Thursday, April 16th 2026

Intel "Crescent Island" Xe3P to Skip Arc Gaming GPUs, Focus on Workstations

by
AleksandarK
 Discuss (15 Comments)
Intel's upcoming "Crescent Island" series of GPUs, based on the newly developed Xe3P graphics IP, will be hitting the market this year. However, it seems this IP won't be featured in the desktop Arc gaming series of discrete GPUs. According to a reliable leaker, Jaykihn, Intel will not release this GPU generation as dedicated Arc gaming graphics cards. Instead, Xe3P-based GPUs will power "Crescent Island" data center and workstation GPUs, similar to the current Arc Pro series for professional users. This leaves Arc gamers without a clear indication of when, or even if, they will receive a new gaming Arc GPU based on the Xe3 or Xe4 IP in the coming months.

Intel recently announced the Arc Pro B70 and Arc Pro B65 graphics cards, which maximize the BMG-G31 "Battlemage" Xe2 silicon but are intended for professional users only. A recent driver update added the ability to play games on these cards, but they are still primarily designed for AI workloads and professional visualization. Gamers are still seeking clarity about future updates, and the lack of recent rumors regarding an additional Arc gaming discrete GPU is concerning. Even the higher-end Arc B770, which has been rumored for some time, seems to be on hold. Upcoming events like Computex might offer Intel a chance to at least provide a teaser of what the desktop Arc GPU family will look like or if there will be any updates soon.
For now, Intel's strategy remains focused on pushing new GPU IP through integrated graphics, such as the Arc B390 iGPU found in "Panther Lake" processors, which use Xe3 IP. This approach allows Intel to integrate new GPU designs into high-volume mobile SoCs and make numerous game optimizations for these GPUs along the way. For the Xe3P IP, the upcoming "Nova Lake" is expected to integrate up to 12 Xe3P GPU cores in a desktop APU design. However, if Intel does not release any discrete Xe3P GPU SKUs, the rumored APU may be the closest option to Xe3P on desktop, aside from pursuing the upcoming workstation and data center "Crescent Island" discrete GPUs with 160 GB of LPDDR5X memory.

Finally, we know that Intel is not abandoning its Xe graphics, as the company is already working on "Xe Next" architecture. However, gamers need a clear roadmap or some new teasers to look forward before investing into the existing Intel Arc ecosystem.
Source: Jaykihn on X

Related News

Add your own comment

15 Comments on Intel "Crescent Island" Xe3P to Skip Arc Gaming GPUs, Focus on Workstations

#1
wEeViLz
no one cares about the gamers anymore :shadedshu:
Posted on Reply
#2
Grimling
wEeViLzno one cares about the gamers anymore :shadedshu:
Why sell a GPU to Gamers for 1000 USD, when you can sell the same GPU to "AI-Corporations" for 6000 USD?
Posted on Reply
#3
RejZoR
GrimlingWhy sell a GPU to Gamers for 1000 USD, when you can sell the same GPU to "AI-Corporations" for 6000 USD?
And then sell you gaming for 50€ a month subscription ala GeForce NOW and then jack up the price every few months. Pay everything, own nothing.
Posted on Reply
#5
Mrgravia
Sucks that we will seemingly never get a refresh of their low end. A380/A310 is pretty long in the tooth these days.
Posted on Reply
#6
Dragokar
So we gonna see a rebranded nvidia GPU labeled as XE4 after that?
Posted on Reply
#7
Darmok N Jalad
TumbleGeorgeAI buble soon will be end. Society rejected moar data centres.
Yeah, local communities have been pushing against these here, too. I think people see the liabilities they bring, despite the “community leaders” talking about how good they’ll be for jobs and tax revenue. Maybe we’ve just heard that too many times before and no longer believe it. We’ve been asked for years to conserve the very resources that these sites consume in high volumes.
Posted on Reply
#8
evernessince
GrimlingWhy sell a GPU to Gamers for 1000 USD, when you can sell the same GPU to "AI-Corporations" for 6000 USD?
Let's be honest, Nvidia is the only one that's selling $1,000 GPUs. People in that price range want dual use cards and Nvidia have a complete monopoly on the professional and AI ecosystems.

Gaming space ain't much better either. Intel is probably realizing what AMD did a few years back, software gaps take a very long time to close and require large financial outlays. It's a market conditioned by Nvidia to benefit Nvidia.
Posted on Reply
#9
DeltaHawk001
I understand being mad at intel for this, but keep in mind that the B580 is the best new GPU for under 300 dollars. Intel knows that they probably can't beat Nvidia or AMD yet in gaming, so I expect them to make more gaming GPUs when they have more experience.

B770 when????

Also, intel has surprised many people in the past. Remember when we all though arc was discontinued?

And as for the A380 and A310, the integrated graphics keep getting better and better, so they may be replaced by that.
Posted on Reply
#10
TechBuyingHavoc
Darmok N JaladYeah, local communities have been pushing against these here, too. I think people see the liabilities they bring, despite the “community leaders” talking about how good they’ll be for jobs and tax revenue. Maybe we’ve just heard that too many times before and no longer believe it. We’ve been asked for years to conserve the very resources that these sites consume in high volumes.
Wait until you see the rates for electricity that industry pays vs normal people. It is egregious enough to make your blood boil.

That is separate from the mandatory connection fee and/or grid fee that every consumer has to pay. My utility is doubling the mandatory connection fee next year. I have not heard one word about datacenters in my area paying more for their power. Any paid off tool in local/state/federal government that is for data centers, I am voting against 100% :mad:
Posted on Reply
#11
Darmok N Jalad
TechBuyingHavocWait until you see the rates for electricity that industry pays vs normal people. It is egregious enough to make your blood boil.

That is separate from the mandatory connection fee and/or grid fee that every consumer has to pay. My utility is doubling the mandatory connection fee next year. I have not heard one word about datacenters in my area paying more for their power. Any paid off tool in local/state/federal government that is for data centers, I am voting against 100% :mad:
Well, there are reasons that large industrial customers pay less in rates. Their use is very high and they have a single point of supply. Much of home usage and base fees are there to cover the cost to maintain the infrastructure that supplies you the electricity, which you want to have 24/7, in varying quantities. And as much as you pay, it costs even more to keep an aging infrastructure functional. Believe it or not, these large customers pay so much that their usage probably subsidizes your costs. Like everything else, there is a very real cost to serve each person. A data center might even own most of the equipment, so it is “cheaper” for the utility to supply them than 10,000 homes that use nowhere near as much. If electricity generation has no negatives, this would all be good and fine. The problem is electricity generation does have real costs, government oversight, and supply constraints. I don’t wonder as much about “fair share” as I worry about meeting demand. Those 10,000 houses need electricity as much as a data center, perhaps even more so, as we are rather dependent on it for our survival.
Posted on Reply
#12
Squared
DeltaHawk001I understand being mad at intel for this, but keep in mind that the B580 is the best new GPU for under 300 dollars. Intel knows that they probably can't beat Nvidia or AMD yet in gaming, so I expect them to make more gaming GPUs when they have more experience.

B770 when????

Also, intel has surprised many people in the past. Remember when we all though arc was discontinued?

And as for the A380 and A310, the integrated graphics keep getting better and better, so they may be replaced by that.
The B580 is already competitive with AMD and Nvidia in virtually every way that matters, it's just a small chip though. I think Intel is assuming past sales numbers mean that brand reputation isn't good enough, nevermind that the B580 has established a pretty strong reputation.

The A380 and A310 aren't about graphics. They're some of the best media encoders right behind the RTX 400 series & 500 series and the Arc B series. The Xe1 iGPU on desktop Arrow Lake might be in the same ballpark but it's the very best desktop iGPU media engine for desktop amd it's still behind the B series. And as someone with an RX 9060 XT and an Arc A310, I can confirm that even AMD's best still hasn't entered the media engine contest.
Posted on Reply
#13
evernessince
TechBuyingHavocWait until you see the rates for electricity that industry pays vs normal people. It is egregious enough to make your blood boil.

That is separate from the mandatory connection fee and/or grid fee that every consumer has to pay. My utility is doubling the mandatory connection fee next year. I have not heard one word about datacenters in my area paying more for their power. Any paid off tool in local/state/federal government that is for data centers, I am voting against 100% :mad:
The utilities are perfectly happy to place the burden of data centers on regular people. Heck a good chunk of them have institutional investors. State mandated monopolies are good business, especially in a low regularity environment. Good for investors at least, not for you or me.
Posted on Reply
#14
Mrgravia
SquaredThe B580 is already competitive with AMD and Nvidia in virtually every way that matters, it's just a small chip though. I think Intel is assuming past sales numbers mean that brand reputation isn't good enough, nevermind that the B580 has established a pretty strong reputation.

The A380 and A310 aren't about graphics. They're some of the best media encoders right behind the RTX 400 series & 500 series and the Arc B series. The Xe1 iGPU on desktop Arrow Lake might be in the same ballpark but it's the very best desktop iGPU media engine for desktop amd it's still behind the B series. And as someone with an RX 9060 XT and an Arc A310, I can confirm that even AMD's best still hasn't entered the media engine contest.
Exactly! The A310 and A380 are darlings for folks building media center rigs, with maybe a side of light gaming. Would be nice to have an improvement there, with more Vram and muscle, if still behind the B570/580. Something new, low profile or ITX in format. The 5050 series is the newest in that arena, and rather expensive compared to A310/380 series.
Posted on Reply
#15
Squared
MrgraviaExactly! The A310 and A380 are darlings for folks building media center rigs, with maybe a side of light gaming. Would be nice to have an improvement there, with more Vram and muscle, if still behind the B570/580. Something new, low profile or ITX in format. The 5050 series is the newest in that arena, and rather expensive compared to A310/380 series.
I'd be happy with just the same GPU compute capabilities but the B-series encoders. Although since I already bought something when then A310 was the only cheap option, at this point I'd like a C or D-series encoder.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 12th, 2026 04:42 CST change timezone

Latest GPU Drivers

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts