Wednesday, February 22nd 2017

AMD Reveals Ryzen 7 Family, Pricing, and Radeon Vega Logo

At a press event by AMD, company CEO Lisa Su unveiled the first three AMD Ryzen desktop processor models, the top-dog Ryzen 7-1800X, the Ryzen 7-1700X, and the Ryzen 7-1700. The R7-1800X is priced at USD $499, followed by the R7-1700X at $399, and the R7-1700 at $329. The three chips will be available for purchase on the 2nd of March, 2017. The R7-1800X is clocked at 3.60 GHz, with a TurboCore frequency of 4.00 GHz, and the XFR (extended frequency range) feature, which further overclocks the chip, depending on the effectiveness of your CPU cooler.

The Ryzen 7-1700X ships with 3.40 GHz clocks, with 3.80 GHz TurboCore frequency, and the XFR feature. The Ryzen 7-1700 lacks XFR, and comes with slightly lower clocks, at 3.00 GHz core, and 3.70 GHz TurboCore. All three are true 8-core chips, with 512 KB of dedicated L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Also featured are dual-channel DDR4 integrated memory controllers, and an integrated PCI-Express gen 3.0 root complex. The Ryzen 7-1700 has a TDP of just 65W (for a performance 8-core chip that's a kick in the butts of Intel's engineers), and will include an AMD Wraith Max cooling solution, while the 1700X and 1800X have TDP rated at 95W, and will come without coolers. At its media event, CEO Lisa Su stated that at $499, the Ryzen 7-1800X "smokes" the Intel Core i7-6900K eight-core processor. The company also unveiled the branding of its Radeon Vega enthusiast graphics family. Lastly, feast your eyes on the beautiful, 14 nm, Made-in-USA die-shot of Ryzen.
Source: HotHardware
Add your own comment

141 Comments on AMD Reveals Ryzen 7 Family, Pricing, and Radeon Vega Logo

#26
MxPhenom 216
ASIC Engineer
medi01Total number of transistors is a bit worrying (4.8 billion, haswell had 2.6)
Why is that worrying at all?
Posted on Reply
#27
Convexrook
medi01Mm, nope?
I mean this chip will be hot as F*&k and you know die size and coolers won't sit well, some new coolers on the way.

Intel still has this in the bag [ by the tray load].
Posted on Reply
#28
londiste
medi013.6 billion.
isn't 6900k technically a cut-down 6950k? that would be 3.6 billion for 10 cores.
Posted on Reply
#29
suraswami
If I get any tax returns going to ask them to deposit directly into AMD's account :laugh: Send me those chips :rockout:
Posted on Reply
#30
N3M3515
alucasaNot worrying for Intel. Worrying for us.
That will continue to be a problem until a giant like intel either buys amd on enters the scene.
Posted on Reply
#31
coolernoob
there is no need to compare 1800X vs i7-6900k... you can compare 1700 (no X for 329$) vs i7-6900k and still come to conclusion that even a 50% price drop would still make intels chip look very bad
Posted on Reply
#32
HD64G
More transistors and still they have an 8-core, 16-thread CPU that is close to 6900K for $329 and with a 65W TDP? Miraculous achievement in my mind then...
Posted on Reply
#33
Evo85
AMD doesn't have to beat Intel. All they have to do is be competitive. Intel has done most of the work of being beat.

Intel isn't going to halve the prices of their processors overnight. That would be a publicity nightmare. And they can't push out a competitive processor at that price overnight either.

The hard truth is Intel didn't see this coming and they have been caught with their pants down. Which is a good thing. It's good to be humbled from time to time.

Let the CPU wars begin again!
Posted on Reply
#34
TheGuruStud
alucasaAMD has caught up, not suppressed Intel. I reckon Intel will make price adjustment and we will finally see 15% increase which Intel claims for Cannonlake.

How long it took AMD to catch up is what is worrying.
Intel has no architecture change until whatever in 2019. They have a shrink coming in 2H 2018 for desktop.

Unless you think sky to baby was a change... (Their engineers can whine all they want, they wasted their time).
Posted on Reply
#35
DarkHill
Evo85The hard truth is Intel didn't see this coming and they have been caught with their pants down. Which is a good thing. It's good to be humbled from time to time.

Let the CPU wars begin again!
ofcourse they did, with spies and leaks, they probably been aware of the ryzen performance for months. I just dont think they care.

The majority will stick to what they trust. I doubt ryzen is going to affect intel a lot in 2017.

AMD has thrown everything on this bandwagon, and if Intel launch canonlake with agressive pricing and 15%(real this time) improved IPC, AMD is fucked.

Nobody hopes that will be the case of course, but i will imagine its going to be the case.
Posted on Reply
#36
Liviu Cojocaru
I think all the reviewers that took part in this event left it with the Ryzen samples, let see gaming benchmarks and OC potential
Posted on Reply
#37
TheLaughingMan
Be prepared. The next news post from AMD will probably be OCer's breaking the Cinebench world record using an 1800X at 5.14 GHz on all cores using LN2 to get a score of 2449.

Posted on Reply
#39
Fx
SlizzoYou get stock clock bumps of 100MHz, but if you have good cooling and don't feel like overclocking yourself this should prove out to be a nice "auto" overclocker.

Of course in a weeks' time we will see how much this bares out.
Exactly. Which is why I find value in it. I don't overclock anymore these days.
Posted on Reply
#40
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
medi01Possibly because when mentioned performance is achieved there isn't much difference between "140w" intel and "95w" ryzen.
People often forget intel has never rated the same as AMD and the only thing I have ever seen come out of intel based on TDP is the capability to run higher wattage though the silicon. We have all seen what happens when you try to pull 140w through a 6700/7700k. Not quite the same issue with HEDT chips from them.
Posted on Reply
#41
Joss
ShihabyoooI have to admit, though, the 1700 makes the other two irrelevant. XFR might be interesting in theory, but for a 20/50% price premium? Not much., especially when considering all those chips are OC'able, making the clock differences also irrelevant to many. The whole thing doesn't make sense!
I agree with you,

1800x 8c/16t unlocked $499
1700x 8c/8t unlocked $399
1700 8c/8t locked $329

this would make more sense.
Posted on Reply
#42
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
JossI agree with you,

1800x 8c/16t unlocked $499
1700x 8c/8t unlocked $399
1700 8c/8t locked $329

this would make more sense.
They will probably be locked by the TDP.
Posted on Reply
#43
Nergal
ALL ABOARD....THE HYPETRAIN!!!
Destination: whooping some fanbois

The claims AMD are making are so way beyond expectations that even if the reality is less, it´s still a small wonder what they did. You simply cannot minimize the achievement here.

The complacency that AMD´s rivals had will now be paid in market share.
Posted on Reply
#44
natr0n
Analogy Time:
Intel is Hulk Hogan/A nobody jabroni
AMD is Iron Sheik/A Legend

And if you know shieky baby
"I will suplex you, put you in the Camel Clutch, break your back and fck your ass make you humble."

Can't wait to upgrade my dinosaur.
Posted on Reply
#45
G33k2Fr34k
It's a shame modern video games are shite and there's no point in upgrading your CPU/GPU any more.
Posted on Reply
#46
mcraygsx
alucasaAMD has caught up, not suppressed Intel. I reckon Intel will make price adjustment and we will finally see 15% increase which Intel claims for Cannonlake.

How long it took AMD to catch up is what is worrying.
Lets see if I can purchase i7 6900k for similar price as 1800X, Not going to happen.
Posted on Reply
#47
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
mcraygsxLets see if I can purchase i7 6900k for similar price as 1800X, Not going to happen.
I got my 6850K in the same price point as the 1600x is rumored to hit. Intel can price items right there they have made a choice to instead make billions in profit.
Posted on Reply
#48
Pure Wop
TheLaughingManBe prepared. The next news post from AMD will probably be OCer's breaking the Cinebench world record using an 1800X at 5.14 GHz on all cores using LN2 to get a score of 2449.

Impressive, but seems no where close to breaking a world record or surpassing a 2679 V4? The 32-core Naples might, though.
Posted on Reply
#49
Ravenas
Happy to see AMD coming out of the gutter with some new chips. I have been eager to update my process for quite sometime now. May preorder the 1800x once I have time to sit down and read a few reviews.

Not trying to add a nationalist comment here, but love the fact these are made in USA.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 26th, 2024 17:00 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts