Saturday, June 20th 2026

AMD to Restore TSME (Memory Encryption) on Consumer Ryzen Processors After Backlash

AMD backpedaled on its recent decision to remove Transparent Secure Memory Encryption (TSME) feature on its consumer Ryzen processors, which was typically enabled by default. The company had, in April, quietly disabled the feature for Ryzen consumer processors through an AGESA update encapsulated into motherboard firmware updates. The idea probably was to restrict TSME to Ryzen commercial-segment processors, sold under the Ryzen PRO brand, besides Ryzen Threadripper WX workstation processors, and EPYC server processors. For reference, Intel offers a similar feature, TME-MK (Total Memory Encryption-Multi-Key) on even its consumer Core processors, and not just its commercial Core vPro processors.

AMD said that it has decided to restore TSME "based on valuable community feedback," and end-users should expect UEFI firmware updates that restore the feature starting next month (July 2026). TSME is a hardware-based feature that leverages fixed-function hardware on the silicon to encrypt the contents of the memory, providing an additional layer of security. Since AMD shares a common IOD design across its Ryzen consumer and Ryzen PRO commercial product lines, the feature is physically present.
In a statement to Tom's Hardware, AMD said:
AMD Memory Guard (Transparent Secure Memory Encryption, or TSME) is a hardware-based memory encryption technology available on our Ryzen PRO desktop and mobile processors where supported in silicon. It is a foundational security feature, and we have no plans to remove support from our Ryzen PRO lineup. This commitment holds now and in the future.

Regarding certain non-PRO Ryzen 9000-series desktop processors, a BIOS option to enable Memory Guard was previously available but was removed in a recent update. Based on valuable community feedback, we will reinstate this option in an upcoming BIOS release in July."
Source: Tom's Hardware
Add your own comment

90 Comments on AMD to Restore TSME (Memory Encryption) on Consumer Ryzen Processors After Backlash

#2
Shihab
I know that people would scoff at anyone suggesting hiring more people in this brave new world of slop generators, but AMD should really appoint someone and task them with asking just one simple question: "Yes, but how would our consumers feel about this?"

Because obviously, whoever makes decision at AMD is a bloody moron!
Posted on Reply
#3
user556
It made Intel look better. That's the question said moron probably should have asked.
Posted on Reply
#4
JimBob69
How was it removed? BIOS updates? Chipset drivers? Something else?
Posted on Reply
#5
TheGeekn°72
it is a moral obligation to bully megacorps into not bullshitting us
in the world we live in, we NEED MORE security, NOT LESS of it
Posted on Reply
#7
Grimling
I actually was not even aware of this feature before, to be honest.
Was this something you needed to activate in bios, or was it on by default?
Posted on Reply
#8
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
JimBob69How was it removed? BIOS updates? Chipset drivers? Something else?
BIOS policy with updates. Like the removal of ECC above 5200 MT which is also being reverted.
GrimlingI actually was not even aware of this feature before, to be honest.
Was this something you needed to activate in bios, or was it on by default?
On by default, at least on my STRIX.
Posted on Reply
#9
TumbleGeorge
TheGeekn°72it is a moral obligation to bully megacorps into not bullshitting us
in the world we live in, we NEED MORE security, NOT LESS of it
The right way is monopoly, biiiig oligopolies, cartels to be divided apart and stopped from their actions against consumers.
Posted on Reply
#10
_roman_
Well one feature is brought back and other features are removed forever "silently". The bad evaluation of delayed updates, early product support ends, no fixes and removal of features will be heavily considered next time. I hope Intel does worse and there are no risc-V or other alternatives so AMD will make another sale. AMD shall not on Microsoft Windows and DRM Games as these factors will get smaller as people grow older and loose interests. ARM cores and other architectures can also do basic personal computing.

AMD friendly reminder, I wait since 09 / 2025 to get Radeon 7800XT removed features restored.

the time wasted for removing that feature should have been spend better to fix e.g. Power consumption issue by wrongly reading out EDID for Radeon 6000. I doubt that is fixed by now. Or fix no Post Screen with Raeeon 9070 on MSI X670E motherboards.

edit
JimBob69How was it removed? BIOS updates? Chipset drivers? Something else?
The other News Site claimed AGESA. AGESA should be UEFI, that should be on the motherboard Firmware LEVEL. AFAIK 1.2.7.0 AGESA removed the features silently.
Posted on Reply
#11
Grimling
dgianstefaniOn by default, at least on my STRIX.
Interesting. That means it does not have a negative impact on performance.
And that means, it should definitely be on, by default in general.
Good that they reverse this questionable decision!
Posted on Reply
#12
FrozenPie1
Based on valuable community feedback, we will reinstate this option in an upcoming BIOS release in July.
This is the nicest euphemism for "shitstorm" I read in a long time :D
Posted on Reply
#13
Kohl Baas
ShihabI know that people would scoff at anyone suggesting hiring more people in this brave new world of slop generators, but AMD should really appoint someone and task them with asking just one simple question: "Yes, but how would our consumers feel about this?"

Because obviously, whoever makes decision at AMD is a bloody moron!
Moron that later... :laugh:


Jokes aside, there are a lot of balls dropping lately at industry giants whom you'd assume have all the talents and whatnot for all that money dedicated not to drop balls left, right and center...
Posted on Reply
#14
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
GrimlingInteresting. That means it does not have a negative impact on performance.
And that means, it should definitely be on, by default in general.
Good that they reverse this questionable decision!
It can have a mild impact I'd imagine, but negligible in most cases. It is a hardware feature after all.
Posted on Reply
#15
Exilarch
I think companies need more public backlash.
Posted on Reply
#16
A Computer Guy
My bets on Linus or Musk called up AMD and said WTF guys I was using that feature ….
Posted on Reply
#17
FrozenPie1
dgianstefaniIt can have a mild impact I'd imagine, but negligible in most cases. It is a hardware feature after all.
Cloudflare benchmarked SME (not TSME) more than six years ago and there it was an impact of 2,6 - 4,2 % on performance. I would believe that later EPYC generations improved in that area.
Posted on Reply
#18
azrael
JimBob69How was it removed? BIOS updates? Chipset drivers? Something else?
For the end user: firmware (UEFI/BIOS)
For manufacturers: the AGESA blob.
Posted on Reply
#19
marios15
TSME is pretty useless for consumer hardware anyway
enterprise/datacenters...sure i get it, but home users? lol
Posted on Reply
#20
1stn00b
Congrats to Ryzen 9000 owners for getting TSME.
Posted on Reply
#22
Darkholm
AMD is forever successful in saving defeat from the jaws of victory. Kudos.
Posted on Reply
#23
Tek-Check
marios15TSME is pretty useless for consumer hardware anyway
enterprise/datacenters...sure i get it, but home users? lol
Is that true for home users?
Was this a storm in a cup of tea or the feature is genuinely useful?
Posted on Reply
#24
kondamin
Tek-CheckIs that true for home users?
Was this a storm in a cup of tea or the feature is genuinely useful?
It’s a vunrerability and there is ai that can find ways to exploit flaws at a rate undreamed of for the history of computing.
Posted on Reply
#25
Bigshrimp
I am actually shocked that they would reverse course. I thought consumers didn't matter to these corporations anymore?
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 11th, 2026 18:12 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts