Tuesday, October 28th 2025

Almost 90% of Windows Games Run on Linux, Notes Report

Linux gaming has quietly reached a new inflection point. A recent Boiling Steam summary of crowd-sourced ProtonDB compatibility reports shows that about 89.7% of Windows titles now at least launch on Linux systems. The numbers are spread into a few categories. Games rated "Platinum," meaning they install, run, and save on Linux without requiring user intervention, made up 42% of new releases tracked in October, up from 29% the previous year. At the same time the share of titles that refuse to launch, the so-called "Borked" cohort, has fallen to roughly 3.8%, a group that still includes deliberate blocks such as March of Giants, which explicitly detects Wine and Proton and exits to the desktop.

The most persistent obstacles are not obscure indies but anti-cheat middleware and contractual choices. Easy Anti-Cheat, BattlEye, and similar systems remain the primary gatekeepers for online multiplayer, and enabling them on Linux is often more a negotiation than a mere technical flip of a switch. When a studio approves Steam Deck support, desktop Linux compatibility frequently follows within a single build cycle, suggesting the code paths are already unified and only sign-off is pending.
We recently saw a YouTuber test the ASUS ROG Xbox Ally X with Bazzite, a Linux distribution similar to Valve's SteamOS. At 17 W TDP, the Xbox Ally X achieves about 47 FPS in Kingdom Come: Deliverance 2 on Windows, compared to 62 FPS on Bazzite. At 13 W, Windows gets 35 FPS, while Bazzite reaches around 37 FPS. In Hogwarts Legacy, performance jumps from 50 FPS on Windows to 62 FPS on Bazzite at 17 W. At 35 W, the gap narrows to 5 FPS, with Bazzite still leading. Additionally, Bazzite delivers a more consistent frame rate, avoiding the frequent dips seen on Windows. When Valve decides to roll out SteamOS to the public, we might see an uptick of Linux gamers to a point where making a Windows-exclusive title is no longer a common case.
Sources: Boiling Steam, Proton DB
Add your own comment

58 Comments on Almost 90% of Windows Games Run on Linux, Notes Report

#1
BArms
Would love to see TPU research windows alternatives a lot more in the future. I have a feeling I'll be trying to install and use Bazzite on my next computer build instead of Windows. Really tired of the constant dark patterns of Windows 10/11, they seem to be evil incarnate with their pushing of ads/bloat and restricting installations without a M$ account just to name a couple things. Anyone use Bazzite or another Steam-OS clone and had good luck with it?
Posted on Reply
#2
Shihab
Microsoft reversing its anti-kernel-level-access policies and starts encouraging even splash screen loaders to be installed as kernel drivers in 3... 2... 1...
BArmsthey seem to be evil incarnate
You new to Microsoft?
Posted on Reply
#3
BArms
ShihabMicrosoft reversing its anti-kernel-level-access policies and starts encouraging even splash screen loaders to be installed as kernel drivers in 3... 2... 1...


You new to Microsoft?
lol, nah just tolerated them so far but my hatred of their business practices has grown exponentially in the last few years.
Posted on Reply
#4
Nostras
The problem with these reports is that they imply that gaming on linux works much better than e.g. 2 years ago, but the problem is that the majority of games that do not work are the high-profile or very popular ones.
Once you factor in the popularity of games 2025 will look a lot more like 2020. Probably even worse actually.
Posted on Reply
#5
Dr. Dro
From the perspective of someone with an Nvidia GPU: No. Linux gaming isn't ready. Not yet. Until we have easy hardware tweaking and first-class driver support.
Posted on Reply
#6
Hecate91
Good, the reasons to use Windows for games keeps on diminishing, except for titles requiring kernel level access and certain games using a Windows only anti-cheat.
Posted on Reply
#7
dia6olo
I don't understand why people complicate it so much.
I'm a Linux user for around 2 years now (CachyOS). Linux is far from perfect, it has its quirks and issues but then so does Windows, if there's one thing that Linux has taught me it's that Windows falls well short of perfect too!
In any case, with the path Windows has been following for a number of years now, I no longer like doing computer stuff in Windows and so don't.
I do game though from time to time and know that while Linux has made huge strides with gaming compatibility, it is still not there yet.
Because of it I still dual boot, at the end of the day the cost of a spare drive is peanuts and I get the best of both worlds.
I do all my computer stuff in Linux and only switch to Windows for gaming.
Posted on Reply
#8
Litzner
Over the last 5 years I have tried swapping to Linux multiple times. I had always ran into serious performance or audio issues when it came to gaming, that was until last spring. I tried again and everything has been running great. I had setup Windows on another NVME thinking I would have to use it still and I haven't booted off of that in 5 months. I only still have Windows for some tools I don't trust to work in Linux, even though they probably will through Wine (like the software I use to flash the ECM on my truck), and if I decide to play a game that requires kernel level anti-cheat. Also I don't care as much about kernel level anti-cheat now as almost the only thing that is on that OS are games that require that BS.
Posted on Reply
#9
R-T-B
NostrasThe problem with these reports is that they imply that gaming on linux works much better than e.g. 2 years ago, but the problem is that the majority of games that do not work are the high-profile or very popular ones.
Not really been my experience. It's certainly a lower percentage amongst online games that are popular (due to anti cheat) but even there it's like, 25/75 at worst and constantly improving. That is a poor percentage but it's not all of them and only one category of game type.

2 years ago there were no workaround for kernel level anticheat. Now there are several.
Posted on Reply
#10
TheDeeGee
So i can just install games from the late 90s and early 2000s like i do now on Windows?
Posted on Reply
#11
Shihab
Dr. DroFrom the perspective of someone with an Nvidia GPU: No. Linux gaming isn't ready. Not yet. Until we have easy hardware tweaking and first-class driver support.
Only undervolting is limited. You can easily set fan profiles, power limits, and clock offsets via a GUI pretty much as you would on Windows (Formerly via GWE, currently LACT).
Tbh tho, I don't see why geeking out with hardware has anything to do with gaming. It's nice to have, sure, but it's by no means critical, as evident in the plethora of people playing on consoles, handhelds, and even PCs (because seriously, do you think the average user even knows what a clock is?).

Signed: Someone with an ancient, Nvidia GPU.
Posted on Reply
#12
_roman_
I am a long-term user. I prefer to keep questionable gaming binaries within the questionable Windows 11 Pro operating system. If I were to play a game again that is not fully open source with available source code, I would most likely install a separate gaming distro. I want to keep my full system backup to a reasonable size, so I prefer to exclude games from it.

I'm more interested in the games that do not work—and why.

Note: I doubt - I think I saw dr dro in another topic with a nvidia 5090 in a screenshot.

High level Hardware support is just bad. Regardless if it is a nvidia gpu or amd gpu. I tested nvidia 960 early 2023 again. The lact package came far too late and only works for a few months for a radeon 7800xt. That package should be developed by amd and shouldd have been perfect 4 years ago. I have only tested so far if GPU fans can be turned off or not, which seems to work.
LitznerI only still have Windows for some tools I don't trust to work in Linux, even though they probably will through Wine (like the software I use to flash the ECM on my truck), and if I decide to play a game that requires kernel level anti-cheat.
You named a reason where I would keep a separate windows installation. I would not bet on it that timing wise and device wise everything is passed on just in time correctly low hardware level wise.
Posted on Reply
#13
Litzner
Dr. DroFrom the perspective of someone with an Nvidia GPU: No. Linux gaming isn't ready. Not yet. Until we have easy hardware tweaking and first-class driver support.
Nvidia has been investing much more into Linux development recently and over the last 6 months they have made a lot of progress. AMD is still king I think for getting more games working well on Linux, but Nvidia isn't nearly as far behind as they were even just 1 year ago, where then I would call them almost unplayable in comparison.
Posted on Reply
#14
tommo1982
The real obstacle to gaming on Linux were corporations, who want to control everything, and people behind open source software. They were against anything closed source in kernel.
To the average user Linux is a better choice. It's easier to understand and lacks bloated settings useful only in corporate environment. Most posts on computer forums are out of touch with reality. We, people whose computer hardware is a passion, are in a minority. The majority care none, and don't want to learn of what was written here. Otherwise Apple wouldn't be so successful.
Posted on Reply
#15
R-T-B
TheDeeGeeSo i can just install games from the late 90s and early 2000s like i do now on Windows?
Mostly yes. You occasionally will need to tweak a compatability setting or something but mostly tools like proton/lutris automate that. It's pretty seamless in the gaming distros.
Posted on Reply
#16
Event Horizon
The Steam Deck has really turbocharged Linux gaming.
Posted on Reply
#17
Dr. Dro
LitznerNvidia has been investing much more into Linux development recently and over the last 6 months they have made a lot of progress. AMD is still king I think for getting more games working well on Linux, but Nvidia isn't nearly as far behind as they were even just 1 year ago, where then I would call them almost unplayable in comparison.
I don't deny there has been progress. But it's still nowhere near the same level of experience. And then there's the anti-cheat issues that are still pervasive. It needs more time. A lot more time.
Posted on Reply
#18
TheinsanegamerN
Dr. DroI don't deny there has been progress. But it's still nowhere near the same level of experience. And then there's the anti-cheat issues that are still pervasive. It needs more time. A lot more time.
nvidia's proprietary drivers work fine. Sure, the FOSS side is behind, but most gamers wont care one way or the other.

Anticheat is a dev issue, not linux. Enough people move over and they WILL support linux.
Posted on Reply
#19
Dr. Dro
TheinsanegamerNnvidia's proprietary drivers work fine. Sure, the FOSS side is behind, but most gamers wont care one way or the other.

Anticheat is a dev issue, not linux. Enough people move over and they WILL support linux.
Can you already install them without having to recompile and resign your kernel by hand?
Posted on Reply
#20
colossusrageblack
It's great news, but Linux is not ready for the majority of users. There are distros like Bazzite that are close, at least for gaming, but if you have an Nvidia GPU (driver issues and performance degradation) or an OLED display (HDR support nowhere near on par with Windows), you're probably going to want to hold off.
Posted on Reply
#21
TheinsanegamerN
Dr. DroCan you already install them without having to recompile and resign your kernel by hand?
Definition: Red Herring Argument

"A red herring is a logical fallacy where an irrelevant topic is introduced to divert attention from the original, and often more important, issue. It's a tactic used to mislead an audience by shifting focus to a different subject, often a more emotionally charged or easily defensible one, to avoid addressing the real point at hand"

Any driver that is not included in your chosen distribution has to be compiled into your kernel. This is not a new thing, nor is it a major deal. This is true for any hardware, not just graphics cards. Every time the linux kernel is updates, all drivers in tree are recompile as well. In Linux Mint it is a 1 click, 1 password, 1 restart install. No harder than it is on Windows 11.

The proprietary nvidia drivers work fine on linux. The function of installing new drivers in linux does not change this fact. As "someone with an Nvidia GPU" you should be able to come up with a better argument than this.
Posted on Reply
#22
Dr. Dro
TheinsanegamerNDefinition: Red Herring Argument

"A red herring is a logical fallacy where an irrelevant topic is introduced to divert attention from the original, and often more important, issue. It's a tactic used to mislead an audience by shifting focus to a different subject, often a more emotionally charged or easily defensible one, to avoid addressing the real point at hand"

Any driver that is not included in your chosen distribution has to be compiled into your kernel. This is not a new thing, nor is it a major deal. This is true for any hardware, not just graphics cards. Every time the linux kernel is updates, all drivers in tree are recompile as well. In Linux Mint it is a 1 click, 1 password, 1 restart install. No harder than it is on Windows 11.

The proprietary nvidia drivers work fine on linux. The function of installing new drivers in linux does not change this fact. As "someone with an Nvidia GPU" you should be able to come up with a better argument than this.
No, that wasn't a rhetorical question (and I genuinely understand how it may have sounded malicious), it's genuinely an actual question. I've always used Fedora, and it has always been a royal pain for me. Like, actual wall of text walkthrough

www.if-not-true-then-false.com/2015/fedora-nvidia-guide/

This is where my boomer inclinations kick in, I don't really have much or any mastery over Linux at all, I've used Windows my whole life and I'm not exactly close minded
Posted on Reply
#23
melkor_unlimited
LitznerOver the last 5 years I have tried swapping to Linux multiple times.
Do it or do not do it.
There is no try.
TheDeeGeeSo i can just install games from the late 90s and early 2000s like i do now on Windows?
I used to play Baldurs Gate and Baldurs Gate II on Red Hat 7.1
Worked better on Linux than on WIndows NT 4.
Dr. DroCan you already install them without having to recompile and resign your kernel by hand?
Compile kernel?

You do not have to.
But you can.
Posted on Reply
#24
Dr. Dro
melkor_unlimitedCompile kernel?

You do not have to.
But you can.
It is required that you sign and recompile in order to install the proprietary driver, or a secure boot violation will occur. I'm probably doing it "the hard way" and some automated system or easy to install package probably exists though
Posted on Reply
#25
wNotyarD
Dr. DroIt is required that you sign and recompile in order to install the proprietary driver, or a secure boot violation will occur. I'm probably doing it "the hard way" and some automated system or easy to install package probably exists though
When I still had my 1050-equipped laptop, it did recompile the kernel each update due to the GeForce drivers (that's what DKMS is for, right? If it ain't, I'll gladly be corrected). No intervention required from me, though. No issues at all with Secure Boot, and I did dual boot in that machine.

Note: I used Garuda with it (and still do on my AMD desktop), and it has a driver manager for choosing between open and proprietary drivers. I'm unaware how vanilla Fedora deals with this.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 13th, 2026 17:03 PST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts