Friday, May 15th 2026

Dell Introduces New 14S and 16S Mid-Range Laptops with Core Ultra Series 3 CPUs

Dell has silently expanded its mainstream laptop portfolio with the new Dell 14S and 16S mid-range, productivity-focused notebooks positioned below the XPS lineup. The new models combine slim aluminium chassis designs with Intel's latest Core Ultra Series 3 processors and Copilot+ AI functionality. The Dell 14S is available in configurations equipped with up to a Core Ultra 9 386H, 32 GB of LPDDR5X memory, and a 14-inch FHD+ OLED touchscreen. The system measures 313.7 x 224 x 15.4 mm and weighs between 1.49 kg and 1.54 kg depending on configuration. Worth noting that Dell also offers the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H configuration, which upgrades several key specifications, including switching from standard Intel Graphics to Intel Arc graphics, doubling memory to 32 GB LPDDR5X, and increasing storage capacity to a 1 TB PCIe NVMe SSD. The higher-end configuration also changes the chassis color from Frost Blue to Celestial Blue and replaces the non-touch OLED display with a touch-enabled FHD+ OLED panel. However, this also raises the price to $2,169. Meanwhile, the larger Dell 16S starts with similar hardware but expands to a 16-inch chassis and optional 2.8K OLED touch display variants. The 16S laptops measure 356.8 x 251.4 x 15.4 mm, with the weight ranging from 1.79 kg to 1.86 kg.

Connectivity is largely identical across both models, including dual Thunderbolt 4 ports with DisplayPort 2.1 and Power Delivery support, HDMI 2.1, dual USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A ports, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth, and a 70 Wh battery paired with a 65 W USB-C charger. Dell also equips both laptops with 2 MP RGB-IR cameras, dual-array microphones, stereo speakers using Cirrus Logic SmartAmps, and integrated Copilot+ AI capabilities via the Intel onboard NPU hardware. As we mentioned, both systems can be configured with processors up to the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, paired with up to 32 GB LPDDR5X memory and OLED display options. Base configurations start at $1,319 and include an Intel Core Ultra 5 322 six-core processor, 16 GB RAM, a 512 GB PCIe NVMe SSD, and FHD+ touch displays.
Sources: IT Home, Dell 14S (product page), Dell 16S (product page)
Add your own comment

9 Comments on Dell Introduces New 14S and 16S Mid-Range Laptops with Core Ultra Series 3 CPUs

#1
Arrakis9
Had me going until the part about the 60hz refresh rate on the OLED.
Posted on Reply
#2
AleXXX666
Arrakis9Had me going until the part about the 60hz refresh rate on the OLED.
wow, this looks like GAMING laptop for you, or you need 144 Hz refresh rate to watch some "hot NSFW stuff"?:rolleyes:
Posted on Reply
#3
phints
AleXXX666wow, this looks like GAMING laptop for you, or you need 144 Hz refresh rate to watch some "hot NSFW stuff"?:rolleyes:
OLED updates in 0.1 ms with zero ghosting and zero inverse ghosting. Why in the world would the display not be at least 120Hz VRR?

Otherwise it’s a nice clean design, even though not a fan of the off center touchpad and don’t want a numpad on a laptop.
Posted on Reply
#4
AleXXX666
phintsOLED updates in 0.1 ms with zero ghosting and zero inverse ghosting. Why in the world would the display not be at least 120Hz VRR?

Otherwise it’s a nice clean design, even though not a fan of the off center touchpad and don’t want a numpad on a laptop.
100 is enough, even 75
Posted on Reply
#5
TheinsanegamerN
AleXXX666100 is enough, even 75
75? What year is it, 1997?

For the price they charge for these plastic boxes, they could throw in a high refresh rate screen,. iPhones come with 120hz screens now.
Posted on Reply
#6
soder
TheinsanegamerN75? What year is it, 1997?

For the price they charge for these plastic boxes, they could throw in a high refresh rate screen,. iPhones come with 120hz screens now.
yep, its sort of ridiculous that in 2026, a $2000 laptop with oled screen still stuck at crap 60hz. Watch an oled TV with 120Hz gaming content, and its amazing. A laptop limited to 60Hz is like going back in time after that experience. Sorry to say, but yeah, thats what called advancement in tech.

We could stuck at 386 33Mhz, with 512KB video ram, and VGA resolution as well, right?
Posted on Reply
#7
AleXXX666
TheinsanegamerN75? What year is it, 1997?

For the price they charge for these plastic boxes, they could throw in a high refresh rate screen,. iPhones come with 120hz screens now.
and what is the DIFFERENCE besides crap battery life?:rolleyes::oops:
soderyep, its sort of ridiculous that in 2026, a $2000 laptop with oled screen still stuck at crap 60hz. Watch an oled TV with 120Hz gaming content, and its amazing. A laptop limited to 60Hz is like going back in time after that experience. Sorry to say, but yeah, thats what called advancement in tech.

We could stuck at 386 33Mhz, with 512KB video ram, and VGA resolution as well, right?
the difference is "gaming content". Yeah it's nice to have higher refresh rate but when used from battery this will drain it faster... and using laptop 24/7 from socket is a desktop...:rolleyes:
Posted on Reply
#8
Arrakis9
AleXXX666wow, this looks like GAMING laptop for you, or you need 144 Hz refresh rate to watch some "hot NSFW stuff"?:rolleyes:
Nope, just looking mainly for a non gamer looking laptop with an OLED screen and a decent refresh rate (90hz-144hz) so all of my eye candy extensions on Gnome look smooth as butter :)
And yes it will be primary for media consumption but not the kind you mention :laugh:
Sorry if I want something that looks classy and has the same image quality as my phone just on a bigger scale, didn't know that would strike a nerve!
Posted on Reply
#9
AleXXX666
Arrakis9Nope, just looking mainly for a non gamer looking laptop with an OLED screen and a decent refresh rate (90hz-144hz) so all of my eye candy extensions on Gnome look smooth as butter :)
And yes it will be primary for media consumption but not the kind you mention :laugh:
Sorry if I want something that looks classy and has the same image quality as my phone just on a bigger scale, didn't know that would strike a nerve!
Hence even 75 is “just okay” vs 75, haven’t seen any 90 on laptops/monitors (only phones/tablets), so 100 is logical maximum for me at least for non-gaming laptops, as more Hz more battery drain, and “variable” is stupid for me it’s same stupid as “start-stop” in cars at traffic lights I like something either “on” pr “off” not complicating things…:rolleyes:
Posted on Reply
Nov 14th, 2026 20:13 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts