Friday, June 5th 2026

Western Digital Ultrastar HDD Storage at Computex 2026

Having offloaded its entire consumer flash storage business to Sandisk brand, Western Digital is focusing on the Ultrastar brand of enterprise hard drives, and the G-Drive brand of professional storage solutions. During the exhibition in Taipei, the company highlighted how continuous AI workloads ,ranging from initial training models to active agentic systems, generate massive, compounding volumes of data. WD asserts that managing this exponential data growth while maintaining economic efficiency is the defining challenge for enterprise and cloud computing environments. By treating AI primarily as a data system rather than merely a compute system, the company aims to provide the foundational storage necessary for long-term operational viability.

Central to Western Digital's showcase are several significant advancements in traditional mechanical storage. The company demonstrated its comprehensive Ultrastar hard drive portfolio, which utilizes recording technologies such as UltraSMR, ePMR, and HAMR to achieve massive capacities. To integrate these advanced drives into functional enterprise environments, the company expanded its platform solutions with the introduction of the Ultrastar Data 3000 series JBODs. These scalable enclosures feature twelve ports of 24 Gb/s SAS-4 host connectivity to accommodate increasing bandwidth demands. The 3000 series implements specialized physical engineering, including ArcticFlow multizone cooling and IsoVibe vibration isolation technologies. Western Digital states that these environmental controls can reduce drive return rates by up to sixty-two percent, ensuring dependable operation in high-density deployments.
Add your own comment

11 Comments on Western Digital Ultrastar HDD Storage at Computex 2026

#1
csendesmark
Very nice, just on the day I receive my new WD Gold 24TB :laugh:
On the otherhand, I doubt that the "smaller" 18-24 TB models would get any cheaper because of these.
Posted on Reply
#2
bonehead123
Sooooo, all they had to say is, without all the techno-babble:

Spinning rust lives on, albeit in bigger & bigger capacities, hahaha :)

But as my data center friends will say:

Gimme 100,000 ZB's, or gimme death :D
Posted on Reply
#3
remixedcat
do they have 40+TB CMR? All I've seen so far is SMR for that.

But man o man the RAID rebuild/resilver times on these...
Posted on Reply
#4
Solaris17
Super Dainty Moderator
remixedcatdo they have 40+TB CMR? All I've seen so far is SMR for that.

But man o man the RAID rebuild/resilver times on these...
Yeah your not catching me doing SMR for big data
Posted on Reply
#5
Random_User
Having offloaded its entire consumer flash storage business to Sandisk brand,
LOL, much like it was originally. AFAIK Toshiba, Sandisk and Hynix (Hyndai) were the pioners of NAND/flash, while WD was making their garbage HDD drives. Their only hope is Hitachi, hence Ultrastar. Without it, WD is doomed.


No offence to WD, or other brands. Just personal experience. Sanmung and Hitachi were the best drives. Most likely, there are still somewhere both are still spinning tiressly.
WD=WooDpeckers.
Posted on Reply
#6
ZeDestructor
With HDD prices are bad as they are right now and my capacity needs as low as they are (compared to many folks I know), I bought 5 8TB SSDs instead of my intended 3×22+TB or 4×16+TB HDDs. Roughly the same dollar amount, not *that* much less capacity and I end up with fewer HDDs in my array (down to just 6 instead of the expected 9-10) once I'm done with the data shuffling
Posted on Reply
#7
Athena
It's pretty interesting how they are doing error correction on these beasts
it makes data recovery way more complicated, and the prices for that is going to keep getting higher and higher, which is also why that tape is still widely used, and the prices are still stable for tape, unlike everything else
Posted on Reply
#8
Dr. Dro
AthenaIt's pretty interesting how they are doing error correction on these beasts
it makes data recovery way more complicated, and the prices for that is going to keep getting higher and higher, which is also why that tape is still widely used, and the prices are still stable for tape, unlike everything else
The only reason tapes remain stable is that the tape drive itself costs a veritable fortune, new LTO-9 drives from HPE are ~$7200, gatekeeping both consumers and small businesses who would resort to them for mass storage. It's quite unfortunate, really.
Posted on Reply
#9
remixedcat
Dr. DroThe only reason tapes remain stable is that the tape drive itself costs a veritable fortune, new LTO-9 drives from HPE are ~$7200, gatekeeping both consumers and small businesses who would resort to them for mass storage. It's quite unfortunate, really.
doesn't HPE have a monopoly on those too?
Posted on Reply
#10
Dr. Dro
remixedcatdoesn't HPE have a monopoly on those too?
No idea, there are some older drives from other OEMs but even old LTO-4 drives go for hundreds
Posted on Reply
#11
ZeDestructor
AthenaIt's pretty interesting how they are doing error correction on these beasts
it makes data recovery way more complicated, and the prices for that is going to keep getting higher and higher, which is also why that tape is still widely used, and the prices are still stable for tape, unlike everything else
In actual practice, most folks don't care - a lone drive is the basic unit of storage and you apply redundancy and encryption on top of that. Drive dies? you swap it out and throw out and/or (physically) shred the drive and move on with life. There is a concern about rebuild times, but that's not a problem for slow storage and with enough redundancy. The only reason tape is still around is because there are orgs out there who need a form of bulk, backup storage that is specifically not just a backup HDD array/cluster a distance away from the main array/cluster
Dr. DroThe only reason tapes remain stable is that the tape drive itself costs a veritable fortune, new LTO-9 drives from HPE are ~$7200, gatekeeping both consumers and small businesses who would resort to them for mass storage. It's quite unfortunate, really.
With LTO-10 the drives go up in price again to about 14 grand. Don't be misled by the headline storage numbers on LTO - they always yell about the compressed number and never the raw number which is the one we actually care about given our data is already compressed!

Talking actual numbers (on the more useful sizes), the tapes are not that cheap either:
  1. 90-100 bucks per 18TB LTO-9 (5-5.55 USD/TB)
  2. 265-295 bucks per 30TB LTO-10 (8.83-9.83 USD/TB)
  3. 465-585 bucks per 40TB LTO-10 (11.63-14.63 USD/TB)
At those sorts of prices, even the currently massively inflated 24+USD/TB hard drives look pretty alright, especially once you factor that you go from seek times measured in minutes to seek times measured in milliseconds. And we haven't talked about the tape library with autoloader either. And the climate-controlled storage room. And you get far higher sequential speeds when HDDs are setup in arrays too. And the tape drive wear. And the fact that you need to double or even triple the prices on any tape and drives you buy because the risk of a drive eating a tape is very, very real.
remixedcatdoesn't HPE have a monopoly on those too?
Dr. DroNo idea, there are some older drives from other OEMs but even old LTO-4 drives go for hundreds
The monopoly holders are Quantum Corporation (generic publicly-traded company) for the drives and seemingly Fujifilm for the tapes. HP, Dell, MagStor etc are all "just" rebranders applying their logos to the same bits. The only exception to that is IBM, who work closely with Quantum and Fuji for LTO R&D, but they don't manufacture anything themselves (thus the need for partners in the first place)
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 12th, 2026 09:42 PST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts