Wednesday, December 17th 2025

AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D Listed at $553, Slightly Above Ryzen 7 9800X3D

AMD's upcoming Ryzen 7 9850X3D processor is slowly hitting the retailer space, and the pricing has been leaked by @momomo_us. At $553, the new "Granite Ridge" Ryzen 9000 X3D SKU is priced roughly $70 more than the Ryzen 7 9800X3D at its launch. The Ryzen 7 9850X3D CPU features 8 cores and 16 threads, 96 MB of L3 cache, and a boost clock up to 5.6 GHz, with a 120 W power envelope. This represents a 400 MHz increase over the Ryzen 7 9800X3D model, which has the same cache and core configuration. At Switzerland retailer Orderflow.ch, the CPU is listed for 473.55 CHF, which is 20% higher than the Ryzen 7 9800X3D.

Officially, AMD's Ryzen 9000 series supports DDR5 memory speeds up to 5600 MT/s, but this model could push that number to 9,800 MT/s if earlier reports are accurate. AMD is likely using higher-binned dies it has saved over the past few months to offer a better alternative to Intel's upcoming "Arrow Lake Refresh," scheduled for early 2026, and "Nova Lake," scheduled for late 2026. As Intel has confirmed it will ship with native support for DDR5 memory speeds reaching 7200 MT/s on CUDIMM modules, AMD is fighting with a faster CPU clock and supposedly better memory speeds to offer good competition in the consumer DIY PC space.
Source: @momomo_us
Add your own comment

53 Comments on AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D Listed at $553, Slightly Above Ryzen 7 9800X3D

#26
TechpowerLeft
Too small performance gain.
However... In a "not so distant" future, probably the existence of this new CPU will push down 9800X3D prices, so it's OK.
Posted on Reply
#27
Bigshrimp
No one will buy this product for that cost. Most people would just go buy a 9800X3D, lol.
Posted on Reply
#28
Visible Noise
phintsThis should be $399. What a joke. Wait for Zen 6 or get a 9800X3D.
Please show your math.
Posted on Reply
#29
Tyl3n0L
Hey,

I'm currently running a 7700x, 64GB 5600mhz CL36, 4090.

Wondering if something like this would be worth getting for me? Screen resolution is 3840x1600. I mostly play MSFS2024 which loves X3D CPU...
Posted on Reply
#30
Visible Noise
Tyl3n0LHey,

I'm currently running a 7700x, 64GB 5600mhz CL36, 4090.

Wondering if something like this would be worth getting for me? Screen resolution is 3840x1600. I mostly play MSFS2024 which loves X3D CPU...
You know this doesn’t officially exist right? You’re asking if you should upgrade to a rumor.
Posted on Reply
#31
Tyl3n0L
Visible NoiseYou know this doesn’t officially exist right? You’re asking if you should upgrade to a rumor.
I know it doesn't. But it's been reported many times already.

Thanks for the help though!
Posted on Reply
#32
Dr. Dro
Tyl3n0LHey,

I'm currently running a 7700x, 64GB 5600mhz CL36, 4090.

Wondering if something like this would be worth getting for me? Screen resolution is 3840x1600. I mostly play MSFS2024 which loves X3D CPU...
Yeah, it'll be a great upgrade for MSFS. But also keep an eye on the 9800X3D.
Posted on Reply
#33
freeagent
Pretty much a half a GHz in clock speed is a respectable bump. Factor in the +200 and you are looking at 5850MHz of X3D that can handle high speed ram.

It is not for you guys who are complaining about it..
Posted on Reply
#34
Tyl3n0L
Dr. DroYeah, it'll be a great upgrade for MSFS. But also keep an eye on the 9800X3D.
Yeah I guess it depend on msrp once it hits retail.
Posted on Reply
#35
Dr. Dro
freeagentPretty much a half a GHz in clock speed is a respectable bump. Factor in the +200 and you are looking at 5850MHz of X3D that can handle high speed ram.

It is not for you guys who are complaining about it..
Don't wanna crash the party, but that is rumored to handle high-speed RAM, that is. All we have is a flimsy BIOS screenshot with a weird date that is probably a prank released out there to build hype. 9800 MT/s is impossible to run on your average X870E motherboard, even with a Phoenix CPU. To get that fast you need highly binned CUDIMMs, a suitable CPU with a strong IMC and a 1 DPC motherboard that can run them. Needless to say not even most Arrow Lake systems are capable of that...
Tyl3n0LYeah I guess it depend on msrp once it hits retail.
Yup. The 400 MHz here is a relative boon, but it's not worth $200 over the 9800X3D.
Posted on Reply
#36
LastDudeALive
This is either a way to quietly retire the regular 9800X3D SKU (like the 5700X3D was, but this time with a higher-priced model to maximize margins), or it'll come with CUDIMM support which will actually be worth the price. But if it's just slightly faster base clocks at a higher price, it should be DOA if AMD doesn't immediately cut 9800X3D production.
Posted on Reply
#37
Tam 212
PhilaphlousAnnnndddd who's going to be first to try these on their ASRock board?????

My 9700x is surviving quite well on my ASROCK B650i. I've kept voltages down and temps limited to 70C with PBO CO enabled...hopefully things will survive. I've already voided my warranty by lapping the CPU IHS... :toast:
I think the bulk of the issues appear to be from their newer 800-series boards - and when paired with X3D skus in particular as I haven't heard of a statistically aberrant incident rate with 600-series. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Regardless, may long live your 9700X.
Posted on Reply
#38
Makaveli
Tyl3n0LHey,

I'm currently running a 7700x, 64GB 5600mhz CL36, 4090.

Wondering if something like this would be worth getting for me? Screen resolution is 3840x1600. I mostly play MSFS2024 which loves X3D CPU...
I think you answered your own question.
Dr. DroDon't wanna crash the party, but that is rumored to handle high-speed RAM, that is. All we have is a flimsy BIOS screenshot with a weird date that is probably a prank released out there to build hype. 9800 MT/s is impossible to run on your average X870E motherboard, even with a Phoenix CPU. To get that fast you need highly binned CUDIMMs, a suitable CPU with a strong IMC and a 1 DPC motherboard that can run them. Needless to say not even most Arrow Lake systems are capable of that...



Yup. The 400 MHz here is a relative boon, but it's not worth $200 over the 9800X3D.
To add to this wasn't that on a 2 dimm channel board and not 4 ?

I think people are getting way too excited over this when the memory controller should be the same on this cpu as other X3D's chips.
Posted on Reply
#39
Dr. Dro
MakaveliTo add to this wasn't that on a 2 dimm channel board and not 4 ?

I think people are getting way too excited over this when the memory controller should be the same on this cpu as other X3D's chips.
Reportedly on a B850 AYW, which is 1DPC but doesn't exactly have hyper optimized traces.
Posted on Reply
#40
Vayra86
This looks like a worthy upgrade. I have no use for it. But damn. 120W. 8/16, X3D @ 5,6. Gimmeeeeeh
Posted on Reply
#41
jesdals
Well I am more than Happy with my decision to grab the 9800x3d at BF. But like to see how PC bying is going to look in 2026
Posted on Reply
#42
Chrispy_
Where's my $399 9700X3D?

I don't care about a 3% performance increase for 20% more money, I want my 3% performance decrease for 20% less money!
Posted on Reply
#43
maximumterror
PhilaphlousAnnnndddd who's going to be first to try these on their ASRock board?????

My 9700x is surviving quite well on my ASROCK B650i. I've kept voltages down and temps limited to 70C with PBO CO enabled...hopefully things will survive. I've already voided my warranty by lapping the CPU IHS... :toast:
AMD abandoned their 8-core and 12-core 65W CPUs fans/users
Posted on Reply
#44
phanbuey
maximumterrorAMD abandoned their 8-core and 12-core 65W CPUs fans/users
I don't think they abandoned them as much as they don't want to sell the same silicone for less money locked to 65W. If you enable eco mode and put an offset on the 9000 series they're really efficient.
Posted on Reply
#45
jesdals
Chrispy_Where's my $399 9700X3D?

I don't care about a 3% performance increase for 20% more money, I want my 3% performance decrease for 20% less money!
On BF I gave less for my 9800x3d it was 3.190dkr that more or less like 320 dollars includeing taxes
Posted on Reply
#46
ixi
Who cares, need to wait for 10k gen.
Posted on Reply
#47
529th
Seems like an interesting part.

Looking forward to bench-marks


Thanks
Posted on Reply
#48
maximumterror
phanbueyI don't think they abandoned them as much as they don't want to sell the same silicone for less money locked to 65W. If you enable eco mode and put an offset on the 9000 series they're really efficient.
So what you say is I buy Super Duper and then just castrate myself to 65W, and of course, when I buy Super Duper I don’t need a Super Duper PSU, motherboard, and the rest??
Posted on Reply
#49
phanbuey
maximumterrorSo what you say is I buy Super Duper and then just castrate myself to 65W, and of course, when I buy Super Duper I don’t need a Super Duper PSU, motherboard, and the rest??
from the point of view of the company: why would i sell you capped super duper silicon for less money if I don't need to?

if you want power efficient you just have to pay for super duper and then cap it yourself. If you can sleep at night re: mobo/ram/psu isn't really a worry - because what else r u gonna do - buy intel? at 65W?

AMD is just gouging because intel has nothing at 65W that's competitive so they release the 9700, call it the 9700X at 65W and charge u super duper $.
Posted on Reply
#50
Chrispy_
maximumterrorSo what you say is I buy Super Duper and then just castrate myself to 65W, and of course, when I buy Super Duper I don’t need a Super Duper PSU, motherboard, and the rest??
As long as you manually set the cTDP in the motherboard BIOS, you can get away with a more basic motherboard with lesser VRMs, lesser VRM cooling, and a smaller CPU cooler.

I'm loathe to ever suggest you buy a cheaper PSU. Something that's made to a standard able to pass 80PLUS Platinum certification, or at least 80PLUS Gold from a brand with a good support/warranty/review track record is always mandatory for me. A decent PSU will last at least a decade for most people and since PSU problems are so random and hard to nail down as the culprit when troubleshooting, I just avoid anything other than high quality ones. My time and avoiding the headaches of PSU woes is far more valuable than the extra cost of a premium PSU! It's worse than that though, a flaky PSU can damage your motherboard and GPU, potentially even your CPU and RAM if it's particularly bad! Don't risk it, buy something top-tier and consider that you're budgeting for it over 10+ years when you are debating over whether it's worth the additional cost.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 15th, 2026 04:46 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts