Monday, May 12th 2025

Intel Partner Flags 24 GB Arc B580 Variants in EEC Filing Ahead of Computex

Maxsun's parent company has quietly registered new 24 GB versions of Intel's Arc B580 graphics card with the EEC. While regulatory filings often cover placeholder or speculative hardware, this submission lines up with ongoing rumors about a high-memory "Battlemage" model aimed at both gamers and professionals. Back in December and January, Intel launched the Arc B580 and B570 GPUs, bringing the Battlemage architecture to desktops just a few months after "Lunar Lake" appeared on laptops. Those first cards came with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory, a surprisingly generous amount for graphics cards selling under $300, and they helped establish Intel as a real contender in the mainstream GPU market. Since then, chatter about a 24 GB version has never died down. The story gained weight when board partner Sparkle briefly hinted at such a variant and then retracted the comment under NDA obligations. Further fueling speculation, a Sparkle representative in China discussed the planned "B580 24 GB" during a March social-media exchange.

Now, Maxsun's EEC filing lists two models called "iCraft 24G" and "iCraft 24G OC," and those names match what Sparkle first mentioned. There's no guarantee these cards will actually hit store shelves, but the matching details and timing suggest Intel may be testing the waters for a memory-heavy Arc B580. That would make sense given recent leaks about an Arc PRO A60 workstation card also packing 24 GB of memory. Under the hood, the Arc B580's BMG-G21 chip offers up to 20 Xe cores and 2,560 shader units, putting it in the same ballpark as NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 4060. With Computex just days away, Intel will finally reveal whether these high-memory Arc B580 cards, or perhaps even bigger Battlemage-based workstation GPUs, are coming our way. Additionally, enthusiasts are keeping an eye on the rumored Arc B770, which is expected next quarter and likely to be detailed at Computex alongside Intel's broader Battlemage and upcoming Xe3 "Celestial" roadmap.
Sources: EEC, Olrak29 on X, via VideoCardz
Add your own comment

12 Comments on Intel Partner Flags 24 GB Arc B580 Variants in EEC Filing Ahead of Computex

#1
phints
24GB is nice but what kind of memory bus are we dealing with? 192-bit doubled (like Nvidia does x060Ti) or a full 384-bit? This makes 5070 and down even more embarassing of a purchase. 16GB VRAM is the minimum now.
Posted on Reply
#2
THANATOS
phints24GB is nice but what kind of memory bus are we dealing with? 192-bit doubled (like Nvidia does x060Ti) or a full 384-bit? This makes 5070 and down even more embarassing of a purchase. 16GB VRAM is the minimum now.
192-bit in clamshell.
Posted on Reply
#3
AntiX3DGlazer
This really doesn't seem like a gaming card.
Posted on Reply
#4
Wirko
AntiX3DGlazerThis really doesn't seem like a gaming card.
It will/would be an AI card, half cheaper than the currently cheapest 24 GB card.
Posted on Reply
#5
trsttte
THANATOS192-bit in clamshell.
Or the 32Gb chips samsung was planning.
Posted on Reply
#6
InVasMani
trsttteOr the 32Gb chips samsung was planning.
Unfortunately Intel's been tight lipped and rumors haven't really indicated anything particularly leaning towards a 32GB variant. Just enthusiasts and wishful thinking that maybe we could see B770 with 32GB. For Celestial I can absolutely see Intel leaning that direction. I think the biggest issues with these is Intel should've ideally launched them alongside B580 to begin with. It kind of takes the wind out of the sails a good bit with Celestial not as far away in horizon now. At least for me I'm feeling compelled to wait for Celestial at this point because they dragged their heels too much.
Posted on Reply
#7
rattlehead99
trsttteOr the 32Gb chips samsung was planning.
Is Samsung actually going to release 4GB GDDR6 chips?
Posted on Reply
#8
Wirko
trsttteOr the 32Gb chips samsung was planning.
Do we have any GDDR vs DDR die size data and comparisons available, to see if such a die is at all possible on the same process as 32Gbit DDR5?
Posted on Reply
#9
Caring1
AntiX3DGlazerThis really doesn't seem like a gaming card.
It does if the OC card as well as stock is an indication.
Posted on Reply
#10
trsttte
InVasManirumors haven't really indicated anything particularly leaning towards a 32GB variant
Not 32 gigabytes video card, 32 gigabit gddr6 chips that x6 to fill a 192bit bus would give you a 24 gigabyte video card.
Posted on Reply
#11
rattlehead99
WirkoDo we have any GDDR vs DDR die size data and comparisons available, to see if such a die is at all possible on the same process as 32Gbit DDR5?
JEDEC have it speced and now Samsung improved GDDR6 with a new process node as shown as their new 20Gbps modules run cooler and consume less power on the RX 9070(XT) that came out this month.
Posted on Reply
#12
Wirko
rattlehead99JEDEC have it speced and now Samsung improved GDDR6 with a new process node as shown as their new 20Gbps modules run cooler and consume less power on the RX 9070(XT) that came out this month.
Package sizes and pinouts, yes. But not die sizes. I can't find info on anything newer than DDR4 and GDDR5, it looks like analysts are very much interested in processors and maybe NAND, but all kinds of RAM... not much.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 14th, 2026 18:59 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts