Friday, January 22nd 2016

MSI Intros 970A-G43 Plus Socket AM3+ Motherboard

MSI unveiled the 970A-G43 Plus socket AM3+ motherboard. Priced under $100, this board offers a modern feature-set for mid-range gaming PC builds based on AMD FX processors. The board supports socket AM3+ processors with TDP of up to 125W. The board is based on AMD 970 + SB950 chipset. It draws power from a combination of 24-pin ATX and 8-pin EPS power connectors, and conditions it for the CPU with a 4+1 phase VRM. The CPU socket is wired to four DDR3 DIMM slots, which support up to 32 GB of DDR3-2133 MHz memory.

Expansion slots include one PCI-Express 2.0 x16, featuring a reinforcement brace; one PCI-Express 2.0 x16 (electrical x4), and two each of PCIe 2.0 x1 and legacy PCI. Storage connectivity includes six SATA 6 Gb/s ports. Modern connectivity includes two USB 3.1 (10 Gb/s) ports; two USB 3.0 (front-panel) ports, 8-channel HD audio (Realtek ALC892), and gigabit Ethernet (Realtek controller). The board is driven by UEFI firmware, and supports modern Windows 8.1/10 features.
Add your own comment

65 Comments on MSI Intros 970A-G43 Plus Socket AM3+ Motherboard

#51
R-T-B
I feel like this should be installed only in a computer build you are building for a sworn enemy.
Posted on Reply
#52
MxPhenom 216
ASIC Engineer
-The_Mask-At last, one person that actually gets it.

Others should know that there are a lot of different manufacturers and types of mosfets, and the max current also depends on the way the VRM is implemented.

Over and out.
But at least buildzoid is able to demonstrate some sort of knowledge on power delivery, current, and mosfets.

You = "I know I'm right but unable to prove it"
Posted on Reply
#53
Keullo-e
S.T.A.R.S.
RejZoRNot everyone target top end. For some, cost/efficiency matters more.
Even my H81 & G3258 kicks the shit out of those AMD warmers in most use, and yes, my setup is cost-effective.
Posted on Reply
#54
Thefumigator
9700 ProEven my H81 & G3258 kicks the shit out of those AMD warmers in most use, and yes, my setup is cost-effective.
you are comparing a 2014 processor with those "AMD warmers" that include FX8320 and FX8350 from year 2012 which from a performance point of view are still valuable, specially if you find where they shine.

My point is, if you get a good cost effective setup go for it. I did exactly that in 2012 and what I got is an FX8320.
Posted on Reply
#55
Jism
You still can assemble a good and quality AMD rig based on AM3. It's not like your missing the boat on something here. AMD Cpu's can handle all games, programs, encoding and all the other things you need todo, just a little slower and for a lower price.

4+1 VRM design does'nt tell anyone here wether it's bad or good. Low quality motherboards dont need 8 / 12 VRM phase design. You dont need a large VRM design either if the goal is just to assemble a usable computer without overclocking and stuff. As long as it works on basic stuff it's alright.

AM3 still oc's better then any intel counterpart. Add some DDR3/1600 memory, a fast SSD, a good graphics card and your good to go. You still have money in the pocket by not going for intel and able to buy something extra such as a headset, gaming mouse and what else.

I still run on a classic Thuban X6 on 4GHz. It whoops X8 Vishera's ass on IPC. It does run all games i want and it suits me for my 60 hours weekly working.
Posted on Reply
#56
dj-electric
I gotta give bta credit as an editor, who knows what to put on the news feed to cash in on dozens of comments.

Nobody should really care about a new-ish motherboard for a dying socket, its all about the pure fact that this thing made it to a new PR post.
Posted on Reply
#57
CAPSLOCKSTUCK
Spaced Out Lunar Tick
I love the way everyone hates on AM3 +


it makes the parts really really cheap secondhand.

Use them within the OBVIOUS limitations and enjoy a nice cheap PC.

My recent example.

Giga 880----------£ 23.00
Athlon ii x4 640-- £ 20.00
HD 6970 ---------£ 50.00

and that includes delivery.


I have Intel and AMD builds at the moment, both are excellent thankyou very much.
Posted on Reply
#58
PP Mguire
I'm currently running a 940BE, kill me now haha.
Posted on Reply
#59
FreedomEclipse
~Technological Technocrat~
When i first saw pictures of this motherboard, I couldnt help but start singing....


Posted on Reply
#60
Keullo-e
S.T.A.R.S.
Thefumigatoryou are comparing a 2014 processor with those "AMD warmers" that include FX8320 and FX8350 from year 2012 which from a performance point of view are still valuable, specially if you find where they shine.

My point is, if you get a good cost effective setup go for it. I did exactly that in 2012 and what I got is an FX8320.
Yeah, but the same Vishera silicon is still sold as their "flagship" CPUs.
Posted on Reply
#61
bencrutz
9700 ProYeah, but the same Vishera silicon is still sold as their "flagship" CPUs.
absolutely, and at a "flagship" price too :roll:
Posted on Reply
#62
Aquinus
Resident Wat-man
PP MguireI'm currently running a 940BE, kill me now haha.
That is what I upgraded from 4 years ago to my 3820. Don't you just love DDR2? :p
Posted on Reply
#63
PP Mguire
AquinusThat is what I upgraded from 4 years ago to my 3820. Don't you just love DDR2? :p
It's actually running 100% fine. I played 5 hours of Phantom Pain last night maxed out @ 4k with no issues. My only complaint so far is the bios will see my M.2 but won't boot to it. Hard to believe I've had this thing 7 years though and it still runs like a champ.
Posted on Reply
#64
firecrow797
well i just picked up a new one earlier today for 70usd. i wish i had researched it a bit before hand but owell. Im replacing my 870-g45 which is on the 770 chipset and i plan on using my old phenom II for now
Posted on Reply
#65
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
not moving, waiting on Zen.

990FX Sabertooth R2.0 (Solid Board)
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 25th, 2024 08:57 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts