Tuesday, June 6th 2017

AMD's Entry-Level 16-core, 32-thread Threadripper to Reportedly Cost $849

AMD has recently announced that at least nine models are in preparation for their new HEDT line-up, which will, for now, feature processors with up to 16 cores and 32 threads. The entry-level 16-core chip, the Threadripper 1998, will come in at 3.20 GHz with 3.60 GHz boost, 155 W TDP, and is absent of XFR.

If recent reports hold true, this entry-level Threadripper 1998 will come in at $849. Now, let's be honest - this seems like an immensely optimistic value, undercutting even Intel's 10-core 7900X, which has been announced at $999 (in tray quantities.) That's over 6 more cores and 12 more threads for $150 less. And let's just say that AMD's IPC isn't that much lower than Intel's to justify such an aggressive undercutting, a high-volume approach to the market.
Source: ETeknix
Add your own comment

128 Comments on AMD's Entry-Level 16-core, 32-thread Threadripper to Reportedly Cost $849

#126
systemBuilder
If you just wanted to piss on the rumor why did you press me so hard for the source? It is a realiable source that is far more reliable about AMD matters than most sources, why don't you educate yourself a little bit before going off half-cocked with wild accusations, he has a whole web page of his predictions for the past 5 years - when he made them and when they came true. Your assertions carry little weight if you provide no references yourself.
Posted on Reply
#127
DeathtoGnomes
notbBut should we believe him? How do we know he's a reliable source?
As for the "2x" idea - it's, sadly, not that simple. Production cost includes packaging, some allocated cost etc. This would make a difference.
Keep in mind Ryzen CPUs are often bundled with a cooler. :)
Not exactly true. You can buy ANY CPU without a cooler.
Posted on Reply
#128
notb
systemBuilderIf you just wanted to piss on the rumor why did you press me so hard for the source?
Because this is important information and you should have mentioned where you got it from.
systemBuilderIt is a realiable source that is far more reliable about AMD matters than most sources
You didn't say where you get this info from, so how is it relevant whether the source is reliable or not?
1) Retail price, naming, release dates etc is public information - thousands of people know this before the official launch (from retailers to package/brochure printers).
2) Production cost is a corporate secret. Even most employees don't know precise figures for their firms' products.
Just the fact that someone is often correct at (1) doesn't imply he should be also right with (2).
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 16th, 2024 13:56 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts