Monday, August 18th 2025
Intel "Bartlett Lake-S" Steppings Suggest Third Rebrand of "Raptor Lake" as "Bartlett Lake Hybrid"
"Bartlett Lake-S" is an interesting chip by Intel, given that its "Nova Lake-S" desktop processors with large L3 caches won't arrive before mid/late 2026. The chip is built on the idea that the "Raptor Cove" P-core offers gaming performance comparable or better to the "Lion Cove" P-cores implemented on "Arrow Lake-S." Intel figured that for a monolithic silicon with a similar die-size of "Raptor Lake-S," which has 8 P-cores and 4 E-core clusters, it could design a silicon with 12 P-cores for the same number of ring-stops, sharing the same 36 MB of L3 cache. A recent post on Twitter by Jaykihn highlights the stepping of this silicon as A0, but there's more to the story—apparently Intel will recycle its older "Raptor Lake" and "Alder Lake" silicon within "Bartlett Lake" generation, and refer to them as "Bartlett Lake Hybrid."
This "Bartlett Lake Hybrid" line of processors will reuse B0, C0, and H0 chips. The B0 chip is the original "Raptor Lake-S," which comes with an 8P+16E core-configuration, 36 MB of L3 cache, 2 MB of L2 cache per P-core, and 4 MB of L2 cache per E-core cluster. The C0 silicon is derived from "Alder Lake-S," with an 8P+8E config that has 1.25 MB of L2 cache per P-core and 2 MB of L2 cache per E-core cluster, with 30 MB of L3 cache. The H0 silicon originally drove the lower half of the 12th Gen Core family, it has 6 P-cores, each with 1.25 MB of L2 cache, no E-core clusters, and 18 MB of L3 cache.Intel will not market "Bartlett Lake-S" as the 15th Gen Core series, but switch to its new nomenclature under the Core 2-series, but without the "Ultra" brand extension, denoting the lack of an on-die NPU. Unfortunately, leaked marketing material by Intel points to the chip being primarily targeted at the OEM and embedded markets, and not DIY retail, in other words, there are no signs yet of a retail desktop chip that you can pop into a Socket LGA1700 rig.
"Bartlett Lake-S" A0 will be the desktop processor with the highest P-core count from Intel, and will also be the processor with the highest P-cores within a single compute complex (i.e. sharing an L3 cache), across brands, because the 12-core and 16-core AMD Ryzen desktop processors have their cores split between two complexes, in the form of two CCDs. When threads migrate between CCDs, their working data must be transferred via the I/O die. If the data still resides in the source CCD's cache, it is duplicated into the destination CCD's L3, otherwise, it must be fetched from DRAM.
Sources:
Jaykihn (Twitter), VideoCardz
This "Bartlett Lake Hybrid" line of processors will reuse B0, C0, and H0 chips. The B0 chip is the original "Raptor Lake-S," which comes with an 8P+16E core-configuration, 36 MB of L3 cache, 2 MB of L2 cache per P-core, and 4 MB of L2 cache per E-core cluster. The C0 silicon is derived from "Alder Lake-S," with an 8P+8E config that has 1.25 MB of L2 cache per P-core and 2 MB of L2 cache per E-core cluster, with 30 MB of L3 cache. The H0 silicon originally drove the lower half of the 12th Gen Core family, it has 6 P-cores, each with 1.25 MB of L2 cache, no E-core clusters, and 18 MB of L3 cache.Intel will not market "Bartlett Lake-S" as the 15th Gen Core series, but switch to its new nomenclature under the Core 2-series, but without the "Ultra" brand extension, denoting the lack of an on-die NPU. Unfortunately, leaked marketing material by Intel points to the chip being primarily targeted at the OEM and embedded markets, and not DIY retail, in other words, there are no signs yet of a retail desktop chip that you can pop into a Socket LGA1700 rig.
"Bartlett Lake-S" A0 will be the desktop processor with the highest P-core count from Intel, and will also be the processor with the highest P-cores within a single compute complex (i.e. sharing an L3 cache), across brands, because the 12-core and 16-core AMD Ryzen desktop processors have their cores split between two complexes, in the form of two CCDs. When threads migrate between CCDs, their working data must be transferred via the I/O die. If the data still resides in the source CCD's cache, it is duplicated into the destination CCD's L3, otherwise, it must be fetched from DRAM.



26 Comments on Intel "Bartlett Lake-S" Steppings Suggest Third Rebrand of "Raptor Lake" as "Bartlett Lake Hybrid"
Who cares?
Show must go on!
Will be interesting if this translates to any meaningful difference in FPS compared to 8p cores @ 1080p/1440p.
As for Bartlett Lake-S it's clearly a stopgap for some markets due to limited TSMC capacity. I'm skeptical about it becoming a true mainstream product.
We can hope to see Bartlet Lake - S in the retail market though, as it would be the only chip to make sense to buy as DIY.
Now, will it be better than RPL for gaming? I have no idea. Let's see (and have TPU bench it).
- Hz is unknown.
- Locked/unlocked is unknown, but I wouldn't hold my breath here if non-retail.
- Same L3, despite 50 % more cores, but that's not much of a problem for Raptor in games.
All these unknowns seems to make it a wet dream for some.
"If we don't know how good it is, I bet it must be the best we've ever seen!" /s
It should have launched Last year when their stock was tanking
Where are B770 and better, next generation of GPU - le.go!
Just the fact that L3 is not increased rules out any performance increase in most games.
Very few games use more than 8 cores extensively so that 12 core would provide a meaningful benefit. Not to mention it would by design have to be at 1080p/1440p where the game is more CPU limited.
The only benefit can see from a pure 12p/0e core design are applications that are latency sensitive, but require more than 8 cores and where core hopping to e-cores induces a performance penalty. Im sure these exist, but they're edge cases and hence the likely OEM launch.
I'm very interested in the 12-core Bartlett, even if it's not entirely new tech. It'll go great on my Apex Encore.
Such a chip would be a good sendoff for the era of monolithic dies.
The newer tile designs are not done for performance. They are primarily cost efficiency designs to counter the increasing expense of newer nodes, and secondarily a way to scale up to very high core counts for the server space.
The X3D AMD lines undo this cost efficiency to restore performance to a tiled design, while their 'halo' effect draws users into buying AMD non-X3D chips which are not as performant as the monolithic Intel chips.
Zen 6 will have 12 cores in a single chiplet and it will destroy these chips in terms of IPC and efficiency. Intel needs to focus on new stuff, not on a platform from 2021.
That said, first time I've seen the purported 12P+0E model referred to as "A0" silicon, maybe it'll materialize, maybe it won't.
Although an all-P-core desktop processor is not groundbreaking, in my opinion it's also not stupid.
For gaming and desktop use the power difference between an E and P core is minimal compared to how much electricity a GPU uses. The complexity of writing software that efficiently makes use of P and E cores at the same time is impossible relative to how difficult it is just to make use of many identical cores. Even if the scheduler avoids the E cores, they still take a slot in the ring bus.
What's not to like about getting rid of all those E cores on the desktop?