Monday, September 29th 2025

Samsung Cuts 2 nm Node Pricing by 33% in TSMC Competition Push

Samsung has cut its 2 nm wafer prices to $20,000 offering a 33% discount compared to TSMC's expected $30,000 per wafer cost, industry reports say. The company aims to draw customers to its underused advanced manufacturing capacity. The Korean chipmaker faces big pressure to get returns on billions it put into cutting-edge fabrication plants across South Korea and the United States. With production lines running below capacity due to few orders, Samsung has started using bold pricing tactics to compete with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company's strong market position. Just recently, the company landed a $16.5 billion deal with Tesla to make next-gen AI chips. People in the industry think this team-up might grow to include more chances maybe even making chips for Elon Musk's xAI project.

TSMC keeps its lead in advanced node manufacturing getting major clients like NVIDIA and AMD for its 2 nm process. The Taiwanese foundry plans to start mass production of 2 nm chips in Q4 2025 even with record-high wafer prices at $30,000 per unit. Samsung has always used lower prices to take on TSMC's control of the market, and it seems to remain on the same strategy with discounts up to 33% cheaper than TSMC's prices for similar 2 nm chip-making services.
Sources: SamMobile, via DigiTimesAsia
Add your own comment

13 Comments on Samsung Cuts 2 nm Node Pricing by 33% in TSMC Competition Push

#1
rattlehead99
It will be interesting to see if that sways big companies to use Samsung and have lower prices.
Posted on Reply
#2
TheinsanegamerN
They wouldn't have to cut pricing if it was actually competitive and available at any sort of scale. TSMC is overbooks and extremely expensive. nVidia alone could print tens of billions a year by adopting extra fab space.
Posted on Reply
#3
bgx
Last time, Nvidia went in for Samsung, and we all know how it ended up.
Posted on Reply
#4
TheinsanegamerN
bgxLast time, Nvidia went in for Samsung, and we all know how it ended up.
Ampere was a huge financial success for nVidia, so.......
Posted on Reply
#5
_roman_
LOL

Ask for higher DRAM prices but cuts costs on another business unit.
Posted on Reply
#6
Denver
But Samsung's first-generation 2nm is equivalent to TSMC's third-generation 3nm. The target of the price comparison is wrong.
Posted on Reply
#7
kondamin
AMD should get a ryzen AI line going over there so they can get decent market penetration now that they have IP that is completive.
Posted on Reply
#8
slyphnier
i wonder, say like 20k per wafer but only like 60% yield vs 30k but over 80% yield
if the situation like that, then in the end the price difference not that big, no ?

not sure how high samsung latest node yield, but last year samsung reported still struggling with their chips yield
Posted on Reply
#9
sephiroth117
bgxLast time, Nvidia went in for Samsung, and we all know how it ended up.
the RTX 3080 is, for me, amongst the best GPU Nvidia ever created. Gaming wise, it sold crazy well
Posted on Reply
#10
phints
sephiroth117the RTX 3080 is, for me, amongst the best GPU Nvidia ever created. Gaming wise, it sold crazy well
3080 is decent but the gen was not great. The performance per watt going from RTX 30 to 40 series was one of the biggest increases in recent time almost all because of Samsung 8N -> TSMC 5N. The 3070 (should be a classic mid tier card) was an abysmal 8GB crashing the resale value of the card, they finally also moved to 12GB at 4070.

Ironically going from 40 to 50 series is one of the worst improvements in history, it's just a TDP bump. Why? Because same node is used.
Posted on Reply
#11
Flyordie
I read all these posts on this and think... "And here I am still running a GPU made on 14nm FinFET." lol.
Posted on Reply
#12
alawadhi3000
Samsung didn't cut anything.

Samsung first generation "2nm" (SF2) process is a rebranded third generation "3nm" (SF3P) process so the expected price was already ~$20K per wafer.
Posted on Reply
#13
TechBuyingHavoc
_roman_LOL

Ask for higher DRAM prices but cuts costs on another business unit.
Maybe it is because Samsung is actually competitive on DRAM (more of a commodity market, nobody badmouths Samsung DRAM) and not competitive on logic fabrication.

Nah, that makes too much sense.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 13th, 2026 21:49 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts