Wednesday, December 17th 2025

AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D Listed at $553, Slightly Above Ryzen 7 9800X3D

AMD's upcoming Ryzen 7 9850X3D processor is slowly hitting the retailer space, and the pricing has been leaked by @momomo_us. At $553, the new "Granite Ridge" Ryzen 9000 X3D SKU is priced roughly $70 more than the Ryzen 7 9800X3D at its launch. The Ryzen 7 9850X3D CPU features 8 cores and 16 threads, 96 MB of L3 cache, and a boost clock up to 5.6 GHz, with a 120 W power envelope. This represents a 400 MHz increase over the Ryzen 7 9800X3D model, which has the same cache and core configuration. At Switzerland retailer Orderflow.ch, the CPU is listed for 473.55 CHF, which is 20% higher than the Ryzen 7 9800X3D.

Officially, AMD's Ryzen 9000 series supports DDR5 memory speeds up to 5600 MT/s, but this model could push that number to 9,800 MT/s if earlier reports are accurate. AMD is likely using higher-binned dies it has saved over the past few months to offer a better alternative to Intel's upcoming "Arrow Lake Refresh," scheduled for early 2026, and "Nova Lake," scheduled for late 2026. As Intel has confirmed it will ship with native support for DDR5 memory speeds reaching 7200 MT/s on CUDIMM modules, AMD is fighting with a faster CPU clock and supposedly better memory speeds to offer good competition in the consumer DIY PC space.
Source: @momomo_us
Add your own comment

53 Comments on AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D Listed at $553, Slightly Above Ryzen 7 9800X3D

#1
Battler624
I wouldn't say $70 is slighty above.
Posted on Reply
#2
Tam 212
Seems similar to what Intel used to do with their -KS skus?

I also would not describe a $70 USD increase as slight but I guess the AMD sales and marketing for this top bin 8-core X3D will only help to further maximize AMD's profit margin

So who's going to be the first to install and benchmark it on Asrock 800-series boards?
Posted on Reply
#3
Makaveli
Tam 212So who's going to be the first to install and benchmark it on Asrock 800-series boards?
Posted on Reply
#4
_roman_
Woot. I am glad it is not ryzen 10000. I would be annoyed when i purchased a cpu and suddenly ryzen 10000 had dropped.

Prices will be much higher In Germany And Austria most likely. After release the prices will skyrocked for those who want the "best" "fastest" cpu in the viewpoint of the buyer. It does not matter if it is the fastest one, the highest specced processor will see price increases. The 70 us dollars will most likely be 100€ bare minimum extra price on top of the already risen cpu prices for certain skus.
Posted on Reply
#5
Cheeseball
Not a Potato
Possible 5% to 10% improvement in FPS in some games from a 9800X3D perhaps? 400MHz (and then another +200MHz with a PBO and CO combo) is a big frequency bump, especially for low-threaded (~6T and below) games.

If it's like a 9800X3D, then it may still shine when limited to 88W like the 7800X3D. With this limit it will suffer at full multi-threaded workloads, but gaming should be fine as not all cores are trying to run at their max.
Posted on Reply
#6
zenlessyank
Kind of expensive for an 8 core chip. The 9900x is $389 with 12 cores minus a little bit-o-cache.
Posted on Reply
#7
GhostRyder
I will be interested to see this chip with faster memory if the reports are true. Would be interesting to see how it will perform with some crazy memory speeds.
Posted on Reply
#8
sethmatrix7
Tam 212So who's going to be the first to install and benchmark it on Asrock 800-series boards?
Just the first person to burn down their house with a 9850X3D!
Posted on Reply
#9
NickeeCoco
So, 20% more expensive for 10% more speed? Yep, that's a 2025 component, all right
Posted on Reply
#10
Makaveli
GhostRyderI will be interested to see this chip with faster memory if the reports are true. Would be interesting to see how it will perform with some crazy memory speeds.
unless its 1:1 faster speed with IF gains will be minimal.

Don't except major improvement here until Zen 6 and its new I/O die.
Posted on Reply
#11
Hereticbar
9850X3D being "only" $70 more expensive compared to a 9800X3D is nothing.

However, getting some 9800 MT/s DDR5 memory to pair with it could be cost a kidney or two in this market.
Posted on Reply
#12
Dr. Dro
I called it. Premium SKU positioned above the 9800X3D, potentially either replacing it or driving ASP upwards on both SKUs.
zenlessyankKind of expensive for an 8 core chip. The 9900x is $389 with 12 cores minus a little bit-o-cache.
The problem with the 9900X is the split topology. The 6+6 configuration will never perform as if it were 12 contiguous cores in the same complex. You can have 12 cores, but a 6+6 9900X will never perform as well as an equivalent 8+0 model will at anything that is even remotely latency sensitive.

Topology is Ryzen's bane overall. The single biggest improvement introduced by Zen 3 was the move from 4+4 to 8+0 per CCX, equaling CCX = CCD. Until a CCX/CCD with 12 cores+ is provided by AMD, the models that have 6 core CCDs are best avoided. The Ryzen 9 X3D models further complicate the topology issue by having most of the cache memory physically located on one side of the processor, which is why the Ryzen 7 X3D models are so dang good - the full potential of the hardware can be extracted without any hurdles of wasted cycles moving data around and/or ensuring cache coherency. A mitigation would be the 9950X3D2 with two X3D dies, which would largely behave like a standard 9950X.
Posted on Reply
#13
rv8000
Hereticbar9850X3D being "only" $70 more expensive compared to a 9800X3D is nothing.

However, getting some 9800 MT/s DDR5 memory to pair with it could be cost a kidney or two in this market.
Unless they were able to add in support for cu-dimm somehow, dont expect any truth to higher ddr5 frequencies. Id say the chance is about 0.0001%
Posted on Reply
#14
Hecate91
I wouldn't consider $70 just slightly above the 9800X3D or nothing in terms of cost.

I think it would've been nice for the 9850X3D to replace the 9800X3D for the same price, with the 9800X3D being discounted, but then again the 9850X3D is the flagship version.
Posted on Reply
#15
londiste
Tam 212Seems similar to what Intel used to do with their -KS skus?
That was pretty much my first thought as well. That 400MHz max boost clock is 7-8% higher clocks that can be a positive boost - for example in gaming or other single-core workloads - but not really worth the roughly 20% higher price. Maybe higher since 9800X3Ds seem to be available below MSRP these days.
Posted on Reply
#16
Icon Charlie
Why in HELL should I by anything When the Rampocalypse is just gain traction???
Ensh!tication of that is everything Tech is/has happened.

All this does is to NOT BUY ANYTHING UNLESS ABSOLUTLY NECESSARY.

AND AMD IS PARTLY TO BLAME...
Posted on Reply
#17
ir_cow
CheeseballPossible 5% to 10% improvement in FPS in some games from a 9800X3D perhaps? 400MHz (and then another +200MHz with a PBO and CO combo) is a big frequency bump, especially for low-threaded (~6T and below) games.

If it's like a 9800X3D, then it may still shine when limited to 88W like the 7800X3D. With this limit it will suffer at full multi-threaded workloads, but gaming should be fine as not all cores are trying to run at their max.
more like zero improvement in games unless you are rocking a RTX 5090
Posted on Reply
#18
Makaveli
Icon CharlieWhy in HELL should I by anything When the Rampocalypse is just gain traction???
Ensh!tication of that is everything Tech is/has happened.

All this does is to NOT BUY ANYTHING UNLESS ABSOLUTLY NECESSARY.

AND AMD IS PARTLY TO BLAME...
That is only an issue for people not on AM5 DDR5 platform already.

If you are still on a DDR4 system this post doesn't even apply to you.
Posted on Reply
#19
Hereticbar
Hecate91I wouldn't consider $70 just slightly above the 9800X3D or nothing in terms of cost.

I think it would've been nice for the 9850X3D to replace the 9800X3D for the same price, with the 9800X3D being discounted, but then again the 9850X3D is the flagship version.
Don't think that's likely to happen. I doubt they have enough higher-binned dies available for 9850X3D to fully replace 9800X3D, which means there's no incentive to make what will be effectively a price cut.
Posted on Reply
#20
Cheeseball
Not a Potato
ir_cowmore like zero improvement in games unless you are rocking a RTX 5090
You would probably see the improvement in eSports titles, like CS2/Valorant/Marvel Rivals at 1080p/1440p. On heavier, modern engines at 1440p+ not much.
Posted on Reply
#21
Makaveli
CheeseballYou would probably see the improvement in eSports titles, like CS2/Valorant/Marvel Rivals at 1080p/1440p. On heavier, modern engines at 1440p+ not much.
The clockspeed increase will probably equal 5% more performance at best.
Posted on Reply
#22
Philaphlous
Annnndddd who's going to be first to try these on their ASRock board?????

My 9700x is surviving quite well on my ASROCK B650i. I've kept voltages down and temps limited to 70C with PBO CO enabled...hopefully things will survive. I've already voided my warranty by lapping the CPU IHS... :toast:
Posted on Reply
#23
SemperPC09
Unfortunate, I was hoping that the 9850X3D was going to be put at $450-$480 (Common price for 9800X3D according to amazon) and the 9800X3D would fall down to like $400. Also, I wouldn't consider $70 as a little above, that is a lot above for most of us. I hope AMD reconsiders or that this is just a placeholder. Time will tell I guess. We will also have to see how well it performs, it might be worth the extra chunk of change or it could bring a few percent at best. I am excited for the rumored revamped six-core. Should at least be interesting and maybe push 9600x prices even further down.
Posted on Reply
#24
Dr. Dro
Icon CharlieWhy in HELL should I by anything When the Rampocalypse is just gain traction???
Ensh!tication of that is everything Tech is/has happened.

All this does is to NOT BUY ANYTHING UNLESS ABSOLUTLY NECESSARY.

AND AMD IS PARTLY TO BLAME...
I was hoping CPU prices would come down a little, but products like this are released in these trying times by design. However, a consumer-side boycott of memory and SSD products will be completely ineffectual. Should demand in the consumer space suddenly drop, these products already have interested buyers: vendors will simply halt production lines and divert inventory towards the enterprise space, causing prices to soar even higher as any and all stocks of the product available for purchase begin to deplete.

It has been some time now that the semiconductor industry has been catering to the DIY channels in a nearly charitable manner. Every RTX 5090 that Nvidia builds is an AI accelerator they didn't sell, each 64 GB memory stick that Micron sold under Crucial is another stick that didn't end up at the hands of an enterprise customer that would pay 10 times its market worth otherwise. Each SSD that Samsung builds for the consumer segment is another that isn't inside a Dell EMC or HPE compute cluster. AMD put the Threadripper in the back seat to divert production for Epyc to the point of canceling products in the past, and right now they're positioned as exceptionally low volume, extreme margin products just to say they aren't completely unavailable. Intel has built nothing practically nothing but Xeons in a couple of years.

All you can do as a consumer is buy smart. But eventually this won't be a solution anymore, especially if you don't live in a particularly abundant market. Depending on the demand level you might still be in an area where distribution delays have somewhat sheltered you from the price increases, but even in these markets the situation has begun to deteriorate. For example, I purchased two 8 GB DDR5 sticks two weeks ago - Kingston Fury Beast 5600 C36 sticks, of the kind you'd find in a cheap gaming PC not too long ago - their price has increased by 2.8x since. All major stores in Brazil have already begun to see insufficient stock and price increases on whatever little you can find.
Posted on Reply
#25
phints
This should be $399. What a joke. Wait for Zen 6 or get a 9800X3D.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 15th, 2026 04:34 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts