Sunday, June 27th 2021

Intel DG2 GPU with 256 Execution Units Offers GTX 1050 Performance

We have been receiving several leaks for Intel's upcoming DG2 GPUs with a 256 Execution Unit model recently appearing on Geekbench paired with a 14-core Alder Lake mobile CPU. The Alder Lake mobile processor featured an integrated Xe GPU with 96 Execution Units which were also benchmarked. The 256 Execution Unit graphics card tested is likely derived from the mid-range DG2-384 GPU. The 96 EU DG2 iGPU featured a maximum frequency of 1.2 GHz while the 256 EU variant increased that to 1.4 GHz. The DG2-256 scored an OpenCL score of 18,450 points in the Geekbench 5 benchmark which places it at GTX 1050 performance level. The DG2-96 integrated GPU scored 6,500 points which is comparable to a GTX 460. While these performance numbers are low it is important to keep in mind that these are just early results from a mid-range mobile offering and Intel is planning to release cards with 512 Execution Units which should compete with the RTX 3070 Ti and 6700 XT.
Sources: Geekbench (DG2-256), Geekbench (DG2-96), VideoCardz
Add your own comment

33 Comments on Intel DG2 GPU with 256 Execution Units Offers GTX 1050 Performance

#26
jardows
If it performs like a 1050, and is priced where the 1050 was at launch, I won't complain too much.
Posted on Reply
#27
Fouquin
All this conjecture based on OpenCL performance? OpenCL is not indicative of 3D graphics performance... For example Vega 56 outperforms RX 5700 XTs in OpenCL, and in games the 5700 XT absolutely trashes the Vega 56.
Posted on Reply
#28
Punkenjoy
Well it's still way too early to really know what is going to happen. We lack too much information.

We don't know if this chip have it's own memory, or use the system RAM, if it have it's own memory, what type, what speed, etc.
We don't know what is the TDP but since it's a laptop part, it can be quite low.

So way to few information to really know what is going on. But let's say this chip is a IGP that use dedicated memory and run at 30w, it's impressive. If it's a decidated GPU using 64 bit GDDR6 at 100w, still somehow good. If the memory bus is 128 bit +, i would say the performance become to be bothersome altought it would still depend on how much power it can use. if it have 128 bit GDDR6 but run at 50w, that is good performance. Not amazing, but reasonably good.

So i recommend we wait for more detail before jumping on bandwagon or trashing the product.
Posted on Reply
#29
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
lexluthermiesterI'm in a "wait & see" frame of mind. The DG1, for the market it's aimed at, hit the mark spot-on. Saying that the DG2 will be a 3070ti competitor is more ambitious then I am willing to accept. However, credit where it's due, with the DG1, Intel succeeds where it wanted to. Willing to give the benefit of the doubt, but only in a reasonable way. I think we can expect something good from DG2.
Im not holding my breath, it was Raja Koduri that nearly killed RTG, on top of that intel igps have been completly lacking.
Posted on Reply
#30
lexluthermiester
eidairaman1Im not holding my breath, it was Raja Koduri that nearly killed RTG, on top of that intel igps have been completly lacking.
Have taken a look at the DG1? In spite of all the criticisms, it performs well in the market segment it's intended for. You of all people should know that a good performance is a good performance regardless of reputation.
Posted on Reply
#31
ltkAlpha
If I were Intel I'd try to go for at least 1060 performance for my entry level gaming GPU in late (?) 2021. 1050 impressed no one even when it came out back in 2016.
Posted on Reply
#32
lexluthermiester
ltkAlphaIf I were Intel I'd try to go for at least 1060 performance for my entry level gaming GPU in late (?) 2021.
Intel DG1 opening entry was perfectly placed. It is right where they wanted it and succeeds in that market segment.
ltkAlpha1050 impressed no one even when it came out back in 2016.
Incorrect. The 1050/1050ti were excellent value offerings. They fit very well into a market segment that needed them and to this day still perform on a level that is acceptable to anyone needing a budget card for light gaming.
Posted on Reply
#33
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
I had a low profile 1050ti and used it to play games on a 1080P TV/HTPC - they were not bad cards, just badly priced at the time

The real reason these cards are dead in the water, is that they only work on very specific CPU and mobo combinations... they're really an add in booster for the IGP, until they work on everything
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 19th, 2024 06:16 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts