Monday, October 16th 2023

NVIDIA Increases GeForce NOW Pricing in Canada and Europe

According to the latest NVIDIA knowledge base FAQ, the pricing structure of NVIDIA's GeForce NOW game streaming service is increasing. Applicable only to Canada and Europe, the price increases due to "increased operational costs in those areas," as NVIDIA notes. The customers paying in CAD, GBP, EUR, SEK, NOK, DKK, CZK, and PLN will experience a roughly 10-20% price increase of around one to two Euros, based on the GeForce NOW subscription level. However, there is a good chance to secure better prices for the following months, as active and new members who sign up for GeForce NOW before November 1st can lock in their memberships at the current pricing for six months before experiencing an increase.

The company notes that this also impacts membership gift card pricing adjustment, with gift cards purchased before November 1st honoring the old pricing and newly minted gift cards after November 1st getting a price increase. This change occurs across all subscription tiers, including the Priority tier for 1080p gaming at 60 FPS, the Ultimate tier for 4K experience at 120 FPS, and the Founders Ultimate tier, which increases gameplay duration from six to eight hours. You can see the updated pricing structure in the table below.
Sources: NVIDIA FAQ, via VideoCardz
Add your own comment

33 Comments on NVIDIA Increases GeForce NOW Pricing in Canada and Europe

#26
mechtech
What’s the old saying

A fool and their money are soon parted??
Posted on Reply
#27
Vayra86
rbgcGamernexus here, gamenexus there, scam, physics, impossible, latency, price, ... :)

Try some games on Ultra with following config yourself and you will see.

Use logic. You are not gaming at 19ms. You have a 19ms ping time. But you are forgetting frame processing time (if you get 120fps, add another 8ms; at 60 fps, you have a good 16ms) and then processing of the stream on your system, and then the input lag on your own system on top. Effectively you are at least 25-30ms slower than offline play but often easily 40-60ms. Thats the equivalent of a 30 fps Vsync - or worse- in responsiveness. And thats considering a perfect connection - 19ms is pretty standard on a fast broadband with a same-landmass internet hub but not what most people get especially when they are not wired.
Posted on Reply
#28
DY69SX
b1k3rdudeI dont game on my phone and dont use that much data, but I appreciate that some people do. On the subject of Virgin, they are known for spying (packet inspecting) on their customers and throttling any traffic the deem they dont like for any reason.

But back on topic, I never complained about my ISP or the speed I was getting. As someone else has already pointed out, go back and re-read my post chap.
Bruv I mention Three as a example for consideration because you said you have broadband/internet issues ;) and about Virgin am with them on and off since 2005 when the bought my previous ISP Blueyonder ;D and throttling happened only once in the beginning of the biggest scam in the world history!! I called them and bollock them and since then never happen again and I got 250mbit plan but in real it's 285mbit :) and what do you mean by spying (packet inspecting)??
Posted on Reply
#29
HOkay
A question for those who are down on streaming games from cloud services, have you tried it? It is unquestionably worse than local, but it can be a shockingly ok gaming experience for games that don't need the lowest input lag possible. Anything in 3rd person / over the shoulder view is totally fine to play. A racing game or a fast-paced fps is not. But then for me even local streaming in my house on Gigabit Ethernet is too high input lag for those types of games.

I agree it's too expensive, given it's only really ok for a cut down selection of games, but if most of what you enjoy playing doesn't need really low input lag & you don't wanna sink £2k into building a PC, I see the appeal.

I was someone who first tested the game streaming water back in the OnLive days! I remember sitting at lunch at work streaming something over 4G & being amazed at how good it was back then. It wasn't good enough, but I was still surprised. I was a Stadia subscriber for a little while too (RIP). That was...kind of impressive & disappointing at the same time. At its best it was a really good experience, but you'd only get stints of a few minutes of its best, before its worst would show itself...

My point was, Internet access & server performance will get stable enough one day for it to be a very viable alternative for a lot of people.
Posted on Reply
#30
DY69SX
b1k3rdudeI dont game on my phone and dont use that much data, but I appreciate that some people do. On the subject of Virgin, they are known for spying (packet inspecting) on their customers and throttling any traffic the deem they dont like for any reason.

But back on topic, I never complained about my ISP or the speed I was getting. As someone else has already pointed out, go back and re-read my post chap.
And did you forget you can share your mobile internet with your TV Laptop Tablet PC and any other device! I was using Three 5G for nearly 2 years as my main internet with data usage exceeding 1TB month after month and no issue and even finished CP 2077 trough GF NOW without any problems!
Posted on Reply
#31
b1k3rdude
DY69SXAnd did you forget you can share your mobile internet with your TV Laptop Tablet PC and any other device! I was using Three 5G for nearly 2 years as my main internet with data usage exceeding 1TB month after month and no issue and even finished CP 2077 trough GF NOW without any problems!
I daily drive a custom, rooted rom on my android, and it has a firewall and a permission manager - short version it dosent use that much data unless I want it too. And I have a pi-hole install on my home LAN, I blocked all the unessicary traffic from things like the TV, so again, no unnecessary traffic. And all the computers have debloated and tweaked versions of windows 10/11 and all have a custom firewall, so all that unnecessary 'telemetry' is blocked.
DY69SXBruv I mention Three as a example for consideration because you said you have broadband/internet issues ;) and about Virgin am with them on and off since 2005 when the bought my previous ISP Blueyonder ;D and throttling happened only once in the beginning of the biggest scam in the world history!! I called them and bollock them and since then never happen again and I got 250mbit plan but in real it's 285mbit :) and what do you mean by spying (packet inspecting)??
I didnt say I had problem with my BB connection. I said that the connection is not always guarenteed, be that from the connection dropping and I having to reset the modem or a power outage because of a brownout. As reasons go for having zero interest in GFN, the afformentioned is fairly low on the list. So at the risk of having to REPEAT myself -
  • A lot of games are still not supported.
  • I can't play ANY games that arent on the service or any of the digital stores.
  • I can't play ANY local games on the service.
  • I can't leverage CUDA in a lot of the applications I use.
I play a few games that are NOT on any digital store and use applications that use cuda. Those two alone mean GFN is doa for me.
Posted on Reply
#32
b1k3rdude
I am simply using a bit of common sense, so if that means some people are going to taking the mick, whatever.

I assume you mean "OpnWRT" and I have tried it. I dont like the gui, its even more users unfriendly than pfsense, were such a thing possible.
Posted on Reply
#33
95Viper
Stay on topic.
Stop the insults.
Be civil in your posting/discussions
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 11th, 2024 02:43 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts