don't know how it varies between different countries and laws...
For the US in particular, emulation itself is legal, bypassing copyright protections is not.

www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/1201

Technically, all Nintendo platforms have that since the Wii, IIRC.

RyujinX and all other Switch emulators were determined to be entirely applications whose only function was either to bypass copyright protections or depended entirely on some other thing breaking said copyright protections. Hence they were deemed illegal at least as far as it got into court. Realistically, we can't be 100% sure because the case never reached the Supreme Court, which would have either issued a ruling that would determine if that was the case and set a precedent, or decided not to take the case, thus setting the immediately lower court's ruling as a precedent.

A while back, there was some concern that this could be used against Dolphin, the GameCube/Wii emulator, but Dolphin is a special case in which it's speculated to have unwittingly shielded itself from the same lawsuit type by not being exclusively an application for bypassing copyright protections and not depending on bypassing copyright protections to function (because the GameCube doesn't have the protections that the Wii has).
Posted on Reply
#5
GenericUsername2001
windwhirlFor the US in particular, emulation itself is legal, bypassing copyright protections is not.

www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/1201

Technically, all Nintendo platforms have that since the Wii, IIRC.

RyujinX and all other Switch emulators were determined to be entirely applications whose only function was either to bypass copyright protections or depended entirely on some other thing breaking said copyright protections. Hence they were deemed illegal at least as far as it got into court. Realistically, we can't be 100% sure because the case never reached the Supreme Court, which would have either issued a ruling that would determine if that was the case and set a precedent, or decided not to take the case, thus setting the immediately lower court's ruling as a precedent.
A comment on the Nintendo vs Emulator lawsuits. The Ryujinx team was never sued by Nintendo, and the head dev was located in Brazil anyways, so any US court rulings would be limited to what is posted on US websites. Instead Nintendo "contacted" the head dev (with rumors of the contact team being some rather unpleasant men showing up at his house) and "convinced" him to stop the project.

The Yuzu devs were the ones Nintendo sued in US courts, for breaking the DCMA and such. The Yuzu devs settled out of court; there was no legal decision made by the courts there. Settlements like that don't create binding precedent for the court.
Posted on Reply
#6
lexluthermiester
RuruIsn't emulation 100% legal but sharing the BIOS isn't?
That about sums it up.
Ruruedit: Though I don't know how it varies between different countries and laws...
This is true as well.
windwhirlFor the US in particular, emulation itself is legal, bypassing copyright protections is not.

www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/1201
Technically, all Nintendo platforms have that since the Wii, IIRC.
It's far more complex than that. To sum up, the DMCA is intended to protect copyright holders from infringement. It is not intended to limit citizen/user rights. Where citizen rights begin, the DMCA ends, generally.
Posted on Reply
Nov 11th, 2026 20:46 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts