Monday, March 30th 2026

NVIDIA Readies Rubin-based GeForce RTX 60-series with Massive RT Performance Gains

The rumor mill has started grinding about NVIDIA's next-generation gaming GPU, and it looks like NVIDIA does not want to allow the current market environment to get in the way of implementing its product roadmap, with a roughly 2-year GeForce generation product launch cadence. The next-generation GeForce RTX 60-series will be powered by the "Rubin" graphics architecture. "Rubin" already debuted on NVIDIA's bread-winning AI GPU series, and is making its way to GeForce, reports RedGaming Tech.

The first slice of rumors about GeForce RTX 60-series predicts that NVIDIA will stick to a more conservative approach with foundry nodes, and not go with a sub-2 nm nanosheet-based node. GeForce "Rubin" will be built on some variant of the current TSMC 3 nm FinFET node. They need not be the same N3 node that's in use by Apple, Intel, and others; and NVIDIA might collaborate with TSMC on an exclusive variant just the way it created the NVIDIA 4N node, derived from TSMC N5. Chips in the series will follow the numbering scheme "GR20x," with examples being "GR202" for the biggest part powering the flagship product. The 3 nm node will allow NVIDIA to maintain GPU clock speeds ranging between high 2 GHz and low 3 GHz, which is a minor increase over the current "Blackwell."
GeForce "Rubin" will introduce the new 6th Gen Tensor cores, and 5th Gen RT cores. We already have some clue about the design goals of the two. The new 6th Gen Tensor cores, along with the generational increase in the main compute muscle of the GPU, should better accelerate neural rendering and DLSS 5, the revolutionary new technology that augments game assets with AI-generated effects in real time. NVIDIA's early demo of DLSS 5 required a pair of RTX 5090 graphics cards, so the goal should be to bring DLSS 5 within the performance envelope of a single GPU, including mid-range and performance segment ones, not just the high-end.
Next up, is the 5th Gen RT core, and RedGaming Tech says that NVIDIA is chasing a 100% gen-over-gen increase in real-time Path Tracing performance over the current RTX 50-series "Blackwell" series.

As for the traditional pure raster 3D graphics performance, it's predicted that "Rubin" will post modest generational gains, ranging between 30% to 35% SKU-to-SKU versus the current RTX 50-series. This would be banking on the IPC, clock speed, and energy-efficiency advances brought about by 3 nm and the new "Rubin" SM (streaming multiprocessor).

Memory size and bandwidth could increase SKU-to-SKU over the current "Blackwell" generation, with the exception of the top RTX 6090. NVIDIA will stick to GDDR7 as the memory standard, however, the company could increase memory bus width in pursuit of memory size and bandwidth gains. The top-spec "GE202" silicon powering the RTX 6090 will retain a 512-bit GDDR7 memory bus of its predecessor, the RTX 5090. NVIDIA might tap into faster GDDR7 speeds for modest bandwidth increase. The silicon has 192 SM, and the RTX 6090 could be cut down from this. 32 GB might remain the memory size for the RTX 6090.

The RTX 6080 could be based on the "GR203" silicon, which physically features a 320-bit wide GDDR7 memory interface for 20 GB of memory, along with a memory bandwidth increase of at least 25% over the current RTX 5080.

The RTX 6070 will see a major memory size and bandwidth increase. NVIDIA will build the RTX 6070 on the "GR205" silicon, which comes with a 256-bit GDDR7 memory interface, and the RTX 6070 will get 16 GB of it, for an at least 33% memory bandwidth increase
Source: RedGaming Tech (YouTube)
Add your own comment

162 Comments on NVIDIA Readies Rubin-based GeForce RTX 60-series with Massive RT Performance Gains

#1
zenlessyank
My wallet went and hid.

Such RAM stinginess.
Posted on Reply
#2
Frick
Fishfaced Nincompoop
Good thing RT/PT has no impact on graphics quality and is entirely optional.
Posted on Reply
#3
Dimitriman
I cant wait for the generational Ai upgrade and 100% price hike on every model because Jensen just cares so much about gamers.
Posted on Reply
#4
Gigaherz
1000% There will be no 16gb+ version besides a 90 tier card.
Posted on Reply
#5
azrael
Now, if any statement should be taken with a truck load of salt, it's one from RedGamingTech.
Posted on Reply
#6
TheDeeGee
Remember RTX Remix?

Boy, how that died out quickly.
Posted on Reply
#7
CornyOC
So about 30% uplift over 5090, and focused on PT performnace, to at least double it. I mean it sound like it's going to be similar uplift as this gen was vs 4090. Sounds passable unless you are into PT that much...
Posted on Reply
#8
kondamin
No, I can’t see them get tsmc to make a new node just for their consumer graphics
Posted on Reply
#9
_JP_
I read "readies" and thought: "That must been the sticker of the parcel shipping, 'cause these must be in storages since late '25."
Then again, must be in reaction to their stock not holding the $180 4wk average.
Posted on Reply
#10
watzupken
Upgrades in hardware is going to be very predictable but knowing Nvidia, they will pivot to AI to demonstrate performance and image improvements. DLSS 5 is a very clear indication. I think they will triple down on AI enabled framegen and let Jensen fluff up improvements like, 3x more powerful than RTX 5090.
Posted on Reply
#11
Windyson
3GBx16(512Bit)
3GBx12(384Bit)
3GBx8(256Bit)
3GBx6(192Bit)
3GBx4(128Bit)
Posted on Reply
#12
cinemaware
So a youtuber said something based on a tweet, and everybody's got their pitchforks out already. There's a surprise :D

Also, can somebody answer me this: if Nvidia apparently only cares about AI and RT, hates gamers, etc, what stops AMD or Intel from delivering the holy grail of 50% (or whatever is supposed to be substantial enough) raster difference and gaining 90% market share?
Posted on Reply
#13
Bwaze
What "Gaming market share"?

Who is going to build a gaming PC, or buy a prebuilt in a market with these prices of memory, storage, GPUs, CPUs?

Apparently if the war in Middle East doesn't stop real soon many semiconductor fabs will have to stop production due to Helium shortage.

That's on top of all the price hikes that haven't even been implemented yet.
Posted on Reply
#14
PCL
cinemawareSo a youtuber said something based on a tweet, and everybody's got their pitchforks out already. There's a surprise :D

Also, can somebody answer me this: if Nvidia apparently only cares about AI and RT, hates gamers, etc, what stops AMD or Intel from delivering the holy grail of 50% (or whatever is supposed to be substantial enough) raster difference and gaining 90% market share?
The same thing that prevented anyone from catching Intel when they stopped caring for a decade. $$$. Being the market leader has its perks. It is not, however, proof that they're focusing on the right things.
Posted on Reply
#15
jesdals
Looking forward not to spend 5000 dollars on a GPU
Posted on Reply
#16
TumbleGeorge
cinemawareSo a youtuber said something based on a tweet, and everybody's got their pitchforks out already. There's a surprise :D

Also, can somebody answer me this: if Nvidia apparently only cares about AI and RT, hates gamers, etc, what stops AMD or Intel from delivering the holy grail of 50% (or whatever is supposed to be substantial enough) raster difference and gaining 90% market share?
AMD doesn't have enough capacity leased from TMSC to produce the necessary amount of hardware for home users. Intel, at least in theory, could commit its factories. As long as it finally manages to achieve high yields with its new lithography processes.
Posted on Reply
#17
Bwaze
jesdalsLooking forward not to spend 5000 dollars on a GPU
You can not spend 5000 dollars today! You're welcome.
:p

Posted on Reply
#18
_JP_
BwazeYou can not spend 5000 dollars today! You're welcome.
:p

Coincidentaly, the 5060 Ti was launched at $429 (for a sense of scale), so you could get 5090 or 12x5060 Ti. :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#19
cinemaware
TumbleGeorgeAMD doesn't have enough capacity leased from TMSC to produce the necessary amount of hardware for home users. Intel, at least in theory, could commit its factories. As long as it finally manages to achieve high yields with its new lithography processes.
PCLThe same thing that prevented anyone from catching Intel when they stopped caring for a decade. $$$. Being the market leader has its perks. It is not, however, proof that they're focusing on the right things.
My question was a bit rhetorical, but thanks for your input anyway. However, have you considered that perhaps it has nothing to do with being a "market leader", or access to fabs, and more to do with the fact that Moore's Law is dead, and simply not being technologically advanced enough.

To put it more simply, I'm pretty sure that if AMD had designs of a Nvidia-killing Raster King GPU, they would come out with it long time ago.
Posted on Reply
#21
Dr. Dro
This "leak" comes from an incredibly unreliable source. I personally don't think we'll see GR202 ship this year just yet. A September release would be earnest, and frankly Nvidia hasn't even made Blackwell settle yet. Too many driver problems throughout this generation.
BwazeYou can not spend 5000 dollars today! You're welcome.
:p

Or maybe don't use a limited release, numbered, specially binned extreme overclocking card as the price benchmark, just saying.
PaganstompIm good. Thanks.

Might as well have lit $170 under a match with no DX12U support or current driver branch available, but hopefully it serves you well
Posted on Reply
#22
Bobaganoosh
watzupkenUpgrades in hardware is going to be very predictable but knowing Nvidia, they will pivot to AI to demonstrate performance and image improvements. DLSS 5 is a very clear indication. I think they will triple down on AI enabled framegen and let Jensen fluff up improvements like, 3x more powerful than RTX 5090.
Yup. I would expect that any "twice as fast" type of claim would include a bump in frame Gen/AI-rendered frames. They have made it clear that is their path to improvements now.
Posted on Reply
#23
Denver
The reliability of rumors coming from this source is even lower than those coming from MLID.

If I had to guess, I’d say a 50% improvement in RT. 3nm isn’t much denser than 4nm.
Posted on Reply
#24
ExplodingCaps
I expect 6090 price will be $3000 and 6080 $1500 minimal before AIB and regional markup. And I will cling to my 4090 until its last breath.
Posted on Reply
#25
TumbleGeorge
cinemawareand more to do with the fact that Moore's Law is dead
Do you check this "fact"? If I remember correctly GTC Beijing / Computex 2017 was first public claim from Mr Huang about Moore's law. How times number of transistors in chips increase from 2017 to early 2025(last generations of consumer GPU and CPU)?
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 12th, 2026 04:43 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts