Friday, November 13th 2026

NVIDIA Allegedly Engineered Scarcity By Funding AI Startups To Buy Its GPUs

Following the departure of now-former NVIDIA CEO, Jensen Huang, a new report by The Wall Street Journal (via Wccftech) has emerged alleging that NVIDIA artificially inflated the ongoing GPU and memory shortage by investing in AI startups that would go on to buy NVIDIA GPUs and build data centers. The reason behind this was to maintain the perception of ongoing high demand and to move an oversupply of semiconductors from TSMC.

The WSJ report cites an August meeting between Huang and his senior finance team, including NVIDIA's CFO and acting CEO, Colette Kress, during which Kress pushed for a reduction in circular financing agreements, in response to which Huang allegedly lay into Kress, calling her a "deer in the headlights," after she had pushed to scale back NVIDIA's $250 billion deal with OpenAI. Jensen's push for further investment into small-scale cloud providers was seemingly in response to the changing tide that saw AI hyperscalers move away from off-the-shelf components in favor of custom solutions.
The situation described in the report saw NVIDIA on the hook for an "avalanche" of GPUs from TSMC, for which it would have no immediate buyers. Part of the issue highlighted by Kress was also that these small-scale cloud providers NVIDIA was investing in could not afford to buy NVIDIA GPUs, meaning they, too, could be a financial dead end.
Sources: The Wall Street Journal, via Wccftech
Add your own comment

28 Comments on NVIDIA Allegedly Engineered Scarcity By Funding AI Startups To Buy Its GPUs

#1
Paganstomp
if it smells like dirt...

( I'm waiting for more sh!t that comes down the tracks that will paint a larger picture. )
Posted on Reply
#4
john_
The WSJ report cites an August meeting between Huang and his senior finance team,
I read "fiance team".

Anyway, as I've said in another thread, I believe he is a major loss for the tech industry because he was forward-thinking and capable of driving progress.

However, as I've also said, his business tactics were truly provocative, monopolistic, and anti-consumer. Of course, while many of us sat around writing about how Nvidia operates, various people would chime in to tell us that other companies that have done far less were just as bad—granting Nvidia absolution through false equivalence and lumping everyone together. Where are those today. Most of those vocal members of this forum have disappeared.
Posted on Reply
#5
Launcestonian
john_....

However, as I've also said, his business tactics were truly provocative, monopolistic, and anti-consumer. Of course, while many of us sat around writing about how Nvidia operates, various people would chime in to tell us that other companies that have done far less were just as bad—granting Nvidia absolution through false equivalence and lumping everyone together. Where are those today. Most of those vocal members of this forum have disappeared.
Seems Mr Huang was a believer in laissez-faire capitalism.
Posted on Reply
#6
john_
LauncestonianSeems Mr Huang was a believer in laissez-faire capitalism.
He is 63 years old. I don't know whether, past a certain point, the thirst for money was simply a thirst for money, or if it gave him the feeling that with more billions he could accelerate Nvidia's technological evolution and, by extension, manage to bring more of his plans to life sooner. Obviously, he had no problem stepping on competitors and consumers along the way.
Posted on Reply
#8
ymdhis
This was already obvious to anyone who noticed that Nvidia is financing AI companies. Wall Street must be full of intellectually challenged individuals.
Posted on Reply
#9
Hecate91
Yeah not a surprise he convinced AI startups to buy GPU's, given he's oversold other companies on buying GPU's to the point they have a bunch of servers sitting unused as the datacenters for them aren't built yet. This is very telling of Jensen inflating the AI circular investment bubble to maximize profits, turns out he went too far being greedy.
Posted on Reply
#10
Darmok N Jalad
john_Anyway, as I've said in another thread, I believe he is a major loss for the tech industry because he was forward-thinking and capable of driving progress.
So are most Bond villains.
Posted on Reply
#11
freeagent
Money, Power, Ego, Blue pills, White powder..

It really is too bad that he chose the dark side.

Sucks to be him right now.
Posted on Reply
#12
trsttte
Startups like OpenAI and Anthropic? It's not like it was ever a secret...
Posted on Reply
#13
kondamin
Wow truly groundbreaking journalism, what has been going around the internet for ages now.

Jensen is just a small part of the problem, the larger problem is big money wanting to earn more money faster and it doesn’t care if it ruins the wider economy.
Posted on Reply
#14
FR3D1
Ninja Cat
freeagentWhite powder..
Creatine monohydrate?

Back to topic;
This current flood of "speculation" is boring me to death.

R.I.P.,
Fred.
Posted on Reply
#15
boidsonly
I wonder if AMD will get dragged into this scarcity debacle.
Posted on Reply
#16
Mysteoa
boidsonlyI wonder if AMD will get dragged into this scarcity debacle.
Probably, I wouldn't be suppressed if there some kind of investigation going on at AMD at the moment.
Posted on Reply
#17
Event Horizon
"I think the fact that everything is scarce is fantastic for us" hits different now.
Posted on Reply
#18
user556
I wouldn't be surprised if he was talked into it. As others have said, Nvidia's circular AI investments weren't the only oddities reported in the last couple of years.
kondaminWow truly groundbreaking journalism, what has been going around the internet for ages now.
Speculation is easy but doesn't prove anything.
Posted on Reply
#19
evernessince
john_I read "fiance team".

Anyway, as I've said in another thread, I believe he is a major loss for the tech industry because he was forward-thinking and capable of driving progress.

However, as I've also said, his business tactics were truly provocative, monopolistic, and anti-consumer. Of course, while many of us sat around writing about how Nvidia operates, various people would chime in to tell us that other companies that have done far less were just as bad—granting Nvidia absolution through false equivalence and lumping everyone together. Where are those today. Most of those vocal members of this forum have disappeared.
Technically skilled sure but he drove Nvidia as one of the most anti-competitive, anti-consumer companies on the planet. Seems to be a common theme for tech companies.
Posted on Reply
#20
_roman_
It seems we have no other problems and all the news is suddenly full with nvidia.
I wonder what else will pop up in the next days.
Posted on Reply
#21
ViperXTR
I remember him saying this few months back:
Posted on Reply
#22
jnv11
We already have espionage and smuggling. This article about Nvidia allegedly orchestrating fake demand makes me think that this could be an antitrust violation. With all of these allegations, if they are proven, could Nvidia and Jensen Huang be vulnerable to being prosecuted for racketeering or RICO?

I could be wrong because I am not a lawyer.
Posted on Reply
#23
mechtech
freeagentMoney, Power, Ego, Blue pills, White powder..

It really is too bad that he chose the dark side.

Sucks to be him right now.
Does it though?

Even if he looses half in a divorce he still has billions.
Posted on Reply
#24
freeagent
mechtechDoes it though?

Even if he looses half in a divorce he still has billions.
Will he though? I am sure all kinds of investigations are underway as we speak..
Posted on Reply
#25
TumbleGeorge
I'm feeling how many retirement savings lighten up and evaporate into thin air just like that.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 13th, 2026 22:16 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts