Friday, April 6th 2018

In Aftermath of NVIDIA GPP, ASUS Creates AREZ Brand for Radeon Graphics Cards

Graphics card manufacturers are gradually starting to align their gaming brands with NVIDIA to get admission into the exclusive GeForce Partner Program (GPP). Although there isn't any official confirmation on behalf of the NVIDIA AIB partners, small but significant changes are starting to become evident. The first example comes from Gigabyte's Aorus gaming line. Gigabyte currently offers the Gaming Box external graphics enclosure with a GeForce GTX 1070, GTX 1080, or a Radeon RX 580. If we look at the packaging closely, we can clearly see that the RX 580 box lacks the Aorus branding. However, Gigabyte isn't alone though. MSI is apparently in favor of GPP too as they remove all their Radeon Gaming X models from their global website. Take the Radeon RX 580 for instance. The RX 580 models from the Armor lineup are the only ones present. Surprisingly the US website still carries the Gaming X models.

The latest rumor suggests that ASUS is the third AIB partner to jump on the GPP bandwagon. The Taiwanese manufacturer is allegedly creating the AREZ brand to accommodate their Radeon products. The AREZ moniker probably alludes to the Ares series of dual-GPU graphics cards historically centered around AMD GPUs. If this rumor is true, the Strix, Dual, Phoenix, and Expedition Radeon models are going to fall under the new AREZ branding. ASUS might even go as far as dropping their name from the AREZ models entirely.
Update 17/04/2018: ASUS has officially announced the 'AREZ' brand here.
Source: VideoCardz
Add your own comment

137 Comments on In Aftermath of NVIDIA GPP, ASUS Creates AREZ Brand for Radeon Graphics Cards

#126
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Navi is just a 7nm die shrink of Vega. Don't get too excited.

That WCCF article is way too rosy to be remotely accurate.

Whatever comes after Navi might be exciting because, apparently, Navi is the last of GCN.
Posted on Reply
#127
Jism
springs113That is not the issue...the issue is Nvidia wants claim for the already established branding of these companies to only be used for them.
No,

Nvidia offers Asus a way to make more money due to some sort of program which requires exclusiveness. Asus is'nt forced to say Yes but they do. They are willing to set aside the brand for just Nvidia only.

Still does'nt change my mind for buying AMD cards now and in the future. If it's from Asus, Sapphire or Gigabyte, all those brands are good.

Cooling, good VRM is what matters on cards.

Speaking of which; AMD controls a important market which is the Console, as more and more devs are extracting more and more power from AMD chips these days. The AMD eco system in games was a very smart move.
Posted on Reply
#128
springs113
Strong arming companies is a choice? What world are you living in?
Posted on Reply
#129
Xzibit
Apparently it will be announced soon
Kyle BennettI have AREZ information from my contacts. It is 100% true. It will be announced officially this week.
Posted on Reply
#130
Xzibit
@Chino
ChinoUpdate 16/07/2018: The AREZ website is now live.
Are you from the future ?
Posted on Reply
#131
springs113
My radeon cards will be bought from SAPPH and XFX, no one else. Nvidia if I do will be from EVGA.
Posted on Reply
#132
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
AMD's not-so-veiled response to NVIDIA in general, especially GPP:
gaming.radeon.com/en/radeon-a-gamers-choice/
AMDWe pledge to put premium, high-performance graphics cards in the hands of as many gamers as possible and give our partners the support they need without anti-competitive conditions.
Posted on Reply
#133
springs113
FordGT90ConceptAMD's not-so-veiled response to NVIDIA in general, especially GPP:
gaming.radeon.com/en/radeon-a-gamers-choice/
Sad I tell you...it seems there's more than meets the eye. We will see in the coming weeks. I cant believe this thing hasn't gone into litigation yet either.
Posted on Reply
#134
John Naylor
Can we expect Burger King to put out a press release whining why they can't call their 1/4 pound hamburger sandwich the "quarter pounder". How about Dodge whining about why the can't start selling the Shelby Viper to compete with the Shelby Mustang ? nVidia watched AMD pretend that Freesync was a "free" version of G-Sync for years now... despite the fact that Freesync does not offer motion blur reduction technology and doesn't include a hardware module. There are Freesync monitors with manufacturer provided MBR tech hardware modules that can actually offer a product comparable to G-Sync. But AMD chose not to do so preferring to let consumers assume the "its the same thing" mindset held by most gamers. Using idential or similar naming convention, to my view, is the unfair tactic... why does AMD now use the X370 moniker if not to siphon from the reputation of Intel's Z370 ? If it's better, why not try and distinguish yourself ? I'm getting a bit frustrated with the "review my build" emails from users with a proposed build including an i5 / i7 with am X370 MoBo. What's next the AMD 1180 Tu ?

If there's anything unethical here, it's trying to bleed sales of a competitor's brand reputation. It's the AIB partners making the decision here not nVidia; nVidia put a proposal on the table ... if you partner with us to create a premium line where we unlock power, voltage and boost limits to help you build your brand, then we do not want that investment of our time, effort, and money to be diluted by allowing our competitor to use the same brand name. They have the right to do that. MSi can certainly decide "OK, we are going to use the Gaming X moniker for our AMD gaming line and pick a new name for our nVidia line". But is that in MSI's interests when 83% of the Gaming X cards thay have sold were 1060 - 1080 Ti's ? ... of course not. This is why football teams can't wear the same jersey ... why phones can't use the same product name, why I can't sell shoes with a Jimmy Choo logo. If consumers want to buy a card with AMD or nVidia techhnology, they shouldn't have to read the fine print to see what they are getting.

I'm all for AMD returning to competitiveness at the high end but whining that they can't use the same brand name as their competitor to my eyes screams "we want you to believe we are as good as them". If you believe that your next gen cards are better, then you should be striving to differentiate yourself, not copy them.
Posted on Reply
#135
springs113
John NaylorCan we expect Burger King to put out a press release whining why they can't call their 1/4 pound hamburger sandwich the "quarter pounder". How about Dodge whining about why the can't start selling the Shelby Viper to compete with the Shelby Mustang ? nVidia watched AMD pretend that Freesync was a "free" version of G-Sync for years now... despite the fact that Freesync does not offer motion blur reduction technology and doesn't include a hardware module. There are Freesync monitors with manufacturer provided MBR tech hardware modules that can actually offer a product comparable to G-Sync. But AMD chose not to do so preferring to let consumers assume the "its the same thing" mindset held by most gamers. Using idential or similar naming convention, to my view, is the unfair tactic... why does AMD now use the X370 moniker if not to siphon from the reputation of Intel's Z370 ? If it's better, why not try and distinguish yourself ? I'm getting a bit frustrated with the "review my build" emails from users with a proposed build including an i5 / i7 with am X370 MoBo. What's next the AMD 1180 Tu ?

If there's anything unethical here, it's trying to bleed sales of a competitor's brand reputation. It's the AIB partners making the decision here not nVidia; nVidia put a proposal on the table ... if you partner with us to create a premium line where we unlock power, voltage and boost limits to help you build your brand, then we do not want that investment of our time, effort, and money to be diluted by allowing our competitor to use the same brand name. They have the right to do that. MSi can certainly decide "OK, we are going to use the Gaming X moniker for our AMD gaming line and pick a new name for our nVidia line". But is that in MSI's interests when 83% of the Gaming X cards thay have sold were 1060 - 1080 Ti's ? ... of course not. This is why football teams can't wear the same jersey ... why phones can't use the same product name, why I can't sell shoes with a Jimmy Choo logo. If consumers want to buy a card with AMD or nVidia techhnology, they shouldn't have to read the fine print to see what they are getting.

I'm all for AMD returning to competitiveness at the high end but whining that they can't use the same brand name as their competitor to my eyes screams "we want you to believe we are as good as them". If you believe that your next gen cards are better, then you should be striving to differentiate yourself, not copy them.
so you're telling me it's ok for me to boss you up in your own home, because essentially that's what nvidia is doing here telling these aib partners they have to give up their branding or else.
Posted on Reply
#136
Xzibit
Harping on that same old angle
John NaylorCan we expect Burger King to put out a press release whining why they can't call their 1/4 pound hamburger sandwich the "quarter pounder". How about Dodge whining about why the can't start selling the Shelby Viper to compete with the Shelby Mustang ? nVidia watched AMD pretend that Freesync was a "free" version of G-Sync for years now... despite the fact that Freesync does not offer motion blur reduction technology and doesn't include a hardware module. There are Freesync monitors with manufacturer provided MBR tech hardware modules that can actually offer a product comparable to G-Sync. But AMD chose not to do so preferring to let consumers assume the "its the same thing" mindset held by most gamers. Using idential or similar naming convention, to my view, is the unfair tactic... why does AMD now use the X370 moniker if not to siphon from the reputation of Intel's Z370 ? If it's better, why not try and distinguish yourself ? I'm getting a bit frustrated with the "review my build" emails from users with a proposed build including an i5 / i7 with am X370 MoBo. What's next the AMD 1180 Tu ?
You serious again?

Quarter pounder is trademarked by Mc Donalds 1973

Shelby is also trademarked
John NaylorIf there's anything unethical here, it's trying to bleed sales of a competitor's brand reputation. It's the AIB partners making the decision here not nVidia; nVidia put a proposal on the table ... if you partner with us to create a premium line where we unlock power, voltage and boost limits to help you build your brand, then we do not want that investment of our time, effort, and money to be diluted by allowing our competitor to use the same brand name. They have the right to do that. MSi can certainly decide "OK, we are going to use the Gaming X moniker for our AMD gaming line and pick a new name for our nVidia line". But is that in MSI's interests when 83% of the Gaming X cards thay have sold were 1060 - 1080 Ti's ? ... of course not. This is why football teams can't wear the same jersey ... why phones can't use the same product name, why I can't sell shoes with a Jimmy Choo logo. If consumers want to buy a card with AMD or nVidia techhnology, they shouldn't have to read the fine print to see what they are getting.
ROG was started with motherboards, in fact it was an AMD motherboard. GPUs werent even part of the ROG brand until 2+years later. The ROG brand was established by then.
AsusThe ROG story begins with the Crosshair, which set a new standard for enthusiast motherboards in the era of dual-core Athlon 64 processors for Socket AM2.
Football (or other sport) teams are trademarked by their league.

Phones (depends on the phone) can be either trademarked, registered trademarks or both.

:banghead:
John NaylorI'm all for AMD returning to competitiveness at the high end but whining that they can't use the same brand name as their competitor to my eyes screams "we want you to believe we are as good as them". If you believe that your next gen cards are better, then you should be striving to differentiate yourself, not copy them.
I know this is a hard question to even think about for you but why would Nvidia ask for exclusive game branding if it thought their hardware as you put it "made the brand" ? Why go after an existing brand from AIBs and OEMs that have a mix product stack from PSU, MB, Headsets, Mouse, Keyboards etc.

It wants that established Brand association to boost sales in their favor.
Posted on Reply
#137
Doctor Who
With all due respect, anybody that actually thinks GPP is a good thing isn't thinking straight. And you all come up with very weak arguments. The last thing this industry needs is Nvidia bullying AIB's into signing GPP that clearly supports Anti PC Gaming, competition and consumerism.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 14th, 2026 20:36 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts