Thursday, March 26th 2026

Intel Officially Confirms: Core Ultra 9 290K Plus Won't be Released

When the rumor mill for Intel's "Arrow Lake Refresh" began, we expected three SKUs: Core Ultra 5 250K Plus, Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, and a flagship Core Ultra 9 290K Plus. However, we later discovered that Intel is not launching the flagship SKU and will only release the Core Ultra 5 and Core Ultra 7 models. Instead, Intel chose to focus on delivering value with its Core Ultra 7 270K Plus SKU, which features 8 P-Cores and 16 E-Cores with a maximum turbo boost of 5.5 GHz. For individual boosting frequency, P-Cores reach up to 5.4 GHz, with a base speed of 3.7 GHz. E-Cores have a maximum boost frequency of 4.7 GHz and a base speed of 3.2 GHz. The main reason for canceling the flagship SKU is product overlap, as the Core Ultra 9 290K Plus would have the same core configuration as the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, just with slightly higher clock speeds. Consequently, Intel decided not to launch this SKU. It has now been confirmed by Intel Germany for PC Games Hardware that Intel will definitely not introduce this SKU at any point in the future.
Florian Maislinger, Tech Communication Manager, Intel GermanyIntel is excited to deliver exceptional value with our Intel Core Ultra 200S Plus series processors. The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus are positioned to deliver outstanding gaming performance and incredible value compared to our competition. Our objective was to maximize performance for the desktop SKUs that are most widely available. As a result, Intel is not launching a U9 290K Plus SKU.
Source: PC Games Hardware
Add your own comment

32 Comments on Intel Officially Confirms: Core Ultra 9 290K Plus Won't be Released

#3
Sabato69
So we have leaks from one side and on the other side a news that say we are not gonna do that...
Posted on Reply
#4
Ihnako
In the past intel released processors with exact the same core count and just slighly higher clocks as i3/i5/i7 and i9 (mostly for notebooks).
Posted on Reply
#5
aktpu
Hard to see they could meaninfully improve 9, since 7 got the bumps
Posted on Reply
#6
Tyler-98-W68
About the only thing I could see them improving on a 9 series refresh might be higher e-core clocks, as most have a fair amount of headroom. I can run mine at 5.1ghz on my 285k. Power consumption goes up a fair amount though so it would probably be something like KS variant.
Posted on Reply
#7
Alan Smithee
Meaning: We are too scared to launch another high TDP SKU that is effectively factory overclocked, because it might fail like 13th-14th gen and we can't have another debacle like that.
Posted on Reply
#8
DeltaHawk001
I'm sure this is completely unrelated to the 9950x3d2, and in other words, today amd announced the 9950x3d2
Posted on Reply
#9
AleXXX666
Tyler-98-W68About the only thing I could see them improving on a 9 series refresh might be higher e-core clocks, as most have a fair amount of headroom. I can run mine at 5.1ghz on my 285k. Power consumption goes up a fair amount though so it would probably be something like KS variant.
more cache, anyone? :rolleyes:
LOVED the i9-10900K thing for it's "more cores" compared to same gen i7, then next i9 were pure marketing BS compared to that, I don't know how e-cores clocks could make it stand better for potentially OVERPRICE
Posted on Reply
#10
Tyler-98-W68
Well when you have 16 cores that can overclock around 600mhz.....it makes a decent difference in performance.
Posted on Reply
#11
Dr. Dro
Alan SmitheeMeaning: We are too scared to launch another high TDP SKU that is effectively factory overclocked, because it might fail like 13th-14th gen and we can't have another debacle like that.
This has nothing to do with the Raptor Lake reliability issues. They were caused by microcode bugs, which have since then been fixed.
Posted on Reply
#12
Darthgrey
Before for Intel it was not a problem to sell exactly the same core configuration as a separate i9 and i7 models (check i7 11700K and i9 11900K for extra $150))
Posted on Reply
#13
Dr. Dro
DarthgreyBefore for Intel it was not a problem to sell exactly the same core configuration as a separate i9 and i7 models (check i7 11700K and i9 11900K for extra $150))
Rocket Lake was an outlier. They couldn't ship a 6-core i7 by 2019, it just wasn't gonna work.
Posted on Reply
#14
Simkin
DeltaHawk001I'm sure this is completely unrelated to the 9950x3d2, and in other words, today amd announced the 9950x3d2
I'm skipping LGA 1851 for obvious reasons as i already sit on LGA 1700, and i guess many others do.

With AMD's positioning in the marked with their X3D chips it makes sense for intel to skip the 290 i guess, they can't compete now anyway in area's such as gaming.

Only thing interesting now is upcoming Nova Lake..
Posted on Reply
#15
Prima.Vera
When you start naming your products as retarded Asian name conventions such as Mega Ultra Plus Extreme Titanium Ti, kind of naming, it's pass time to fire that retarded Chinese/Taiwanese Marketing team and bring back THE PROPER naming convention that was used up to 14th Gen. While there, axe the Xeon team also for overly complicated and useless namings too.
Posted on Reply
#16
notoperable
For once Intel understood his customer properly: nobody gives a s**t - so they saved themselves the paper launch costs :-)
Posted on Reply
#17
Dr. Dro
notoperableFor once Intel understood his customer properly: nobody gives a s**t - so they saved themselves the paper launch costs :-)
Not the reason why: 270K+ has received the full die configuration, which means the only thing a 290K+ would have to show for would be higher clocks at a much higher price. Not worth even spending the time to bin these chips.
Posted on Reply
#18
notoperable
SimkinI'm skipping LGA 1851 for obvious reasons as i already sit on LGA 1700, and i guess many others do.

With AMD's positioning in the marked with their X3D chips it makes sense for intel to skip the 290 i guess, they can't compete now anyway in area's such as gaming.

Only thing interesting now is upcoming Nova Lake..
Fellow User who, like me - enjoys the LGA 1700 island of misery and its unique exerpeince!
Posted on Reply
#19
Simkin
notoperableFellow User who, like me - enjoys the LGA 1700 island of misery and its unique exerpeince!
Bought my 13900K in 2022, so far so good, it has been reliable and stable. Have been updating all the microcode/bios.
Posted on Reply
#20
notoperable
SimkinBought my 13900K in 2022, so far so good, it has been reliable and stable. Have been updating all the microcode/bios.
minus 20% of performance mitigations tax that was never refunded
Posted on Reply
#21
Simkin
notoperableminus 20% of performance mitigations tax that was never refunded
So you saying my 13900K has been stable since 2022, but i have had a 20% performance mitigation?
Posted on Reply
#22
Dr. Dro
notoperableminus 20% of performance mitigations tax that was never refunded
I'm sorry, but the 13900K did not get 20% slower over time. Nor did the Spectre/Meltdown thing ever apply to it. If you've had such trouble, it's on you.
Posted on Reply
#23
Tyler-98-W68
The microcode update generally caused a 2-6% drop in performance. Not 20% that's a pretty wild number to pull out of your ass
Posted on Reply
#24
Dr. Dro
Tyler-98-W68The microcode update generally caused a 2-6% drop in performance. Not 20% that's a pretty wild number to pull out of your ass
Not that it applies to RPL to begin with
Posted on Reply
#25
notoperable
SimkinSo you saying my 13900K has been stable since 2022, but i have had a 20% performance mitigation?
Depends on your use case +/- its easy to validate by running a kernel mainline compile with mitigations=off and without in the kernel command line on boot
Dr. DroI'm sorry, but the 13900K did not get 20% slower over time. Nor did the Spectre/Meltdown thing ever apply to it. If you've had such trouble, it's on you.
First, nobody said about anything being slower over time. Secondly - how can this be on me, enlighten me how you came to this conclusion, lastly you might
be using keywords like Specre or Meltdown to sometihng else then processor vulnebarilities - otherwise you wouldnt use it in context of raptor lake
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 13th, 2026 22:36 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts