Sunday, December 21st 2025

Valve Discontinues Steam Deck LCD, OLED Versions Remain

Valve has officially discontinued its 256 GB LCD version of the Steam Deck handheld gaming console, phasing it out entirely from its offerings. However, this is not the end of the Steam Deck lineup, as the 512 GB and 1 TB OLED versions will continue manufacturing and sales. According to Valve, "We are no longer producing the Steam Deck LCD 256 GB model. Once sold out, it will no longer be available." This is a logical decision considering Valve is trying to simplify its production lines as it introduces new products such as the Steam Machine, Steam Frame, and Steam Controller.

The LCD version of the Steam Deck carried a MSRP of $399 and came with 256 GB of storage, but to upgrade to OLED, gamers had to spend an extra $150 for a price tag of $549. Of course, the OLED SKU carries a fleet of benefits, with the most obvious being the display quality with HDR and a higher 90 Hz refresh rate, longer battery life, and bigger storage capacity for larger games. To make matters more interesting, Valve's website already shows that the LCD version is out of stock, so if gamers want to get their hands on the Steam Deck at the lower price point, they have to look at third-party retailers for any remaining stock.
Additionally, Valve's discontinuation of the 256 GB version might have something to do with the global NAND flash shortage, which is causing a strain on the company's multi-product lineup. All available NAND chips are now redirected towards 512 GB and 1 TB SKUs, as well as the Steam Machine launch scheduled for 2026. As the scarcity of NAND grows, redirecting supply for higher-margin products is somewhat understandable. However, with many new players entering the handheld console space, we have to wait and see how gamers react.
Source: Valve
Add your own comment

16 Comments on Valve Discontinues Steam Deck LCD, OLED Versions Remain

#1
Vayra86
OLED's premium is worth it. That's all I can say, having used both.
Posted on Reply
#2
Rover4444
AleksandarKThe LCD version of the Steam Machine carried an MSRP of $399 and came with 256 GB of storage
Huh?
Posted on Reply
#3
_roman_
Makes sense to sell the bigger "harddrive" version to get less money when flash prices go up.
Why not sell a oled version with 256GB as an option?
Posted on Reply
#4
Onasi
This should be noted to be an effective MSRP increase on the Deck overall. It’s hard to fault Valve for it considering the ongoing hardware pricing crisis and their need to also secure parts for their new products, but this essentially makes the Deck a 550 device. Granted, probably most people who wanted the base model already got it.
Posted on Reply
#5
AleksandarK
News Editor
Rover4444Huh?
Monday mornings... thanks!
Posted on Reply
#6
Hakker
I think it has more to do with production capacity. The LCD version is quite different than the OLED version. Diffferent Wifi, battery, screen and cooling to begin with. It's not just a screen swap what they did.
Posted on Reply
#7
Solaris17
Super Dainty Moderator
OnasiThis should be noted to be an effective MSRP increase on the Deck overall. It’s hard to fault Valve for it considering the ongoing hardware pricing crisis and their need to also secure parts for their new products, but this essentially makes the Deck a 550 device. Granted, probably most people who wanted the base model already got it.
They might also be doing it to stave off upping prices for the other version since memory contracts account for qty. So redirecting chips they contractually got cheap to the higher end versions so they can make more at the same price makes sense from a good guy perspective. Are they actually doing that? No idea. But if there is any company that atleast tries to resist corp greed if you told me it was valve I’d believe you.
Posted on Reply
#8
lexluthermiester
$400 was asking too much for the original system. $550 and $650 for these? HELL NO! Anyone who pays so much for such old hardware specs has more money than sense..
Posted on Reply
#9
Vayra86
OnasiThis should be noted to be an effective MSRP increase on the Deck overall. It’s hard to fault Valve for it considering the ongoing hardware pricing crisis and their need to also secure parts for their new products, but this essentially makes the Deck a 550 device. Granted, probably most people who wanted the base model already got it.
Oh look how beautifully that aligns to a 599,- Steam Machine, now...

There is definitely more to this sudden change than the price of parts ;)
lexluthermiester$400 was asking too much for the original system. $550 and $650 for these? HELL NO! Anyone who pays so much for such old hardware specs has more money than sense..
'old' hardware spec, except there is nothing at this power envelope that does noticeably better - we can mull over 20% here or there but it will not change the game whatsoever for this segment. Valve is completely right about their stance on a successor. But I agree, purely on the face value of the parts themselves... its overpriced. But that goes for almost every prefabricated device vs a DIY build - Steam Machine already has the same dialogue around it.

That's what matters. You can have a more recent chip, and it'll use the same power, or use more power and perform marginally better, which is a nothingburger on a device operating on a battery.

The spec that does matter is the software it runs, how it runs it, and the overall QoL of the device, which is unsurpassed. Other things it has the competiton has not: repairability, upgradability, and a perfect positioning in the PC gaming ecosystem with no ties to a rapidly degenerating Windows.

What you're looking at here, is Valve doing us an Apple situation, without the shitty gatekeeping tactics, and given the track record of Apple's experience, I'll happily pay a bit of premium for that, especially given the freedom we maintain while having vastly improved software.
Posted on Reply
#10
TheGeekn°72
Vayra86But I agree, purely on the face value of the parts themselves... its overpriced. But that goes for almost every prefabricated device vs a DIY build - Steam Machine already has the same dialogue around it.
that's the thing though, the Deck doesn't really have DIY alternatives: unless Raspberry Pi suddently started making SBCs with a Z1 APU on them, DIY Decks are not happening (though I wonder if somehow there's a market for Deck motherboards)
the closest thing would be -following the principle that SteamOS on ARM will eventually show up since that's allegedly what the Frame runs on a Snapdragon gen8 APU- a smartphone running SteamOS with modded on controller inputs, extra cooling and extra battery
Posted on Reply
#11
lexluthermiester
Vayra86old' hardware spec, except there is nothing at this power envelope that does noticeably better - we can mull over 20% here or there but it will not change the game whatsoever for this segment. Valve is completely right about their stance on a successor. But I agree, purely on the face value of the parts themselves... its overpriced. But that goes for almost every prefabricated device vs a DIY build - Steam Machine already has the same dialogue around it.

That's what matters. You can have a more recent chip, and it'll use the same power, or use more power and perform marginally better, which is a nothingburger on a device operating on a battery.

The spec that does matter is the software it runs, how it runs it, and the overall QoL of the device, which is unsurpassed. Other things it has the competiton has not: repairability, upgradability, and a perfect positioning in the PC gaming ecosystem with no ties to a rapidly degenerating Windows.
Um, no. The SteamDeck is running hardware that is 6 years old at this point. Newer systems in the same price point are running much newer and better performing hardware, with better screens and better batteries. Other manufacturers handheld units are also using Windows so the Linux compatibility question is not a concern with them.

The SteamDeck at this point in time for the $550/$650 asking price is a stupidly foolish choice.
Vayra86What you're looking at here, is Valve doing us an Apple situation, without the shitty gatekeeping tactics, and given the track record of Apple's experience, I'll happily pay a bit of premium for that, especially given the freedom we maintain while having vastly improved software.
On this we agree, Valve is very much doing the Apple thing: Charging too much money for a name. Except that Valve is not reaching the same level of value balance. With Apple products, one at least gets modern hardware for the insane prices being charged instead of 6 year old hardware with a low resolution screen.

At this point in time, the SteamDeck is a valid option only for people with more money than brains. For everyone else, there are MUCH better options at similar prices..
Posted on Reply
#12
Vayra86
lexluthermiesterUm, no. The SteamDeck is running hardware that 6 years old at this point. Newer systems in the same price point are running much newer and better performing hardware, with better screens and better batteries. Other manufacturers handheld units are also using Windows so the Linux compatibility question is not a concern with them.

The SteamDeck at this point in time for the $550/$650 asking price is a stupidly foolish choice.


On this we agree, Value is very much doing the Apple thing: Charging too much money for a name. Except that Value is not reaching the same level of value balance. With Apple products, one at least gets modern hardware for the insane prices being charged instead of 6 year old hardware with a low resolution screen.

At this point in time, the SteamDeck is a valid option only for people with more money than brains. For everyone else, there are MUCH better options at similar prices..
Apple products and modern hardware... never cutting edge either; Apple is known to charge through the nose for specs and especially memory.

Low res is in fact, a perk adding to the Deck's battery life and at this diagonal Im not seeing the advantage of 1080p. Shit gets tiny that way, not a fan. Ill take native scaling and comfortable sizing + low battery use over res every time.

As for those better options, Im not seeing too much of them, and/or they lack something.
Posted on Reply
#13
lexluthermiester
Vayra86Low res is in fact, a perk adding to the Deck's battery life and at this diagonal Im not seeing the advantage of 1080p.
The advantage is choice. For games that don't need super high-end specs, running at 1080p+ will do little or nothing to battery life. But for titles that do need higher end performance, a user can always drop the resolution down to something lower to increase framerates or even battery life if desired. With the SD, the user has none of those options.
Vayra86Shit gets tiny that way, not a fan. Ill take native scaling and comfortable sizing + low battery use over res every time.
That's a personal preference thing. I'd much rather have the options and the liberty of choice. Ironically, this is why Windows is the better fit for handhelds..
Posted on Reply
#14
Vayra86
lexluthermiesterThe advantage is choice. For game that don't need super high-end specs, running at 1080p+ will do little or nothing to battery life. But for titles that do need higher end performance, a user can always drop the resolution down to something lower to increase framerates or even battery life if desired. With the SD, the user has none of those options.

That's a personal preference thing. I'd much rather have the options and the liberty of choice. Ironically, this is why Windows is the better fit for handhelds..
Its very much a preference thing, for sure. But in general, I don't feel the difference in terms of specs is that meaningful on a handheld, I find myself playing games that I really don't play on the PC on it, and they tend to suit the 'occasion' for the use of a handheld better, too - a half hour, or an hour of gaming tops, perhaps two if you're really into it. Its also mostly indie stuff, platformers, puzzle stuff, isometric/turn based, and really, very rarely if ever a 3d viewport-based game, which is where the specs really come into play, as well as resolution.

Is an alternative to Deck objectively a better device in terms of performance, I won't contest that. But is it performance I really benefit from, or do I benefit more from good battery life, a very nice OLED screen, plenty of storage and a very lean OS... I've experienced the latter. Inside SteamOS, its really a console experience, you hit the stuff you want to play, and its go time, and all the necessary controls are in reach both within and outside the game. The GUI and the seamlessness is what I've really come to like - its 'unlike PC gaming' really, whereas a Windows handheld does not get there at all. In the very same menu, I can fire up Super Mario Bros. (the original) or Donkey Kong emulated perfectly; its just fucking brilliant.
Posted on Reply
#15
lexluthermiester
Vayra86But in general, I don't feel the difference in terms of specs is that meaningful on a handheld
I've used the SD and a few other handhelds that have come since. The difference is there. The SD's hardware is just too dated for the current market, which brings us right back around to the over-priced point.
Vayra86The GUI and the seamlessness is what I've really come to like - its 'unlike PC gaming' really, whereas a Windows handheld does not get there at all.
That's very much personal preference thing. I've had a chance to sit down with Lenovo's recent offerings and all it took for me was to increase the scaling options and all was well.
Vayra86I can fire up Super Mario Bros. (the original) or Donkey Kong emulated perfectly; its just fucking brilliant.
As an emulation geek and enthusiast I can confidently say retro-console emulation on Windows is leaps and bounds better than it is on Linux. I'm not saying it's bad or poor because it isn't, just not as good as it is on Windows. When we factor in PC game compatibility issues on Linux, Windows is still the clear choice for handhelds. Valve has really kicked up the level of compatibility a bunch of notches, but it's not where I would want it to be.
(Side note: Emulation and gaming is one of the reasons ZorinOS impresses me, the support for gaming has greatly improved in Zorin, much more than Mint and on par with Bazzite.)

At this point in time, the SD might still be able to function as a reasonable gaming handheld. However, at the prices on offer? Hell no.
Posted on Reply
#16
chrcoluk
Vayra86OLED's premium is worth it. That's all I can say, having used both.
My switch is OLED and my steam deck is LCD, I can barely tell the difference. I guess I am not that sensitive to the benefits of OLED.

I expect the lowest model has been loss leading or barely break even, and the recent market problems have broke the camels back.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 13th, 2026 17:01 PST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts