Thursday, May 23rd 2019

AMD X570 Unofficial Platform Diagram Revealed, Chipset Puts out PCIe Gen 4

AMD X570 is the company's first in-house design socket AM4 motherboard chipset, with the X370 and X470 chipsets being originally designed by ASMedia. With the X570, AMD hopes to leverage new PCI-Express gen 4.0 connectivity of its Ryzen 3000 Zen2 "Matisse" processors. The desktop platform that combines a Ryzen 3000 series processor with X570 chipset is codenamed "Valhalla." A rough platform diagram like what you'd find in motherboard manuals surfaced on ChipHell, confirming several features. To maintain pin-compatibility with older generations of Ryzen processors, Ryzen 3000 has the same exact connectivity from the SoC except two key differences.

On the AM4 "Valhalla" platform, the SoC puts out a total of 28 PCI-Express gen 4.0 lanes. 16 of these are allocated to PEG (PCI-Express graphics), configurable through external switches and redrivers either as single x16, or two x8 slots. Besides 16 PEG lanes, 4 lanes are allocated to one M.2 NVMe slot. The remaining 4 lanes serve as the chipset bus. With X570 being rumored to support gen 4.0 at least upstream, the chipset bus bandwidth is expected to double to 64 Gbps. Since it's an SoC, the socket is also wired to LPCIO (SuperIO controller). The processor's integrated southbridge puts out two SATA 6 Gbps ports, one of which is switchable to the first M.2 slot; and four 5 Gbps USB 3.x ports. It also has an "Azalia" HD audio bus, so the motherboard's audio solution is directly wired to the SoC. Things get very interesting with the connectivity put out by the X570 chipset.
Update May 21st: There is also information on the X570 chipset's TDP.
Update May 23rd: HKEPC posted what looks like an official AMD slide with a nicer-looking platform map. It confirms that AMD is going full-tilt with PCIe gen 4, both as chipset bus, and as downstream PCIe connectivity.

AMD X570 overcomes the greatest shortcoming of the previous-generation X470 "Promontory" chipset - downstream PCIe connectivity. The X570 chipset appears to put out 16 downstream PCI-Express gen 4.0 lanes. Two of these are allocated to two M.2 slots with x4 wiring, each, and the rest as x1 links. From these links, three are put out as x1 slots, one lane drives an ASMedia ASM1143 controller (takes in one gen 3.0 x1 and puts out two 10 Gbps USB 3.x gen 2 ports); one lane driving the board's onboard 1 GbE controller (choices include Killer E2500 or Intel i211-AT or even Realtek 2.5G); and one lane towards an 802.11ax WLAN card such as the Intel "Cyclone Peak." Other southbridge connectivity includes a 6-port SATA 6 Gbps RAID controller, four 5 Gbps USB 3.x gen 1 ports, and four USB 2.0/1.1 ports.

Update May 21st: The source also mentions the TDP of the AMD X570 chipset to be at least 15 Watts, a 3-fold increase over the X470 with its 5W TDP. This explains why every X570-based motherboard picture leak we've seen thus far shows a fan-heatsink over the chipset.
Sources: ChipHell Forums, HKEPC
Add your own comment

75 Comments on AMD X570 Unofficial Platform Diagram Revealed, Chipset Puts out PCIe Gen 4

#26
mat9v
I wonder, why the CPU does not have any SATA ports on this diagram. Wouldn't it break compatibility with x370/x470 chipset based boards if CPU did not have SATA controller?
All NVMe ports on this diagram (be it from CPU or chipset) are either PCIEx 3.0 x4 or PCIEx 4.0 x2 - that's what 32Gbps stands for.
Should we understand that Ryzen 3xxx CPUs will not have USB Gen2 support built-in and will depend on chipset to provide one? Why?
Why use ASM1143 to provide only one USB Gen2 port?
This whole thing makes no sense to me.
Posted on Reply
#27
TheLostSwede
News Editor
Tsukiyomi91Yes the physical appearance of the PCIe slot doesn't need major changes like USB. I don't really mind getting my hands on the latest tech. For 10GbE NIC cards, finding reasonably priced ones on e-tailer sites isn't hard but the downside is always the cables since they're still expensive to get one. On top of that, very few ISPs are utilizing 10Gbps & if there's one, it's only for the super-rich.
What does 10Gbps have to do with internet speed? I connect my PC to my NAS via 10Gbps. I think most people want it for shuffling large files around their local network, not for the internet access. And Cat 6A cabling is pretty cheap imho.
mat9vI wonder, why the CPU does not have any SATA ports on this diagram. Wouldn't it break compatibility with x370/x470 chipset based boards if CPU did not have SATA controller?
All NVMe ports on this diagram (be it from CPU or chipset) are either PCIEx 3.0 x4 or PCIEx 4.0 x2 - that's what 32Gbps stands for.
Should we understand that Ryzen 3xxx CPUs will not have USB Gen2 support built-in and will depend on chipset to provide one? Why?
Why use ASM1143 to provide only one USB Gen2 port?
This whole thing makes no sense to me.
Hard to say, the whole layout looks like a bit of a mess imho.
It seems like a lot of things are labelled wrong as well. Maybe someone forgot to update the numbers?
The chipset to CPU link is also too narrow in terms of GT/s.
No, the two ports below the ASM1143 are Gen 2.
No logic as far as I can tell.
Again, poorly designed board, it happens...

As I pointed out, this is not really representative of the X570 chipset based on what I know.
Posted on Reply
#28
Vya Domus
Manu_PT55mm fan on every motherboard hype :D
You should make a script or something so that you don't have to do all this hard work spamming every thread.
Posted on Reply
#29
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
T1beriuMath doesn't add up. 16 + 4 + 4 = 24, just like X370/X470.
x16 for PEG, x4 for M.2, x4 for internal "Taishan" SB, x4 for external SB = 28.

AM4 platform has two southbridges, one on the CPU silicon, one on the motherboard. The one on the CPU silicon talks to the K17 iNB over 4 PCIe lanes that are abstract. On a Threadripper or EPYC, the internal SB is disabled on all but one of the "Zeppelin" dies on the MCM. So those lanes are freed up.

The internal SB puts out SATA6G (two ports), USB3, LPCIO (Legacy/ISA), and HD Audio buses. The external SB augments additional SATA, USB, and downstream PCIe for things such as WLAN, GbE-PHY, USB3.1, etc.

Posted on Reply
#30
chaosmassive
TDP of the AMD X570 chipset to be at least 15 Watts, a 3-fold increase over the X470 with its 5W TDP. This explains why every X570-based motherboard picture leak we've seen thus far shows a fan-heatsink over the chipset.
can we have passive cooling for those chipset? any kind of moving parts tends to fail due to wear and tear, and it doesnt good for long term investment
I mean its just 15W TDP, surely it is possible, right?
Posted on Reply
#31
TheLostSwede
News Editor
chaosmassivecan we have passive cooling for those chipset? any kind of moving parts tends to fail due to wear and tear, and it doesnt good for long term investment
I mean its just 15W TDP, surely it is possible, right?
*sigh*

Yes, it's possible.
Posted on Reply
#32
Mysteoa
Recently Buildzoid made a video regarding the x570 and talked about the fan. He was told from MB vendors that it get hot during raid operation with M2 SSD.
What I speculated is for MB vendors to implement hybrid fan curve, to not spin until necessary, which should be most of the time.
Posted on Reply
#33
nemesis.ie
Tsukiyomi91Yes the physical appearance of the PCIe slot doesn't need major changes like USB. I don't really mind getting my hands on the latest tech. For 10GbE NIC cards, finding reasonably priced ones on e-tailer sites isn't hard but the downside is always the cables since they're still expensive to get one. On top of that, very few ISPs are utilizing 10Gbps & if there's one, it's only for the super-rich.
10GbE will work fine with e.g. Cat6 and likely 5e too, certainly if you are not running 20m+ lengths and keep to the usual 3 to 10m that most homes need.

What are these expensive cables you are talking about? an SFF+ to SFF+ cable (~€50) works out a lot cheaper than buying two copper NICs for example too.
Posted on Reply
#34
Imsochobo
nemesis.ie10GbE will work fine with e.g. Cat6 and likely 5e too, certainly if you are not running 20m+ lengths and keep to the usual 3 to 10m that most homes need.

What are these expensive cables you are talking about? an SFF+ to SFF+ cable (~€50) works out a lot cheaper than buying two copper NICs for example too.
cat5e works fine for me.
Posted on Reply
#35
FYFI13
MysteoaRecently Buildzoid made a video regarding the x570 and talked about the fan. He was told from MB vendors that it get hot during raid operation with M2 SSD.
What I speculated is for MB vendors to implement hybrid fan curve, to not spin until necessary, which should be most of the time.
That was exactly my thoughts. On most systems passive cooling should do the job.
Posted on Reply
#36
Aquinus
Resident Wat-man
chaosmassiveI mean its just 15W TDP, surely it is possible, right?
So are a lot of laptop CPUs. 5 watts isn't a whole lot in the grand scheme of things, but mind you that 15 watts is a 200% instead over what it used to be and heat is going to scale with that. It's not so much about not being a lot of heat, it's more about how much heat can convection and conduction get rid of until it builds up to a point that's hotter than the max temperature you want, because if CPUs could run at 180*C, we wouldn't need active cooling because the difference in temperature would probably actually be good enough for a lot of cases, but it's not.

So just because 15 watts isn't a lot, it can easily become a lot if you have no airflow. Just check out literally every fanless laptop that gets placed under load.
Posted on Reply
#37
Valantar
AquinusSo are a lot of laptop CPUs. 5 watts isn't a whole lot in the grand scheme of things, but mind you that 15 watts is a 200% instead over what it used to be and heat is going to scale with that. It's not so much about not being a lot of heat, it's more about how much heat can convection and conduction get rid of until it builds up to a point that's hotter than the max temperature you want, because if CPUs could run at 180*C, we wouldn't need active cooling because the difference in temperature would probably actually be good enough for a lot of cases, but it's not.

So just because 15 watts isn't a lot, it can easily become a lot if you have no airflow. Just check out literally every fanless laptop that gets placed under load.
That's true. Still, it ought to be possible to keep the chipset at or below 85-or-so C if it's hooked up to the VRM heatsink with a decent heatpipe and there are ... you know, actual fins on the heatsinks. Revolutionary, I know, but it's possible. Of course, a fan that stays off except under heavy loads won't hurt anyone either, and a 15W TDP does after all not equal 15W constant power draw. Consindering that the majority of this chipset seems to be a PCIe 4.0 switch, I'm guessing that is where the power draw comes from, meaning it won't be an issue unless there are a lot of fast PCIe devices being taxed.
Tsukiyomi91problem is all currently released GPUs are using PCIe 3.0 standards, so why the reveal that it has PCIe 4.0? Unless AMD releases a GPU that leverage the new tech, I'm all ears about it. Until then, having it now is a little pointless.
The Radeon VII is already PCIe 4.0 compatible. It's likely Navi will be too, although I guess we'll know for sure in a week or three.
Posted on Reply
#38
ppn
And for what. DDR5, PCIE 5 and 5-nanometer technology are just around the corner.
Posted on Reply
#39
Imsochobo
ppnAnd for what. DDR5, PCIE 5 and 5-nanometer technology are just around the corner.
PCI-E 5.0 is probably not going to be very mainstream, I suspect SB will be 5.0 then spit out 4.0
+ Maybe first PCI-E and M2 but no devices will use it, gpu's hardly stress 16x 3.0.. mostly 8x is enough.
Posted on Reply
#40
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
Still an unreasonably small number of PCI-E lanes coming off the Southbridge. We don't need PCI-E 4.0, we need more usable PCI-E lanes.
Posted on Reply
#41
Penev91
15 watts is nothing if there's an adequate heatsink. X58 and 990FX were both above 20W and didn't have active cooling. This is just lazy design on the motherboard manufacturer's behalf.
Posted on Reply
#42
Valantar
ppnAnd for what. DDR5, PCIE 5 and 5-nanometer technology are just around the corner.
Yeah, let's just stop making new products with new technology because even better technology is arriving in the next couple of years. Good strategy. /s

In all seriousness, though: PCIe 5.0 is yet to be standardized, and given historical time spans from standardization to consumer hardware, we won't see that until late 2021 at the very earliest - and likely later than that given that it's heavily focused on server-specific functionality. DDR5 will likely arrive with AM5(?) and whatever consumer socket Intel launches in 2020-21. Intel tends to prioritize new RAM for HEDT and server, though, so we might have to wait longer than that. And where, exactly, is the harm in moving to PCIe 4.0 even if 5.0 were to arrive in just a few years? Someone has to start the push for faster interfaces on devices, and device manufacturers aren't going to invest in PCIe 4.0 controllers etc. if there are no PCs that support them. And given PCIe backwards compatibility, when 5.0 arrives this will mean that there's a decent selection of 4.0 devices on the market for those boards, rather than having to stick with 3.0 devices until 5.0 reaches GPUs, SSDs and the like. This is a win-win scenario, stop complaining.
newtekie1Still an unreasonably small number of PCI-E lanes coming off the Southbridge. We don't need PCI-E 4.0, we need more usable PCI-E lanes.
...which is exactly what PCIe 4.0 allows for. How? By doubling bandwidth per lane. A PCIe 4.0 x2 SSD can match the performance of a PCIe 3.0 x4 SSD, meaning that you can run two fast SSDs off the same number of lanes as one previously. A single 4.0 lane is enough for a 10GbE NIC, where you previously needed two lanes. And so on and so forth. GPUs won't need more than x8 PCIe 4.0 for the foreseeable future (and in reality hardly more than x4 for most GPUs), so splitting off lanes for storage or other controllers is less of an issue. Sure, performance (or the advantage of splitting lanes) is lost if using PCIe 3.0 devices, but there is flexibility to be had - for example a motherboard might have two m.2 slots where they share the latter two lanes (switchable in BIOS, ideally) so that you can run either two ~3.5GB/s SSDs or one faster than that. Motherboard trace routing will also become less complex if the thinking shifts this way, leading to potentially cheaper motherboards or more features at lower price points.
Penev9115 watts is nothing if there's an adequate heatsink. X58 and 990FX were both above 20W and didn't have active cooling. This is just lazy design on the motherboard manufacturer's behalf.
Not if the fans only run when needed - if so, it's arguably smart design, not lazy. Still, I would entirely welcome a return to functional heatsinks on motherboards. The EVGA x299 Dark sets a good precedent.
Posted on Reply
#43
TheLostSwede
News Editor
newtekie1Still an unreasonably small number of PCI-E lanes coming off the Southbridge. We don't need PCI-E 4.0, we need more usable PCI-E lanes.
Based on? It's 16 lanes in total. Eight for M.2, one for Ethernet, one for Wi-Fi and six for expansion slots. You need more?
Technically external USB controllers shouldn't be needed, as all the USB 3 ports are 3.1 G2 and the chipset should support eight of them.
Posted on Reply
#44
Valantar
TheLostSwedeBased on? It's 16 lanes in total. Eight for M.2, one for Ethernet, one for Wi-Fi and six for expansion slots. You need more?
Technically external USB controllers shouldn't be needed, as all the USB 3 ports are 3.1 G2 and the chipset should support eight of them.
In addition to the four USB 3.1g2 from the CPU, of course. So 12 total. Ought to be enough for most people. Two internal headers + 8 rear ports?
Posted on Reply
#45
TheLostSwede
News Editor
ValantarIn addition to the four USB 3.1g2 from the CPU, of course. So 12 total. Ought to be enough for most people. Two internal headers + 8 rear ports?
Right, I was just looking at the chipset itself. @newtekie1 was complaining about lack of PCIe lanes though.
It really comes down to what the board makers do with the available lanes, as AMD has added what seems to be more than sufficient lanes imho.
I don't think eight of them has to be used for M.2 devices either (not counting the additional four from the CPU).
Posted on Reply
#46
nemesis.ie
Probably there will be a few USB2.0 headers on boards too.

If anyone needs more than this, there is of course Threadripper and with luck an X599 or the like in due course.
Posted on Reply
#47
Valantar
nemesis.ieProbably there will be a few USB2.0 headers on boards too.

If anyone needs more than this, there is of course Threadripper and with luck an X599 or the like in due course.
If the rumors of X570 being the EPYC chipset are accurate, there likely won't be any more I/O on an X599 chipset, but of course there'll be 64 or so CPU PCIe lanes to use for whatever. That ought to help, yeah :)
Posted on Reply
#48
IceShroom
jeremyshawStrangely, I have heard the 28 lanes claim before. Maybe the socket itself has the pinout for them, but it's never used. Or the other 4 lanes are for different configurations (such as chipset-less configurations, like the A300/X300 "chipsets"), and considered to be exclusive of the "main" 24 lanes.

Either way, socket information for AM4 and especially FP5 are somewhat hard to find, compared to their Intel counterparts.
"Zepline" die actually has 32 PCI-e lane.
On AM4 it only 24 lanes are activate for maybe compitability for reason with APU.
But on for Embedded server part all 32 Lanes are active.
www.amd.com/en/products/specifications/embedded/8161
Posted on Reply
#49
nemesis.ie
@Valantar Exactly, that's the point. :) Just put your 4x M.2. card in and an I/O card and you are rocking and still have 2 full x16 slots to pop the GPUs in as well as all the chipset stuff.

@IceShroom Isn't it called "Zeppelin" like the air-ship?

I presume all that goes away with the CPU chiplet and moves to the I/O die. What exactly they have in there has kind of yet to be revealed fully.
Posted on Reply
#50
springs113
A little off topic but I wonder if the next generations of consoles are utilizing gen4 pci-e? I saw a Sony demo the other day and the loading times were fantastic. If such speeds is expected on a console, then in a highend PC, that should be a given. Wouldn't mind a full motherboard rgb block that covers the chipset as well. I need a lil bling in my life.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 19th, 2024 05:29 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts