elghinnarisaSo, when you are asked to provide backup to your claims you do the normal. Act like a child and deflect because your unable to argue your points, probably because you have none.

You cannot even follow your own advice, to put up or put a cork on it. Truly, a show of character do you not think?

You made the accusation I made new accounts, prove it then. Its not allowed, you have nothing to lose. Or do you, if you are wrong? Consider that for a second. Because that, is not my account.

You always do this, you make claims and demand others to prove things to you. But when you are asked to do the same you go around in circles just shit-posting and complaining and blaming others.

So far you done nothing. I asked you to provide all these grandiose research you talk about. And still, not a single thing. Just accusations and complaints.

lexluthermiesterYou want to debate your baseless arguments, tell it to a wall, because I don't care.

elghinnarisaSo, when you are asked to provide backup to your claims you do the normal. Act like a child and deflect because your unable to argue your points, probably because you have none.

You cannot even follow your own advice, to put up or put a cork on it. Truly, a show of character do you not think?

You made the accusation I made new accounts, prove it then. Its not allowed, you have nothing to lose. Or do you, if you are wrong? Consider that for a second. Because that, is not my account.

You always do this, you make claims and demand others to prove things to you. But when you are asked to do the same you go around in circles just shit-posting and complaining and blaming others.

So far you done nothing. I asked you to provide all these grandiose research you talk about. And still, not a single thing. Just accusations and complaints.

lexluthermiesterwww.masterclass.com/articles/persistence-of-vision-explained
www.exploratorium.edu/snacks/persistence-of-vision
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persistence_of_vision
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1084467/pdf/pnas01913-0065.pdf
www.ijirset.com/upload/2019/november/66_PERSISTENCE_IP.PDF

Read, learn. Or continue in ignorance, your choice..

AusWolfYou only need to read back a bit, mate. All the research he's talking about is there:

https://old.reddit.com/r/Monitors/comments/lfqjvz/open_letter_to_lg_regarding_27gl850_and_its_issues/

lexluthermiesterAlmost correct. The human eye can not perceive individual frames of animation past 80hz, but can not perceive a difference of framerate beyond about 300hz to 320hz.

This is because of a WELL documented and proven physical limitation known as "persistence of vision". This condition is why we all easily enjoyed CRT screens BITD without actually seeing the individual scan-lines. Even at 50hz PAL standard, the human eye can not perceive the scan-lines of the electron gun. And before anyone says "It's because of the phosphor glow effect.", no it isn't. High-speed camera's have already debunked that nonsense.

This is why 300hz, 480hz and 500hz panels are a waste. They can not help the human eye see faster even if the screen can display a higher framerate.

ir_cowI wonder if the extra Hz even if you can't push the frames will give a clearer image.

ir_cowKinda like 240Hz TVs, they are getting 60hz input, yet look extra smooth.

lexluthermiesterNewer QDLED screens don't suffer from that problem so far. Of course they are brand new.