Thursday, July 3rd 2025
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT Gains 9% Performance at 1440p with Latest Driver, Beats RTX 5070 Ti
In what could spell trouble for the upcoming GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER, Hardware Unboxed found that the latest Adrenalin drivers give the Radeon RX 9070 XT a 9% gain in raster performance at 1440p over review press drivers. This closes its performance gap with the current GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, which would make the card faster than any potential SKU NVIDIA intends to position between the RTX 5070 and RTX 5070 Ti. This testing is part of a feature by Hardware Unboxed where they compared current drivers to review press drivers for both the RX 9070 XT and RTX 5070 Ti.
When averaged across 16 games, the RX 9070 XT with latest drivers was found to gain 9% performance over review press drivers; whereas the RTX 5070 Ti with the latest drivers only gained 2.5% performance over its review press drivers. This 9% gain for the RX 9070 XT puts it ahead of the RTX 5070 Ti. Both the RTX 5070 Ti and RX 9070 XT are capable of gaming at 4K with some settings turned down. Here, averaged across the same 16 games, Hardware Unboxed found that the RTX 5070 Ti gained 3% performance, while the RX 9070 XT gained 4%, and the two GPUs were evenly matched. Helping AMD's average are specific game tests where the RX 9070 XT vastly improved its performance, with "Counter Strike 2" posting a 23% improvement, and "Spider-Man Remastered" posting a massive 27%. "Hogwarts Legacy" sees an 18% gain for AMD. There's more interesting findings and insights in the Hardware Unboxed video linked below.
Sources:
Hardware Unboxed (YouTube), VideoCardz
When averaged across 16 games, the RX 9070 XT with latest drivers was found to gain 9% performance over review press drivers; whereas the RTX 5070 Ti with the latest drivers only gained 2.5% performance over its review press drivers. This 9% gain for the RX 9070 XT puts it ahead of the RTX 5070 Ti. Both the RTX 5070 Ti and RX 9070 XT are capable of gaming at 4K with some settings turned down. Here, averaged across the same 16 games, Hardware Unboxed found that the RTX 5070 Ti gained 3% performance, while the RX 9070 XT gained 4%, and the two GPUs were evenly matched. Helping AMD's average are specific game tests where the RX 9070 XT vastly improved its performance, with "Counter Strike 2" posting a 23% improvement, and "Spider-Man Remastered" posting a massive 27%. "Hogwarts Legacy" sees an 18% gain for AMD. There's more interesting findings and insights in the Hardware Unboxed video linked below.




153 Comments on AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT Gains 9% Performance at 1440p with Latest Driver, Beats RTX 5070 Ti
Where are the articles the videos and the reports about melted 9070xts? Let me guess, sapphire managed to fix the 12vh cable and so the sapphire 9070xt doesnt melt, amiright?
A good 75% of the post on reddit that I see are from novice users and people that has no clue what they are doing. I will sometimes go in there and question them I once asked a guy if he manual set the vsoc on his AM5 board and the response is what is that?
You have no way of telling if that person knows anything about computers or first time builders, the status of their windows install etc. Some of them tweak the crap out of their systems just blindly following YouTube guides yet fail to mention that in their post. Its just a generic post saying this card sucks or these drivers are terrible.
As someone that has been doing this for along time I red flag those post immediately.
In some places RX 9070 XT sells out better than its competitors.
AMD’s top of the line GPU has officially graduated out of mid-range performance.False, and you know it. Stop posting lies.
chipsandcheese.com/p/rdna-4s-out-of-order-memory-accesses
chipsandcheese.com/p/dynamic-register-allocation-on-amds
The video had at least two games that the RTX 5070 Ti lost to the RX 9070 XT with its day one driver: Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2 and Call of Duty: Black Ops 6. With the current drivers, the RTX 5070 Ti now wins over the RTX 5070 Ti in Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2, but still loses to the RX 9070 XT in Call of Duty: Black Ops 6. If this was an anti-Nvidia hit piece, this updated driver re-review would have skipped Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2.
Also, Sapphire does fix several of the problems that plague Nvidia cards regarding the 12V-2x6 power connector. First, Sapphire’s RX 9070 XT Nitro+ draws less current than the RTX 4090, RTX 5080, and RTX 5090. Sapphire’s RX 9070 XT Nitro+ draws less current than what the 12V-2x6 should really be rated for, which looks like it should be around 450 sustained watts or less. Second, Sapphire draws current from both sides of the 12V-2x6 socket and places fuses on both sides of the socket so that if one side overdraws current, that fuse on that side will blow and shut the card down. Nvidia’s Founders Edition cards can’t balance current draw on their 12V-2x6 sockets so it is prone to drawing current from one side of the socket, creating an imbalance in current on the 12V-2x6 cable. Nvidia’s partners’ cards aren’t as prone to biasing the current draw on the 12V-2x6 sockets because they draw current from both sides of the socket.
Interested to see how RDNA 4 fits into that picture, i.e. what the scope for improvement is and whether it will age like modern wine.
As for 12V2x6 pin, not it's not safe. Sapphire and ASrock cards are lower TBP cards, they require less current to be delivered to them.
Though this does not save them from facing issue when current is distributed unevenly.
Give it some time and I'm sure we'll hear about connector problems on Sapphire Nitro and ASRock Taichi cards.
More people have driver issues with RTX 5000 cards than have users of RX 9000 cards. Worse thing is: RTX 5000 cards driver issues are more serious - they affect system stability.
Nvidia fucked up something with RTX 5000 series pretty good. It was obvious from the first time when even reviewers encountered issues when testing RTX 5090 and 5080.
They suspected PCIe 5.0 implementation to be a culprit, because when they switched link speed to 4.0, problems were mitigated. Nvidia blamed motherboard makers.
The reality is: no RX 9000 card required mobo BIOS update or any sort of PCIe 5.0 problem mitigation. PCIe 5.0 was simply not problematic on RX series. This actually says a lot.
Then the issues with drivers started emerging more and more as Nvidia kept trying to fix compatibility issues.
Many new drivers broke things for older RTX cards (specifically RTX 3000 and 4000 series). You can find users reporting problems in TPU particular news post about new drivers.
Don't tell me to go read some Reddit posts. I've been through Nvidia's own forums multiple times. I'm telling you to go directly to Nvidia's own forums.
And so we keep going, 1 or 2 new driver release(s) per week, and still problems. This all points to a bigger problem, in my opinion.
Nvidia has been known for having good drivers for a long time. And now with new cards they suddenly lost all their wisdom and don't know how to make drivers?
I think they are trying to solve design flaw or hardware issue, or any unexpected behavior that they were not aware of before.
Drivers are problem because they break things (or lower performance) on older cards, things that have worked okay for months, or even years.
In other words: Continuous tries for fixing the RTX 5000 series via drivers led to opposite effect on older cards. That's why (I think) the Nvidia's drivers are a mess now IMO.
I think lexluthermiester was right about PCIe x8 problems (performance drops) of RTX 5060 (Ti) cards when paired with PCIe <5.0 mobos.
It does not work normally as you'd expect from previous generations when x8 link was used.
Heads up: With next generation the tables might as well turn again and we may end up with good old fashioned crappy AMD drivers again. Good times ahead!
As for why some people don't (seem to) have issues:
There will always be users that don't have problems or they don't notice anything unusual.
Every user has different use scenario, thus different statistical chance for problems to occur. Gaming 5 hours a week is not like gaming 5 hours a day.
Some people always update their drivers when new version gets released, some update once per 2 months, or less frequently.
Some say it's for cost reasons, but i dont buy that. If Nvidia with their notoriously high margins can put it on a $250 RTX 5050 then AMD could have easily done on a $699 RX 9070 XT and probably their entire RDNA4 line.
Also it's not a die limitation. RDNA3 was already fully capable of 80Gbps as it was enabled on their Pro series cards that used the exact same Navi dies that consumer models did. It's just a PCB decision whether to enable it or not.