Thursday, March 31st 2022

Intel Arc DG2-512 Built on TSMC 6nm, Has More Transistors than GA104 and Navi 22

Some interesting technical specifications of the elusive two GPUs behind the Intel Arc "Alchemist" series surfaced. The larger DG2-512 silicon in particular, which forms the base for the Arc 5 and Arc 7 series, is interesting, in that it is larger in every way than the performance-segment ASICs from both NVIDIA and AMD. The table below compares the physical specs of the DG2-512, with the NVIDIA GA104, and the AMD Navi 22. This segment of GPUs has fairly powerful use-cases, including native 1440p gameplay, or playing at 4K with a performance enhancement—something Intel has, in the form of the XeSS.

The DG2-512 is built on the 6 nm TSMC N6 foundry node, the most advanced node among the three GPUs in this class. It has the highest transistor density of 53.4 mTr/mm², and the largest die-area of 406 mm², and the highest transistor-count of 21.7 billion. The Xe-HPG graphics architecture is designed for full DirectX 12 Ultimate feature support, and the DG2-512 dedicated hardware for ray tracing, as well as AI acceleration. The Arc A770M is the fastest product based on this silicon, however, it is a mobile GPU with aggressive power-management characteristic to the form-factor it serves. Here, the DG2-512 has an FP32 throughput of 13.5 TFLOPs, compared to 13.2 TFLOPs of the Navi 22 on the Radeon RX 6700 XT desktop graphics card, and the 21.7 TFLOPs of the GA104 that's maxed out on the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti desktop graphics card.
Sources: Hardware Unboxed (YouTube), VideoCardz
Add your own comment

27 Comments on Intel Arc DG2-512 Built on TSMC 6nm, Has More Transistors than GA104 and Navi 22

#26
Crackong
It is quite fascinating seeing Intel's PR worked on confusing ppl's concepts on Brand names and the actual architecture.
Posted on Reply
#27
ratirt
watzupkenThis is not true. From an architecture standpoint, ARC and Xe graphics are likely built on the same foundation, with perhaps some minor differences. Alder Lake’s UHD graphics is basically derived from the same Xe graphic solution. All are just naming conventions, but fundamentally, I believe they are pretty much the same. I feel the naming convention is a huge mess as usual from Intel where they have ARC, Xe, DG1, UHD, etc…
Maybe they are or maybe they aren't. I'm sure Intel know about the quirks that are with the older iGPUs and I'm sure these will have to be tackled. i would not get surprised if the iGPUs be abandoned at some point and focus will be on arc. With them being same? I'm not so sure about that. Just because it is graphics from the same company, it does not have to be that way. Maybe the difference is so substantial, that the drivers will be separate. Sometimes it is better to start from scratch and get a dedicated driver than implement a driver into existing one. I'm sure Intel has thought about it but obviously we can't tell for sure.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jun 6th, 2024 17:57 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts