Thursday, April 9th 2026

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 Dual Edition MSRP is $899

Ahead of its April 22 retail availability, AMD confirmed the U.S. MSRP (pre-tax) pricing of its upcoming flagship desktop processor, the Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 Dual Edition. The chip comes with an AMD MSRP of $899, or $200 higher than the launch MSRP of the Ryzen 9 9950X3D. This doesn't necessarily mean that the processor will be available to buy at $899, retailers could mark the chip further up, and taxes could push its street price above the $1,000-mark. At launch, the processor will be sold both as retail PIB (processor in box) packages, as well as part of pre-built gaming desktops by popular OEMs and systems integrators.

The Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 Dual Edition is a 16-core/32-thread processor powered by "Zen 5" microarchitecture and 3D V-Cache technology, with stacked 3D V-Cache on both its 8-core chiplets, resulting in an on-package L3 cache of 192 MB, and a total cache (L2+L3) of 208 MB. In comparison, the 9950X3D only has 3D V-Cache on one of its two CCDs, and relies on software-based OS scheduler guidance to ensure gaming workloads are directed to the CCD with 3D V-Cache. Besides cache, the 9950X3D2 Dual Edition is mostly similar to the 9950X3D, except its maximum boost frequency is 5.60 GHz, or 100 MHz lower than the 9950X3D; and it comes with a higher TDP of 200 W, compared to 170 W of the 9950X3D. While technically compatible with any Socket AM5 motherboard, support requires UEFI firmware updates from motherboard vendors.
Source: HotHardware
Add your own comment

52 Comments on AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 Dual Edition MSRP is $899

#26
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
starfalsFinally, ive been waiting for CPUs to finally go near 1000 bucks. Now we are living in the super duper pricy future. You want the best? No more 400 bucks parts. Gotta pay up poors! 1k video card, (ok ok 5k) 1k for CPU, 1k for SSD and 1K for ram :)
The existence of $800 CPU means $400 (faster) CPU is "no more"?
Posted on Reply
#28
Thunderslat
starfalsFinally, ive been waiting for CPUs to finally go near 1000 bucks. Now we are living in the super duper pricy future. You want the best? No more 400 bucks parts. Gotta pay up poors! 1k video card, (ok ok 5k) 1k for CPU, 1k for SSD and 1K for ram :)

I said it a few years ago, people said ur stupid to think CPUs will ever go near 1000. Look where we are. Same way smartphones were not gonna go past 500 bucks lol. I also called that one and people said nobody would spend 1000 on a phone. I guess people were sooo wrong for that one too. There is a reason why Asus aint gone as a company. Gone as in bankrupt. They overprice stuff BIG!!!! time!!!! Asus RTX 5080 is 1700-1800 euro here. Every other 5080 is around 1150-1300. They were selling 5070ti for the price of 5080, 4070 for the price of 4070ti etc. I can keep on going. Most expensive monitors too. Any other brand is a TON cheaper. IPS high refreshrate? Most pricy. OLED? Most pricy... rather get GB/MSI or even LG. Samsung even! It just makes Asus look like a scam company.

Anyways. Do i dare predict $2000 CPUs? Now that sounds too crazy even to me...
Just look up the Athlon 64 X2 4800+. $1000. Pretty sure Inntel did it with the Pentium EE as well.
Posted on Reply
#29
Bagerklestyne
If I wasn't waiting for 12 core ccd's (zen 6) I'd find a way to justify this.
Posted on Reply
#30
AleXXX666
csendesmarkOMG, these model names
EXACTLY, +1 here. X3D looks the same as XD (smiley/emoji):D:D:D:D:D
Posted on Reply
#31
MondoMike
X3D chips are such a scam for the typical gamer that so many fall for, performance diminishing returns are so huge to compared normal AMD and Intel Chips. People are spending as much on their CPUs as their GPUs when in reality it should be under at the absolute maximum of half the cost of the GPU. This is coming from a former 9800x3d and 5800x3d owner which I either resold or returned after a month or so of playing a very CPU demanding titles daily. Save your money, go with entry-level/mid-range modern CPUs (9600x, 9700/7700, 245/250/265/270 skus) those can all be paired with virtually any GPU (I'd probably avoid a 9600x/14600/245 when pairing with a 5080/5090). The only x3d chips that are even worth considering are the 7500/7600x3d when considering new CPUs simply because they can be had for about the same price as their non-x3d variants.

This new chip is only for those that have an endless budget and will pay the $400 premium for 5% more performance.
Posted on Reply
#32
watzupken
I honestly don't see the point of this chip. From an productivity standpoint, that extra cache is generally useless. I also do no believe we are going to see a massive performance uplift in games over say a 9800X3D. So I am not sure who is this for. AMD have gone completely missing from the consumer space after selling themselves to AI. They are just regurgitating their 2025 products as "new" in 2026. All their competitors are tramping over them left right and center, Intel, Qualcomm, Apple, etc...
Posted on Reply
#33
AusWolf
Oof... I'd much rather suggest getting a used 7950X3D for ~300 which is way more energy efficient as well.
csendesmarkOMG, these model names.... 😆
Anyway, looking forward seeing the reviews.
It should rather be called Diminishing Returns Edition, imo. I'm sure dual X3D is good, but definitely not $900 good.
Posted on Reply
#34
HD64G
Anyone expecting big gains in gaming, don't. I a few games maybe 10% over the 9959X3D. For most, less than 5%. That CPU is made for workstations and apps that need more cache and will help users that won't need anymore ultra fast or ultra tight timings for their RAM. It will be a sub of a Threadripper for those that don't want to spend much more. There will surely be a real and of high demand market for this CPU. Gamers, don't bother, friendly advice to not get disappointed. The CPUs on sale today are more than enough. If you really need something substantially faster, wait for Zen6 and maybe next Intel CPUs.
Posted on Reply
#35
harm9963
5950X was $799.99 when I got it and MB was $449.99 , but Ram was so cheap and just a afterthought , thankfully upgrading is year's away , RTX4090 and DLSSQ is more than enough for me !
Posted on Reply
#36
Panther_Seraphin
$1k always used to be the "baseline" price for the absolute top end chips of their generation. Now in these days HEDT didnt exist really for consumers

AMD FX-57
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+
Intel X6800
Intel QX6700
Intel QX9650
Intel i7 965X
etc etc etc

Now we do have HEDT and the price does get ridonculous now. I mean a top end threadripper setup can clear $3-4k dollars for board and CPU alone, and with current prices the same again in RAM..........
Posted on Reply
#37
lightning70
A chip that appeals to enthusiasts and rich people who want to break benchmark records.
You can get the 270K Plus for less than half the price and get pretty close performance, maybe slightly slower computing performance. Except for the game of course.
I'd buy the standard 9950X3D instead of paying that money.
Posted on Reply
#38
AusWolf
HD64GAnyone expecting big gains in gaming, don't. I a few games maybe 10% over the 9959X3D. For most, less than 5%. That CPU is made for workstations and apps that need more cache and will help users that won't need anymore ultra fast or ultra tight timings for their RAM. It will be a sub of a Threadripper for those that don't want to spend much more. There will surely be a real and of high demand market for this CPU. Gamers, don't bother, friendly advice to not get disappointed. The CPUs on sale today are more than enough. If you really need something substantially faster, wait for Zen6 and maybe next Intel CPUs.
I agree. Games in those rare instances when they use more than 8 cores, are much more held back by communication through the infinity fabric than by not having the extra cache on the second CCD. I think 12 cores on a single CCD on Zen 6 will be a much bigger leap than this.
Posted on Reply
#39
vbq7qK68eyYAH4iR
Mere Mortal
Sol_BadguyAbsolutely, if you're not buying on launch day paying full price you're doing it wrong.
But if you really wanna flex, why upgrade?
Buy a whole system for each CPU gen, gotta collect 'em all, right?
Less brag and more trying to highlight the benefits of what platform/socket longevity gets you. Something I'll never want to willing give up now that I've had a taste of it.
Posted on Reply
#40
MondoMike
Panther_Seraphin$1k always used to be the "baseline" price for the absolute top end chips of their generation. Now in these days HEDT didnt exist really for consumers

AMD FX-57
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+
Intel X6800
Intel QX6700
Intel QX9650
Intel i7 965X
etc etc etc

Now we do have HEDT and the price does get ridonculous now. I mean a top end threadripper setup can clear $3-4k dollars for board and CPU alone, and with current prices the same again in RAM..........
What was the compute performance difference between ultra high end , mid-range, and entry level? I'm sure it was night and day.
Posted on Reply
#41
Panther_Seraphin
MondoMikeWhat was the compute performance difference between ultra high end , mid-range, and entry level? I'm sure it was night and day.
A lot of it back then was silicon quality. Most of the EE overclocked further than the comparable non-ee part, they were also fully unclocked back in the day with multipliers being able to go ABOVE stock values. Where as the Non EE parts were limited to the multiplier they shipped with or lower.

For example the q6600s were amazing perf/$ but nearly all of the QXs just had either more OC headroom or reached a set speed a hell of a lot easier.

Q6600 - hwbot.org/benchmarks/cpu_frequency/rankings?processorId=919&hardwareType=cpu
QX6850 - hwbot.org/benchmarks/cpu_frequency/rankings?processorId=1423&hardwareType=cpu

In terms of raw performance? Your talking low double to high single digit percentages in the most cases.
Posted on Reply
#42
mechtech
Need to pair this with some inexpensive jedec 6400 2x32GB ram...................and there goes the budget
Posted on Reply
#43
dont whant to set it"'
MondoMikeX3D chips are such a scam for the typical gamer that so many fall for, performance diminishing returns are so huge to compared normal AMD and Intel Chips. People are spending as much on their CPUs as their GPUs when in reality it should be under at the absolute maximum of half the cost of the GPU. This is coming from a former 9800x3d and 5800x3d owner which I either resold or returned after a month or so of playing a very CPU demanding titles daily. Save your money, go with entry-level/mid-range modern CPUs (9600x, 9700/7700, 245/250/265/270 skus) those can all be paired with virtually any GPU (I'd probably avoid a 9600x/14600/245 when pairing with a 5080/5090). The only x3d chips that are even worth considering are the 7500/7600x3d when considering new CPUs simply because they can be had for about the same price as their non-x3d variants.

This new chip is only for those that have an endless budget and will pay the $400 premium for 5% more performance.
Trashing the chips over on the internet with a post doesn't make you in the right, if you had not known that by now.

Would I like one?: Yes.
Is it for me?: Probably not. (Or not at this moment in time for me).

I jumped on the X3D ship when it 1st sailed,. because it suited my use case (still with the5800x3d and it's still downclocked*power tuned down).

Maybe it's not for you , maybe it is.

Le: missed a "you" somewhere.
Posted on Reply
#44
MondoMike
dont whant to set it'Trashing the chips over on the internet with a post doesn't make you in the right, if you had not known that by now.

Would I like one?: Yes.
Is it for me?: Probably not. (Or not at this moment in time for me).

I jumped on the X3D ship when it 1st sailed,. because it suited my use case (still with the5800x3d and it's still downclocked*power tuned down).

Maybe it's not for you , maybe it is.

Le: missed a "you" somewhere.
Not sure what you mean by "in the right" in this instance but it seems my observation has triggered you, it's a forum where people can freely voice their opinions. They are over-hyped and overpriced gaming chips that do not benefit most people who can afford that budget on a CPU. They perform about the same as chips at half the price at 4k which is a somewhat popular resolution in high end builds where these chips would be used. Just trying to educate the public, it's unfortunate that you took my comment so personally.
Posted on Reply
#45
Octavean
windwhirlWe had "Extreme Edition" Intel CPUs that had a 1000 USD MSRP back with Nehalem in 2009/2010. And we had those for years afterwards as well.
Exactly, however, there were typically cheaper options in the product lineup. So you couldn't buy the wiz bang Core i7-980X Extreme Edition at ~$1000 USD back in 2010. You just buy a possessor lower down the stack on the same or similar platform,...
Posted on Reply
#46
Arc1t3ct
I'm definitely buying one for my next build.
Posted on Reply
#47
Noci
azraelThe funny thing is that everyone has *demanded* AMD released this. Now they have, albeit a bit late, and it's no longer interesting?
Exactly, I do remember heated discussions of having a 5900X3D or 5950X3D with V-cache on both CCD's after the release of the original 5800X3D.
Also rumors about a engineering sample of the 5900X3D, which was never released by AMD due to lack of added value (due to the physical placing of the 3D cache and infinity fabric at that time).

I'm wondering about that 30 Watts extra TDP, for 3D V-cache only? I hope it has more to do with increased (IPC) single thread performance (one can dream right? ;)).

Anyway, let's await the reviews and also important (later on) how it relates and compares to the upcoming Zen 6 CPU's to see if it will be a viable product.
For now I can only say; Expensive but interesting
Posted on Reply
#48
A Computer Guy
Vayra86Probably <700 in two months
I hope so. For $900 I'd consider putting that money toward a Threadripper instead and get getting a better platform overall.
azraelThe funny thing is that everyone has *demanded* AMD released this. Now they have, albeit a bit late, and it's no longer interesting?
Still interesting but $900 seems a bit tough at least for those not making money off of using the CPU. It is unique, maybe niche, for sure. Can't wait to see if the reviews reveal some wizbang performance number to justify the cost.
vbq7qK68eyYAH4iRLess brag and more trying to highlight the benefits of what platform/socket longevity gets you. Something I'll never want to willing give up now that I've had a taste of it.
It's funny...I kind of see platform/socket longevity on AMD as a blessing and a curse now because of how frequent UEFI updates have been occurring. It's got to be a nightmare for board vendors to have to keep their entire lineup up to date.
Posted on Reply
#49
vbq7qK68eyYAH4iR
Mere Mortal
A Computer GuyIt's funny...I kind of see platform/socket longevity on AMD as a blessing and a curse now because of how frequent UEFI updates have been occurring. It's got to be a nightmare for board vendors to have to keep their entire lineup up to date.
Very true, but I feel like MB vendors also bring it onto themselves a bit. They release an enormous amount of SKUs. They already charge what feels like is an insane amount for what I'd consider basic modern functionality. If they were a little more focused, it'd make things easier for them.
Posted on Reply
#50
Noci
With a (expected) € 900 price tag it surely is costly compared to the 9950X3D (now doing € 615 here in the Netherlands). That would mean a € 285 for 64MB 3D V-Cache and some innovation.

Beside that enormous price tag, one should feel pretty much obligated to pair this CPU at least with a RTX 5090 (starting here locally form € 3150 and up) :fear:
Also this combo screams for a high end mainboard and when you want to throw in some high end RAM, blazing fast SSD's you'll have a perfect recepe for acute palpitations ;).

Yup, defenitly a nice market for peeps with a big wallet :roll:.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 14th, 2026 12:56 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts