Friday, September 19th 2025

ASUS Proposes Reinforced PCIe Slot to Deliver 250 W of Power From the Motherboard

ASUS unveiled a prototype this week with a new method for graphics cards to draw power from the motherboard's PCIe expansion slot, proposing a solution that could eliminate the need for card-mounted power cables for many entry-level and mid-range GPUs. The concept focuses on beefing up the physical PCIe power path: ASUS engineers widened and thickened the contact pads at the front edge of the card's PCIe interface, enlarged the copper area inside the corresponding slot, and fused several 12-volt lanes into larger, lower-resistance conductors. To share the load, the traditional 8-pin connector is relocated onto the motherboard, allowing the slot and onboard connector to work together. Higher-conductivity materials and a larger terminal cross-section are used to increase the continuous current capacity without modifying the card's external form factor.

This idea could be a good match for GPUs in the 180-220 W range, where customers might appreciate a cable-free card. Examples could include RTX 5060 Ti-class parts or comparable AMD models. The company has not released full schematics, continuous current ratings, thermal validation, or long-term endurance data, and the headline 250 W claim leaves some questions unresolved. A conventional slot plus a motherboard auxiliary connector typically totals 225 W, where the 8-pin supplies 150 W and the PCIe connector gives 75 W. ASUS is already known for experimenting with alternative power delivery, with an example being the Graphics Card High-Power (GC-HPWR) connector. This is a higher-power design, rivaling NVIDIA's 12V-2x6V connector.
Sources: IT Home, via ComputerBase
Add your own comment

95 Comments on ASUS Proposes Reinforced PCIe Slot to Deliver 250 W of Power From the Motherboard

#1
Chrispy_
This doesn't solve anything at all. You still have to plug power into the motherboard, likely via the problematic 12V6X2 connector once they extend it beyond 250W.

Now you also need to dedicate additional (expensive) PCB layers and throw a lot more copper traces (expensive) at it too. It's just a glorified extension cable that adds another connector to the equation. Why go from the PSU directly to the GPU when you can now do it with extra steps!! (/s)

Cable still required, but now you need a new motherboard, too....

Why? Because cables are evil, apparently and this fits the dumb BTF form factor that's all about form over function, for people with infinite wallets.
Posted on Reply
#2
john_
Because we would love 850W graphics cards.
Posted on Reply
#3
Nostras
I'm not wholly against this, but I question the target audience.
ASUS is for sure not going to add this to cheap motherboards and instead add it to already quite expensive motherboards.
Who's going to combine such an expensive motherboard with a <=225W GPU?
Posted on Reply
#4
lepudruk
This might be (some) solution for less power hungry GPUs, but for the rest.. Need to wait for BTF 3.0 and PSU-MB blade connectors.
Posted on Reply
#5
windwhirl
NostrasASUS is for sure not going to add this to cheap motherboards and instead add it to already quite expensive motherboards.
... To be honest, I'd feel this whole move would be just a justification to increase motherboard pricing even more.
Posted on Reply
#6
Nostras
windwhirl... To be honest, I'd feel this whole move would be just a justification to increase motherboard pricing even more.
Ehh, ASUS has not shown this behaviour considering their whatever-its-called on the motherboard after the pci-e slot.
If they're serious I'm expecting them to make variants of their ROG series with this feature that are priced a bit higher.
Posted on Reply
#7
TumbleGeorge
Have solution. Just set graphic cards GPU frequency enough lower than today raped high choices which is too out of GPU efficiency range.
Posted on Reply
#8
r00tcz
This is way worse bodge than BTF or what is it called. This connector was never meant to be used for 250W, even with some magical golden contacts, this is 12V-HP disaster waiting to happen at over 3x the current.
Also not a single word on how is this even negotiated. I only hope it is, because standard motherboards/slots will just melt or straight up burn if you try to do this...
Posted on Reply
#9
TPUnique
That'd be great. Around 200W is my comfort zone.
Posted on Reply
#10
TumbleGeorge
How did they deal with the increased induction currents?
Posted on Reply
#11
TPUnique
Chrispy_This doesn't solve anything at all.
Yes it does. It improves compatibility in tight SFF cases, where the power cable protruding on the GPU's side leads to a waste of space in order to accommodate it.
Posted on Reply
#12
sudothelinuxwizard
Is it just me or does pushing 225W through less then 10 microscopically thin copper traces sound like a fire hazard?
Posted on Reply
#13
DavidC1
This is a stupid idea. It should be separate as always. It also makes problems worse if connector-gate happens again, as now you fry a much larger PCB instead of tiny GPU board. And high power means you need to worry about heat on the mobo now too. It makes repair difficult too. But I'm not surprised. Asus always sucked on the user friendly aspect. Worst customer support.

Apparently that's the trend to keep up with the "You'll own nothing and be happy" motto of stream everything, throwaway everything, get in debt all the time mentality.
Posted on Reply
#14
_roman_
:) Stick to the existing standards before the nvidia 900 graphic card series.

Up to 200 Watts is less than a No Radeon 6600xt, 6800 non xt or 7800xt. I just named a few grpahic cards i bought and used myself in windows 10 or 11 pro.

the 200 watt days are over. This is not even enough for a cpu.

I do not know who I want to give the worst Mainboard brand sticker. Asrock or ASUS or Gigabyte.... A hard competition during the year.
Posted on Reply
#15
Nostras
sudothelinuxwizardIs it just me or does pushing 225W through less then 10 microscopically thin copper traces sound like a fire hazard?
EEs typically know what they're doing. Since you can't really mess the connection up I'd argue this is least concern.
Posted on Reply
#16
Hecate91
TPUniqueYes it does. It improves compatibility in tight SFF cases, where the power cable protruding on the GPU's side leads to a waste of space in order to accommodate it.
Graphics cards that aren't 3 slot bricks would better solve compatibility with ITX SFF cases.

I don't see what this is supposed to do other than make the power connector more complicated than it really needs to be, and it will raise motherboard prices even higher.
Posted on Reply
#17
trsttte
Lol, hopefully the PCI-SIG will see this bullshit for what it is: bullshit!

They didn't lift a finger to implement ATX12VO which actually brings some advantages but are now pushing a stupid change that bring no technical advantage whatsoever - it's just looks of components closed in a box that's under a desk hidden.

The scary part is if Dell/Lenovo/HP get on board with something like this because it could make desktop assembly cheaper and repairs more difficult.
Posted on Reply
#18
freeagent
Hecate91Graphics cards that aren't 3 slot bricks would better solve compatibility with ITX SFF cases.
My GTX580 is a 3 slot brick lol. But my 980 Classified is sweet at only 2 slots. My Zotac is closer to 3 slots.. no point in trying to run an Asus Hyper M.2 card under it or anything.

My 3070Ti has the same cooler as the 3080 so it is a pig too.
Posted on Reply
#19
LabRat 891
Seems dumb.

If they want to put more power on/in the slot, extend the slot towards the I/O bracket w/ Power and Ground pins (ala ATX20+4 or AGPpro).
That way there's 100% backwards compatibility and a usable wattage capacity on the board.

Still, requires re-laying out the PCB, and still requires EPS and/or +12VHPWR/+12V-2x6 aux inputs on the board.
The only 'plus' would be the board could actively balance the per-conductor load; requiring more power circuitry on the mainboard... :rolleyes:
NtM, the +12V and GND 'high current plane' would probably go through the PCB space where most boards isolate their onboard sound. (that'd be great for sound quality :laugh:)
Posted on Reply
#20
Ravenmaster
I wonder if this bug also extends to Desktop motherboard BIOS
Posted on Reply
#21
Panther_Seraphin
sudothelinuxwizardIs it just me or does pushing 225W through less then 10 microscopically thin copper traces sound like a fire hazard?
Same Designer from 12vhpwr infiltrated PCI-SIG by the looks of things if this gets signed off



Also IIRC wasnt one of the main reason nearly every card has moved the majority if not all the load onto dedicated feeds from the PSU is due to both noise concerns in power delivery and the instability it may cause to other devices inadvertantly?
Posted on Reply
#22
LabRat 891
Panther_SeraphinSame Designer from 12vhpwr infiltrated PCI-SIG by the looks of things if this gets signed off
Kinda seems that way. Perhaps, a consequence of modern 'techniques' and 'thoughts'?
Panther_SeraphinAlso IIRC wasnt one of the main reason nearly every card has moved the majority if not all the load onto dedicated feeds from the PSU is due to both noise concerns in power delivery and the instability it may cause to other devices inadvertantly?
Yup. Also, we used to encase PCs inside windowless thick steel and/or aluminum chassis to mitigate EMI/RFI, bi-directionally.
Alas in the 2020s, who'd ever let a silly thing like logic or physics get in the way of consumer product engineering? :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#23
ymdhis
I propose we put IEC C14 plugs on the graphics cards. Boom, now you can deliver up to 3800 watts to them. Problem solved.
Posted on Reply
#24
chrcoluk
To me, this adds the board as a extra component for the power delivery, and the last thing I want handling that kind of wattage to my GPU is the board itself. Also as Chrispy said, PSU would still need to supply power to the board anyway. So its just plugging in a cable to a different spot in the system.

Better to have PSU > GPU than PSU > Board > GPU.

Vendors trying to solve an issue that doesnt need solving, 8 pin cables are fine.

End result not just an added failure point but yet another price bump on boards.
Posted on Reply
#25
freeagent
This would help prevent 12VHPWR plugs from melting I think. I know for sure they can take 400w :D
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 11th, 2026 02:12 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts