Friday, January 16th 2026

TechPowerUp Readers Willing to Move Away from Windows after Windows 10 EOL: Frontpage Poll

In Q4 2025, we asked our readers if in the light of Microsoft discontinuing Windows 10 and rising dissatisfaction with Windows 11, they would consider moving away from Windows altogether to alternative operating systems. The results are fascinating. Over the quarter, our frontpage poll gathered over 34,000 responses. A significant majority of 55.4% (18,981 readers) voted that they would consider moving away from Windows to Linux. What's more interesting is that only 4.5% (1,538 readers) say that they're willing to move to macOS (replace their PC with a Mac of some shape or form). A marginal 1.9% say they are willing to give up the PC as their main client computing device, and switch to a game console, such as the latest Xbox Series S/X or PlayStation 5; and probably stick to endpoints handed out by their work/school.

These three responses add up to 61.8%, or nearly two-thirds of our readers being disillusioned with Windows. 38.2%, or 13,105 readers answered that they will not consider moving away from Windows. The poll suggests a general sense of dissatisfaction with being restricted to Windows 11. Comments suggest that this stems from its interface being seen by some as a downgrade from Windows 10, besides its latest slew of other Microsoft products, such as 365, Copilot, Teams, and Bing, being seen as invasive or bloatware.
Add your own comment

104 Comments on TechPowerUp Readers Willing to Move Away from Windows after Windows 10 EOL: Frontpage Poll

#51
TheDeeGee
I would, but can't due to certain software i use not being support on Linux.

And overall Windows is just more plug and play.
Posted on Reply
#52
W4llBangdMyself
Already moved to KDE Fedora twice, for a few months each time, but had to return to windows every time because I got tired of troubleshooting bugs introduced by updates and the lack of Foobar2000 on Linux. Deadbeef and Audacious are far, very far from being adequate replacements. The problem I had with bugs could maybe be mitigated by delaying installing updates to maybe once a week, but I just really loved running "sudo yum (or dnf) upgrade" every day :) If MS keeps making win11 worse and worse like they have been doing since win11 got released, I will just have to say goodbye to Foobar2000 and just move to KDE Fedora permanently. Or I'll just have to live with running Foobar on Wine, which is far from optimal.
Posted on Reply
#53
zenlessyank
W4llBangdMyselfAlready moved to KDE Fedora twice, for a few months each time, but had to return to windows every time because I got tired of troubleshooting bugs introduced by updates and the lack of Foobar2000 on Linux. Deadbeef and Audacious are far, very far from being adequate replacements. The problem I had with bugs could maybe be mitigated by delaying installing updates to maybe once a week, but I just really loved running "sudo yum (or dnf) upgrade" every day :) If MS keeps making win11 worse and worse like they have been doing since win11 got released, I will just have to say goodbye to Foobar2000 and just move to KDE Fedora permanently. Or I'll just have to live with running Foobar on Wine, which is far from optimal.
Amarok is pretty good. But, yes, Foobar2000 is king. They do have it integrated with wine although but I haven't tried it.
Posted on Reply
#54
CrAsHnBuRnXp
AusWolfThis should teach Microsoft a lesson, but I'm afraid it's too late. Linux isn't just nicer to use, but it's also free. Thanks to Proton, gaming isn't an issue, either. There is no way Microsoft can trump that.
What about anti-cheat stuff from CoD and BF6?
Posted on Reply
#55
Solaris17
Super Dainty Moderator
CrAsHnBuRnXpWhat about anti-cheat stuff from CoD and BF6?
Depends. Older cod sure, bf6 no.

Most are using blanket statements.

Most anticheat works fine on Linux.

Kernel anticheat like BF6 absolutely does not.
Posted on Reply
#56
Gunbound
zenlessyankUntil you sudo apt update and something breaks and you gotta fix it. Or you buy a new fancy keyboard and can;t get it installed because, you know, there was nothing to learn.

You should know better than this.
I'm still quite angry how Intel XE driver support is not widely compatible on all the different distros available still today. Why can it not be as widely supported as i915?
Posted on Reply
#57
L'Eliminateur
TheDeeGeeI would, but can't due to certain software i use not being support on Linux.

And overall Windows is just more plug and play.
and THIS is my main issue too!.
I can use Windows for EVERYTHING:
¿i want to game? i just load ANY game from practically the dawn of PC to know and it WORKS on any storefront, i have BF6 and any game with anticheat works.
I need to do productive stuff?, i load whatever software i need, adobe CC specially and i don't need to bother with any gremlins, same with handbrake, networking tools, etc
I need text editing: notepad++ i have dozens of open files at the same time, there's still not a comparable editor in linux.
I need light editing of photos?, windows photo app, i can even delete backgrounds in a single click with the included AI tools, without even needing photoshop.
I need fancontrol?, i load fancontrol, it works
I need nvidia broadcast for webcam effects and the best audio noise reduction
I need all the specific software for my peripherals, i load logitech g suite and it works.
I need the software for my clone streamdeck, it works

With Linux i run into roadblocks since starting it:
No nvidia broadcast
no logitech software
no fan control(that i know of)
no adobe software
no stream deck software

Everyone says "well, then dual boot when you want to do that other stuff", NO, why would i waste my time like that?, what if i want to game whilst i have my productive stuff open at an alt+tab distance?, i do that all the time i have everything open, bnot to mention it's almost impossible to maintain a perfectly identical browsing profile (i use firefox with 800+ open tabs in 10+ groups) between both OS.

If everything works perfectly and how it should in windows, why would i bother to make my life miserable by wasting time dual booting when linux would hardly work for anything?

And if i want to play something else whilst in windows then i should boot into linux to play that other game... that would also work in windows, so i end up either installing same game twice or wasting time...


so no, there's no replacement for windows, ANY of the things i've listed by themselves are enough to roadblock the idea.

I'll keep using win10, i don't care about any security updates, at least until the base software i use stops updating or supporting win10
Posted on Reply
#58
dgianstefani
TPU Proofreader
Solaris17Most anticheat works fine on Linux.
I mean even on the site Linux users use to check, most games don't work...

Importantly the extremely popular games like Fortnite and BF6, or League of Legends, it's no. Whereas the site is a list of all games with anticheat including indie games, and assigns them all equal weighting for that final percentage. I'd be interested to see what kind of percentage would be the result of daily players having weighting.

Valorant doesn't work but CS2 does because Valve, I think that's the most popular game that is supported.

areweanticheatyet.com/
Posted on Reply
#59
mechtech
AusWolfFree to obtain and free to upgrade aren't the same thing.


When there are completely free options that serve my needs just as well, if not better than paid ones, I do have an issue paying. But each to their own.
Agreed

Just saying I would have no issue paying for a linux distro instead of w11 if I get full control of the OS, even if it's free I'd probably donate just because.

Be nice to see Mint/Zorin/a few others become a fully fledged windows replacement/alternative.

hmmmm interesting
www.windowscentral.com/microsoft/windows/zorin-os-18-has-reached-2-million-downloads-with-1m-windows-defections-fueling-one-of-linuxs-biggest-growth-stories-in-2026
Posted on Reply
#60
WarriorK9999


This is my entire year of staying on any Linux distro. SteamOS is arch linux based.

People always exagerate issues like having to use command lines and software support (not perfect but way better now) but doesn't realize these days most applications are online that it makes OS less important. I can understand for people who really needs Windows 10 but those aren't the majority. Older people mostly use like social media, email, banking and youtube. I can say same with younger people who grew up with smartphone only. When I built PCs for free with Linux Mint they had no issues. It really shows how the internet now makes daily task more universal.

DeMicrosoft is something that really helps. I used Samsung Dex as my desktop for a year. I had to sell most of my things including my PC except monitor and storages before moving to another country. It was a Samsung Note 9 with a cracked screen that can still be connected to a monitor with a USB 3.0+hdmi hub. I did play games limited to PS2/PS1 emulator, couple of Android games and even tried WPS office as main.

People dont realize a lot of things change since 2010 and I can understand why people say that. I will point this out that I am not that good at understanding command lines. I just want things to work which I did.

Something I don't miss setting up a Windows PC is finding drivers and turning off telemtry and disable services. For me I just need Brave, Steam, Protonup, Lutris, LibreOffice and couple of emulators.

Reason why I say this. I don't want to give a wrong idea. I know people here aren't like me so I would point out what I do on my PC. Its not much but for me it is.
Posted on Reply
#61
FatherOBlivion
Didn't answer the poll as I've never been a Windows user. Even professionally (and I've been in tech since the floppy). Apple and Linux only. (okay, tbh, there was a brief instance where an acquired company had some Windows NT boxes, but those were quickly retired. And Solaris for a few years as well).

Linux gaming, while not perfect, has come a very long way in recent years. Rare I have issues with the titles I care about. Seems the pace of improvement is accelerating, and I love it.
Posted on Reply
#62
AusWolf
CrAsHnBuRnXpWhat about anti-cheat stuff from CoD and BF6?
It was mentioned and discussed before in case you haven't noticed.
mechtechAgreed

Just saying I would have no issue paying for a linux distro instead of w11 if I get full control of the OS, even if it's free I'd probably donate just because.

Be nice to see Mint/Zorin/a few others become a fully fledged windows replacement/alternative.

hmmmm interesting
www.windowscentral.com/microsoft/windows/zorin-os-18-has-reached-2-million-downloads-with-1m-windows-defections-fueling-one-of-linuxs-biggest-growth-stories-in-2026
I 98% replaced Windows with a free distro. :)

The only things that don't work are games dependant on the EA or Ubisoft launchers, but luckily, I play those extremely rarely.
Posted on Reply
#63
Steevo
One stable release of Windows 11 with the option to remove the garbage would change everyone's mind. MS built a platform/OS they could still charge $160 for and they won't. Their idea was to make the OS SAAS and it doesn't work when others are free and free of the bloat.
Posted on Reply
#64
zenlessyank
SteevoOne stable release of Windows 11 with the option to remove the garbage would change everyone's mind. MS built a platform/OS they could still charge $160 for and they won't. Their idea was to make the OS SAAS and it doesn't work when others are free and free of the bloat.
It exists. It's called Tiny11. I have been running it on my 2 rigs for several years now.
Posted on Reply
#65
RJARRRPCGP
dgianstefaniGaming is an issue if the game has anti cheat.
The key="kernel-anti-cheat" or "client-sided-anti-cheat". More so, if kernel-driver-based!
But even the ones that are not as invasive, such as Battleye, is a show-stopper for Linux users. :(
Posted on Reply
#66
tommo1982
TheDeeGeeI would, but can't due to certain software i use not being support on Linux.

And overall Windows is just more plug and play.
No, Linux is. Drivers come with kernel and if the driver is present, hardware just works. There's no need for useless software manufacturers include with their drivers.

Simple example.
I bought Asus Tuf Gaming B850-Plus. It has WiFi 7, 2.5G LAN and Bluetooth v5.4. I like Mint, but the latest build has kernel version 6.14, not the latest. Unfortunately only WiFi worked. Kernel 6.14 didn't have drivers for latest hardware. Mint is an Ubuntu derivative, so I installed Ubuntu 25 with 6.17 kernel and everything works. I had no hardware issues whatsoever. AMD GPU's don't need proprietary driver either.

With AM4 you go with Mint 22.3 and forget what installing drivers is.

You might argue it's a hassle and you only install manufacturers drivers under Windows for it to work. Those drivers don't always work as intended and in some cases you need particular version, which is common with laptops. With Linux I forgot I need to install drivers. Stuff just works.
Posted on Reply
#67
RJARRRPCGP
Solaris17Kernel anticheat like BF6 absolutely does not.
Vanguard and Electronic Arts' anti-cheat=You can fuhgetaboutit!
:(
W4llBangdMyselfhad to return to windows every time because I got tired of troubleshooting bugs introduced by updates
Often, vice-versa here, because I have been seeing broken Windows 11 updates during summer and fall, 2025.

Looks like I'll have a rig with Nobara on it for when I'm forced to reinstall Windows 11, as if it were Vista. Vista was broken AF, too and to some degree, 7 was too and 8x.

8x, with 8.1, had random Windows Update failures. 8x was infamous for random Windows Update error codes for critical updates, IIRC.
Posted on Reply
#68
wolf
Better Than Native
Moving my main pc to Linux just seems like a headache I don't need right now. My wife and son use the pc for various tasks/ games here and there, training them on a whole new OS is a no thanks. M$ software to work from home which I'd need to research and be 100% sure works flawlessly or I'd lose WFH. Statements like it's fine if your hardware is supported make me hesitant, what if I (want to) change hardware and the OS doesn't like it, can't remember that issue happening to me in recent history under Windows, or at least if that happened, I'd be in my comfort zone to troubleshoot/rectify it. I keep hearing Nvidia is Le bad under Linux and well, I'm not taking a downgrade just to make the move or gamble on the issues. Maybe in the future if I find a Radeon product and AMD's software/feature stack and support acceptable and it provides a large upgrade to a 5080... that feels at least 2+ years away. It's rarer these days, but I do play online games so rolling the dice on of the one I want to play with friends will work or not is dicey.

In theory, I'd love to, it sounds great on paper when it all works, and it's obvious it works well for many. But in reality there's to many unknowns, effort barriers and learning required when my pc is a combo of a tool that already is fit for use and purpose, and a gaming rig where I have zero issues with gaming related to Windows, and it has multiple users.

I got a family and a full time job man, I ain't got time for this.
Posted on Reply
#69
RJARRRPCGP
I remember when Nvidia was very easy under Linux-You just have to use non-FOSS software.

Intel has the best record, overall.

There were reports that Radeon was bad in Linux, support would be broken due to software issues. I would hope by now that the Radeon support is top-notch.
Posted on Reply
#70
TheinsanegamerN
I've been running Linux for well over a year without issues. My media PC, my laptop, and my big desktop all run Linux, the first two full time. My big desktop still has Windows LTSC on a second drive, but only for software that requires Windows. That's pretty rare now, helldivers 2 and halo infinite both run in Linux, but performance can be an issue and Halo has an issue of defaulting to the lowest settings regardless of what is selected, so both reside on WinBlows. Deep Rock Galactic runs great in linux and that is what we play 99% of the time. Axis and Allies needs Windows, mostly because its not the installer but a pre installed grayware version because the official version is rare and expensive now. Last year I used Windows at home a grand total of 3 times.

I dont understand where this idea of Linux still being hard to use comes from. I have my whole family on it. Dad, Mom, Sister, Grandma, they all use Linux full time without issue. None of them are what I would consider remotely "tech literate". The only bump in the road was PDFs from the state retirement system, which will ONLY open in Adobe Reader, so Grandma and Dad needed virtual machines with windows to open them.

Do you occasionally need Terminal to fix something? Yeah. Is it more common then needing CMD to fix Windows? Nope. Does it matter? Absolutely not. Because when normies have an issue, they call their TECH GUY, regardless of which OS they run. There's still things missing, like a Google Drive Desktop application for Linux doesnt exist, which sucks, but then I moved to Proton Drive anyway and the family just manually upload stuff to their drives; overall it ahs been a wonderful experience.

Recently I got to take 16 days off around Christmas. Coming back to work and having to use Windows again was like deja vu of the first week running just Linux at home. It's pretty easy to get used to running the penguin these days.
RJARRRPCGPI remember when Nvidia was very easy under Linux-You just have to use non-FOSS software.

Intel has the best record, overall.

There were reports that Radeon was bad in Linux, support would be broken due to software issues. I would hope by now that the Radeon support is top-notch.
nVidia is still just as easy to use today as it was before, You just use their drivers.

Intel does work well, there are some cases of longstanding bugs for games though. Tropico 5 needs a command line string to avoid a black screen, for example.

The reports of AMD being bad are a decade out of date. AMD open sourced their drivers in late 2017, by 2020 they were in comparable shape to nVidia and today they are by far the best on the market, with the caveat that they are tied to MESA version, which was a problem until recently on Ubuntu distros. Today anything remotely modern is well supported and even first gen GCN is being maintained by one guy.
Posted on Reply
#71
AusWolf
tommo1982No, Linux is. Drivers come with kernel and if the driver is present, hardware just works. There's no need for useless software manufacturers include with their drivers.

Simple example.
I bought Asus Tuf Gaming B850-Plus. It has WiFi 7, 2.5G LAN and Bluetooth v5.4. I like Mint, but the latest build has kernel version 6.14, not the latest. Unfortunately only WiFi worked. Kernel 6.14 didn't have drivers for latest hardware. Mint is an Ubuntu derivative, so I installed Ubuntu 25 with 6.17 kernel and everything works. I had no hardware issues whatsoever. AMD GPU's don't need proprietary driver either.

With AM4 you go with Mint 22.3 and forget what installing drivers is.

You might argue it's a hassle and you only install manufacturers drivers under Windows for it to work. Those drivers don't always work as intended and in some cases you need particular version, which is common with laptops. With Linux I forgot I need to install drivers. Stuff just works.
Or take my printer as an example... it's not exactly old, but has been discontinued for a while, so finding drivers for it is a hassle... on Windows, that is. On Linux, it just works.

The only problem is that in rare cases when something doesn't work, you're in for a bumpy ride (luckily, that hasn't happened to me, touch wood).
wolfMoving my main pc to Linux just seems like a headache I don't need right now. My wife and son use the pc for various tasks/ games here and there, training them on a whole new OS is a no thanks. M$ software to work from home which I'd need to research and be 100% sure works flawlessly or I'd lose WFH. Statements like it's fine if your hardware is supported make me hesitant, what if I (want to) change hardware and the OS doesn't like it, can't remember that issue happening to me in recent history under Windows, or at least if that happened, I'd be in my comfort zone to troubleshoot/rectify it. I keep hearing Nvidia is Le bad under Linux and well, I'm not taking a downgrade just to make the move or gamble on the issues. Maybe in the future if I find a Radeon product and AMD's software/feature stack and support acceptable and it provides a large upgrade to a 5080... that feels at least 2+ years away. It's rarer these days, but I do play online games so rolling the dice on of the one I want to play with friends will work or not is dicey.

In theory, I'd love to, it sounds great on paper when it all works, and it's obvious it works well for many. But in reality there's to many unknowns, effort barriers and learning required when my pc is a combo of a tool that already is fit for use and purpose, and a gaming rig where I have zero issues with gaming related to Windows, and it has multiple users.

I got a family and a full time job man, I ain't got time for this.
Linux is a community, there are lots of people happy to help you through the unknowns, of which, there isn't as many as you think. :)

For starters, your desktop environment matters. If you choose a distro with KDE, you're in for pretty much Windows-like look and feel with barely anything new to learn. I also like Cinnamon, but it usually comes with the old X11 display compositor which doesn't support VRR or HDR screens. KDE is also a touch more Windows-y so to speak, comes with Wayland (for HDR and VRR), and is more configurable.

Then comes your distro. Debian-based ones like Ubuntu and Mint are stable, but don't have cutting-edge hardware support. That is, if you buy an Nvidia 60-series, or AMD 10-series (or whatever they will call it) GPU straight at launch, you'll be waiting for drivers for a while. Arch has drivers ready pretty quickly, but it's "the fiddly Linux" for pros, so I'd leave that alone, unless you choose Manjaro (an Arch-derivative) with KDE. Fedora and its derivatives are a good middle ground. Fedora comes with KDE as well. The only time you'd have to mess around is with the Nvidia drivers.

Or if this is too much reading and hassle (I don't blame you if it is), then Just go with Bazzite (a gaming-oriented Fedora derivative) with the pre-installed Nvidia drivers and call it a day. :)

As for online games, I wouldn't get rid of Windows straight away. Personally, I have it installed on my second SSD, and I switch the boot order if needed. You can also ask for a dual boot setup upon installing Linux, but that can cause problems as it touches the bootloader on your Windows drive, so personally, I wouldn't recommend it.

Then comes work... if you need Microsoft apps for working from home, then you can either do the above (have two OSes installed), or just disregard this post entirely and stay on Windows. :)

This meme pretty much sums it up:

No offense to anyone - the above is intended purely for fun. :D
Posted on Reply
#72
Apocalypsee
I am one of few that still stick to Windows. Even if Windows 11 being bad, I still using them. After I bought MSI Claw that come preinstalled with Windows 11 I don't have any problems or criticism towards it even after updated to 25H2. Granted I run debloat script and disable few stuff, and I well aware what's to disable in advance but as far as my experience its been smooth sailing to me. Its very hard for me to move to Linux because I just so used to Windows.

I tried Ubuntu and seen my dad running Mint on his laptop, it seems pretty breezy for his laptop (his is old Lenovo Core2Duo with 2GB of RAM) that can even browse modern web and YouTube but....I don't know Linux is just not for me. I don't know what future might bring, or even Windows 12 even a thing, but my desktop still using Windows 10 and my handheld is Windows 11, despite the advancement of Linux for gaming. I don't play any online game, I strictly play offline single player games it should be easy for me to do the transition and yet I'm not. I have various PC that runs 98SE, XP, 7 using their almost period correct hardware.
Posted on Reply
#73
R-T-B
Mr. PerfectYeah, right.

Run a follow up poll in six months to see what OS people are using then and I bet it'll all still be Windows.
The numbers are arguably shifting though. The poll just asks if people would "consider" moving, and that so many would shows an obvious trend to the way the wind is blowing.
AusWolfOr take my printer as an example... it's not exactly old, but has been discontinued for a while, so finding drivers for it is a hassle... on Windows, that is. On Linux, it just works.

The only problem is that in rare cases when something doesn't work, you're in for a bumpy ride (luckily, that hasn't happened to me, touch wood).


Linux is a community, there are lots of people happy to help you through the unknowns, of which, there isn't as many as you think. :)

For starters, your desktop environment matters. If you choose a distro with KDE, you're in for pretty much Windows-like look and feel with barely anything new to learn. I also like Cinnamon, but it usually comes with the old X11 display compositor which doesn't support VRR or HDR screens. KDE is also a touch more Windows-y so to speak, comes with Wayland (for HDR and VRR), and is more configurable.

Then comes your distro. Debian-based ones like Ubuntu and Mint are stable, but don't have cutting-edge hardware support. That is, if you buy an Nvidia 60-series, or AMD 10-series (or whatever they will call it) GPU straight at launch, you'll be waiting for drivers for a while. Arch has drivers ready pretty quickly, but it's "the fiddly Linux" for pros, so I'd leave that alone, unless you choose Manjaro (an Arch-derivative) with KDE. Fedora and its derivatives are a good middle ground. Fedora comes with KDE as well. The only time you'd have to mess around is with the Nvidia drivers.

Or if this is too much reading and hassle (I don't blame you if it is), then Just go with Bazzite (a gaming-oriented Fedora derivative) with the pre-installed Nvidia drivers and call it a day. :)

As for online games, I wouldn't get rid of Windows straight away. Personally, I have it installed on my second SSD, and I switch the boot order if needed. You can also ask for a dual boot setup upon installing Linux, but that can cause problems as it touches the bootloader on your Windows drive, so personally, I wouldn't recommend it.

Then comes work... if you need Microsoft apps for working from home, then you can either do the above (have two OSes installed), or just disregard this post entirely and stay on Windows. :)

This meme pretty much sums it up:

No offense to anyone - the above is intended purely for fun. :D
Its all good. I indeed have no life lol.
RJARRRPCGPThe key="kernel-anti-cheat" or "client-sided-anti-cheat". More so, if kernel-driver-based!
But even the ones that are not as invasive, such as Battleye, is a show-stopper for Linux users. :(
Its getting better all the time though. Check areweanticheatyet (google it). About half are working at least somewhat now.
Posted on Reply
#74
bobbybluz
All of the too many PC's I have are running Win 10 & 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC so I have no reason to go to a new OS. I'll be long gone before any of them lose security updates.
Posted on Reply
#75
AusWolf
R-T-BIts all good. I indeed have no life lol.
Hats off to you then, good sir! :toast:

I wanted to switch to Arch and install KDE myself, but as soon as I stumbled upon the Arch website, my entire brain went NOOOPE, not gonna happen! :laugh:

I might go with Fedora KDE one day just to feel what a "pure" (a non-derivative) distro is like.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 13th, 2026 18:22 PST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts