Tuesday, July 14th 2026

HWMonitor v1.65 Brings Back Hotspot Reading for NVIDIA RTX 50 Series

CPUID has just released HWMonitor version 1.65, which reintroduces the previously abandoned hotspot temperature reading for NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 50 series "Blackwell" GPU. When NVIDIA originally launched its "Blackwell" GPU lineup, the company removed the ability for popular utilities like GPU-Z and HWMonitor to access hotspot sensor data, even though the sensor was present on the die. We initially thought it was impossible to access this data again without using NVIDIA's internal tool, Modular Diagnostic Software (MODS), which is not publicly available. However, the latest HWMonitor update has restored this capability. Although we are unsure how the update accomplishes this without public API exposure, which NVIDIA restricted with the RTX 50 series, the software reportedly bypasses this limitation and successfully performs a normal hotspot reading.

An extreme overclocker known as "Madness" on X has already tested the latest HWMonitor version 1.65 on a shunt-modded and water-cooled RTX 5090 GPU, which is drawing over 900 W from the wall. Under the water block, the GPU's hotspot sensor measures around 68°C, while the normal temperature reporting shows a delta of about 17°C, indicating that the reported GPU temperature is around 51°C. Although this delta between the overall GPU die temperature and hotspot temperature isn't ideal, it provides overclockers with more detailed information about their GPUs.
Yesterday, we reported that NVIDIA's internal tool, Modular Diagnostic Software (MODS), detected a hotspot of 107°C on an RTX 5070 Ti GPU, while regular tools only registered temperatures of about 67°C to 68°C through the public tool API. This suggests significant discrepancies between hotspot temperatures, which might explain why the GPU is thermal throttling, even when normal temperature readings appear fine.
Sources: HWMonitor, via VideoCardz
Add your own comment

40 Comments on HWMonitor v1.65 Brings Back Hotspot Reading for NVIDIA RTX 50 Series

#1
RejZoR
Well, everyone was whining about high delta between core temperature and hotspot of RX 9070 XT. Now you know why NVIDIA is hiding it.
Posted on Reply
#2
PixelTech
CPUID GOAT
I wanna see what mine is when I get home.
EDIT: Oh wait... I can't. CPUID doesn't have a Linux supported version? bummer
EDIT EDIT: Tried installing anyways and discovered I had Wine that could adapt it anyways. Sadly, HWM only showed clock speeds and not temperatures. And my GPU didn't even show up as a part, odd.
Posted on Reply
#3
Hecate91
It's clear why Nvidia was hiding the sensor, but according to some it was better to not know, and now I wonder if there will be an increase in RMA'ed GPU's with high hotspot temps.
But i'm curious how HW monitor is revealing the sensor, previously it was apparently hidden when the GPU driver loads.
Posted on Reply
#4
JustBenching
So nvidia didnt remove the sensor out of greediness to save a dollar. The sensor is there already. Good news for 5xxx owners.
Posted on Reply
#5
Arrakis9
Hecate91It's clear why Nvidia was hiding the sensor, but according to some it was better to not know, and now I wonder if there will be an increase in RMA'ed GPU's with high hotspot temps.
But i'm curious how HW monitor is revealing the sensor, previously it was apparently hidden when the GPU driver loads.
there was a recent leak of an internal Nvidia tool that could read hotspot temps. My guess is it was reverse engineered and added to HW mon
Posted on Reply
#6
Ed_1
So, the next question is, can GPU-Z get this support :)
Posted on Reply
#7
Arrakis9
Ed_1So, the next question is, can GPU-Z get this support :)
@W1zzard
Posted on Reply
#8
Onasi
I can’t wait for people to start panicking because they fail to interpret what they will see from the reading. We already had this song and dance with AMD.
Posted on Reply
#9
AVATARAT
OnasiI can’t wait for people to start panicking because they fail to interpret what they will see from the reading. We already had this song and dance with AMD.
So you'd prefer it to be hidden?
______

Linux, when? :D
Posted on Reply
#10
JustBenching
AVATARATSo you'd prefer it to be hidden?
______

Linux, when? :D
Nobody wants it hidden but it's such a tiny issue nobody really cares. Nobody won't buy a 5xxx because of the Hotspot temp, the people complaining are just doing it cause nvidia is involved and for no other reason. It's like the boy who cried wolf, when people cry so much nobody will take them seriously even when in fact there is an actual important issue.
Posted on Reply
#11
RejZoR
Hecate91It's clear why Nvidia was hiding the sensor, but according to some it was better to not know, and now I wonder if there will be an increase in RMA'ed GPU's with high hotspot temps.
But i'm curious how HW monitor is revealing the sensor, previously it was apparently hidden when the GPU driver loads.
Modern GPUs all seem to have large deltas and it's normal. For example on my RX 9070 XT I intentionally use GPU Core and not GPU Hotspot in FanControl. It just seems more realistic and I can better control my case fans depending on GPU load using Max function for both CPU and GPU sensor. So my case fans ramp up accordingly whether I'm doing work on CPU only or GPU only, case fans ramp up correctly regardless.

With hot spot reading I was getting such high numbers on GPU most of the time it was hard to really create a meaningful case fans curve... And it was spiking up to high values for rather mundane tasks which just isn't realistic or useful. Regular temperature makes more sense so I just use that instead.
Posted on Reply
#12
Bwaze
That was quick from "Sensors actually exist!" to "Here's a tool that actually uses them."

I wonder if there wasn't any reverse engineering, but Nvidia actually provided info how to read the sensors now that we knew they exist and can be read.
Posted on Reply
#13
Onasi
AVATARATSo you'd prefer it to be hidden?
No. It’s another data point, useful for XOC dudes. It’s just basically irrelevant for everyone else, but people will be stupid. I told people not to read too much into AMD having fairly high hotspot temperatures for years, I am not changing my position now that NV also exposes this metric. It’s a nothingburger in 95% of cases.
Posted on Reply
#14
Ed_1
Just tested on my ASUS prime 5070ti in a UE5 game, GPU temp max was 61.5c and hotspot was 74.8c max. So 12-13c more with hotspot.
Posted on Reply
#16
Hecate91
RejZoRModern GPUs all seem to have large deltas and it's normal. For example on my RX 9070 XT I intentionally use GPU Core and not GPU Hotspot in FanControl. It just seems more realistic and I can better control my case fans depending on GPU load using Max function for both CPU and GPU sensor. So my case fans ramp up accordingly whether I'm doing work on CPU only or GPU only, case fans ramp up correctly regardless.

With hot spot reading I was getting such high numbers on GPU most of the time it was hard to really create a meaningful case fans curve... And it was spiking up to high values for rather mundane tasks which just isn't realistic or useful. Regular temperature makes more sense so I just use that instead.
I'm fine with high hotspot delta on a GPU, since that's how modern GPU's are, though when the hotspot reading is over 100C that is a sign thermal paste isn't covering the GPU die completely.
I would personally rather have the data available that not, however I agree focusing on the hotspot delta temp alone isn't something to be worried over, still useful info to have though.
JustBenchingNobody wants it hidden but it's such a tiny issue nobody really cares. Nobody won't buy a 5xxx because of the Hotspot temp, the people complaining are just doing it cause nvidia is involved and for no other reason. It's like the boy who cried wolf, when people cry so much nobody will take them seriously even when in fact there is an actual important issue.
So it's an issue that nobody should care about with Nvidia, but when it comes to AMD it was, the whole tech media blew up a 20C or less delta temp as something important.
The double standards people have for the green brand is always interesting.
Oh, and no one doesn't buy a 5000 series GPU over the 12vhwpr connector either, doesn't mean they have to like an awful connector.
Posted on Reply
#17
tsunami2311
Dr. DroFor those who prefer HWiNFO64, the author also dropped this on OCN. The 8.51 beta includes 50 series hotspot reading as well.

www.hwinfo.com/beta/hwi64_851_6025.zip
nice I will wait for that update, as I dont use HW monitor but I Do use HWinfo64
Posted on Reply
#18
shuffy_losys
OnasiI can’t wait for people to start panicking because they fail to interpret what they will see from the reading. We already had this song and dance with AMD.
This was my thought as well. My questions about this hot spot temperature are:
  • Where in the GPU is it?
  • How long did it last?
Because if the hotspot temperature is just floating around the GPU more or less randomly and it only lasts for say milliseconds at a time, then is this something to really worry about?

And another thing is, that nobody seems to want to answer, is we know temperature degrades electronics, but we don't have any practical indicators of the relationship. There might be some theoretical formula, but not a bunch of real-world sample points.
Posted on Reply
#19
JustBenching
Hecate91So it's an issue that nobody should care about with Nvidia, but when it comes to AMD it was, the whole tech media blew up a 20C or less delta temp as something important.
The double standards people have for the green brand is always interesting.
Oh, and no one doesn't buy a 5000 series GPU over the 12vhwpr connector either, doesn't mean they have to like an awful connector.
Nobody blew up anything with AMD, you are just making stuff up. Plus im not the tech media so what double standards are you even talking about.

Again, you are crying wolf when there is nothing there, don't be surprised when people ignore you even when there is a wolf.
Posted on Reply
#21
JustBenching
shuffy_losysThis was my thought as well. My questions about this hot spot temperature are:
  • Where in the GPU is it?
  • How long did it last?
Because if the hotspot temperature is just floating around the GPU more or less randomly and it only lasts for say milliseconds at a time, then is this something to really worry about?

And another thing is, that nobody seems to want to answer, is we know temperature degrades electronics, but we don't have any practical indicators of the relationship. There might be some theoretical formula, but not a bunch of real-world sample points.
When it comes to nvidia GPUs the delta should always be at or below 15C. 20C is acceptable but a bit too much. Anything over that limit and it's always either a bad paste application or pads. It's always on the GPU core itself btw. I have no idea how it works with amd gpus, those seem to have a bigger delta for some reason.
Posted on Reply
#22
shuffy_losys
JustBenchingWhen it comes to nvidia GPUs the delta should always be at or below 15C. 20C is acceptable but a bit too much. Anything over that limit and it's always either a bad paste application or pads. It's always on the GPU core itself btw. I have no idea how it works with amd gpus, those seem to have a bigger delta for some reason.
But again, is it in the same spot or is it rotating and for how long is it staying in that spot? A hot spot that's travelling around the chip and isn't there for very long isn't necessarily a problem.

It's always important to understand the data as much as possible, otherwise it may do more harm than good. I had a problem when I used to work for an airplane manufacturer where the autopilot aborted a take off, but none of the flags indicated a reason. It turns out, the abort trigger happened for much less than a second, and the flag was only captured once a second. Without understanding this, we might've chased down a ghost.
Posted on Reply
#23
Covante
JustBenchingNobody wants it hidden but it's such a tiny issue nobody really cares. Nobody won't buy a 5xxx because of the Hotspot temp, the people complaining are just doing it cause nvidia is involved and for no other reason. It's like the boy who cried wolf, when people cry so much nobody will take them seriously even when in fact there is an actual important issue.
I care. I spend time on a tech support forum and looking at hwinfo logs and checking if people are overheating is something I do often. A gpu overheating just on the hotspot while the core/average temp is like 70 happens sometimes. More common with radeon than nvidia, like you said they tend to have a bigger delta, but no reason for nvidia to remove a feature just because they are emabrrassed that they have a delta as bad as radeons now with 50 series.
Posted on Reply
#24
evernessince
One can hope Nvidia just makes it available again next gen without having to jump through hoops. I say hope because Nvidia has a history of doubling down. EVGA would know that best, every time they modded around Nvidia imposed limitations, Nvidia clamped down harder, and now we have a card market where board vendors can do basically nothing.
OnasiNo. It’s another data point, useful for XOC dudes. It’s just basically irrelevant for everyone else, but people will be stupid. I told people not to read too much into AMD having fairly high hotspot temperatures for years, I am not changing my position now that NV also exposes this metric. It’s a nothingburger in 95% of cases.
Bad heatsink designs, bad batches, and just random QC issues happen. It's useful to determine paste coverage and thus fairly useful to everyone. The procedure for that use case is pretty simple, find out the average delta for your SKU and if you're significantly above it, you either have a bad paste application or a cooler contact / surface issue.
JustBenchingNobody blew up anything with AMD, you are just making stuff up. Plus im not the tech media so what double standards are you even talking about.

Again, you are crying wolf when there is nothing there, don't be surprised when people ignore you even when there is a wolf.
You did make the argument just yesterday that seeing AMD hotspot temps was worse than simply believing your Nvidia card's temps are lower:
JustBenchingSo it's better to have your vram and hotspot cooking and degrading themselves but knowing about it than having your hotspot hidden? Okay, we will agree to disagree. I'd rather have my parts not cook themselves to death - planned obsolescence and all of that.
Posted on Reply
#25
wolf
Better Than Native
I'm interested to see a much larger sample size of hotspot vs regular core temp readouts. The single data point that's being sensationalised (no surprise there) is just that, a single data point. Now if all 5000 series GPU's are pushing 30+ degree deltas and 100c+ hotspots, now that might be worth investigating.
JustBenchingIt's like the boy who cried wolf, when people cry so much nobody will take them seriously even when in fact there is an actual important issue.
The usual suspects will be here crying just as loud and projecting their double standards, and the others that make up that group will be there to like react their posts. Such is the cycle of NDS.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 15th, 2026 09:31 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts