Monday, November 3rd 2025

12V-2×6 Power Connector Burns on Sapphire Radeon RX 9070 XT GPU

The story of the 12V-2x6 power connector overheating is almost as old as the original 12VHPWR connector itself, and the improved 12V-2x6 still faces issues common to the 12-pin GPU power connector family. Recently, another instance of a burning 12V-2x6 connector was reported, this time on a Sapphire Radeon RX 9070 XT GPU. A user named u/ProfessionalHost3913 shared images on the r/AMD subreddit showing his Sapphire Radeon RX 9070 XT with a burned connector end on the GPU. According to the user, the GPU was running at its default settings, with no overclocking or increased power limits, during gaming sessions of Battlefield 6, Cyberpunk 2077, Outerworlds, Minecraft, and others.

The issue appears to arise from powering the GPU with a regular PSU that lacks a native 12V-2x6 output. Instead, the GPU was connected using a 3x8-pin adaptor rather than directly to an ATX 3.1 PSU. These adaptors have been known to cause melted connectors. This problem was first observed in August, highlighting a recurring theme for new builders: to prevent this situation, avoid using last-generation PSUs and opt for an ATX 3.1 PSU design whenever possible to eliminate the need for adaptors. As more companies adopt the 12V-2x6 power source for their GPU designs, gamers might consider investing in ATX 3.1 PSUs to ensure their systems can power future generations of GPUs.
Source: r/AMD Subreddit
Add your own comment

109 Comments on 12V-2×6 Power Connector Burns on Sapphire Radeon RX 9070 XT GPU

#26
Chomiq
Space Lynxno, that is not what the official nvidia adapter looks like, its not blue on the end for one thing. and it has a special thing at the bottom that says nvidia on it, which i imagine has higher quality control standards
Sapphire ships the card with that adapter. Or do you expect Sapphire to ship their AMD GPU's with adapter manufactured for Nvidia?
Posted on Reply
#27
Vayra86
TheDeeGeeThe solution to 12V-2x6 was right under their noses.

Behold, the GTX 680.



All they had to do was a make a new spec for a 6-Pin cable that allows 300W per cable, and change the slotting layout so you can't plug in a regular 6-Pin.

There was even a stacked connector like this designed for 6+8-Pin which could be turned into dual 8-Pin if they wanted to.

There is one problem with this.

On a 450-600W card, you cannot hide the fact the card actually requires a bunch of cables because it uses so much power.

12vhpwr is really a marketing move to hide that fact, too. Look how slick and compact it is, must be good, modern, and efficient, right? I have yet to see the first card that actually needs the physical real estate to harbor more than 3x8pin and doesn't have it. High wattage cards automagically are larger.

Its one big act of misleading customers in an environment that has since AI/RT gone straight to insanity. We are still experiencing the so called 'price of RT' here, and we have only just seen the tip of the iceberg, while knowing there's probably 90% more of it under the surface. We just don't want to believe it anymore, because look at the billions invested and planned to invest! Its too big to fail right?

The very definition of a bubble and humanity is on the Titanic atm. And as long as the music is playing and the porn gifs keep coming, all is well.
Posted on Reply
#28
Chomiq
Vayra86There is one problem with this.

On a 450-600W card, you cannot hide the fact the card actually requires a bunch of cables because it uses so much power.

12vhpwr is really a marketing move to hide that fact, too. Look how slick and compact it is, must be good, modern, and efficient, right? I have yet to see the first card that actually needs the physical real estate to harbor more than 3x8pin and doesn't have it. High wattage cards automagically are larger.

Its one big act of misleading customers in an environment that has since AI/RT gone straight to insanity. We are still experiencing the so called 'price of RT' here, and we have only just seen the tip of the iceberg, while knowing there's probably 90% more of it under the surface. We just don't want to believe it anymore, because look at the billions invested and planned to invest! Its too big to fail right?

The very definition of a bubble and humanity is on the Titanic atm. And as long as the music is playing and the porn gifs keep coming, all is well.
I think it would have worked much better if they simply opted to use two of the original 12-pin microfit, aka pci-e 3.0 design. This entire 12VHPWR blunder comes from trying to run 400W+ on a single connector.
Posted on Reply
#29
FR3D1
Ninja Cat
LabRat 891Gamers are gonna revolt if this connector becomes the norm for next gen.
Maybe they'll try a little less “bending and breaking” at first, right? It's not as if, for example, the 8-pin PCIe connector has never burned out since it was invented. Wrong! Difference? Nowadays, people are too quick to blame others.

With a friendly smile,
Fred.
Posted on Reply
#30
Dr. Dro
Space Lynxthe official nvidia adapter doesn't seem to have any issues, so i guess everyone should just use that
Where are you going to get an Nvidia adapter with a Radeon card though? Honestly the octopus adapters are awful. Proper native cable all the way.
LittleBroI bet Sapphire and AsRock now regret going for 12V2x6 for their top tier models.
No, they really don't. It's statistically insignificant pertaining to RMA numbers.
gupstergStill couldn't bring myself to bu3y a RX 9000 series with one.
Still willing to buy a Radeon at all after the last stunt they pulled? Remarkable.
Posted on Reply
#31
_roman_
Waldorflove how many "issues" of the past 1(2) gens dont seem to be limited to team green.
I'm not sure if that was sarcasm.

It is the nvidia graphic card power plug. REgardless if it is amd or nvidia graphic card, that nvidia graphic card plug seems another time to be faulty. Regardless how often the same plug was rebrandedd with a different name and a bit of small changes. It stays the same fail design. Especially how it is used. When the plug would drive only a 3 Watt Led W5W Bulb in total there will be most likely no issues.
Posted on Reply
#32
Waldorf
while it is Nv design, no one forced amd/gpu makers to use it.
to me there is no difference between someone designing crappy stuff, or others that decided to use it instead inhouse solutions.
just shows all corporations are greedy to the point of where they make products you technically dont want to buy/use.
Posted on Reply
#33
FR3D1
Ninja Cat
_roman_It is the nvidia graphic card power plug.
I quote as follows:
No.
12vhpwr does not come from nVidia, but was specified by PCI-SIG (i.e., also by AMD).
Source ComputerBase (de)

Which is correct, but often concealed.
PCI-SIG

With a friendly smile,
Fred.
Posted on Reply
#34
Philaphlous
The pins for the male/female connectors of molex and PSU's makes me cringe... yes they probably tested them rigorously before producing them, but just small defects in manufacturing can probably spell some pretty high resistance values of these connectors. Plus I don't think they're even made with copper...
Posted on Reply
#35
gupsterg
Vayra8612vhpwr is really a marketing move to hide that fact, too. Look how slick and compact it is, must be good, modern, and efficient, right? I have yet to see the first card that actually needs the physical real estate to harbor more than 3x8pin and doesn't have it. High wattage cards automagically are larger.
Agreed totally.
gupstergStill couldn't bring myself to buy a RX 9000 series with one.
Dr. DroStill willing to buy a Radeon at all after the last stunt they pulled? Remarkable.
I paid well below what they retail ;) , it was an open box purchase. I made the most of other discounts I could leverage, so I have protected myself that way.
Posted on Reply
#36
noel_fs
so this has nothing to do with the actual gpu, its about the cable and psu but you are still mentioning the gpu's brand in the title implying its a design issue? what has tpu become jesus
Posted on Reply
#37
Waldorf
@noel_fs
because the part comes with the card?
the same way you mention the car brand, if they deliver the car with tires that fail prematurely.
Posted on Reply
#38
Dammeron
What's weird here is that all of the power pins are burnt. That should eliminate the suspicions of inproper load balancing, unless the card feeds itself throught just one of them at a time and chooses the pin randomly each time.
Posted on Reply
#39
jnv11
I honestly think that the 8-pin EPS12V connector that powers CPUs should have been reused to power GPUs. It is much more dense than the 8-pin PCI Express Graphics (PEG) connector, is keyed differently than the 8-pin PEG connector so they will not fit each other, use larger pins than the 12V-2x6 connector's pins and therefore can safely handle more current without burning, and has a long track record of not burning. Sure, it can carry up to a little more than 300 watts, but is safe while cutting excessive margin that PEG connectors have with no real safety risk.
Posted on Reply
#40
TheinsanegamerN
A SECOND GPU has burned! Oh noes!

?Meanwhile, if you go by steam's dismal card counts, there are 26,400 9070xts out there. That is a failure rate of.....0.007%.

And I feel like this reminder is needed: 8 pins burned too.



Still waiting on hard numbers that 12v2 fails more than the 8 pin BTW.
_roman_I'm not sure if that was sarcasm.

It is the nvidia graphic card power plug. REgardless if it is amd or nvidia graphic card, that nvidia graphic card plug seems another time to be faulty. Regardless how often the same plug was rebrandedd with a different name and a bit of small changes. It stays the same fail design. Especially how it is used. When the plug would drive only a 3 Watt Led W5W Bulb in total there will be most likely no issues.
It's on AMD's AIBs for not including load balancing.
ChomiqI think it would have worked much better if they simply opted to use two of the original 12-pin microfit, aka pci-e 3.0 design. This entire 12VHPWR blunder comes from trying to run 400W+ on a single connector.
The connector can handle 600w just fine. That is what it is designed for.

What it CANNOT DO is run 600w, or 300w, or 200w over 1 pin. 1 pin can only safely handle 100w.
Posted on Reply
#41
bonehead123
Like my 1st Drill Sergeant said when asked if we could stop training for a moment for a cigarette break:

"Smoke 'em if ya got 'em, simulate if you don't", hahahaha :D
Posted on Reply
#42
bitsandboots
TheinsanegamerNIt's on AMD's AIBs for not including load balancing.


The connector can handle 600w just fine. That is what it is designed for.

What it CANNOT DO is run 600w, or 300w, or 200w over 1 pin. 1 pin can only safely handle 100w.
The connector is more delicate than what it replaces, as there's more pins so there's more that can be failure points.
PCIE 6-pin having 2 12v pins and 8-pin having 3.
If all the power goes to 1 pin, 6-pin only encounters 2x the rated power per pin. 3x for 8-pin. 12vhpwr would encounter 6x.
It's funny that at the same time, 12vhpwr having thinner wires makes it less capable of that.
I don't think we'll see reliable numbers for cable accidents unless a company publishes what's happening in its server farms, so for now we have to use our thinking caps.
Posted on Reply
#43
Vayra86
DammeronWhat's weird here is that all of the power pins are burnt. That should eliminate the suspicions of inproper load balancing, unless the card feeds itself throught just one of them at a time and chooses the pin randomly each time.
Passive load balancing implemented like Intel Core load switching, nice!
Posted on Reply
#44
AusWolf
How long will the industry take to realise that this festering turd of a connector is not safe? :banghead:

Why even try to reinvent the wheel - it's beyond me. :confused:
As more companies adopt the 12V-2x6 power source for their GPU designs, gamers might consider investing in ATX 3.1 PSUs to ensure their systems can power future generations of GPUs.
My Seasonic Prime still has about 9 years of warranty left, so that's a big no from me.
Posted on Reply
#45
Unregistered
Am I wrong in thinking you don't get that many burnt pins unless the adapter was defective?
#46
Hecate91
TheinsanegamerNStill waiting on hard numbers that 12v2 fails more than the 8 pin BTW.
We're on the 3rd or 4th known case of an AMD card with a melting connector, on Nvidia cards it is probably into the hundreds now, and on the third revision the connector still melts.
And I don't expect any PSU or GPU company in the industry to admit just how many connectors failed because it would hurt their sales.
The connector is too fragile compared to the 8 pin molex PCI-e GPU connector, there's no reason why any full size GPU needs the 12 pin connector, especially when 8 pin PCI-e molex can handle more than 150W per cable.
TheinsanegamerNIt's on AMD's AIBs for not including load balancing.
AMD didn't design 12vhwpr or 12v2x6.
It's on Nvidia and Dell for not including load balancing in the design specs.
TheinsanegamerNThe connector can handle 600w just fine. That is what it is designed for.
It can't given that it melts at half of the rated power with nothing in the design to prevent unbalanced loads.
Dr. DroStill willing to buy a Radeon at all after the last stunt they pulled? Remarkable.
Ironic because of the topic and what company designed the connector, but I'm not surprised Nvidia users are going to milk that for all it's worth.
Though the GPU market is completely fked when the choices we have are risk your GPU turning into a brick because a multi-trillion dollar company wanted to save a few cents on current sensing per pin and thermal fuses, or the company with shitty PR who implied users may not get day 1 updates and had to walk back on it.
Posted on Reply
#47
lukart
Vayra86There is one problem with this.

On a 450-600W card, you cannot hide the fact the card actually requires a bunch of cables because it uses so much power.

12vhpwr is really a marketing move to hide that fact, too. Look how slick and compact it is, must be good, modern, and efficient, right? I have yet to see the first card that actually needs the physical real estate to harbor more than 3x8pin and doesn't have it. High wattage cards automagically are larger.

Its one big act of misleading customers in an environment that has since AI/RT gone straight to insanity. We are still experiencing the so called 'price of RT' here, and we have only just seen the tip of the iceberg, while knowing there's probably 90% more of it under the surface. We just don't want to believe it anymore, because look at the billions invested and planned to invest! Its too big to fail right?

The very definition of a bubble and humanity is on the Titanic atm. And as long as the music is playing and the porn gifs keep coming, all is well.
That's where there's things that look good on paper and then in reality will kick in and smash you on the face. I wouldn't touch a 12v connector card with a stick.
Posted on Reply
#48
AusWolf
Vayra86There is one problem with this.

On a 450-600W card, you cannot hide the fact the card actually requires a bunch of cables because it uses so much power.
I have one problem with this.

Why not improve efficiency instead of churning out 450-600 W cards?

"Oh look, our new 9989 XT Ultra Pro Ti is so fast!" - Yeah, right! :rolleyes:

If hardware makers stayed in the land of sanity with power consumption on their cards, we would have never needed a new connector to replace 3x old ones in the first place.
2x 8-pins should be more than enough for any GPU.
Posted on Reply
#49
Dr. Dro
Hecate91Ironic because of the topic and what company designed the connector, but I'm not surprised Nvidia users are going to milk that for all it's worth.
Though the GPU market is completely fked when the choices we have are risk your GPU turning into a brick because a multi-trillion dollar company wanted to save a few cents on current sensing per pin and thermal fuses, or the company with shitty PR who implied users may not get day 1 updates and had to walk back on it.
It's funny because I even explicitly said I wasn't bothered by the split, and found it a necessary measure. But if that PR stunt doesn't shake consumer trust for you, then nothing will. That says more about you than anything or anyone else, really. If that doesn't paint how disjointed and disconnected they are, and doesn't raise any alarms for you at all... then really, just admit it.
Posted on Reply
#50
shuffy_losys
qlumConnectors of the same size that can do this amount of power exist after all.
That'd require bumping up the voltage, but I'm sure all the PSU manufacturers would love to offer say 24V.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 15th, 2026 05:16 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts