Wednesday, May 24th 2023

Intel Core Ultra 7 1003H CPU Benchmark Results Appear Online

A hardware tipster - Benchleaks - has highlighted an interesting new entry for an Intel Meteor Lake Client Platform CPU on the PugetBench site - it seems that early platform validation results have been uploaded by mistake (prior to embargo restrictions). The MTL-P CPU in question appears to be a laptop/mobile variant given its "H" designation. We are also looking at another example of Team Blue's new SKU naming system with this Core Ultra 7 1003H processor - the company has confirmed that revised branding will debut as part of the Meteor Lake family.

The previously leaked Core model (5 1003H) also sported an "Ultra" tag, so it is possible that only high-end examples have been outed online over the past month. Puget System Lightroom Classic benchmark results that were produced by the Core Ultra 7 1003H CPU were not exactly next level - scoring only 534.5 points overall - this could indicate that a prototype unit was benched. An older Core i7-8665U laptop processor only lagged behind by 32.5 points. The test platform was fitted with 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) of DDR5-5600 memory, and ran in a Windows 11 Enterprise (22621) OS environment. Intel's latest marketing spiel is bigging up the potential of Meteor Lake's AI acceleration capabilities, via the built-in neural VPU.
Sources: Puget Systems, Tom's Hardware
Add your own comment

4 Comments on Intel Core Ultra 7 1003H CPU Benchmark Results Appear Online

#1
TheinsanegamerN
God what a terrible naming system. I thought it couldnt get worse them AMD's "decoder ring" system, but here it is.
Posted on Reply
#2
Fouquin
Intel almost had something with simply changing the prefixes.

Core y for ultra-low power.
Core m for mobile/low power.
Core i for performance.

Could have left Core i alone as desktop performance parts, added Core x for unlocked, merged Core m into all mobile, and Core y as anything under 15W.

But with this new scheme we're getting a whole new ranking system tacked onto the existing ranks (9, 7, 5, 3) and still using suffixes to denote further segmentation tiers (K, H, HX, U, UE). I wish Intel would just simplify their product offerings for once. For every new CPU at any given tier that AMD launches, Intel launches 5 different ones.
Posted on Reply
#3
david salsero
Intel's latest marketing spiel is bigging up the potential of Meteor Lake's AI acceleration capabilities, via the built-in neural VPU.
Intel is late, the AMD ZEN 4 7040 Phoenix are already here, but it is very good that there is more competition, now it only remains to see the Software and the utilities for the end user. It is clear that W12 will be a revolution in AI together with the new Direct XII all focused on AI, to that is added the new Office.
At the moment people opt for AMD, we will have to see performance when these MeteorLake come out and see comparisons
Posted on Reply
#4
Prima.Vera
The marketing department should all receive the axe. After their total fiasco with the Xeon name scheme, which is beyond ridiculous, they strike again with the Core series now. :banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::kookoo::kookoo:
Are those retarded idiots really get pay for this total naming system nonsense???
Posted on Reply
Apr 26th, 2024 03:01 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts