Friday, December 8th 2017

NVIDIA Announces TITAN V "Volta" Graphics Card

NVIDIA in a shock move, announced its new flagship graphics card, the TITAN V. This card implements the "Volta" GV100 graphics processor, the same one which drives the company's Tesla V100 HPC accelerator. The GV100 is a multi-chip module, with the GPU die and three HBM2 memory stacks sharing a package. The card features 12 GB of HBM2 memory across a 3072-bit wide memory interface. The GPU die has been built on the 12 nm FinFET+ process by TSMC. NVIDIA TITAN V maxes out the GV100 silicon, if not its memory interface, featuring a whopping 5,120 CUDA cores, 640 Tensor cores (specialized units that accelerate neural-net building/training). The CUDA cores are spread across 80 streaming multiprocessors (64 CUDA cores per SM), spread across 6 graphics processing clusters (GPCs). The TMU count is 320.

The GPU core is clocked at 1200 MHz, with a GPU Boost frequency of 1455 MHz, and an HBM2 memory clock of 850 MHz, translating into 652.8 GB/s memory bandwidth (1.70 Gbps stacks). The card draws power from a combination of 6-pin and 8-pin PCIe power connectors. Display outputs include three DP and one HDMI connectors. With a wallet-scorching price of USD $2,999, and available exclusively through NVIDIA store, the TITAN V is evidence that with Intel deciding to sell client-segment processors for $2,000, it was a matter of time before GPU makers seek out that price-band. At $3k, the GV100's margins are probably more than made up for.
Add your own comment

135 Comments on NVIDIA Announces TITAN V "Volta" Graphics Card

#51
Manu_PT
4k 144hz? Nice dreams :P If it can manage locked 60fps, I repeat, Locked 60fps, minimum fps, on 50% of the titles at ultra settings, you can be happy.
Posted on Reply
#52
Vya Domus
Manu_PTIf they could afford something better they would and they might stop playing Dota or League of Legends 24/7 to try different games..
I can certainly guarantee you that is not the case. I know a crap ton of people that dropped mind boggling amounts of cash on custom PCs and ended up play Fifa and CS:GO on them.
Posted on Reply
#53
Tomorrow


I did a small table a while ago from one of TPU's GTX 1080 Ti review by adding certain percentages to the results in order to predict future performance. Hopefully someone finds these useful. Numbers are in AVG FPS at 1440p max settings.

Btw i got the name right (Titan V) but i doubt it will be 50% faster than 1080Ti. More likely 25% faster. Atleast at stock speeds. Overclocking may get it to 40% perhaps as OC generally adds 10-15%.
Posted on Reply
#54
R-T-B
xkm1948Ok I will take those old Titan Xp and Xs off their hands. $300 about right? :D
That's what I paid for my Titan X Maxwell on Pascal launch, so yeah.
Posted on Reply
#55
the54thvoid
Intoxicated Moderator
Tomorrow

I did a small table a while ago from one of TPU's GTX 1080 Ti review by adding certain percentages to the results in order to predict future performance. Hopefully someone finds these useful. Numbers are in AVG FPS at 1440p max settings.

Btw i got the name right (Titan V) but i doubt it will be 50% faster than 1080Ti. More likely 25% faster. Atleast at stock speeds. Overclocking may get it to 40% perhaps as OC generally adds 10-15%.
It's not how it scales I'm afraid. Making tables based on hardware count is futile.
Posted on Reply
#56
Tomorrow
the54thvoidIt's not how it scales I'm afraid. Making tables based on hardware count is futile.
I'm aware of that. Ths this table is based on rather simple +xx% to existing results. Ofcourse newer cards will be faster but not by exact 25%. Maybe it will be 19,89%, maybe it will be 32,58% in some games. The idea is to give a rough idea how much more power is required to make 1440p 144fps a reality at max settings. Volta likely does not quite get there. For that we likely need Ampere but by that time newer and more demanding games will be out.
Posted on Reply
#57
iO
TomorrowBtw i got the name right (Titan V) but i doubt it will be 50% faster than 1080Ti. More likely 25% faster. Atleast at stock speeds. Overclocking may get it to 40% perhaps as OC generally adds 10-15%.
Tesla V100 ends up 60 to 80% faster than Quadro P100 in LuxMark, depending on scene, but is clocked 10% higher and has 33% more shaders.
Not sure how that translates to GV102 tho..
Posted on Reply
#58
Vayra86
I could quote three full pages but..
ChaitanyaAfter having sold crippled titans at exhorbitant prices now nvidia has decided to sell full core at even worse prices. Guess there are too many suckers in the world to justify these prices. At this rate dont expect x70 or x60 to come at last gen prices.
evernessinceDude, less than 1% of the population has that kind of spare change and it doesn't mean they want to spend it on a graphics card. If they do sell out it's because they only had a handful to begin with.
ensabrenoir....total status symbol /epeen/ mines bigger than yours /bow before me peasants type move.....(they will sell out in like 5 minutes). The mere mortals among us will simply wait for the 1180ti....or something.

....oh my....who will be the first to cop a pair of these in sli (totally epic) .... Jayz 2 cents or linus,
None of you have understood what this card is meant to be, or meant to do. ITS NOT GAMING. ITS NOT MINING. Let it go.
the54thvoidHope not, it would put AMD to shame...



What you want to allude to is its lack of DP compared to AMD. But Volta is an AI design, the tensor cores will be useless for consumers not doing that work.
Well done :) you got the memo
Tomorrow

I did a small table a while ago from one of TPU's GTX 1080 Ti review by adding certain percentages to the results in order to predict future performance. Hopefully someone finds these useful. Numbers are in AVG FPS at 1440p max settings.

Btw i got the name right (Titan V) but i doubt it will be 50% faster than 1080Ti. More likely 25% faster. Atleast at stock speeds. Overclocking may get it to 40% perhaps as OC generally adds 10-15%.
This is useless, because you forgot there's more in a PC than just a GPU pushing pixels. Most notably, a CPU that will bottleneck even current day 1080ti's AND 1080's in several games on that list.
Posted on Reply
#59
Unregistered
Feel liking buying vega now, just to stick it to NSh#tia!

Seriously, now they're taking the pi$$!
#60
Keullo-e
S.T.A.R.S.
But will it run Crysis?
Posted on Reply
#61
deu
Upgrayedd$3K?? ... Double the price of last gen. Is it the HBM2, can't be. Is it the Tensor cores? Will a Non-Tensor version be significantly cheaper?
The price is not set due to production-cost but due to demand. :)
Posted on Reply
#62
Tomorrow
Vayra86None of you have understood what this card is meant to be, or meant to do. ITS NOT GAMING. ITS NOT MINING. Let it go.
This reminds me of the Vega Frontier Edition argument. Then too people were arguing that it is not a gaming card. So let me offer my opinion: it is not marketed as a gaming card. This is true as it does not have GeForce Titan branding but rather just Titan V. However as it has display outputs and uses GeForce drivers it is a gaming capable card.
Posted on Reply
#63
Vayra86
TomorrowThis reminds me of the Vega Frontier Edition argument. Then too people were arguing that it is not a gaming card. So let me offer my opinion: it is not marketed as a gaming card. This is true as it does not have GeForce Titan branding but rather just Titan V. However as it has display outputs and uses GeForce drivers it is a gaming capable card.
Gaming capable =/= gaming card. A Quadro can be gamed on too. Doesn't mean it makes any sense to buy it for that purpose. Besides, these Titans from Pascal onwards are on a whole other level entirely than Vega FE or even the earlier Titans. That's why it is so idiotic to see the same comments return - it didn't make sense with the first Titan if you're being really honest with yourself, and it made even less sense with the Xp and this one.

A GPU is just a chip capable of processing in parallel. What you do with it, and more importantly, what it DOES BEST defines what kind of purpose its made for. It really isn't rocket science
Posted on Reply
#64
bug
Tomorrow

I did a small table a while ago from one of TPU's GTX 1080 Ti review by adding certain percentages to the results in order to predict future performance. Hopefully someone finds these useful. Numbers are in AVG FPS at 1440p max settings.

Btw i got the name right (Titan V) but i doubt it will be 50% faster than 1080Ti. More likely 25% faster. Atleast at stock speeds. Overclocking may get it to 40% perhaps as OC generally adds 10-15%.
I'm not sure how you generated that, but the +100% column is like never twice the value in the column for the 1080Ti.
Posted on Reply
#65
Tomorrow
Vayra86Gaming capable =/= gaming card. A Quadro can be gamed on too. Doesn't mean it makes any sense to buy it for that purpose.
No. There is a difference. Quadro uses different drivers that are not gaming optimized and also uses different cooler design. Titan uses GeForce branch and has the Pascal like cooler. When it comes to buying sense i agree - for 99% of people it does not make any sense to buy this for gaming. That does not mean it can't be used for it or that small number of people won't buy this for gaming exclusively. There is also a group of people who do both gaming and deep learning and for them this is the perfect card.
Posted on Reply
#66
Tomorrow
bugI'm not sure how you generated that, but the +100% column is like never twice the value in the column for the 1080Ti.
Yeah sorry that's minor error on my part. The last column is actually ??? (+125%) not ??? (+100%).

Multiply first column value by 2,25 to verify.
Posted on Reply
#67
bug
TomorrowYeah sorry that's minor error on my part. The last column is actually ??? (+125%) not ??? (+100%).
Damn, I'm good :D
No worries, I think it's useful if you read it right.
Posted on Reply
#69
Vayra86
TomorrowNo. There is a difference. Quadro uses different drivers that are not gaming optimized and also uses different cooler design. Titan uses GeForce branch and has the Pascal like cooler. When it comes to buying sense i agree - for 99% of people it does not make any sense to buy this for gaming. That does not mean it can't be used for it or that small number of people won't buy this for gaming exclusively. There is also a group of people who do both gaming and deep learning and for them this is the perfect card.
Same difference, it still is not a gaming card, but yeah, semantics. Everyone should buy whatever the hell they want, just call it what it is - and I'll still call everyone who buys Titans for regular gaming infinite fools.
Posted on Reply
#70
Dave65
And people will be dumb enough to buy it.. SHOCKER!
Posted on Reply
#71
Tomorrow
Vayra86Same difference, it still is not a gaming card, but yeah, semantics. Everyone should buy whatever the hell they want, just call it what it is - and I'll still call everyone who buys Titans for regular gaming infinite fools.
Those who have bough Titan's in the past have always ended up getting the short stick by Nvidia months later with a much more reasonably priced alternative that is almost as fast. I doubt this time is different. Tho i doubt these people with deep wallets care. Depending on how Nvidia decides to configure GV102 it may actually end up faster in pure gaming.
Posted on Reply
#72
bug
P4-630www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/nvidia-releases-geforce-388-59-whql-drivers.239521/
www.nvidia.com/en-us/titan/titan-v/

Nvidia themselves dropped the GeForce moniker from Titans some time ago, making it official even they're not sure what Titans are. Besides expensive :D
Dave65And people will be dumb enough to buy it.. SHOCKER!
If people buy this thinking they'll get 3x the FPS of mere mortals that "only" pay $1,000 for their video cards, then yes. But if someone has (a lot of) disposable cash and wants to see what the latest architecture to hit the consumer space can do, I don't see where the problem is or why they'd be dumb to do it.
Posted on Reply
#73
FYFI13
3 grand and they didn’t even bother with new design :D
Posted on Reply
#74
P4-630
bugthey're not sure what Titans are. Besides expensive :D
Nice hardware for in a vitrine then....
Posted on Reply
#75
Fluffmeister
Wow what a beast, didn't think the GV100 would ever see the light of day even as a prosumer card. I guess we forget Pascal has been around a while now, just because Vega is massively late doesn't mean Nv has sat around counting all their money.

Presumably they could drop a GV104 or GV102 tomorrow if they wanted. At least some enthusiasts will have a new toy to play with!
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 18th, 2024 07:44 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts