Tuesday, September 15th 2026

Intel "Panther Lake" Hits 80% Yield on 18A Node

Intel's latest "Panther Lake" SoC, featuring a compute tile built on the company's 18A node, has reportedly achieved an 80% yield. This is great news for Intel Foundry, as the 18A yields have been steadily improving. The "Panther Lake" compute die measures approximately 8.004 x 14.288 mm, resulting in a silicon area of 114.304 mm². With this design, yields are around 80%, indicating not only low defect rates for the node but also a high parametric yield, meaning a significant number of dies have all functioning elements. This suggests that Intel is overcoming its historic parametric yield problems alongside manufacturing challenges.

A testament to this progress might be the recently rumored shift in "Nova Lake" production. Intel plans to produce the majority of "Nova Lake" compute tiles in-house, with about 80-90% being manufactured by Intel Foundry and the remainder by TSMC, as part of a dual-sourcing strategy. For a mature node like 18A, defect rates are now low, around D0=0.1 or D0=0.2. It is likely that Intel has achieved the lower end of this range due to advancements in the node and months of high-volume production with "Panther Lake." Combined with the relatively small compute tile used in this SoC, parametric yields appear to be strong.
Currently, Intel is on track to finish the year with about 40,000 18A wafers manufactured per month and plans to reach 60,000 WPM by the end of 2027. For 2028, the goal is to achieve an 80,000 WPM capacity on 18A alone, alongside the ramp-up of 14A. Analysis from GF Securities analyst Jeff Pu suggests that the 14A node will have a manufacturing capacity of around 6,000 wafers per month by the end of 2027, with a projected increase to 24,000 wafers per month in 2028. This is, of course, before any collaboration with Elon Musk's Terafab project, which is expected to utilize the Intel 14A node.
Source: Jeff Pu on X
Add your own comment

15 Comments on Intel "Panther Lake" Hits 80% Yield on 18A Node

#1
jesdals
I love my Pantherlake laptop - but is hopeing for a affordable upgrade when Nova Lake is released
Posted on Reply
#2
Athena
jesdalsI love my Pantherlake laptop - but is hopeing for a affordable upgrade when Nova Lake is released
Unfortunately, nothing will be that affordable until the RAM and NAND prices are under control

It's also nice to hear that Intel is finally heading in the right direction with their FAB tech
Posted on Reply
#3
_roman_
Is it operating at a loss with 80% yield?

when i have to trash 80% of metal or solid wood i am not very happy. I would not consider 80% a decent yield rate or a high yield rate.
Posted on Reply
#4
kondamin
_roman_Is it operating at a loss with 80% yield?

when i have to trash 80% of metal or solid wood i am not very happy. I would not consider 80% a decent yield rate or a high yield rate.
80% is a very decent yield.
TSMC starts mass production of a node at 60% and it slowly becomes better as experience grows on the node.

So with intel sitting at 80% with the more complex power infrastructure, intel has a winner for 18a.

I doubt intel is selling those chips for less than they can produce them, what is true is that they are still stuck with a massive amount of debt due to the build out of all those new fabs and the technical mess they were in prior to Pat G
Posted on Reply
#5
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
jesdalsI love my Pantherlake laptop - but is hopeing for a affordable upgrade when Nova Lake is released
The Lunar/Panther Lake generation seem least in need of an upgrade that quickly.
Posted on Reply
#6
TheinsanegamerN
_roman_Is it operating at a loss with 80% yield?

when i have to trash 80% of metal or solid wood i am not very happy. I would not consider 80% a decent yield rate or a high yield rate.
That's not how percentages work.

If you have 80% yield, you'd be trashing 20% of the material.
jesdalsI love my Pantherlake laptop - but is hopeing for a affordable upgrade when Nova Lake is released
I'm still on rocket lake. The new legion Strix halo laptop is very tempting,but I want to see what the 12xe chip can do power/ battery life wise first.
Posted on Reply
#7
AntiX3DGlazer
dgianstefaniThe Lunar/Panther Lake generation seem least in need of an upgrade that quickly.
Absolutely. It is the single best (relative to competition) laptop cycle Intel has had in decades*.

*Apple being the exception. Apple is on crack and cannot be stopped.
Posted on Reply
#8
Visible Noise
Another “news” article based upon a random tweet. The enshitification continues.
Posted on Reply
#9
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
AntiX3DGlazerAbsolutely. It is the single best (relative to competition) laptop cycle Intel has had in decades*.

*Apple being the exception. Apple is on crack and cannot be stopped.
Yeah LNL was already better in everything except MT. PTL fixes that.
Posted on Reply
#10
AntiX3DGlazer
dgianstefaniYeah LNL was already better in everything except MT. PTL fixes that.
Apple's 1t is still significantly better in consumer applications (web browsers, basically) in addition to most everyting else.
Posted on Reply
#11
kazuviking
kondaminmassive amount of debt due to the build out of all those new fabs and the technical mess they were in prior to Pat G
Atleat he thought of doing long term while the new ceo is just short term profits and appease the investors. Pat was an actual engineer. His bread and butter was 18a.
Posted on Reply
#12
jesdals
TheinsanegamerNbattery life wise first.
Its fine on Pantherlake - but I would like to get Thunderbolt 5 for when Im docking my laptop and useing as a workstation
Posted on Reply
#13
LittleBro
This news post should be tagged as rumor, since it's based on one post on social media platform.

Panther Lake laptops are still scarce and quite expensive. Where are all those Panther Lake chips going then?
Posted on Reply
#14
kondamin
LittleBroThis news post should be tagged as rumor, since it's based on one post on social media platform.

Panther Lake laptops are still scarce and quite expensive. Where are all those Panther Lake chips going then?
compute tiles for Xeons 6+ for servers
those take 12 tiles per chip for single socket systems with up to 288 cores
Posted on Reply
#15
demirael
_roman_Is it operating at a loss with 80% yield?

when i have to trash 80% of metal or solid wood i am not very happy. I would not consider 80% a decent yield rate or a high yield rate.
80% yield means 20% useless dies, not 80%. The rest might actually be useful downbinned.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 12th, 2026 04:40 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts