Monday, October 6th 2025

OpenAI will Buy AMD GPUs, AMD Offers $30+ Billion in Stock to Sweeten the Deal

AMD (NASDAQ: AMD) and OpenAI today announced a 6 gigawatt agreement to power OpenAI's next-generation AI infrastructure across multiple generations of AMD Instinct GPUs. The first 1 gigawatt deployment of AMD Instinct MI450 GPUs is set to begin in the second half of 2026. AMD's strong leadership in high-performance computing systems and OpenAI's pioneering research and advancements in generative AI places the two companies at the forefront of this important and pivotal time for AI.

Under this definitive agreement, OpenAI will work with AMD as a core strategic compute partner to drive large-scale deployments of AMD technology starting with the AMD Instinct MI450 series and rack-scale AI solutions and extending to future generations. By sharing technical expertise to optimize their product roadmaps, AMD and OpenAI are deepening their multi-generational hardware and software collaboration that began with the MI300X and continued with the MI350X series. This partnership creates a true win-win for both companies, enabling very large-scale AI deployments and advancing the entire ecosystem.
As part of the agreement, to further align strategic interests, AMD has issued OpenAI a warrant for up to 160 million shares of AMD common stock, structured to vest as specific milestones are achieved. The first tranche vests with the initial 1 gigawatt deployment, with additional tranches vesting as purchases scale up to 6 gigawatts. Vesting is further tied to AMD achieving certain share-price targets and to OpenAI achieving the technical and commercial milestones required to enable AMD deployments at scale.
"We are thrilled to partner with OpenAI to deliver AI compute at massive scale," said Dr. Lisa Su, chair and CEO, AMD. "This partnership brings the best of AMD and OpenAI together to create a true win-win enabling the world's most ambitious AI buildout and advancing the entire AI ecosystem."
"This partnership is a major step in building the compute capacity needed to realize AI's full potential," said Sam Altman, co-founder and CEO of OpenAI. "AMD's leadership in high-performance chips will enable us to accelerate progress and bring the benefits of advanced AI to everyone faster."
"Building the future of AI requires deep collaboration across every layer of the stack," said Greg Brockman, co-founder and president of OpenAI. "Working alongside AMD will allow us to scale to deliver AI tools that benefit people everywhere."
"Our partnership with OpenAI is expected to deliver tens of billions of dollars in revenue for AMD while accelerating OpenAI's AI infrastructure buildout," said Jean Hu, EVP, CFO and treasurer, AMD. "This agreement creates significant strategic alignment and shareholder value for both AMD and OpenAI and is expected to be highly accretive to AMD's non-GAAP earnings-per-share."
Through this partnership, AMD and OpenAI are building the infrastructure to meet the world's growing AI demands, by combining world-class innovation and execution to accelerate the future of high-performance and AI computing.
Source: AMD
Add your own comment

74 Comments on OpenAI will Buy AMD GPUs, AMD Offers $30+ Billion in Stock to Sweeten the Deal

#51
john_
LastDudeALiveThose acquisitions are just catching up to what Nvidia was doing 10 years ago, offering a full product and software stack for datacenter operation.

I'm talking about Nvidia's investment in Intel, both a direct competitor and a competitor to Nvidia's biggest competitor. Nvidia is selling shovels in the gold rush, and using the money from that to make strategic investments that will be worth it for 20+ years, even if AI crashes.

AMD is going the opposite way, being bought-out piecemeal by its customers. The balance of power is completely opposite, and shows how mismanaged AMD has been.
Oh come on. You first say that AMD hasn't done any acquisitions, then downplay AMD's acquisitions, especially Xilinx that was an over 30 billions deal. Maybe you would like to inform us when Nvidia started building FPGAs and maybe also inform us how successful Intel was with Altera's acquisition. As for the investment in Intel, it is important of course, but not as important as AMD's deal with OpenAI. Nvidia and Intel deal could give Intel an extra billion or two per quarter that AMD will lose obviously. AMD's deal with OpenAI will be a $100+ billions income for AMD while also keeping them in the game of AI. AMD managed to neutralise Nvidia's $100 billion investment in OpenAI.

You either have no idea of business or you have a need to make anything AMD look bad.
What is it?
Posted on Reply
#52
LastDudeALive
john_AMD managed to neutralise Nvidia's $100 billion investment in OpenAI.
Nvidia invested in OpenAI. OpenAI invested in AMD. Do you see the difference in power dynamics?

Nvidia is growing, acquiring other major players. AMD is being acquired by major players.

Everyone is begging to use Nvidia's GPUs, offering pieces of themselves to sweeten the deal. AMD has to sell themself at a 99.99% discount to get OpenAI to use their GPUs.

And talk of "neutralizing" an investment is just silly. In fact, since Nvidia invested in OpenAI, and now OpenAI is investing in AMD... that means Nvidia (indirectly) has a stake in AMD.
Posted on Reply
#53
Tek-Check
LastDudeALiveThose acquisitions are just catching up to what Nvidia was doing 10 years ago, offering a full product and software stack for datacenter operation.
Not everyone needs to do things at the same time. They are trying to catch up in one important market segment and that's fine. Nothing wrong with it. You should be extremely happy that any company has guts to try to catch up instead of leaving entire world of data center GPUs in one monopolistic hand. A monopoly would lead to a total disaster for customers and we know this from many industries around the world.
LastDudeALiveI'm talking about Nvidia's investment in Intel, both a direct competitor and a competitor to Nvidia's biggest competitor. Nvidia is selling shovels in the gold rush, and using the money from that to make strategic investments that will be worth it for 20+ years, even if AI crashes.
Nvidia is in a privileged position as the first mover and innovator, and they can do many things, of course, but we also know that increasing number of data center companies want more open and flexible ecosystem rather than yet another edition insulated business model with a high degree of dependency on one single provider. Long-term, it's not healthy for anyone, even not for a company that rips full benefits for a period of time.

Luckily, Intel did not agree to surrender their entire line of Xeons to Nvidia. That would have been a catastrophe. They only agreed to supply one line of Xeons with NVLink C2C IP under license from Nvidia.
LastDudeALiveAMD is going the opposite way, being bought-out piecemeal by its customers. The balance of power is completely opposite, and shows how mismanaged AMD has been.
This is pure nonsense. There is no evidence of any mismanagement at AMD. It's just another movement of promises and assets in a burgeoning AI bubble, the bubble that may trigger another economic crash if mishandled badly by global investors and if there is lack of accountability of this sector by national governments around the world. But that's another topic for a different occasion.

However, don't forget that AMD has more diverse portfolio and increasingly important role in CPU business globally, commanding rather astonishing 42% of x86 revenue share with EPYC line alone, and growing as we speak. In addition, they have managed to gather support from the most important players globally and started the momentum of open standards and ecosystem in data center, which is extremely important for customers and the health of the industry. They co-developed and co-founded UALink Consortium, as well as UCIe, to open up the industry to more flexible and standardized silicon design without IP dependency on Nvidia, as well as more diverse and open deployments of hardware in data center that will allow customers to pick-and-choose several components of their liking, most suitable for their needs and budget rather than being completely dependent on Nvidia's closed ecosystem. This is going to materialize next year with Helios and other systems. It's an enormous effort on a scale that few really appreciate until they find out more about it. Most of investors without technical expertise are completely oblivious to such important developments. I don't blame them, but their technical advisers should know those movements and have an ability to present it to them in a digestible way.

Ownership-wise, Nvidia and others are also sliced and owned by gigantic asset management conglomerates, such as Vanguard, BlackRock and others, and myriad of investors and investment funds, some of which have other, sometimes dubious connections around the world, including in some countries where you and I would never like to live. It's a deep, deep rabbit hole, indeed.... Let's not go there in this forum. But hey, they are all happy to be gliding on AI wave that is getting increasingly speculative and therefore unstable. You'd better buy popcorn to see what's going to unravel from this raging beast.

Recent MIT study, publicly available, has warned us about serious problems with monetization of AI beyond a few companies and associated business ecosystem that provide silicon, infrastructure and auxiliary services. In other words, the amount of investment in one single segment of economy is currently very disproportionate to any returns on a wider global scale, including not knowing how to milk an average Joe and how to minimize damage to natural environment. If you produce 1 million liters/gallons of golden water and you can't find enough people to drink it in a sustainable way, you have a problem, a serious problem. It's not surprising that AI industry investments have built a high loss tolerance, being ready to write off $50-60 billions of losses from dozens of failed start-ups without any hiccup or worry. This can be done a few times, but not endlessly. The report has even rattled national banks in several leading countries, to the point that governors are releasing public statements of increased risk to local and global economies. It's not a joke, at all.
Posted on Reply
#54
john_
LastDudeALiveNvidia invested in OpenAI. OpenAI invested in AMD. Do you see the difference in power dynamics?

Nvidia is growing, acquiring other major players. AMD is being acquired by major players.

Everyone is begging to use Nvidia's GPUs, offering pieces of themselves to sweeten the deal. AMD has to sell themself at a 99.99% discount to get OpenAI to use their GPUs.

And talk of "neutralizing" an investment is just silly. In fact, since Nvidia invested in OpenAI, and now OpenAI is investing in AMD... that means Nvidia (indirectly) has a stake in AMD.
Just stop. You don't even know what you are talking about and everything you post are irrelevant with reality.

At least reply to my question.
Is it total lack of understanding business or simply passion for bashing AMD?
Posted on Reply
#55
Tek-Check
john_Nvidia and Intel deal could give Intel an extra billion or two per quarter that AMD will lose obviously.
Interestingly, AMD may not lose much here, if at all, as Nvidia intends to replace some of their Arm CPUs with Xeons featuring NVLink C2C in rack-scalable systems, to provide x86 CPU compute that their customers have been asking for. This is planned for after Vera Rubin VR200, as Vera Rubin is locked already for production. Those Xeons might be fully ready for some VR300 systems and get wider adoption with Feynman-based systems. Nvidia and Intel will experiment with custom Xeon 7 Clearwater Forest and Diamond Rapids CPUs on Bianca-like boards, but it will take time to fine-tune this merge.

EPYC was not present in those rack-scalable systems anyway. If anything, Nvidia will pay less to Arm for licenses and Arm CPUs will face more challenges now that both AMD and Intel x86 CPUs are preparing to enter this big arena and become deployed in rack-scalable systems for the first time ever. It will be a new, sizeable segment of revenues for both. The question is to what extent would Nvidia replace Arm CPUs. I have not heard anything about the scale of change. Does anyone know more about this?
LastDudeALiveAnd talk of "neutralizing" an investment is just silly. In fact, since Nvidia invested in OpenAI, and now OpenAI is investing in AMD... that means Nvidia (indirectly) has a stake in AMD.
Another dude who might benefit from a crash course in logic and causality. Just because two events are linked, it does not mean one causes the other, directly or "indirectly". If a cat like to eat birds, and birds like to eat worms, it does not mean that a cat likes to eat worms.
Posted on Reply
#56
john_
Tek-CheckInterestingly, AMD may not lose much here, if at all, as Nvidia intends to replace some of their Arm CPUs with Xeons featuring NVLink C2C in rack-scalable systems, to provide x86 CPU compute that their customers have been asking for. This is planned for after Vera Rubin VR200, as Vera Rubin is locked already for production. Those Xeons might be fully ready for some VR300 systems and get wider adoption with Feynman-based systems. Nvidia and Intel will experiment with custom Xeon 7 Clearwater Forest and Diamond Rapids CPUs on Bianca-like boards, but it will take time to fine-tune this merge.

EPYC was not present in those rack-scalable systems anyway. If anything, Nvidia will pay less to Arm for licenses and Arm CPUs will face more challenges now that both AMD and Intel x86 CPUs are preparing to enter this big arena and become deployed in rack-scalable systems for the first time ever. It will be a new, sizeable segment of revenues for both. The question is to what extent would Nvidia replace Arm CPUs. I have not heard anything about the scale of change. Does anyone know more about this?
I was thinking retail market also, not just servers. Intel's and Nvidia's combined influence on OEMs and Intel x86 APUs with Celestial or Nvidia iGPUs could harm AMD's market share significantly. This might be 2-3 years away, but it could happen. Also an x86 Intel CPU at 14A, if we assume that 14A is as good or better than TSMC nodes, with a strong Nvidia iGPU could be enough for MS to chose them over AMD for a future XBOX. As long as MS is using the same hardware with SONY, it has no chance to compete with SONY. Nvidia could offer them an advantage in gaming. And I bet that with console prices up and consoles games going up in price, having worst or no margings in XBOX hardware, because of higher price of an Intel+Nvidia APU, wouldn't be that much of a red flag.

Anyway, just thoughts. But if AMD manages to get, let's say, a 25% of the AI market, that would be enough to keep AMD financialy and tecnnologically healthy and competitive, even if AMD does lose market share in CPUs/APUs/gaming GPUs.
Posted on Reply
#57
Tek-Check
john_I was thinking retail market also, not just servers. Intel's and Nvidia's combined influence on OEMs and Intel x86 APUs with Celestial or Nvidia iGPUs could harm AMD's market share significantly. This might be 2-3 years away, but it could happen.
Of course. They have a stranglehold on OEMs, which is a big asset that has twisted many arms before. However, they also joined forces because neither Intel nor Nvidia alone have an answer to Strix Halo, a newly emerging market segment of multi-purpose, scalable mega-APUs. Vast majority of laptops will gradually move to APU designs only, Nvidia knows this, so they will reposition their role from dGPU provider for laptops to mainly scalable iGPU chiplets, minus HX segment for halo gaming and productivity machines. Class 50, 60 and 70 laptop GPUs will easily become iGPU chiplets towards 2030. We will see how this plays out. It will be exciting, for sure.
john_Also an x86 Intel CPU at 14A, if we assume that 14A is as good or better than TSMC nodes, with a strong Nvidia iGPU could be enough for MS to chose them over AMD for a future XBOX. As long as MS is using the same hardware with SONY, it has no chance to compete with SONY. Nvidia could offer them an advantage in gaming. And I bet that with console prices up and consoles games going up in price, having worst or no margings in XBOX hardware, because of higher price of an Intel+Nvidia APU, wouldn't be that much of a red flag.
Quite possible, but this is more towards 2035, the next-next generation of consoles. It could be quite exciting, unless Xbox hardware implodes in a meanwhile or becomes de facto a PC. We willl see. Console cycles have become really long these days and Microsoft is in a precarious situation with Xbox brand, services and positioning. Contracts for 2027 release are done and silicon designs almost finalised with AMD chiplets and RDNA5 graphics.
john_Anyway, just thoughts. But if AMD manages to get, let's say, a 25% of the AI market, that would be enough to keep AMD financialy and tecnnologically healthy and competitive, even if AMD does lose market share in CPUs/APUs/gaming GPUs.
25% could take a decade to achieve and a painstaking effort, but it's feasible if MI450 and MI-next are a success. It's a slow moving change when we have one dominant and entrentched player, and the richest companies being able to hijack majority of advanced node capacity at TSMC. Perhaps this changes a bit with more fabs in the US towards 2030. We have experienced a crawling and painfully slow change in the consumer and server CPU market in last 6-7 years, but it's happening. I hope the world remains stable enough in the first place.
Posted on Reply
#58
Heiro78
Audible nooooo turns into full scream NO! I do not like this news... I'll read the article now.
Heiro78Audible nooooo turns into full scream NO! I do not like this news... I'll read the article now.
Ok, it's not as bad as the headline on the main page made it seem. OpenAI doesn't "directly" own AMD.
Posted on Reply
#59
Imouto
Mister JinxFor whom loves big fires this will be probably quite spectacular one.
This is actually close to reality because China already poured gas on the whole thing and it's holding a matchstick in case things don't go their way. I dunno why these companies and their governments thought the usual capitalistic rules apply.

The whole thing is a massive fire in the making.
Posted on Reply
#60
Vya Domus
Yikes man.

For those that don't know OpenAI to this day still has losses in the billions.
Posted on Reply
#61
Chrispy_
That's one hell of a clickbait headline.

"OpenAI buys AMD"



It's not quite the same as "OpenAI will buy AMD GPUs"...
Posted on Reply
#62
Rover4444
Vya DomusYikes man.

For those that don't know OpenAI to this day still has losses in the billions.
We gotta pump those numbers up.
Posted on Reply
#63
RandallFlagg
Vya DomusYikes man.

For those that don't know OpenAI to this day still has losses in the billions.
The only ones making money in AI are Nvidia, TSMC, and some cloud providers.
Posted on Reply
#64
Chrispy_
RandallFlaggThe only ones making money in AI are Nvidia, TSMC, and some cloud providers.
It sure feels like snake oil at the moment.

As a tool, ChatGPT is kind of replacing Google search, but that's largely because of the enshitification of Google Search with sponsored results, shopping results, ads, and the inaccuracy of Gemini, all prioritised on the page above the first actual search result. Adding to that problem is that so many of the actual search results are pages of AI-generated slop that are either uselessly superficial, wildly inaccurate, or both.

AI might one day be a benefit to the internet, but right now AI is absolutely, visibly, provably, and rapidly ruining it.
Posted on Reply
#65
Shihab
Chrispy_That's one hell of a clickbait headline.

"OpenAI buys AMD"



It's not quite the same as "OpenAI will buy AMD GPUs"...
Came here to complain about this too.
Thanks for giving me a mini heart attack, TPU! -_-
Posted on Reply
#66
RandallFlagg
Chrispy_It sure feels like snake oil at the moment.

As a tool, ChatGPT is kind of replacing Google search, but that's largely because of the enshitification of Google Search with sponsored results, shopping results, ads, and the inaccuracy of Gemini, all prioritised on the page above the first actual search result. Adding to that problem is that so many of the actual search results are pages of AI-generated slop that are either uselessly superficial, wildly inaccurate, or both.
Yeah TBH, the internet has been garbage for most of the last 25 years. When I first started using it, early/mid 90s, it was *all* information and no ads. Mostly data was from universities and government. Then it became commercialized with annoying ads, and for the past 10 years it's just garbage either direct ads or propaganda in the guise of 'reviews' pumping products.
Chrispy_AI might one day be a benefit to the internet, but right now AI is absolutely, visibly, provably, and rapidly ruining it.
Most people - and I mean businesses - seem to think you can just use AI as is without training it, and have no clue what 'training' means or how to do it. If it were really so simple to implement they would have already replaced trucking dispatchers, air traffic controllers, replenishment ordering for retail, and so on. And that's relatively low hanging fruit. Reality is that the required training and implementation is so costly, along with ongoing use costs, any savings from job elimination doesn't justify it in many cases - even though the providers are all losing big money hence effectively subsidizing implementations. Just like .com it's going to bubble, crash the economy, then take another 20 years to mature.
Posted on Reply
#67
Roph
Yeah, along with posting sourceless Moore's Law Is Dead fanfiction as "news" and the literal black market key site ads masquerading as news, TPU's getting stained :(
Posted on Reply
#68
RandallFlagg
I paid my friend $1000 to dig a hole in the woods. He paid me $1000 to fill a hole in the woods. We never lifted a finger and each got $1000 in revenue for our hole making and hole filling businesses.
Posted on Reply
#69
Rover4444
RandallFlaggI paid my friend $1000 to dig a hole in the woods. He paid me $1000 to fill a hole in the woods. We never lifted a finger and each got $1000 in revenue for our hole making and hole filling businesses.
Thank you for creating two jobs and increasing the GDP by $2000! True patriot o7
Posted on Reply
#70
xehmadus
That buy order, is a deal, no matter what RADEON was never appropriate context for GPU's where theyr leader left market 15 years ago
Posted on Reply
#71
lambda
JAKraFull circle? :)
NVIDIA intends to invest up to $100 billion in OpenAI. - link
Now OpenAI invests in AMD?
Posted on Reply
#72
svan71
I find it so odd when it goes to heating and cooling our homes climate change is going to kill us but when Ai uses enough power to run a small city everybody is fine with it. The global warming scam the carbon tax scam is shown for what it is, a total lie told to cripple and control the masses.
Posted on Reply
#73
lambda
svan71I find it so odd when it goes to heating and cooling our homes climate change is going to kill us but when Ai uses enough power to run a small city everybody is fine with it. The global warming scam the carbon tax scam is shown for what it is, a total lie told to cripple and control the masses.
"Everybody" is not fine with it. The masses do not have the "power" to regulate these big conglomerates. Our representatives are lobbied by the big names and somehow it turns into a geopolitical issue rather than labour vs capital class.

The "push" is an attempt to delink/delimit the labour from actual production. An "AI" doesn't complain or ask for wage increase or take a day off or switch to a competitor.

Let's stick to the topic though lest we get our comments removed.
Posted on Reply
#74
Nhonho
Are these giant data centers designed to be used by multiple companies that need AI servers?
Or will each data center be used by a single company?
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 13th, 2026 22:44 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts