Tuesday, May 20th 2025
AMD Announces Radeon RX 9060 XT Graphics Card, Claims "Fastest Under $350"
AMD at Computex 2025 announced the new Radeon RX 9060 XT mid-range graphics card. The card is designed to offer maxed out gaming at 1080p, with ray tracing enabled, and lets you take advantage of new features such as FSR 4 and the upcoming FSR "Project Redstone" feature-set. The card comes in two variants, the RX 9060 XT 16 GB, priced at $350, and the RX 9060 XT 8 GB, priced at $300. Both models are based on the 4 nm "Navi 44" silicon, which they both max out in terms of on-die components. The GPU is based on the RDNA 4 graphics architecture, and comes with 32 CU (compute units), which works out to 2,048 stream processors, 64 AI accelerators, 32 RT accelerators, 128 TMUs, and possibly 64 ROPs. The chip features a 128-bit wide GDDR6 memory interface, the company didn't reveal memory speeds. Both models come with a total board power value of 180 W. The company claims that the RX 9060 XT 16 GB offers up to 821 peak AI TOPS (INT4).
AMD also put out some first party performance claims. The company claims that the RX 9060 XT 16 GB, should beat the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB by 6% on average, tested across 40 game titles, at 1440p. The RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB has an MSRP of $380, making the RX 9060 XT 16 GB cheaper by $30, and as a result, have a 15% performance-per-Dollar edge. The company did not put out any performance claims for the RX 9060 XT 8 GB model. Given that NVIDIA is not developing a 16 GB model of the new RTX 5060 (non-Ti), and its $300 price, things could get interesting for AMD, especially if its claim that the RX 9060 XT 16 GB will be the fastest current-gen GPU under $350 holds. Both the 16 GB and 8 GB variants of the Radeon RX 9060 XT should be available on June 5, 2025.
AMD also put out some first party performance claims. The company claims that the RX 9060 XT 16 GB, should beat the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB by 6% on average, tested across 40 game titles, at 1440p. The RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB has an MSRP of $380, making the RX 9060 XT 16 GB cheaper by $30, and as a result, have a 15% performance-per-Dollar edge. The company did not put out any performance claims for the RX 9060 XT 8 GB model. Given that NVIDIA is not developing a 16 GB model of the new RTX 5060 (non-Ti), and its $300 price, things could get interesting for AMD, especially if its claim that the RX 9060 XT 16 GB will be the fastest current-gen GPU under $350 holds. Both the 16 GB and 8 GB variants of the Radeon RX 9060 XT should be available on June 5, 2025.




141 Comments on AMD Announces Radeon RX 9060 XT Graphics Card, Claims "Fastest Under $350"
Goes to show how much room for refinement there was on the RDNA arch.
Even if it's free no one here should take one, better go buy Nvidia and you get 4 times more frames.
I can't wait for the path tracing benchmarks, but they should hurry before amd finalizes machine learning ray reconstruction, denoising and whatever version of shader execution reordering equivalent they have, then they could have a problem, hopefully they don't implement any of this in said games so no one knows AMD can be competitive in ray tracing.
If AMD wants market share they should pay us to use AMD gpu's, otherwise Nvidia 8gb and 4x more frames it is.
Amen to that, brother (if we estimate the 5060 PT performance to be in the same ballpark as that of the 4060Ti 8G).
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_nm_process
they made that turd:
www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/radeon-rx-6800-xt.c3694
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5_nm_process
www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/radeon-rx-9070-xt.c4229
Of course, with Navi 48 the things are fixed, but still - how many years till we see a working 3nm die, not to mention 2nm ?
Never the less, the point still stands.
Seriously though, you're mentioning PT in context of the 9060 XT 8 GB and 5060? Are you for real, man? :kookoo:
Also, have you tried frame generation with a less than 60 FPS input? Let me spoil it: it's shit.
Just look how whenever AMD makes a GPU, everyone wants to be cheaper than Nvidia to the point of absurdity, they want 16gb, exceptional performance but compete with the crapiest Nvidia gpu's in price.
So to these people, even if AMD gave them for free they would still be unhappy.
Those people you're talking about are Nvidia fans. They don't actually want AMD to be cheaper, they just say that to justify their purchases.
Remember the AMD drivers are bad and how long it stuck, and they are actually good for a good number of years but they worked hard to keep this impression about AMD.
Let's see where the narrative goes once AMD is good with ray tracing.
Corporations now fight with the same tools politicians fight, beyond the actual product there is the propaganda who will say if you buy this product your computer might actually burst into flames, the chance of that happening are very slim but if enough people believe then mission accomplished.
I seriously think there are many many people using their butts instead of their heads to buy stuff, and then justifying their purchases by trying to convince others of doing the same using the most absurd reasons they can come up with (like transistor count, lol). Kind of like fans of a certain German car brand, or those of football (soccer) teams.
I really don't think Nvidia needs to employ anyone to defend them in online forums, nor AMD for that matter... fans do it for free :laugh:
On what experience do you base that statement on?And the point is...?I don't know how one can live without an RT denoiser, honestly. :( Wait, what? :laugh:I can see that. ;)
AMD drivers: seasoned drunks.
NVIDIA drivers: recently introduced themselves to crystal.
Jokes aside, AMD really need to step it up. In current market, their offerings can sell and would sell pretty well. JUST PROVIDE MORE SUPPLY. These fake MSRP crumbs are a disgusting insult.
Let's say i had many GPU's, the last ones were sapphire rx 480, sapphire rx 6700 10gb and now Gigabyte 9070 XT, neither Nvidia or AMD posed any serious problems for me and it is a working computer, if you don't overclock, keep a reasonable clean operating system then you are good with both AMD or Nvidia.
Kids these days have it so easy, in the old days even the PCB of a motherboard or GPU sucked, quality was so poor compared to what we have today, we are spoiled.While i don't agree with the first part, i do agree that fans do it for free.
Before someone labels me as a fan, i hate both Nvidia and AMD equally, one is greedy beyond reason and the other is lazy and copies Nvidia for years, i give credit to Nvidia for moving the industry forward and credit to AMD for keeping them in check as prices go.
I can have a used 4080 for a price lower than the one of 9070 XT.
The smaller company with the much smaller wafer allocation at TSMC delivers 10 times as many GPUs to gamers as the one with 90% market share, yet you say they're doing it wrong?
You also can't fault AMD for the prices as long as they vastly differ across regions. You can have a 9070 XT well under £700 in the UK right now.
There was some buzz on local forums about buying AMD or Nvidia in first few weeks but are deserted now, so they are right, gaming market is small business for them.