Thursday, April 9th 2026

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 Dual Edition MSRP is $899

Ahead of its April 22 retail availability, AMD confirmed the U.S. MSRP (pre-tax) pricing of its upcoming flagship desktop processor, the Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 Dual Edition. The chip comes with an AMD MSRP of $899, or $200 higher than the launch MSRP of the Ryzen 9 9950X3D. This doesn't necessarily mean that the processor will be available to buy at $899, retailers could mark the chip further up, and taxes could push its street price above the $1,000-mark. At launch, the processor will be sold both as retail PIB (processor in box) packages, as well as part of pre-built gaming desktops by popular OEMs and systems integrators.

The Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 Dual Edition is a 16-core/32-thread processor powered by "Zen 5" microarchitecture and 3D V-Cache technology, with stacked 3D V-Cache on both its 8-core chiplets, resulting in an on-package L3 cache of 192 MB, and a total cache (L2+L3) of 208 MB. In comparison, the 9950X3D only has 3D V-Cache on one of its two CCDs, and relies on software-based OS scheduler guidance to ensure gaming workloads are directed to the CCD with 3D V-Cache. Besides cache, the 9950X3D2 Dual Edition is mostly similar to the 9950X3D, except its maximum boost frequency is 5.60 GHz, or 100 MHz lower than the 9950X3D; and it comes with a higher TDP of 200 W, compared to 170 W of the 9950X3D. While technically compatible with any Socket AM5 motherboard, support requires UEFI firmware updates from motherboard vendors.
Source: HotHardware
Add your own comment

52 Comments on AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 Dual Edition MSRP is $899

#1
Vayra86
Probably <700 in two months
Posted on Reply
#2
Hyderz
Can’t wait for the review, in theory it should be a bit faster than its standard x3d sibling
Posted on Reply
#3
csendesmark
OMG, these model names.... 😆
Anyway, looking forward seeing the reviews.
Posted on Reply
#4
kondamin
HyderzCan’t wait for the review, in theory it should be a bit faster than its standard x3d sibling
If you need it you need it, but i doubt it will be an interesting chip for many
Posted on Reply
#5
Hyderz
kondaminIf you need it you need it, but i doubt it will be an interesting chip for many
It would be a big boost from my 9900k but I don’t have much use for the extra cores, I would be better off with 9800x3d.. but I want to move up from 8 cores, zen6 or nova lake looks more appealing to me
Posted on Reply
#6
Bwaze
Vayra86Probably <700 in two months
Or 10, 15% increase, as reported numerous times recently. Apparently there is "increased demand" (where?) causing shortages. Of course the truth is they are meeting lower demand in consumer space (due to high prices of memory, storage) with higher prices to try to rake in additional revenue. That will of course lower the demand further, but that's calculation for another time.

PC makers report surging prices across different components — increasing costs are going beyond memory chip and processors, now affecting PCBs, plastic materials, and more
Posted on Reply
#7
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
HyderzIt would be a big boost from my 9900k but I don’t have much use for the extra cores, I would be better off with 9800x3d.. but I want to move up from 8 cores, zen6 or nova lake looks more appealing to me
Definitely wait for next gen.
Posted on Reply
#8
Chaitanya
Dont really care about it , just give us a proper Ryzen 3 for AM5.
Posted on Reply
#9
azrael
kondaminIf you need it you need it, but i doubt it will be an interesting chip for many
The funny thing is that everyone has *demanded* AMD released this. Now they have, albeit a bit late, and it's no longer interesting?
Posted on Reply
#10
freeagent
azraeland it's no longer interesting?
Nope.. not even in the slightest :D

The price on these will plummet in a few months as the hype train builds up for Zen 6.
Posted on Reply
#11
MahdiTech
amd become the new intel by that price
Posted on Reply
#12
windwhirl
azraelThe funny thing is that everyone has *demanded* AMD released this. Now they have, albeit a bit late, and it's no longer interesting?
Because Zen6 is coming soon. So most potential buyers are divided between buying this now or wait for a Zen6 iteration
Posted on Reply
#13
vbq7qK68eyYAH4iR
Mere Mortal
azraelThe funny thing is that everyone has *demanded* AMD released this. Now they have, albeit a bit late, and it's no longer interesting?
I'm super keen. I went from a 7800x3d to my 9800x3d and i'll be getting one of these and giving my 9800x3d to a friend. They built a new system with a 7600 in it and this'll be a nice surprise and I'll sell the 7600 and keep that money.
freeagentNope.. not even in the slightest :D

The price on these will plummet in a few months as the hype train builds up for Zen 6.
Just buy one of these and then buy a Zen6 CPU when it comes out? That's what I'll be doing and is a beauty of long platform support.
Posted on Reply
#14
529th
Nice product, can't wait for the reviews.

Can the review also include the bios version, too?

Thanks
Posted on Reply
#15
CornyOC
Would be crazy to buy this over Zen 6. Zen 6 will fit into AM5 and will be a much higher performance gain.
Posted on Reply
#16
Sol_Badguy
vbq7qK68eyYAH4iRJust buy one of these and then buy a Zen6 CPU when it comes out? That's what I'll be doing and is a beauty of long platform support.
Absolutely, if you're not buying on launch day paying full price you're doing it wrong.
But if you really wanna flex, why upgrade?
Buy a whole system for each CPU gen, gotta collect 'em all, right?
CornyOCWould be crazy to buy this over Zen 6. Zen 6 will fit into AM5 and will be a much higher performance gain.
Bro why you gotta have common sense like that?
It's such a buzzkill, pragmatism is so depressing...
Posted on Reply
#17
Zendou
HyderzIt would be a big boost from my 9900k but I don’t have much use for the extra cores, I would be better off with 9800x3d.. but I want to move up from 8 cores, zen6 or nova lake looks more appealing to me
Yeah, I think Nova Lake's base memory speed is 8000, so should be interesting to look into once it comes out and reviews are available.
Posted on Reply
#18
DeltaHawk001
For 400 dollars more than the 9850x3d, it had better be worth it

Also, if asrock boards are frying normal x3d chips, this could be bad
Posted on Reply
#19
Zendou
DeltaHawk001For 400 dollars more than the 9850x3d, it had better be worth it

Also, if asrock boards are frying normal x3d chips, this could be bad
Yeah and I know it shouldnt be something people have to do, but if you are a little computer savvy, i think you should always undervolt the CPU as much as the system will allow, verifying it with a stress test of course.
Posted on Reply
#20
kondamin
azraelThe funny thing is that everyone has *demanded* AMD released this. Now they have, albeit a bit late, and it's no longer interesting?
Oh there will be use cases for it, and people will get it just because it's the best chip you can get.
But, your average gamer will not see much benefit from this
Posted on Reply
#21
ejolson
kondaminOh there will be use cases for it, and people will get it just because it's the best chip you can get.
But, your average gamer will not see much benefit from this
The market I see is the gap between Threadripper CPUs with sTR5 sockets and PCs for playing video games. I expect there are lots engineers and scientists who can't justify the Threadripper but would be much happier with the 9950X2D3 than an eight-core processor. I think this market is smaller than gaming but more profitable.

Since the AM5 ecosystem can be reused, there is also little more that needs to be developed to enter the performance middle ground just below Threadripper.
Posted on Reply
#22
Octavean
Vayra86Probably <700 in two months
Ahhhh, less then a DDR5 64GB kit,....Nice!!!
Posted on Reply
#23
starfals
Finally, ive been waiting for CPUs to finally go near 1000 bucks. Now we are living in the super duper pricy future. You want the best? No more 400 bucks parts. Gotta pay up poors! 1k video card, (ok ok 5k) 1k for CPU, 1k for SSD and 1K for ram :)

I said it a few years ago, people said ur stupid to think CPUs will ever go near 1000. Look where we are. Same way smartphones were not gonna go past 500 bucks lol. I also called that one and people said nobody would spend 1000 on a phone. I guess people were sooo wrong for that one too. There is a reason why Asus aint gone as a company. Gone as in bankrupt. They overprice stuff BIG!!!! time!!!! Asus RTX 5080 is 1700-1800 euro here. Every other 5080 is around 1150-1300. They were selling 5070ti for the price of 5080, 4070 for the price of 4070ti etc. I can keep on going. Most expensive monitors too. Any other brand is a TON cheaper. IPS high refreshrate? Most pricy. OLED? Most pricy... rather get GB/MSI or even LG. Samsung even! It just makes Asus look like a scam company.

Anyways. Do i dare predict $2000 CPUs? Now that sounds too crazy even to me...
Posted on Reply
#24
windwhirl
starfalspeople said ur stupid to think CPUs will ever go near 1000
We had "Extreme Edition" Intel CPUs that had a 1000 USD MSRP back with Nehalem in 2009/2010. And we had those for years afterwards as well.
Posted on Reply
#25
A&P211
HyderzIt would be a big boost from my 9900k but I don’t have much use for the extra cores, I would be better off with 9800x3d.. but I want to move up from 8 cores, zen6 or nova lake looks more appealing to me
The 8 cores on the 9900k are different from the 9800x3d.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 14th, 2026 13:08 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts