Tuesday, February 24th 2026

OptiScaler One-Ups AMD With FSR 4 Vulkan Support

We previously covered how enterprising gamers managed to bypass AMD's FSR 4 restrictions to get Redstone frame generation tech working on older RDNA GPUs with OptiScaler. Now, it seems as though OptiScaler has managed bypass another one of AMD's limitations that restricted FSR 4 implementations to DirectX 12 games. According to the build notes uncovered by a Reddit user u/eduhfx, OptiScaler is testing adding Vulkan support in a new test build v0.9.0-pre10. Notably, OptiScaler is using a compatibility tool to work around FSR 4's lack of Vulkan support, similarly to how Linux translates DirectX, calls to Vulkan with DXVK or VKD3D. This also means that FSR 4 on Vulkan should work on Linux systems, as well, where games often run better under Vulkan than DX12—although at the time of writing, FSR 4 w/DX12 currently has issues running on Linux due to a Mesa issue that seemingly cannot be solved by the OptiScaler team.
Added Vulkan w/DX12 support - FSR 4 VK w/DX12, FSR 2.1 VK w/DX12

Currently, known issues:
FSR 4 VK w/DX12 has issues on Linux due to missing Mesa extensions
Not interested in reports as nothing we can fix on our side as far as we know
Sources: u/eduhfx on Reddit, OptiScaler on GitHub
Add your own comment

21 Comments on OptiScaler One-Ups AMD With FSR 4 Vulkan Support

#1
sam_86314
OptiScaler is awesome.

I did a quick and dirty test on three different systems last night using Baldur's Gate 3 running in Vulkan with DLSS inputs and FSR4 outputs.

On my main system (RX 9070 XT), FSR4 seems to work pretty much perfectly.
On my old system (RX 6800 XT), with FSR4 INT8, it also seems to work perfectly.
Out of morbid curiosity, I tested it on my SFF system (Arc Pro B50), with FSR4 INT8 you get significant display corruption and it's pretty much unusable. Interestingly, DX11 with FSR4 INT8 was visually fine, though with significantly worse performance than XeSS (4K, Ultra Preset, Performance DLSS Input: low 30s on FSR4 INT8 vs high 40s XeSS).

I might do a more scientific test after work.
Posted on Reply
#2
Event Horizon
Biggest pleasant surprise of the year so far. Optiscaler is the MVP.
Posted on Reply
#3
Dr. Dro
If AMD had any shame whatsoever they'd respond by releasing FSR 4's source and compiling binaries to run on INT8 and even offer an agnostic version that runs on any hardware.

Yet it's looking more likely at this point they'll send in a mean cease and desist letter to the developers of this app and have them remove any and all references to "stolen" proprietary source code and cease trying to make this work on unauthorized configurations
Posted on Reply
#4
Harun8
Dr. DroYet it's looking more likely at this point they'll send in a mean cease and desist letter to the developers of this app and have them remove any and all references to "stolen" proprietary source code and cease trying to make this work on unauthorized configurations
Can't, they released it under their open source license. Legally, anyone who cloned their repo with that license can do whatever they want
Posted on Reply
#6
Harun8
Dr. DroNot right now, it was a git repo leak and unintentional
The license doesn't care about that. They posted it with the license and legally thats all that matters, intentional or not

Although I wouldn't be surprised if it was an intentional leak by an engineer fed up with the execs not wanting to release it
Posted on Reply
#7
Dr. Dro
Harun8The license doesn't care about that. They posted it with the license and legally thats all that matters, intentional or not

Although I wouldn't be surprised if it was an intentional leak by an engineer fed up with the execs not wanting to release it
It's not exactly how that works, although it's true you can't argue bad faith on the part of anyone who acquired it during the time that it was available. Right now I'm guessing they aren't doing anything about it because it's generating publicity, and it gets people talking about their products I guess
Posted on Reply
#8
Event Horizon
Harun8The license doesn't care about that. They posted it with the license and legally thats all that matters, intentional or not

Although I wouldn't be surprised if it was an intentional leak by an engineer fed up with the execs not wanting to release it
The leaked INT8 FSR4 is not bundled with Optiscaler and likely never will be anyway.
Posted on Reply
#9
Harun8
Dr. DroIt's not exactly how that works, although it's true you can't argue bad faith on the part of anyone who acquired it during the time that it was available. Right now I'm guessing they aren't doing anything about it because it's generating publicity, and it gets people talking about their products I guess
From the license:
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files(the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and /or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions :
Even gives the rights to sell it
Event HorizonThe leaked INT8 FSR4 is not bundled with Optiscaler and likely never will be anyway.
I thought both FSR4 versions are with Optiscaler? From the accidental release?
Posted on Reply
#10
Dr. Dro
Harun8From the license:

Even gives the rights to sell it


I thought both FSR4 versions are with Optiscaler? From the accidental release?
What I'm saying is there was no intention, and that is a crucial argument as far as I'm concerned. Given it was available during a limited window and every action they have taken since indicate that they do not treat this as FOSS, any court would certainly take that into account and consider it to be in error. AMD clearly did not intend to release this as free software and does not show any signs that they intend on doing so at the moment. It's a nuance to consider.
Posted on Reply
#11
sam_86314
Harun8I thought both FSR4 versions are with Optiscaler? From the accidental release?
No, but it's as simple as swapping the DLL for the INT8 one and then it'll give the option for FSR4 when you select FSR3 regardless of GPU platform.

RDNA2 also requires swapping some DLLs from 23.9.1 (which is mysteriously absent from AMD's website, wonder why that is) to the latest driver or you'll get horrible ghosting artifacts.
Posted on Reply
#12
Event Horizon
Harun8I thought both FSR4 versions are with Optiscaler? From the accidental release?
Only the official version (currently FSR 4.0.3) from the SDK which is available for public use here: gpuopen.com/amd-fsr-sdk/

If you want to use INT8 FSR you have to acquire the leaked dll yourself and manually replace the file.
Posted on Reply
#13
Space Lynx
Astronaut
really sad AMD doesn't care about its customers, just hire the fucking dude already who is making this mod. they just signed a deal with meta for 100 billion dollars today, they can afford it.
Posted on Reply
#14
Hecate91
AMD sold 20% of company shares as a deal with meta, no different than any other company signing a deal saying they're going to sell hardware that hasn't been made yet to go into servers that haven't been made yet, for a datacenter that hasn't been built. It's pumping up stock values on promises that more than likely can't be realistically fulfilled.
I think AMD should just hire the Optiscaler guy to make these features official, but who knows if they can afford to do it, given they're spending money they don't have on an AI bubble that could pop.
Posted on Reply
#15
AusWolf
AMD should just offer jobs to the Optiscaler dev team and make their work official at this point. This bullshit has been going on far too long.
Posted on Reply
#16
Visible Noise
Hecate91AMD sold 20% of company shares as a deal with meta,
Incorrect. They issued shares. I’ll leave it to you to educate yourself what the difference is.
(We know you won’t)
Posted on Reply
#17
Firedrops
Harun8Can't, they released it under their open source license. Legally, anyone who cloned their repo with that license can do whatever they want
Wait till you find out how laws are applied differently to the wealthy vs the peasants.
Posted on Reply
#18
Dr. Dro
FiredropsWait till you find out how laws are applied differently to the wealthy vs the peasants.
I mean it isn't even a case of that, it's that they clearly had no intent to open-source that specific version of the program, so technically it is within their rights to revoke the open license and request that circulation be ceased, they are the IP rightsholders and owners even if the project is open source.

If you can build an INT8 version from the 4.0.3 source that has been published on GPUOpen instead of relying on the prerelease leak, then this is pretty much a moot point anyways. I wouldn't know, frankly I find the whole situation parts of amusing, parts of boring, and a whole heap of sad. I'll stick to my much more powerful, far more polished and most importantly, drama-free Nvidia hardware for the time being.
Posted on Reply
#19
Jtuck9
What are some of the standout Vulkan releases? Interested to see the comparisons once the official implementation releases...

We caught wind of Intel advertising for people with knowledge of developing games for Linux, albeit it's likely less the company bolstering its existing teams and more it's trying to recover from the 2025 layoffs. Now, Nvidia is also posting job adverts to get people interested in developing for gaming on Linux.

www.xda-developers.com/nvidia-is-also-hunting-for-linux-developers-to-help-advance-gaming-on-foss/
Posted on Reply
#20
Tomorrow
Dr. DroYet it's looking more likely at this point they'll send in a mean cease and desist letter to the developers of this app and have them remove any and all references to "stolen" proprietary source code and cease trying to make this work on unauthorized configurations
Confusing AMD with Nintendo?

AMD wont bother wasting it's time and resources. Also hilarious to call it stolen when they're the ones who initially published it.
Jtuck9What are some of the standout Vulkan releases? Interested to see the comparisons once the official implementation releases...
Doom: The Dark Ages and the Indiana Jones game. Also Baldurs Gate 3 and No Man's Sky come to mind.
Posted on Reply
#21
Jtuck9
TomorrowDoom: The Dark Ages and the Indiana Jones game. Also Baldurs Gate 3 and No Man's Sky come to mind.
Yea, IdTech sprang to mind, as does Star Citizen. I just wonder how many are married to proprietary technology...
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 13th, 2026 22:12 CST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts